SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc B770: Benchmark Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF paired with the Intel Arc B770 represents a high-core-count desktop configuration that ranks in the 72nd combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part on the 10nm Intel process, while the GPU is Intel's Battlemage-generation Arc B770 on TSMC's 5nm node. Benchmark data shows the processor performing at the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile against all GPUs — a pairing that is heavily CPU-favored in terms of relative hardware strength. It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database; all frame-rate figures presented in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 5.80 GHz, with a 125W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor uses a 257 mm² die on Intel's 10nm process and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark scores for the 13900KF show exceptional multi-threaded throughput. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 48,855 points in multi-core and 6,897 in single-core. The R20 results are 20,519 multi-core and 2,896 single-core, while R15 shows 4,924 multi-core and 695 single-core. Geekbench results are 22,486 multi-core and 2,668 single-core. The 3DMark suite reveals scaling from 1,188 single-thread to 2,353 for 2 threads, 4,643 for 4 threads, 8,510 for 8 threads, 11,177 for 16 threads, and 15,405 for max threads — indicating strong thread-scaling efficiency up to the full 32-thread count. PassMark tests further corroborate this: multi-thread score of 57,729, single-thread of 4,584, integer math at 206,859, floating-point math at 150,869, and extended instructions at 46,084.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 61,841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, scores 61,834 — a 0% delta. The Core i9-13900K is 0.1% behind at 61,766, the Core i9-13900T is 0.2% behind at 61,723, and the Intel Xeon 636 is 0.8% behind at 61,360. This means the 13900KF is effectively tied with its closest competitors at the top of the desktop CPU landscape, with only sub-1% differences separating them. For real workloads, the 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates the processor can handle heavily parallelized tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing with ease, while the 6,897 single-core score ensures snappy responsiveness in lightly threaded applications such as web browsing and office productivity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on their needs, though the platform's memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes directly from the processor, enabling high-speed connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The platform supports ECC memory, which is relevant for workstation and server-adjacent use cases where data integrity is paramount.

The GPU, an Intel Arc B770, has a TDP of 225W and requires a 550W suggested PSU. The CPU's 125W TDP combined with the GPU's 225W TDP means a 550W power supply is the recommended baseline, but the data suggests that a system with this configuration should have adequate headroom for the two components. The GPU requires a single 6-pin and a single 8-pin power connector, and it occupies a dual-slot form factor. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will operate at Gen 4 speeds.

For a sensible next upgrade path, the socket 1700 platform is the final generation for this socket, meaning CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change. However, the 13900KF is already at the top of the desktop heap with a 93rd percentile ranking, so the CPU itself is unlikely to be the bottleneck. A more practical upgrade path involves the GPU: the Arc B770 sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, so upgrading to a higher-performing GPU would be the most impactful change. Alternatively, additional system memory or faster NVMe storage would complement the existing CPU and GPU without requiring a platform change. The PSU headroom from the 550W suggested PSU suggests that a more power-hungry GPU would necessitate a PSU upgrade as well.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this configuration is defined by a stark contrast: the CPU is elite, and the GPU is mid-pack. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs means it outperforms 93% of all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 61,841 is nearly identical to the closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, at 61,834 — a 0% difference. The Intel Core i9-13900K is 0.1% lower at 61,766, the Core i9-13900T is 0.2% lower at 61,723, and the Intel Xeon 636 is 0.8% lower at 61,360. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the 13900KF is at the apex of CPU performance, with no meaningful gap to its nearest competitors.

The GPU, however, presents a different story. The Intel Arc B770 has an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs, with no benchmark entries and no nearest rivals listed in the data. This means the GPU is positioned exactly at the median of the GPU performance distribution — neither a standout performer nor a weak link, but rather an average card in the context of all GPUs. The lack of benchmark data for the GPU is notable; the only performance indicators are the raw specifications and the percentile placement.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 72nd, which reflects the overall system's position relative to other desktop configurations. The pairing is clearly CPU-dominated: the processor's elite standing (93rd percentile) is dragged down by the GPU's median standing (50th percentile), resulting in a system that is above average overall but not top-tier for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's benchmark scores — particularly the 48,855 multi-core Cinebench R23 and the 15,405 max-thread 3DMark — are the system's primary strengths, while the GPU's mid-pack percentile is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. Therefore, all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The CPU's single-threaded performance of 4,584 in PassMark single-thread and 6,897 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggests that the processor will not bottleneck gaming workloads from a CPU perspective. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 11,177 indicates solid multi-threaded performance for modern games that utilize more than a few cores. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the Arc B770 would likely deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but at 1440p and especially 4K, the GPU's mid-pack standing would become the limiting factor. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM provide ample capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures, but the raw compute power is only average.

