SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc B570

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake flagship with Intel's first Battlemage discrete GPU, the Arc B570. The combined system sits at the 79th percentile of all tracked configurations, with the CPU ranking in the 93rd percentile among all processors and the GPU in the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions rather than direct gameplay data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which places it firmly in the LGA 1700 ecosystem alongside other 13th-generation parts. The CPU's 125 W TDP is relatively modest for a 24-core flagship, but the data shows this processor draws enough power that a quality cooler and capable motherboard are required. The socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility between older, more affordable DDR4 modules and newer DDR5 kits. ECC memory support is present, which matters for workstation users who need error correction in scientific or financial workloads.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU itself, offering Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This provides ample bandwidth for the Arc B570's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, and the Gen 5 lanes ensure future storage devices and expansion cards won't be bottlenecked by the platform. The multi-core performance of the i9-13900KF, evidenced by its 48,855 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core, suggests this platform can handle heavy compute tasks for years. However, the LGA 1700 socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so the sensible next upgrade path would be a GPU replacement rather than a CPU swap.

For the GPU side, the Arc B570 carries a 150 W TDP and the suggested PSU rating is 450 W. This means the power supply headroom for the entire system is driven primarily by the CPU plus GPU combined draw, and the 450 W recommendation for the GPU alone suggests a builder should budget for a PSU that comfortably exceeds that figure when paired with a 125 W CPU. The Arc B570 uses a single 8-pin power connector, which simplifies cable management. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means it can drive much faster graphics cards without becoming the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900KF delivers class-leading multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 48,855 in multi-core and 6,897 in single-core, while Geekbench shows 22,486 multi-core and 2,668 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal how the 24-core, 32-thread configuration scales: 2,353 in 2-thread, 4,643 in 4-thread, 8,510 in 8-thread, 11,177 in 16-thread, and 15,405 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern shows strong efficiency from 2 to 8 threads, with diminishing gains beyond 16 threads, which is typical for a hybrid architecture.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 61,841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus with an average score of 61,834, a 0% delta, meaning the i9-13900KF and that rival are statistically tied. It edges out the Intel Core i9-13900K (61,766, 0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i9-13900T (61,723, 0.2% ahead), and the Intel Xeon 636 (61,360, 0.8% ahead). The data shows this CPU is effectively at parity with its closest competitors, which highlights how mature the 13th-generation flagship is.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The multi-thread score of 57,729 and single-thread score of 4,584 show balanced performance. Integer math hits 206,859, floating-point math reaches 150,869, and extended instructions score 46,084. Data compression scores 786,218, while data encryption hits 46,186. These figures indicate strong throughput for both general-purpose and specialized workloads.

The Arc B570 GPU presents a different performance tier. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,649, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 83,514 and 96,844 respectively. PassMark G3D scores 14,195, with G2D at 661. The GPU's average benchmark score is 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20,534 (0.1% ahead of the Arc B570), while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582 (0.1% behind). The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% behind at 20,480, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% behind at 20,662. This places the Arc B570 squarely in mid-range territory, trading blows with last-generation desktop and mobile parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between this CPU and GPU is stark. The i9-13900KF sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc B570 sits in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a clear CPU-heavy balance where the processor far outpaces the graphics card. In gaming workloads, benchmark results indicate the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 15,405 shows it can feed data to the GPU rapidly, but the Arc B570's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 limits overall frame output.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 57,729 PassMark multi-thread score mean compute-heavy tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing will be CPU-bound. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 7,281 shows it can assist in some compute tasks, but it will not accelerate workflows the way a higher-tier GPU might. The data suggests this pairing is best suited for users who need exceptional CPU performance for work and acceptable GPU performance for moderate gaming.

The FPS scaling picture, estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured data, indicates that at 1080p the CPU might occasionally limit frame rates in lightly-threaded games, given its 93rd percentile standing versus the GPU's 65th percentile. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck, and upgrading to a faster graphics card would yield substantial frame rate improvements without needing to touch the CPU. The i9-13900KF's 2,353 2-thread score and 4,643 4-thread score show it handles legacy lightly-threaded titles capably, but the Arc B570's mid-range positioning means high-refresh gaming at maximum settings will be constrained.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1440p or 4K who play modern titles will find the Arc B570 adequate for medium-to-high settings, but the CPU will not be the limiting factor in their experience. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit most from this pairing, as the i9-13900KF's 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 22,486 Geekbench multi-core score directly translate to faster export times, quicker renders, and reduced build durations.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant gains from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration. The PassMark integer math score of 206,859 and extended instructions score of 46,084 indicate strong throughput for compilation and code analysis. Students in engineering or computer science fields who run simulations or process large datasets will appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU's high floating-point math score of 150,869. Small business workstations handling database operations, financial modeling, or scientific computing will find the data compression score of 786,218 and encryption score of 46,186 valuable for file handling and secure communications.

Users who need a powerful desktop for professional workloads but only occasionally game will find this pairing sensible. The GPU's 65th percentile ranking ensures playable frame rates in most titles, while the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures the system never feels slow for compute tasks. Those who game heavily at high refresh rates or plan to use ray tracing extensively should consider a more powerful GPU, as the Arc B570's mid-range position will hold back the CPU's potential in those scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900KF faster than the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: The data shows a 0.1% difference in average benchmark scores, with the i9-13900KF at 61,841 and the i9-13900K at 61,766. The KF variant is effectively identical, differing only in the absence of integrated graphics.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20,556, while the Arc A750 scores 20,582. The A750 is 0.1% ahead, meaning the two GPUs are statistically tied in overall performance.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900KF support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop processors.

Q: Does the Arc B570 support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. These APIs cover current and near-future game and application requirements.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system sits at the 79th percentile of all tracked configurations, indicating it outperforms roughly four out of five tracked systems.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc B570?

A: The GPU has a 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, supported by 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus.

Q: Is the i9-13900KF a good choice for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, the data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,855 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 57,729, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip, designated BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz for 19 Gbps effective. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivers 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may constrain performance at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures.

Compute resources include 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The GPU has 18 ray tracing cores, though tensor core data is not available in the tracked specifications. Pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1). These figures place the Arc B570 in the mid-range segment, competitive with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile according to the nearest rivals data.

The benchmark scores paint a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 is moderate for modern DX12 titles. Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 83,514, suggesting the driver and hardware handle Vulkan workloads particularly well. PassMark G3D score of 14,195 is respectable but not class-leading. The DirectX 9 score of 164 and DirectX 10 score of 65 indicate legacy API performance is weaker, while DirectX 11 at 118 and DirectX 12 at 72 show better modern API support. The GPU compute score of 7,281 is modest, meaning compute-heavy tasks like rendering or machine learning inference will not see dramatic acceleration.

The GPU's 65th percentile ranking and average score of 20,556, with rivals within 0.5%, show it competes closely with the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750. For rendering workloads, the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 18 ray tracing cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but users expecting high-end RT performance will be disappointed. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and 10 GB VRAM are adequate for most current games at 1080p and 1440p, though 4K gaming with high-detail textures may exceed the VRAM capacity in some titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the Arc B570's 14,195 G3D score and 2,649 Steel Nomad score suggest frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for most titles, while the i9-13900KF's 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensures no processor bottleneck. At 1440p, frame rates will drop as the GPU's 65th percentile position becomes the limiting factor. Users targeting 144 Hz or higher will need to reduce settings, as the GPU is the primary constraint in this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by the 15,405 max-thread 3DMark score, handle encoding and overlays without breaking a sweat. The 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means software encoding is viable, though the GPU's 7,281 compute score suggests hardware encoding support is present but not exceptional. Streamers can rely on the CPU for encoding while the GPU handles rendering.

Video editing: The i9-13900KF's 22,486 Geekbench multi-core score and 150,869 floating-point math score accelerate timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export times. The Arc B570's 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough memory for 4K timelines, though the GPU's mid-range compute performance means effects-heavy projects will rely on CPU processing.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will see excellent performance from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration, with the 48,855 Cinebench R23 multi-core score translating directly to faster render times. GPU-based rendering will be less impressive, as the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 and 18 ray tracing cores are mid-range figures, meaning the GPU will not accelerate GPU-render workloads as strongly as higher-tier cards.

Software development: Compilation benefits enormously from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration. The PassMark integer math score of 206,859 and extended instructions score of 46,084 show strong throughput for code compilation and analysis. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running build servers or simulation workloads where memory errors cannot be tolerated.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical productivity tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The i9-13900KF's 4,584 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the Arc B570's 661 G2D score handles 2D desktop composition easily. The system will idle through office workloads, leaving massive headroom for occasional compute tasks.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900KF, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc B570, a Battlemage-generation GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture. The CPU represents the top of Intel's 13th-generation desktop lineup, while the GPU represents Intel's second-generation discrete graphics effort, positioned in the mid-range segment. The combined system percentile is 79, meaning this configuration outperforms the majority of tracked builds, though the wide gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (93rd versus 65th) defines its character.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61,841, ranking in the 93rd percentile, is the star of this build. The GPU's average score of 20,556, ranking in the 65th percentile, is competent but not exceptional. This is a CPU-first system, where the processor provides the bulk of the value and the GPU serves as a capable companion rather than a performance leader. The build class is desktop, confirming this is a full-size tower configuration rather than a laptop or compact system.

Users considering this pairing should understand they are buying near-top-tier CPU performance with mid-range GPU performance. The 79th combined percentile reflects this asymmetry. For workloads that favor CPU compute, this system is exceptional. For gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, it is adequate but not remarkable. The data suggests a GPU upgrade would rebalance the system toward a more even performance profile, while the CPU will remain relevant for years.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for users who want to push beyond the stock boost clock. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support as a notable feature for workstation users.

The CPU's benchmark results reveal exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48,855 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,486 place it firmly in the top tier of desktop processors. The 3DMark thread scaling shows strong performance from 2-thread (2,353) through 16-thread (11,177) workloads, with the max-thread score of 15,405 demonstrating the full 32-thread capability. Single-thread performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 6,897 and Geekbench single-core at 2,668, ensuring responsive daily use.

In the PassMark suite, the CPU shows balanced performance across different workload types. Integer math scores 206,859, floating-point math scores 150,869, and extended instructions score 46,084. Data compression reaches 786,218, while data encryption hits 46,186. The find prime numbers score of 225 is notably lower, reflecting that this workload is not optimized for the architecture. The random string sorting score of 86,510 and physics score of 2,956 round out the profile.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61,841 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61,834, 0% delta), Intel Core i9-13900K (61,766, 0.1% ahead), Intel Core i9-13900T (61,723, 0.2% ahead), and Intel Xeon 636 (61,360, 0.8% ahead). These tiny deltas indicate the i9-13900KF is at the top of its performance class, trading blows with the best available alternatives. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not be a bottleneck in any CPU-bound task, from gaming at high refresh rates to professional rendering and compilation. The 36 MB L3 cache and high boost clock ensure both single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput.