SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a study in contrasts: a flagship 24-core processor built for heavy multi-threaded workloads, matched with a mid-range GPU that targets 1080p and 1440p gaming. Data from the FACT PACK shows a CPU that sits in the 92nd percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 59th percentile. This combination prioritizes CPU-bound productivity and high-refresh gaming, but the GPU is the definitive constraint in graphics-heavy scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a Raptor Lake-S part built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring 24 cores and 32 threads. This hybrid configuration allows the chip to reach a 5.80 GHz boost clock and a 3.00 GHz base clock. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, includes ECC support, and relies on 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. It also integrates UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores show a progression from 1187 in the single-thread test to 2355 with 2 threads, 4648 with 4 threads, 8520 with 8 threads, 11201 with 16 threads, and finally 15509 with the maximum thread count. This near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads indicates robust multi-core engineering. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 38271.5 in the multicore test and 2238.5 in the single-core test, demonstrating that it does not sacrifice single-thread responsiveness while delivering massive parallel throughput.

Real-world workload performance is strong across the board. Geekbench scores of 22820 (multi-core) and 2628 (single-core) confirm its position as a high-end desktop part. PassMark tests show specific strengths: integer math scores 207792, floating-point math scores 151562, and data compression scores 793645. Extended instruction performance is also notable at 46477. The average benchmark score of 61766 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

The nearest rivals highlight the 13900K's position. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T (avg score 61723) and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636 (avg score 61360). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and the Intel Core i9-13900KF by 0.1% each (both with avg scores around 61834-61841). These differences are negligible, meaning the 13900K is effectively tied with its closest competitors, though the KF variant lacks integrated graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 15509 represents its peak parallel capability, while the single-thread score of 1187 shows it is not a slouch in lightly threaded tasks. The Cinebench R20 results—20740 multi-core and 2927 single-core—reinforce this balance. PassMark's multithread score of 58589 aligns with the 3DMark max-thread result, confirming consistent performance across different test suites.

The GPU, a GeForce RTX 3060 Ti based on the GA104 chip (Ampere architecture, Samsung 8 nm process), delivers its own set of numbers. It scores 2626 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, 78927 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 47784 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score of 20349 and GPU compute score of 10006 indicate solid rasterization and compute abilities. Its average benchmark score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 76. The GPU's nearest rivals show it is 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (avg score 16014) and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X (avg score 15862). It trails the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M by 1.4% (avg score 16351) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT by 1.4% (avg score 16361). The GPU sits in a competitive mid-range tier, but the CPU is in a much higher performance league.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-tier performer that will never be the limiting factor in most applications, while the GPU is a competent but mid-pack component. This creates an asymmetric system where the processor's potential is often left untapped in graphics-bound tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data points to a significant imbalance. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 59th percentile ranking means the processor is vastly more capable relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its own. In gaming workloads that are typically GPU-bound, the RTX 3060 Ti will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the 13900K could theoretically feed.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3140 and single-thread score of 4608 indicate it can handle game logic and draw calls without breaking a sweat. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20349, while respectable, is not in the same performance tier as the CPU's multithreaded scores. In compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding that use both components, the GPU will finish its portion of work slower than the CPU can prepare the next frame or data chunk.

The bottleneck is not necessarily a negative; it means the system is well-balanced for CPU-intensive productivity tasks where the GPU does light work (like software development) but unbalanced for gaming where the GPU is the primary renderer. For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 3060 Ti will be the limiting factor, preventing the system from achieving the ultra-high frame rates the CPU could support. For multi-threaded rendering or compilation, the CPU will be the star, and the GPU will be idle or minimally utilized.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements.

Given the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20349 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626, gaming performance should be strong for 1080p and serviceable for 1440p. The RTX 3060 Ti is a mid-range card, so expecting smooth gameplay at high settings in most titles is reasonable. At 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely struggle with the most demanding textures and resolutions.

The CPU's high single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core: 2238.5, 3DMark single-thread: 1187) ensure that frame pacing will be consistent, and the processor will not hold back the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios like open-world games or esports titles. However, the GPU's 59th percentile ranking suggests that frame rates will be typical of a mid-range card, not exceptional.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's strength could push frame rates high at 1080p, but the GPU will still cap the maximum output. In AAA titles at 1440p, expect medium-to-high settings for a stable 60 FPS. At 1080p, high-to-ultra settings are more plausible. These are estimates, not measured results.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can easily feed a high-refresh monitor, but the GPU limits the system to roughly mid-range frame rates. At 1080p, the RTX 3060 Ti should handle 144 Hz in esports titles, but demanding AAA games will likely see lower frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 suggests modern DX12 games will run well at 1080p.

Streaming: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, making it excellent for encoding and gaming simultaneously. The PassMark data compression score of 793645 indicates fast processing of stream data. The GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by tensor cores) can offload encoding, but the CPU alone has plenty of headroom.

Video editing: The 13900K's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 22820 make it exceptional for rendering timelines and exporting. The GPU's compute score of 10006 will help with effects and GPU-accelerated previews, but the CPU will be the primary driver of performance.

3D rendering: Multi-threaded rendering will be extremely fast, with the CPU's max-thread 3DMark score of 15509 indicating strong parallel performance. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are adequate for real-time viewports and smaller scenes, but the CPU will dominate final frame renders.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from the CPU's 32 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 207792 and extended instructions score of 46477 indicate strong performance for build tools. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, so the system is well-suited for this task.

Student and office work: For documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU is massively overkill. The single-thread score of 4608 in PassMark ensures snappy response, but the GPU's power is wasted. This is a high-cost solution for basic tasks, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could be used to disable the discrete GPU for power savings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process. The GA104 chip contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². It operates at a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It includes 38 RT cores for ray tracing and 152 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for a mid-range card.

For rendering workloads, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 and PassMark G3D score of 20349 indicate solid DX12 and OpenGL performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 shows strong compute capabilities for tasks like Blender or DaVinci Resolve, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. The RT cores and tensor cores enable DLSS and ray tracing, but the card's 59th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier performer for these effects at high resolutions.

The nearest rivals show the 3060 Ti is competitive with the RX 5700 XT and RX 9060, but it is a last-generation part (production status is end-of-life, released in late 2020). Its 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance is respectable, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest by modern standards, which could hinder 4K textures.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cheaper DDR4 or faster DDR5, though the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support (16 lanes from the CPU) is forward-looking. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the motherboard's PCIe Gen 5 slots.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 200 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which is modest for this combination. Given the CPU's high core count and the GPU's power draw, a quality 550 W PSU should suffice for stock operation, but overclocking the unlocked multiplier or adding peripherals may require more headroom.

The GPU is end-of-life, so an upgrade would be to a newer generation (successor is GeForce 40). The CPU is still active, and its socket (1700) supports future 13th-gen CPU upgrades, though the platform is nearing the end of its life. A sensible next step would be to upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier card to better match the CPU's performance, as the current GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure any modern GPU will be fully utilized.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900K faster than the Intel Core i9-13900KF?

A: No, the data shows the 13900KF has an average benchmark score of 61841, which is 0.1% higher than the 13900K's 61766. The difference is negligible, and the KF variant lacks integrated graphics.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, achieved with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus running at 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 76, indicating the pair outperforms 76% of all tested desktop combinations.

Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti good for ray tracing?

A: It has 38 RT cores for ray tracing and 152 tensor cores for DLSS, but its 59th percentile ranking suggests mid-range performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2626 indicates it can handle DX12 ray-traced titles at lower settings.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 399 USD.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output and can be used for quick sync video encoding.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-heavy gaming. The 13900K's 92nd percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for 3D rendering, video editing, and software development, where its 24 cores and 32 threads shine. The RTX 3060 Ti, with its 59th percentile GPU ranking, is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light 1440p, but it will not satisfy users seeking 4K or ultra-high refresh rates.

Content creators who render videos or 3D scenes will see massive speedups from the CPU, while the GPU handles previews and effects adequately. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads. Students and office workers should look elsewhere, as this system is overkill for basic tasks and the GPU's power is wasted.

Gamers at 1080p with a 144 Hz monitor will find a capable system, but those targeting 1440p high-refresh or 4K should consider a stronger GPU. The platform's support for DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, and the upgrade path is clear: swap the RTX 3060 Ti for a newer, more powerful GPU to unlock the full potential of the 13900K. Small businesses running CPU-bound workloads (like data processing or virtualization) will also benefit, given the CPU's high PassMark scores in integer math, floating-point math, and data compression.