For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the system could plausibly push frame rates above 100 FPS in esports titles given the CPU's strong single-thread scores, but AAA games at ultra settings would likely see more modest numbers. At 1440p, the GPU's mid-pack positioning would likely result in 60-80 FPS in many titles at high settings, with dips below 60 in the most demanding scenes. At 4K, the GPU would be the clear bottleneck, with 30-50 FPS being a reasonable estimate for most AAA games. These are estimates only; actual performance would depend on the specific game, driver optimizations, and system configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 4,584 single-thread PassMark score and 6,897 Cinebench R23 single-core score are strong indicators for high-refresh gaming at 1080p, where the processor can keep up with high frame rates. The GPU's 50th percentile standing, however, means the system is more suited to 1080p high-refresh than 1440p or 4K high-refresh, where the GPU would limit frame rates.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming, as the 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides ample headroom for encoding video while simultaneously running games. The GPU's 225W TDP and 16 GB VRAM also support hardware encoding, but the CPU alone can handle streaming workloads without GPU assistance.

Video editing: The CPU's 20,519 Cinebench R20 multi-core score and 57,729 PassMark multi-thread score indicate excellent performance for video editing, where multi-threaded rendering and export tasks will be handled with ease. The GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide acceleration for effects and color grading, though the GPU is not top-tier for this workload.

3D rendering: The 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is a direct indicator of 3D rendering performance, and the 13900KF's 93rd percentile CPU ranking means it will outperform the vast majority of processors in CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 32 ray-tracing cores and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and compute performance, but the mid-pack GPU ranking limits the system's GPU-rendering capabilities.

Software development: The CPU's 206,859 PassMark integer math score and 46,084 extended instructions score indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and other compute-intensive development tasks. The 36 MB L3 cache and 32 threads provide excellent parallel compilation performance, and the 93rd percentile CPU ranking means developers will rarely wait on the processor.

Student and office work: The CPU's 4,584 single-thread PassMark score ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The 22,486 Geekbench multi-core score handles multitasking with many open applications without slowdown. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for office applications, and the 225W TDP is manageable for a desktop workstation.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, from the Arc 7 generation. The chip, designated BMG-G31, is manufactured on TSMC's 5nm process with a 368 mm² die size. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU features 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. It has 32 ray-tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though tensor core specifications are not listed in the data. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with modern graphics APIs.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs is the key metric — it means the Arc B770 performs at the median of all GPUs in the database. With an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed, the data provides no direct comparison points. However, the raw specifications suggest a capable mid-range card: 16 GB of VRAM is generous for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures. The 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute is respectable but not class-leading. For rendering workloads, the 32 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but the mid-pack percentile indicates that performance will be average relative to other GPUs. The dual-slot cooler and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors are standard for this class, and the suggested 550W PSU is reasonable given the 225W TDP.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideal for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over GPU performance. The Intel Core i9-13900KF's 93rd percentile ranking makes it a top-tier choice for 3D rendering, video editing, software compilation, and scientific computing — any workload that scales with cores and threads. The 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 57,729 PassMark multi-thread score are compelling for professionals who spend their days waiting on CPU-bound tasks.

For gamers, this system is best suited to 1080p high-refresh gaming, where the CPU's 4,584 single-thread PassMark score can drive high frame rates, and the GPU's 50th percentile standing is adequate for most titles at 1080p ultra settings. At 1440p, the system is still viable but the GPU becomes the limiting factor; at 4K, the GPU would struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding games. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering will find the 13900KF's performance excellent, while those who rely heavily on GPU acceleration may find the Arc B770's mid-pack positioning underwhelming.

Software developers and students will benefit from the CPU's 206,859 integer math score and 32 threads for parallel compilation. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications like databases, virtualization, or financial modeling will see strong performance from the CPU, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking is less relevant for these use cases. The 16 GB VRAM is future-proof for memory-intensive applications, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KF is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61,841.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, which has an average score of 61,834 — a 0% delta. The Core i9-13900K is 0.1% behind, the Core i9-13900T is 0.2% behind, and the Intel Xeon 636 is 0.8% behind.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking against all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B770 is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it performs at the median of the GPU distribution.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72nd, reflecting the CPU's elite standing (93rd) tempered by the GPU's median standing (50th).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900KF has ECC memory support enabled, which is useful for workstation and reliability-focused builds.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B770 is 550W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225W with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-13900KF and the Intel Arc B770 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile, the GPU is the clear bottleneck in this system for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is exceptional, while the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute is merely average. In gaming, the CPU's 4,584 single-thread PassMark score can easily feed the GPU at 1080p, but at higher resolutions, the GPU's mid-pack compute and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates long before the CPU is stressed.

In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the system performs at an elite level — the 24-core, 32-thread CPU with 36 MB L3 cache is the primary driver, and the GPU's mid-pack standing is irrelevant. In GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming, ray-traced rendering, or GPU-accelerated compute, the Arc B770's 50th percentile ranking becomes the limiting factor, capping the system's overall performance. The combined 72nd percentile reflects this imbalance: the system is above average overall, but it is not a balanced high-end configuration. Users who need both CPU and GPU performance would need a higher-ranked GPU to match the CPU's capabilities, while users who only need CPU performance will find no bottleneck at all. The FPS estimates for this system — no measured data exists — suggest that 1080p gaming would be CPU-favorable, while 1440p and 4K would be GPU-limited, reinforcing the conclusion that the Arc B770 is the component that determines the system's ceiling in graphics-intensive scenarios.