SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

21,035 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a study in contrasts, combining a flagship 24-core desktop processor with an entry-level 8 GB graphics card. The result is a desktop build where the CPU is the dominant performance driver in almost every scenario, while the GPU serves as a capable but modest baseline for 1080p gaming. The data shows a combined percentile of 79, indicating that this pairing sits above the majority of systems in the database, but the specific benchmark scores reveal a significant imbalance in raw compute potential between the two components.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The memory clock is rated at 2500 MHz, which translates to 20 Gbps effective. This memory configuration is modest by modern standards, and the 8 GB capacity, while adequate for current 1080p titles, may limit texture detail and resolution scaling in future releases. The GPU's base clock is 2317 MHz, with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and it includes 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units.

For ray tracing and AI acceleration, the RTX 5050 includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance matching at 13.17 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 82.30 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 205.8 GTexel/s. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark score of 2502 places the GPU in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This score indicates that the card is capable of running modern DX12 titles at playable frame rates, but it is not positioned for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming. The Passmark G3D score of 17326 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 90334 reinforce this positioning, showing a GPU that handles standard workloads competently but does not excel in compute-heavy rendering tasks.

The benchmark scores suggest that for 3D rendering, the RTX 5050 is an entry-level option. Its FP32 throughput of 13.17 TFLOPS is sufficient for light to moderate render tasks, but the 8 GB VRAM will be the limiting factor in complex scenes with high-resolution textures. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, which scores 21153 on average, a delta of -0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which scores 20713, a delta of 1.6%. These rivals are older or similarly positioned, confirming that the RTX 5050 is not a high-end part but rather a modern entry-level solution with access to Blackwell features like improved RT cores and tensor cores for DLSS-like functionality, though the data does not specify DLSS performance.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the i9-13900K and the RTX 5050 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor has an average benchmark score of 61766 and sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU has an average score of 21035 and sits in the 66th percentile. This 26-percentile gap indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks such as gaming, while the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload. In gaming, the RTX 5050's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 suggests that frame rates will be constrained by the GPU, especially at higher resolutions.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, or physics calculations, the i9-13900K is the clear driver. Its Passmark multithread score of 58589 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 demonstrate massive parallel processing capability. However, the GPU's Passmark physics score is not listed; instead, the CPU's Passmark physics score is 3140. This indicates that in gaming, the CPU can handle the physics and logic threads easily, but the GPU must render the frames. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. In a scenario where the game is GPU-bound, the RTX 5050 will limit performance; in CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-framerate esports titles at low settings, the i9-13900K can push hundreds of frames per second, but the GPU will still cap the output.

The bottleneck is clear: the RTX 5050 is the constraint for any workload that relies on rasterization or ray tracing. The CPU's 92nd percentile rank versus the GPU's 66th percentile rank shows that for every 1% of CPU performance, the GPU provides only 0.72% of its respective percentile, indicating a significant imbalance that will show up as GPU utilization hitting 100% while the CPU remains underutilized.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The i9-13900K has a TDP of 125 W, while the RTX 5050 has a TDP of 130 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, which combined with the CPU's TDP, suggests a total system draw that a 300 W power supply can handle, but with little headroom for overclocking. The data shows the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, and the GPU is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector, so a quality 300 W PSU is the minimum recommendation.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus, and the platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface, which is half the width of the CPU's lanes but still provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 5050's 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. For an upgrade path, the most sensible step is to replace the RTX 5050 with a higher-tier GPU. The motherboard and CPU can support a much more powerful card, as the i9-13900K's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and high core count will not bottleneck a faster GPU. The CPU's launch MSRP is $589, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 249 USD, but the upgrade path should focus on the GPU, as the CPU is already in the top 8% of all processors and will remain relevant for years. A user could also add more memory, but the dual-channel support is already in place, and the 36 MB of L3 cache is substantial.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The i9-13900K's single-thread score of 1187 on 3DMark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5 ensure that the CPU will not hold back frame rates. However, the RTX 5050's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 indicates that 1440p or 4K high-refresh gaming is out of reach. At 1080p medium-to-high settings, the GPU can deliver playable frame rates, but it will not consistently hit 144 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU is capable, but the GPU limits the experience to standard 60 Hz monitors.

Streaming: The i9-13900K has 24 cores and 32 threads, which are more than sufficient for encoding and streaming workloads. The Passmark data compression score of 793645 and data encryption score of 46609 show that the CPU can handle real-time encoding without impacting gaming performance. The RTX 5050's tensor cores may assist with encoding, but the CPU alone can manage the task, making this a viable streaming setup for 1080p streams.

Video editing: The Geekbench multicore score of 22820 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20740 indicate that the i9-13900K will excel at video editing tasks like rendering timelines and exporting. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance will accelerate effects and color grading, but the 66th percentile GPU rank means it is not a professional-grade accelerator. The combination is suitable for 1080p and light 4K editing, but heavy 4K multi-layer projects will see GPU limitations.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 is exceptional for CPU-based rendering, making this system a strong choice for rendering engines that rely on the processor. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 is modest, so GPU-accelerated renderers will be slower, but the CPU can compensate. The 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit for large scenes.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 207792 and floating point math score of 151562 show that the i9-13900K is a powerhouse for compilation and code analysis. The 24 cores and 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 4608 on Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness in IDEs. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this pairing is excellent for developers.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for this category. The i9-13900K's single-thread performance is top-tier, but the 125 W TDP and high cost of the CPU make it inefficient for basic tasks. The RTX 5050's Passmark G2D score of 1113 is adequate for office applications, but the overall system is far more powerful than needed for spreadsheets or web browsing.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined percentile for this build is 79, placing it in the upper fifth of all systems. The CPU's average benchmark score is 61766, with a 92nd percentile rank. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21035, with a 66th percentile rank. The CPU's 3DMark scores show scaling from 1187 single-thread to 15509 max threads, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 confirms its dominance. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2502 and Passmark G3D score of 17326 show it is slightly above average, but the nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, is only 1.6% slower, indicating the RTX 5050 is a slight improvement over older mid-range parts.

The combined picture is a system that is CPU-bound in most metrics. The i9-13900K's nearest rivals include the i9-13900T with a delta of 0.1% and the i9-13900KF with a delta of -0.1%, showing that the K variant is essentially tied with its siblings. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile, with deltas of -0.6% and -1.6%, respectively. This means the RTX 5050 is roughly on par with older mobile and entry-level desktop parts. The 92nd CPU percentile versus 66th GPU percentile creates a system where the CPU can handle the most demanding computational tasks, but the GPU will struggle with high-end graphics.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There is no measured FPS data available for this exact combination of the Intel Core i9-13900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050; the FACT PACK does not contain any measuredFps rows. Therefore, all frame rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2502 and its 66th percentile rank, the RTX 5050 is expected to deliver playable performance at 1080p resolution with high settings in most modern games. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i9-13900K's single-thread score of 1187 on 3DMark and Passmark single-thread score of 4608 will allow for frame rates well above 144 FPS, but the GPU will cap these at around 120-144 FPS at 1080p ultra. For AAA games with demanding graphics, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor, with estimated frame rates of 60-80 FPS at 1080p ultra in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed. At 1440p, the GPU's performance will drop significantly, with estimates of 30-50 FPS at high settings, making 1080p the only viable resolution for smooth gameplay. The CPU will never be the bottleneck in gaming, as its 92nd percentile rank far exceeds the GPU's capability.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p resolution who play esports titles or older games will find the RTX 5050 sufficient, as the i9-13900K's 92nd percentile CPU rank ensures no CPU-side frame drops. However, gamers seeking 1440p or 4K performance should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 66th percentile rank and 8 GB VRAM will not deliver smooth experiences at those resolutions.

Content creators, specifically video editors and software developers, will benefit most from this pairing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and Passmark multithread score of 58589 make it ideal for rendering, compiling, and data processing. The GPU's 13.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance adds moderate acceleration for effects, but the CPU is the workhorse. Students and small business workstations are over-served by this build; the 125 W TDP CPU and high core count are unnecessary for document editing or spreadsheet tasks, and the GPU's Passmark G2D score of 1113 is adequate but not exceptional for 2D applications. The target user is a developer or a 1080p gamer who wants a future-proof CPU platform and is willing to upgrade the GPU later.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79.

Q: How much faster is the i9-13900K than its nearest rival, the i9-13900T?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, while the i9-13900T scores 61723, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the K.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5050 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900K has ECC memory support.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5050 is 300 W.

Q: How does the RTX 5050's 3DMark Steel Nomad score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5050 scores 2502 on 3DMark Steel Nomad, while the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT scores 20713 on average (Passmark G3D), which is a 1.6% delta in favor of the RTX 5050.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data available for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it features PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, and the CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in both single-thread and multithread workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and Passmark single-thread score of 4608 demonstrate excellent per-core performance, suitable for gaming and responsive applications. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 22820 show massive parallel throughput, making this CPU ideal for video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The Passmark data compression score of 793645 and encryption score of 46609 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The 92nd percentile rank against all CPUs confirms that the i9-13900K is a top-tier processor, with its nearest rival being the i9-13900KF with a delta of -0.1%, meaning they are virtually identical in performance.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as specified by the buildClass field. The pairing of the Intel Core i9-13900K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is a high-CPU, low-GPU configuration. The combined percentile of 79 places it in the upper tier of systems, but the individual component percentiles reveal the imbalance: the CPU is in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is in the 66th percentile. This means the system is over-equipped for CPU-bound tasks and under-equipped for GPU-bound tasks.

The i9-13900K is a flagship desktop processor with a launch MSRP of $589, and the RTX 5050 is an entry-level desktop GPU with a launch MSRP of 249 USD. The build is best described as a workstation-oriented CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU. It offers exceptional performance for productivity, development, and content creation, but for gaming, it is limited to 1080p resolution with medium-to-high settings. The overall tier is that of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU, making it a sensible choice for users who need maximum CPU power and are willing to compromise on graphics performance or plan to upgrade the GPU in the future.