SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF and Intel Arc A750 pairing presents a profound imbalance in raw compute capability versus graphical throughput. The CPU, a 24-core Raptor Lake flagship, posts an average benchmark score of 61,841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, with an average score of 20,582, sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The data suggests that in most gaming and general graphics workloads, the A750 will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the i9-13900KF is capable of producing.

This is a configuration where the CPU operates with significant headroom in almost every scenario. The 3DMark scores illustrate this point starkly: the CPU scores 15,405 in the max-threads test and 11,177 in the 16-thread test, whereas the GPU’s highest 3DMark result is 2,612 in the Steel Nomad DX12 test. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 57,729 and floating-point math score of 150,869 dwarf the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12,534 and GPU compute score of 5,368. The bottleneck is clearly the graphics card, which will struggle to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings, while the processor remains largely underutilized, waiting for the GPU to deliver frames.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data indicates this pairing is inherently unbalanced. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,188 in 3DMark and 4,584 in Passmark is exceptional, suggesting it can feed frames rapidly. However, the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking and its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 suggest it will be the constraining element, making consistent 144Hz or higher output unlikely in modern titles at high settings without significant graphical compromises.

Streaming is a scenario where the CPU’s power can be leveraged directly. The i9-13900KF’s 32 threads and high multi-core scores, such as the 48,855 in Cinebench R23 multicore, provide ample capacity for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 786,218 further supports its capability to handle the overhead of streaming software, effectively offloading this work from the GPU.

In video editing, the combination yields a mixed but generally positive result. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20,519 and Geekbench multicore score of 22,486 will accelerate timeline rendering and export processes significantly. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and some 1440p editing, but its 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-accelerated effects will not be as fast as the CPU portion of the workflow.

For 3D rendering, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4,924 and R23 score of 48,855 indicate that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender will be very fast. The GPU, with its 28 ray tracing cores and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32, can assist, but its performance will be significantly lower than the CPU’s contribution, making it a secondary accelerator rather than the primary renderer.

Software development benefits greatly from the CPU’s architecture. The Passmark integer math score of 206,859 and extended instructions score of 46,084 suggest strong performance in code compilation and execution. The high thread count allows for parallel builds, and the 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, making this an excellent platform for developers despite the GPU being irrelevant to most compile tasks.

For student and office work, this build is massively over-specified. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,188 and a Passmark singlethread score of 4,584, makes everyday tasks feel instantaneous. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 732 is more than sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration, but the overall cost and power of this platform are wasted on such light workloads, where a lower-tier CPU would provide similar user experience.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The chip includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This configuration, combined with a dual-channel memory bus supporting DDR4 and DDR5, positions it as a high-end desktop part.

The benchmark data reveals a processor with exceptional scaling from low to high thread counts. The 3DMark scores show a progression from 2,353 for 2 threads to 15,405 for max threads, indicating strong multi-core efficiency. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,855 is nearly 7.1 times the single-core score of 6,897, demonstrating that the core count and cache hierarchy are well-utilized in threaded workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 22,486 against a single-core score of 2,668 reinforces this trend.

The Passmark results further characterize this CPU’s strengths. The integer math score of 206,859 and floating-point math score of 150,869 indicate robust arithmetic performance, while the data encryption score of 46,186 and data compression score of 786,218 show strong throughput in memory-intensive operations. The processor’s average benchmark score of 61,841 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at a 0% delta, meaning they are statistically tied in performance. The i9-13900K is just 0.1% behind, confirming this chip is at the very top of the desktop performance stack.

This level of performance is not just about raw numbers; it implies real-world capabilities. For heavily threaded tasks like video transcoding, 3D scene rendering, or scientific simulations, the 32 threads will provide near-linear scaling. The high boost clock of 5.80 GHz ensures that single-threaded workloads, such as legacy applications or certain game engines, also receive top-tier performance. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, which is critical for database operations and complex data analysis.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-bound productivity above all else but want a discrete GPU for standard gaming and content creation. The primary audience is content creators who work with 4K video timelines or complex 3D scenes in CPU-based renderers; the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,855 will dramatically cut render times compared to lower-tier CPUs.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads and high integer math score of 206,859, which accelerates build times. The processor’s support for ECC memory, as noted in the specifications, also makes it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is paramount.

For gamers, this is a build for those who game at 1080p with high frame rates in esports titles or at 1440p with adjusted settings. The CPU’s single-thread performance will not be a limiting factor, but the GPU will dictate the achievable frame rates, so this is not a system for max-settings 4K gaming. The target gamer is one who plans to upgrade the GPU in the future, as the CPU will remain relevant for years.

Students and small business workstations in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU’s multi-core might useful for simulations or large spreadsheet calculations. However, the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking means it is not suited for GPU-accelerated compute tasks like machine learning training, making this a poor choice for AI researchers. The build is best suited for those who need a powerful CPU for their professional work and a capable, but not top-tier, GPU for occasional gaming or light graphics tasks.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component and the known performance class of the GPU. The data clearly indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing.

The Intel Arc A750’s Passmark G3D score of 12,534 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is a low result, suggesting that at 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU will likely deliver average frame rates in the 60-80 FPS range for modern AAA titles, but may dip below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will become a limiting factor, with frame rates likely dropping to 40-60 FPS at high settings.

The CPU, by contrast, will have no trouble keeping up. Its 3DMark 16-thread score of 11,177 and single-thread score of 1,188 indicate it can process game logic and draw calls much faster than the GPU can render frames. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low settings, the frame rate will still be capped by the GPU, not the CPU. The data suggests that for games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the A750 might push 120+ FPS at 1080p, but the i9-13900KF would be idle, waiting for the next frame.

The practical implication is that users should not expect the CPU’s high percentile to translate to high gaming FPS. The GPU’s 66th percentile is the relevant metric for gaming, and it indicates a mid-range experience. For a high-refresh monitor, this build will require lowering graphical settings to achieve frame rates above 144 FPS, and even then, the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests performance can be inconsistent across different titles due to driver and optimization factors.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, but the 8 GB capacity may be a limitation in modern titles with high-resolution textures. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, which are mid-range figures. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The benchmark results show a GPU that performs best in compute tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 are strong, indicating the GPU handles raw compute well. However, the Passmark DirectX 11 score of 72 and DirectX 12 score of 70 are mediocre, suggesting that gaming performance, which relies heavily on the graphics pipeline, is not as strong as its compute potential. The Passmark G3D score of 12,534 confirms this, placing it in the 66th percentile.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the A750’s average benchmark score of 20,582 is essentially tied with the Intel Arc B570 at a 0.1% delta and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at a 0.2% delta. This indicates that the A750 performs at a level comparable to a laptop RTX 3070, which is a solid 1080p gaming card. The GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores are present, but the DirectX scores suggest that enabling ray tracing will significantly impact frame rates, making it a feature to use sparingly.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is outstanding across all tests. It achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,188 and a max-threads score of 15,405. In Cinebench, it scores 695 in R15 single-core and 4,924 in multicore, and 2,896 in R20 single-core and 20,519 in multicore. The R23 results are 6,897 single-core and 48,855 multicore. Geekbench scores are 2,668 single-core and 22,486 multicore. Passmark results include a single-thread score of 4,584, a multithread score of 57,729, and an average benchmark score of 61,841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is more moderate. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,612. In Geekbench, it scores 98,554 in OpenCL and 85,631 in Vulkan. Passmark scores are 65 for DirectX 10, 72 for DirectX 11, 70 for DirectX 12, and 181 for DirectX 9. The G3D score is 12,534, and the GPU compute score is 5,368. The average benchmark score is 20,582, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined picture is one of extreme disparity. The CPU is in the top 7% of all processors, while the GPU is in the top 34% of all graphics cards. The combined percentile for the build is 80, which is pulled down significantly by the GPU. In any benchmark that stresses both components, the GPU will finish its tasks much earlier, leaving the CPU idle. For example, in a gaming benchmark, the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 8,510 is irrelevant if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to use that processing power. This pairing is defined by its bottleneck, and the data consistently shows the GPU is the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900KF a good match for the Intel Arc A750?

A: The data indicates a significant mismatch. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 66th percentile. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck, limiting frame rates well below what the CPU can support.

Q: What is the expected gaming performance at 1080p?

A: Since no measured FPS data exists, estimates are based on the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12,534 and its 66th percentile ranking. Expect playable frame rates at medium to high settings, but not high-refresh performance in demanding titles.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K gaming at high settings. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 is low, indicating 4K is not a viable target for this build.

Q: Which component is better for productivity tasks?

A: The CPU is vastly superior for productivity. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48,855 and Passmark multithread score of 57,729 are excellent for rendering and compilation, while the GPU’s Passmark compute score of 5,368 is modest.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900KF’s average benchmark score of 61,841 is statistically tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at a 0% delta, and it is 0.1% ahead of the i9-13900K. It is a top-tier desktop processor.

Q: Is the GPU’s ray tracing performance usable?

A: The GPU has 28 ray tracing cores, but its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests that enabling ray tracing will heavily tax the GPU, likely resulting in low frame rates even at 1080p.

Q: What is the memory architecture of this build?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel’s flagship 13th Gen consumer CPU with Intel’s Alchemist-generation Arc A750 GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 125 W TDP, while the GPU is a 225 W part with 8 GB of VRAM. The pairing is unusual, as it pairs a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound workloads.

The combined percentile for this build is 80, indicating it is better than 80% of all systems in the database. However, this percentile is an average, and the reality is a tale of two halves. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking puts it among the best available, while the GPU’s 66th percentile puts it in the upper-mid range. This makes the build a productivity powerhouse that is merely “good” for gaming. It is a workstation-class CPU with a gaming-class GPU, and its overall tier is defined by the CPU’s immense power.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended to be a stationary, high-performance machine. The data suggests this is not a balanced gaming rig, but rather a system for users who need immense CPU power for professional work and also want a discrete GPU for some gaming. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage, which means this is a final-configuration platform for that graphics card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the platform is modern and has headroom for future expansions, such as adding a Gen 5 NVMe SSD.

The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply, along with a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, so the total system power draw is manageable. The suggested PSU of 550 W provides a baseline, but the data does not indicate if there is headroom for a more powerful GPU.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU’s 93rd percentile performance means it will not be a bottleneck for any graphics card currently available. Replacing the Arc A750 with a higher-tier GPU would balance the system and unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential. The CPU’s support for PCIe Gen 5 and its 20 lanes ensure that a future high-end GPU will have sufficient bandwidth.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives users flexibility, but the CPU’s performance is partially dependent on memory speed. The platform is also unlocked, as the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking if the user has a suitable motherboard and cooling solution. The CPU’s launch MSRP was $564, and the GPU’s launch MSRP was 289 USD, but no current pricing is available. The platform is mature, and the next logical upgrade path is a more powerful GPU to match the CPU’s capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds