SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A380: A Extreme CPU Paired with an Entry-Level GPU

This desktop build combines one of the most powerful consumer processors ever made with a modest entry-level graphics card, creating a system whose overall performance is defined entirely by the workload. The Intel Core i9-13900KF sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A380 lands in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined system percentile is 69. That gap of 49 percentile points between the two primary components is the single most important fact about this pairing: the CPU is a top-tier compute monster, and the GPU is an entry-level graphics solution. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

Gaming Performance

Since there is no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, gaming performance must be estimated from the GPU's benchmark scores alone. The Intel Arc A380 produces a PassMark G3D score of 6252, which places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, directly adjacent to the AMD Radeon 880M (which scores 8436, 1.4% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (which scores 8458, 1.2% higher). These rivals are mobile and integrated-class parts, which tells you the Arc A380 is competing at the very bottom of the discrete GPU hierarchy.

The GPU's compute capabilities are modest: it delivers 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 131.2 GTexel/s of texture fill rate, and 65.60 GPixel/s of pixel rate. Its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus provides 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In DirectX 12, the PassMark score is 35; in DirectX 11, it is 38; in DirectX 9, it is 73. These scores indicate that the card performs relatively better in older API titles, which is typical of entry-level hardware with limited geometry throughput.

For 1080p gaming at high settings, the estimated experience would be playable in esports and older titles but very limited in modern AAA games. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking and its proximity to integrated graphics solutions like the AMD Radeon 880M (only 1.4% ahead in average benchmark score) suggest that frame rates in demanding titles would hover around playable thresholds at best, with significant compromises needed in graphical settings. At 1440p and 4K, the card would struggle considerably, as its 6 GB memory capacity and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are simply insufficient for high-resolution textures and geometry. The DirectX 12 score of 35 in PassMark is particularly telling — modern games built on DirectX 12 would likely see the weakest relative performance.

The CPU, with its 93rd percentile ranking, would never be the limiting factor in gaming. Even at 1080p with a low-end GPU, the i9-13900KF's massive single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1188, PassMark single-thread score of 4584) would ensure that frame pacing is not CPU-bound. The gaming bottleneck in this system is unambiguously the GPU, and any gaming build using this pairing should target 1080p with modest settings expectations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark picture is exceptional. The Intel Core i9-13900KF achieves an average benchmark score of 61841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766 (0.1% behind), and the Intel Core i9-13900T scores 61723 (0.2% behind). This places the 13900KF at the very top of the desktop CPU hierarchy, effectively tied with its K-series sibling and barely ahead of the lower-power T variant.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 48855, while the single-core score is 6897. The multicore result is the standout: it represents a roughly 7x scaling over the single-core result, reflecting the processor's 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20519 and R15 multicore score of 4924 follow the same pattern. Geekbench multicore comes in at 22486, with a single-core score of 2668.

The GPU benchmark picture is far more modest. The Arc A380's average benchmark score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595, 0.4% lower), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, 1.1% higher), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, 1.2% higher), and AMD Radeon 880M (8436, 1.4% higher). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808, and Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 38224 and 36736 respectively. PassMark GPU Compute score is 2762, which is quite low for any compute-heavy workload.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU contributes the vast majority of the system's compute capability, while the GPU contributes relatively little. The combined system percentile of 69 reflects this: it is higher than the GPU alone (44th percentile) but far below what the CPU alone would suggest (93rd percentile), because the GPU drags the overall system down in graphics-bound tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is a poor pairing for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking and 6 GB memory capacity would prevent the system from reaching high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles, regardless of the CPU's capability. The CPU could easily feed a high-refresh monitor, but the GPU would be the constraint, likely holding frame rates below 144 FPS in most games.

Streaming: The CPU is extremely well-suited for streaming. With 24 cores and 32 threads, the i9-13900KF can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without breaking a sweat. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 indicates that there is massive headroom for software encoding (x264) alongside gaming. The GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder would not matter here, as the CPU can handle it all.

Video editing: The CPU's benchmark scores are outstanding for video editing. The 3DMark max-threads score of 15405 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 48855 indicate fast rendering and export times. The GPU's 2762 PassMark GPU Compute score would contribute little to GPU-accelerated effects, but CPU-based workflows would be extremely fast. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 32 threads provide ample parallelism for timeline scrubbing and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU is a rendering powerhouse. Cinebench R23 multicore of 48855 places it near the top of all CPUs, meaning CPU-based rendering engines would complete frames very quickly. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is low for GPU rendering, and its 6 GB memory would limit scene complexity. CPU rendering would be the primary path for this system.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 786218 and integer math score of 206859 indicate strong performance in compilation and data processing tasks. The 24-core/32-thread configuration excels at parallel builds, and the 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures fast single-threaded compilation steps. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory support provides flexibility for various motherboard configurations.

Student and office work: This system is massively overprovisioned for office workloads. The single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread of 4584, Geekbench single-core of 2668) handles office applications with ease, but the 24 cores are largely idle in such tasks. The power draw of 125 W TDP and the large cooler requirements make this an inefficient choice for purely office-focused tasks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a very specific user: someone who prioritizes CPU compute above all else and has only modest graphics requirements. The i9-13900KF's 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for professionals who run CPU-bound workloads — software developers doing large parallel builds, researchers running simulations, or data analysts processing large datasets would all benefit from the 24-core/32-thread configuration.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-rendered workflows would find value here. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 indicates that video exports and 3D scene renders would complete quickly, even though GPU-accelerated effects would be limited. For gamers, this system is only suitable for those playing at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, or those playing older or less demanding titles where the GPU's 44th percentile ranking is sufficient.

The Arc A380's 6 GB memory and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for entry-level 1080p gaming and basic GPU acceleration. Its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor office setups. Small business workstations that need many CPU threads for compilation, data processing, or virtualization would benefit, provided the graphics needs are minimal.

Students and office workers should look elsewhere — the 125 W TDP and the cost of the CPU (launch MSRP of $564) are excessive for document editing and web browsing, and the GPU's capabilities do not compensate with gaming or graphics performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and has ECC memory support. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1188 single-thread, to 2353 for 2 threads, 4643 for 4 threads, 8510 for 8 threads, 11177 for 16 threads, and 15405 for max threads. This scaling is nearly linear, indicating excellent core utilization and a strong memory subsystem. The Cinebench R23 multicore-to-single-core ratio of 7.08x confirms this efficiency.

The PassMark results are equally impressive for compute-heavy workloads. Integer math scores 206859, floating-point math scores 150869, extended instructions score 46084, and data encryption scores 46186. The data compression score of 786218 is particularly high, indicating strong performance in compression and archival workloads. The find prime numbers score of 225 is lower, but this is a niche workload.

The 93rd percentile ranking, with nearest rivals within 0.8% in average score, confirms that the 13900KF is among the best CPUs available. Its 5.80 GHz boost clock is a key advantage for lightly-threaded workloads, while the 24 cores provide massive parallel throughput. For real workloads, this translates to extremely fast compilation times, quick video exports, and responsive multitasking under heavy load.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity. The 125 W TDP is moderate for a flagship CPU, but the system would require a capable cooling solution.

The GPU is the obvious upgrade path. The Arc A380 requires only a 250 W suggested PSU and uses a single 8-pin power connector, so the power delivery infrastructure would not need to change for a GPU upgrade. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface on the Arc A380 is sufficient for its performance level, but a higher-end GPU would benefit from the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The Arc A380 is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. This means that driver optimization may diminish over time, and users should consider upgrading the GPU as their primary next step. A GPU in the 70th-80th percentile range would better complement the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking, bringing the combined system percentile well above the current 69.

The platform itself has room for memory upgrades — moving from DDR4 to DDR5 would improve bandwidth, though the CPU's memory bandwidth is not specified in the available data. The 36 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency, making the system less sensitive to memory speed than some other architectures.

For a sensible next upgrade, the priority order would be: GPU first (the largest bottleneck), then memory capacity or speed if needed, then storage. The CPU is unlikely to need upgrading for many years, given its 93rd percentile ranking and the fact that its nearest rivals are within 0.8% of its score.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system is defined by a severe CPU-to-GPU imbalance. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits in the 44th percentile — a 49-percentile-point gap. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, rendering, and data processing, the system performs at near-flagship levels. In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming and GPU-accelerated effects, the system performs at entry-level levels.

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward. For gaming, the GPU is always the limiting factor. Even the weakest CPU workloads would not be constrained by the i9-13900KF's capabilities. The GPU's DirectX 12 PassMark score of 35, compared to its DirectX 9 score of 73, indicates that newer games (which rely on modern APIs) would see the weakest relative performance, further widening the bottleneck in current titles.

For compute workloads, the CPU is the primary performer, and the GPU contributes little. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 2762 is a small fraction of what the CPU achieves in integer math (206859) or floating-point math (150869). This means that any workload that can use the CPU's 24 cores would vastly outperform what the GPU could handle on its own.

The combined system percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance — it is closer to the GPU's percentile than the CPU's, because most end-user workloads (gaming, general computing) are at least partially GPU-bound. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 for the GPU would be a limiting factor in any 3D application.

The practical implication is that users should not expect balanced performance. This system excels at CPU-heavy tasks and underperforms in GPU-heavy tasks. Upgrading the GPU would immediately shift the combined percentile upward, while upgrading any other component would yield negligible gains.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900KF with the Intel Arc A380. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake processor from Intel's 13th generation, launched with a $564 MSRP in late 2022. The GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 part based on the DG2-128 chip, launched with a $149 USD MSRP in mid-2022, now end-of-life.

The combined system percentile is 69, which places it above average overall but far below what the CPU alone would suggest. The CPU's 93rd percentile is flagship-tier, matching the Intel Core i9-13900K within 0.1% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus within 0%. The GPU's 44th percentile places it below the AMD Radeon 880M (1.4% higher) and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (1.2% higher), firmly in entry-level territory.

The overall tier of this build is "high-CPU, low-GPU" — a workstation-class processor paired with an entry-level graphics card. It is a desktop system intended for users who need maximum CPU throughput and only modest graphics capability. The 125 W TDP of the CPU and 75 W TDP of the GPU mean that total system power is manageable, with a 250 W suggested PSU for the GPU alone.

In summary, this build is a paradox: it contains one of the fastest consumer CPUs available, yet its gaming and graphics performance is limited to entry-level levels. For CPU compute, it is a top-tier machine. For gaming, it is a 1080p entry-level system. The data is clear: the CPU is the star, the GPU is the constraint, and the combined system is only as strong as its weakest link in graphics-bound tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 69, placing it above average but significantly below what the CPU's 93rd percentile would suggest, due to the GPU's 44th percentile dragging the overall score down.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900KF has an average benchmark score of 61841, which is 0% different from the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834), 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900K (61766), and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636 (61360).

Q: What is the Intel Arc A380's performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595), 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462), 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458), and 1.4% higher than the AMD Radeon 880M (8436).

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score and what does it mean?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 48855, with a single-core score of 6897. This indicates roughly a 7x scaling from single-core to multicore, reflecting the processor's 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What type of memory does the Intel Core i9-13900KF support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and it also has ECC memory support, providing flexibility for various system builds.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A380 still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A380 is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. It was launched with a $149 USD MSRP and uses a 1x 8-pin power connector with a 250 W suggested PSU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 1937 MHz, with an effective data rate of 15.5 Gbps.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds