SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc B580: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 13th-generation flagship desktop processor with Intel's Arc B580 graphics card, creating a system that sits at the 80th combined percentile across all CPU and GPU pairings. The CPU alone ranks in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 68th percentile among all graphics cards. This significant gap in relative performance tiers suggests a configuration where the processor is the dominant component, but benchmark data reveals a more nuanced relationship across different workload types.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and represents the Arc 5 generation of Intel's discrete graphics efforts. Fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, the chip contains 19,600 million transistors spread across a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². This is a dual-slot card measuring 272 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 45 mm in width, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W power supply.

Memory configuration is a strong point for this GPU. The B580 comes equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This memory subsystem operates at 2375 MHz, with 19 Gbps effective speed. For modern rendering workloads, 12 GB of VRAM at this bandwidth level provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and complex scene data, though the memory bus width is narrower than some competitors in similar performance brackets.

Clock speeds are modest, with both base and boost clocks fixed at 2670 MHz. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 20 dedicated RT cores, though tensor core specifications are not listed in the data. The compute capabilities translate to a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s, and 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. FP16 performance doubles to 27.34 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, which can benefit certain compute-heavy applications that support reduced precision.

The B580 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for most workloads but may slightly constrain data transfer in scenarios with very large texture sets.

Benchmark scores for the GPU paint a picture of solid mid-range performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 3068, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 92821 and 109672 respectively. Passmark results show a G3D score of 15748, with a GPU compute score of 7729. The average benchmark score across all tests is 23021, placing this GPU in the 68th percentile of all graphics cards.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Arc B580 sits remarkably close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which has an average score of 22895, representing a 0.6% advantage for the Intel card. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, just 0.2% above the B580. Interestingly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 scores 23172, only 0.7% higher, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, putting the B580 1% behind. This clustering suggests the B580 performs in a band roughly equivalent to these established cards, despite architectural differences across generations.

For rendering workloads, the RT cores and 12 GB VRAM make this GPU suitable for modern real-time rendering tasks, though the 20 RT cores are not positioned for heavy ray-traced production work. The 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for real-time graphics, and the 456.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming without significant bottlenecks.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark profile is dominated by exceptional multi-threaded performance. In 3DMark tests, the i9-13900K scores 11201 with 16 threads, 2355 with 2 threads, 4648 with 4 threads, 8520 with 8 threads, 15509 with max threads, and 1187 single-thread. Cinebench results are equally strong: R15 multicore reaches 5805.5, R20 multicore reaches 20740, and R23 multicore reaches 38271.5. Single-core Cinebench scores are 318, 2927, and 2238.5 for R15, R20, and R23 respectively.

Geekbench scores show 22820 multicore and 2628 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 58589, single-thread of 4608, with specific workloads like integer math at 207792, floating point math at 151562, data compression at 793645, data encryption at 46609, extended instructions at 46477, and physics at 3140. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 61766, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs.

Nearest CPU rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900T with an average score of 61723 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (0.1% faster), and the Intel Xeon 636 at 61360 (0.7% slower). These tiny deltas indicate the i9-13900K sits at a performance plateau where several processors achieve nearly identical aggregate scores.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is clearly the performance leader. With the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile, the combined percentile lands at 80. This indicates that while the CPU is near the top of its class, the GPU holds back the overall system from reaching that same tier. The GPU's average score of 23021 versus the CPU's 61766 demonstrates the magnitude of this gap in raw benchmark terms, though these numbers are not directly comparable across different test suites.

For gaming, no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so the following analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's massive multi-threaded advantage and strong single-thread scores suggest it can feed frames to the GPU without becoming the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The GPU's position relative to the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in average score suggests it should deliver playable performance at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, though these figures are estimates.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with the codename Raptor Lake-S. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The processor runs at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts to 5.80 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The TDP is rated at 125 W, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration helps explain the exceptional single-threaded performance, as the large L2 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and storage devices.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output capabilities, though this pairing uses the discrete Arc B580 for all graphics work. The processor was released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $589, and it remains in active production.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that excels at both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark and 4608 in Passmark indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for applications that rely on low-latency, single-core execution. The multi-threaded scores are exceptional: 15509 in 3DMark max threads, 38271.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and 58589 in Passmark multithread.

Real workload implications are clear. For software development, the 24 cores and 32 threads handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently, while the strong single-thread performance accelerates interpreter and JIT-based workloads. For content creation, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 indicates rapid video encoding and 3D rendering, while the single-core score of 2238.5 ensures responsive UI interactions in editing software. The Passmark integer math score of 207792 and floating point math score of 151562 suggest strong general-purpose computation, with data compression at 793645 indicating efficient archival and file operations.

The nearest rival comparison shows this CPU is effectively tied with the i9-13900T (0.1% faster), Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (0.1% slower), and i9-13900KF (0.1% slower), with the Xeon 636 trailing by 0.7%. This suggests that for most workloads, users would see negligible differences between these processors, making the i9-13900K a representative example of top-tier x86 performance in this benchmark generation.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the i9-13900K and Arc B580 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile creates a clear hierarchy: the CPU can handle far more computational work than the GPU can render in real time. This imbalance manifests differently across workload types.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark and 4608 in Passmark indicates it can handle game logic, physics, and draw call submissions without becoming the bottleneck. The GPU, with its 68th percentile ranking and average score of 23021, will be the limiting factor for frame rates in most gaming scenarios. At 1080p, the GPU's raw compute of 13.67 TFLOPS and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cap FPS below what the CPU could theoretically support. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU's VRAM capacity of 12 GB and bandwidth become even more critical, further cementing the GPU as the primary constraint.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. Multi-threaded CPU tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data processing leverage the 24 cores and 32 threads to their full potential. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and Passmark multithread score of 58589 demonstrate that CPU-bound tasks will be exceptionally fast. The GPU's compute score of 7729 in Passmark suggests it can accelerate some tasks, but the CPU's raw throughput will dominate in most non-graphics workloads.

The combined percentile of 80 reflects this mixed profile. The system is not perfectly balanced, but the CPU's strength compensates for the GPU's mid-range positioning in many applications. For gaming, users should expect the GPU to be the bottleneck, meaning graphical settings and resolution will determine performance more than CPU capabilities. For productivity, the CPU will be the star, with the GPU providing supplementary acceleration where supported.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU natively provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means the system can accommodate modern NVMe storage and high-bandwidth peripherals without bottlenecking at the bus level.

Power requirements show a CPU TDP of 125 W and a GPU TDP of 190 W, with the GPU suggesting a 450 W power supply. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components, as a typical 750 W or 850 W PSU would comfortably support this pairing along with multiple drives and cooling systems. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which could increase power draw but also boost performance beyond stock levels.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it has significant headroom to drive higher-tier graphics cards without becoming the bottleneck. Upgrading to a GPU with a similar or higher percentile would better balance the system and improve gaming performance, particularly at higher resolutions where the current GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting.

Alternatively, users could add more memory or faster storage, though the dual-channel memory configuration and PCIe Gen 5 support already provide a solid foundation. The 36 MB of L3 cache and large L2 cache per core reduce memory latency, so memory upgrades would yield diminishing returns for most workloads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display option, making the system usable even if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, placing it in the top fifth of all CPU and GPU pairings.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 2080 in average benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, which is 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080's score of 22895.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The i9-13900K scores 38271.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc B580 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the Arc B580?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 450 W, with the GPU's TDP rated at 190 W.

Q: Does the i9-13900K support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but can accept mid-range GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find the Arc B580's 68th percentile ranking sufficient for most titles, while the i9-13900K ensures no CPU-related frame drops or stuttering. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or data processing will benefit most from the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking, particularly in multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench R23 where the score reaches 38271.5.

Software developers will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads for parallel builds and the strong single-thread score of 4608 in Passmark for interactive tooling. Students in computer science or engineering programs can leverage the CPU's computational power for simulations and data analysis, while the GPU handles visualization tasks. Small business workstations running database operations, financial modeling, or content production will see excellent CPU-bound performance, with the GPU providing adequate graphics acceleration for most professional applications.

The system is less suitable for users whose primary workload is high-end gaming at 4K or ray-traced rendering, where the GPU's 20 RT cores and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance would be the limiting factor. Users in these categories should consider a more powerful GPU to match the CPU's capabilities.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900K, a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the Intel Arc B580, a Battlemage-generation GPU from Intel's Arc 5 lineup. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 68th percentile among all graphics cards. The combined system percentile is 80.

The pairing represents a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that excels in CPU-intensive workloads while providing solid, though not exceptional, graphics performance. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.7% in average score, indicating it sits at a performance plateau, while the GPU's nearest rivals include the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, showing it competes with established mid-to-high-end cards from previous generations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1187 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 68th percentile ranking will limit maximum FPS in graphically demanding games. At 1440p, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient resources for most titles, though frame rates will be lower than what the CPU alone could support.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle both game rendering and encoding simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The Passmark multithread score of 58589 indicates ample headroom for software encoding, while the GPU can offload encoding tasks via its dedicated hardware, though specific encoder details are not listed.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 accelerates export and render times dramatically. The GPU's compute score of 7729 in Passmark helps with effects and color grading, and the 12 GB VRAM supports large timelines with multiple high-resolution tracks.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will see exceptional performance from the 24-core processor, with the Passmark floating point math score of 151562 indicating strong throughput. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc B580's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is adequate for preview renders but slower for final output.

Software development: Compilation and build times benefit from the 32 threads, with the Passmark integer math score of 207792 indicating fast code execution. The single-thread score of 4608 ensures responsive IDE performance, and the 36 MB L3 cache accelerates frequent access to code modules.

Student and office work: For general productivity, this system is massively over-provisioned. The CPU's single-thread performance makes document editing and web browsing instantaneous, while the GPU handles spreadsheet rendering and presentation graphics without issue. The 125 W CPU TDP and 190 W GPU TDP are efficient enough for daily use, though the system is not optimized for low-power operation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 23021 and its position between the RTX 2080 (22895) and RTX 3080 (23172), the Arc B580 is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most modern titles. The 12 GB VRAM provides sufficient capacity for high-resolution textures, and the 456.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth texture streaming. At 1440p, frame rates will drop but remain playable in less demanding games, with more graphically intensive titles requiring medium settings to maintain smooth performance.

The CPU's exceptional performance ensures that frame rates will be GPU-limited in virtually all gaming scenarios. The single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark and 4608 in Passmark indicate the processor can handle game logic and draw calls without becoming the bottleneck, even in CPU-intensive titles like simulators or strategy games. The 36 MB L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.80 GHz further reduce latency, contributing to consistent frame pacing.

For competitive gaming at 1080p, the system should deliver high frame rates in esports titles, though the GPU's mid-range positioning means it will not reach the extremely high refresh rates achievable with top-tier GPUs. For AAA gaming, users should expect solid 60 FPS performance at 1080p with high settings, with 1440p requiring some compromises in graphical quality. The absence of measured FPS data means these estimates carry uncertainty, and actual performance may vary based on specific game optimizations and driver maturity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds