SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing represents a study in asymmetry. The CPU is a flagship-class, 24-core desktop processor that sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mainstream 61st-percentile part. This combination produces a system where the processor’s immense multi-threaded throughput is largely decoupled from the graphics card's more modest rasterization ceiling. The data indicates a platform designed for productivity and high-refresh competitive gaming rather than a balanced 4K ultra powerhouse. This analysis will break down the measured benchmark scores, contextualize the pairing, and outline the realistic usage scenarios based solely on the provided facts.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. It features a substantial 24 cores and 32 threads, capable of boosting from a 3.00 GHz base clock to a 5.80 GHz boost clock. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling a design that favors both high-frequency responsiveness and high-throughput parallel workloads. With a TDP of 125 W, it is a high-power desktop component, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, along with ECC memory support. The CPU also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a dominant multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 38271.5 points in the multicore test, while the single-core test yields 2238.5 points. This multi-core strength is corroborated by a Geekbench multicore score of 22820 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 15509. The 3DMark scaling from 2 threads (2355) to 16 threads (11201) shows near-linear scaling, indicating that the architecture effectively utilizes its core count for heavily threaded workloads. Single-thread performance is also excellent, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4608, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 61766, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Core i9-13900T (avg score 61723, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (avg score 61834, delta -0.1%), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF (avg score 61841, delta -0.1%). The deltaPct values are within a fraction of a percent, indicating that this chip is virtually tied with its closest competitors in overall average scoring. However, the 13900K’s specific Cinebench and Passmark scores, such as 58589 in Passmark multithread and 207792 in Passmark integer math, underscore its capability in rendering and complex calculations. Data encryption (46609) and compression (793645) scores also highlight strong performance in those specific tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 5.80 GHz boost clock and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2355 provide ample single-thread headroom for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The GPU, however, becomes the limiting factor for achieving extremely high frame rates in newer titles, making this a strong pairing for esports and competitive games where CPU speed matters most.

Streaming: The 24-core and 32-thread configuration, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5, ensures that encoding a stream while gaming imposes minimal performance penalty. The CPU’s massive multi-threaded capacity can handle real-time x264 encoding at high presets, offloading the work from the RTX 4060 and allowing the GPU to focus on rendering frames.

Video Editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export operations benefit greatly from the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 58589 and its high floating-point math score of 151562. The 36 MB of L3 cache and high memory bandwidth support smooth operation with large project files, though the 8 GB GPU memory may limit the complexity of GPU-accelerated effects in some cases.

3D Rendering: This is where the CPU excels unequivocally. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20740 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 11201 demonstrate that this processor can chew through complex scenes and final-frame renders in applications like Blender or 3ds Max. The RTX 4060’s 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and ray tracing cores can assist with real-time viewport rendering and final-frame denoising, but the CPU is the primary workhorse for final frame production.

Software Development: Compilation times for large codebases are drastically reduced by the high integer math score (207792 in Passmark) and the sheer number of threads. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 8520 indicates that even less-parallelized build processes will benefit from the high clock speeds, while parallel test suites will leverage the full 32-thread capacity.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is vastly overqualified for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The Passmark single-thread score of 4608 ensures that these tasks are instantaneous, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output if the dedicated GPU is disabled or removed. The high core count could be useful for running multiple virtual machines in a computer science curriculum.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a severe imbalance where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU. The CPU is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile, a 31-percentage-point gap. In gaming, this means the RTX 4060 will almost always be the primary bottleneck, as the CPU has the raw speed (3DMark single-thread score of 1187) to feed the GPU frames at most resolutions. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19545 is approximately 31% of the CPU’sega average benchmark score, but this comparison is not direct; however, the percentile gap is clear.

For CPU-bound workloads like physics calculations (Passmark physics score of 3140), the GPU’s compute capabilities (Passmark GPU compute score of 9213) are insufficient to offload significant work, making the CPU the sole limiting factor. In contrast, for GPU-bound tasks like DirectX 12 gaming (Passmark DirectX 12 score of 76), the CPU has ample headroom, and the GPU’s frame rate will plateau. The FPS scaling is likely to be suboptimal; at 1080p, the CPU may be underutilized in some titles, while at 1440p, the GPU will be fully saturated. This is not a balanced pairing for maximum performance in either direction, but rather a system that prioritizes CPU capability for non-gaming tasks.

Who Should Build It

Enthusiasts seeking a productivity-first machine: Users who primarily perform video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation but also game occasionally will find the CPU’s performance transformative. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and the Passmark multithread score of 58589 make this a compelling choice for professional workloads.

Competitive gamers at 1080p: The CPU’s high boost clock and strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1187) allow for maximum frame rates in competitive shooters and MOBAs, where the RTX 4060 is sufficient to drive high refresh rates at lower graphical settings.

Small business workstations: The CPU’s data encryption score of 46609 and ECC memory support make it suitable for financial modeling or database servers that demand data integrity, while the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory can handle basic CAD and visualization tasks.

Not recommended for: High-resolution (4K) ultra-settings gamers who would be bottlenecked by the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. Similarly, users whose primary workload is GPU rendering or AI model training will find the 8 GB VRAM capacity restrictive.

Benchmark Performance

CPU: The Intel Core i9-13900K scores 38271.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 2238.5 in single-core, and 22820 in Geekbench multicore. Its average benchmark score is 61766, placing it in the 92nd percentile globally. It is statistically tied with the Intel Core i9-13900T (0.1% faster) and the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (0.1% slower).

GPU: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19545 in Passmark G3D and 95057 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score is 17639, placing it in the 61st percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which is 0.2% slower, and the AMD Radeon 780M, which is 0.3% faster.

Combined: The system’s combined percentile is 77, reflecting the CPU’s high standing pulling up the average of the GPU’s lower position. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 indicates moderate 1440p rasterization ability. The combined picture is a system with extreme CPU compute headroom and adequate 1080p/1440p gaming capability, with the GPU being the clear limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900K is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Raptor Lake architecture, supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides high bandwidth for the fastest storage devices. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W for the GPU alone. This indicates that a system power supply of 500-600 W is sufficient for this configuration in typical builds.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the graphics card. The CPU has massive headroom to support a significantly more powerful GPU, as evidenced by its 92nd percentile ranking. An upgrade to a higher-tier GPU (e.g., a 70-class or 80-class card) would balance the system and unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads are likely to remain relevant for several more years, making it a strong foundation for future GPU upgrades. The platform itself, however, is on a mature socket, and future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard and memory, though the current DDR5 support offers good longevity.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process, featuring 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz and boosts to 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is a limiting factor at higher resolutions but is adequate for 1080p and light 1440p gaming.

The GPU features 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, along with 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 175 and DirectX 12 score of 76 indicate solid DX11 performance but weaker DX12 throughput compared to higher-tier cards. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 48643 demonstrates competent compute performance in Vulkan workloads.

The GPU’s percentile of 61 and average score of 17639 are modest for the GeForce 40-series, aligning it with entry-level discrete cards. Its nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% slower) and the AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% faster) underscores that this is an entry-level performance tier. For rendering, the 24 RT cores will enable ray tracing in games, but the 8 GB VRAM will cap texture quality and scene complexity in professional 3D applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing Intel’s flagship 13th-gen processor with NVIDIA’s entry-level 40-series GPU. The system’s combined percentile is 77, indicating a high overall performance tier, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s 92nd percentile standing. The GPU’s 61st percentile is the weak link, making this a CPU-centric build. It is best described as a high-performance workstation-class CPU with a modest gaming GPU attached. The build excels in CPU-bound tasks like rendering, encoding, and compilation, while providing a competent but not exceptional 1080p gaming experience. The 24-core and 32-thread processor, paired with an 8 GB graphics card, creates a system that is more powerful in the tower than on the screen for modern AAA titles.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900K faster than the Intel Core i9-13900T?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The i9-13900K has an average score of 61766, while the i9-13900T scores 61723, making the 13900K 0.1% faster, a statistically negligible difference.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile compared to the CPU?

A: The GPU is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. This represents a 31-percentage-point gap, with the CPU being significantly higher-performing in its class.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the RTX 4060?

A: The RTX 4060 has a memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s, utilizing 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900K support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU specification lists ECC memory support as true. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types on a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is 300 W. The GPU’s TDP is 115 W.

Q: How does the CPU perform in Cinebench R23 multicore compared to single-core?

A: The CPU scores 38271.5 points in the R23 multicore test and 2238.5 points in the single-core test. The multicore score is approximately 17 times higher, reflecting the 24-core and 32-thread design.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, which places this build in the top 23% of all systems, though this is heavily weighted by the CPU’s performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-13900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The following frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Based on the CPU’s high single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1187) and the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19545, the system is expected to provide excellent 1080p performance in most titles. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU’s 5.80 GHz boost clock should drive frame rates well above 200 FPS at high settings, as these games are CPU-bound. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 4060 is expected to deliver between 60 and 100 FPS, depending on the game’s optimization and ray tracing load.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a limiting factor. Estimates suggest that most AAA games will run at 50-70 FPS on high settings, with older or less demanding titles staying above 60 FPS. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may also cause texture pop-in or reduced quality in games exceeding that capacity. At 4K, the system is not recommended for high settings, as the GPU’s bandwidth and VRAM are insufficient for consistent 60 FPS in modern titles; users would need to rely on upscaling algorithms, though the data does not specify DLSS performance. The CPU will not be a bottleneck in any of these scenarios, as it has ample headroom over the GPU’s capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds