SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A380 — Hardware Analysis

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. All frame-rate discussions in this analysis are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, not from direct gameplay testing. The data shows a profound mismatch between the two parts: the Core i9-13900K sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A380 sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. This pairing produces a system whose gaming performance will be almost entirely dictated by the graphics card, with the CPU effectively never breaking a sweat in most titles.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data is available for this combination, the following expectations are qualitative estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and the CPU's known headroom. The Arc A380's PassMark G3D score of 6252 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 place it in the lower-midrange of desktop graphics. At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU will deliver playable but modest frame rates in esports titles, while demanding AAA games will require reduced settings for smooth gameplay. At 1440p and 4K, the A380's 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth become significant constraints, and ultra-preset gaming at those resolutions should be considered impractical.

The CPU side of this pairing tells a different story. The i9-13900K's single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5 indicate exceptional per-core performance, which helps maintain minimum frame rates even when the GPU is the bottleneck. In CPU-light games at 1080p, the A380 will be the limiting factor, and frame rates will scale primarily with GPU load rather than CPU capability. For games that are heavily multi-threaded, the i9-13900K's 24 cores and 32 threads provide massive headroom, but the A380's 1024 shading units and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap overall output well before the CPU becomes relevant.

The practical takeaway: expect 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most titles, with competitive esports titles potentially reaching high refresh rates. At higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled, the A380's 8 ray-tracing cores will struggle, and the 6 GB memory buffer will limit texture quality. The i9-13900K's performance will only become visible in frame-time consistency and in games that are unusually CPU-bound, which are rare with a GPU of this class.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900K delivers exceptional CPU benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 38271.5 multi-core and 2238.5 single-core. Geekbench results show 22820 multi-core and 2628 single-core. PassMark multi-thread score is 58589, with a single-thread score of 4608. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 1187 single-thread to 15509 max-threads, with 16-thread score of 11201. These numbers place the CPU at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61766.

The GPU presents a stark contrast. The Arc A380's PassMark G3D score is 6252, with a GPU compute score of 2762. Geekbench OpenCL score is 38224, and Vulkan score is 36736. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808. These results place the GPU at the 44th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558. The nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M at 8595 (0.4% faster), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 8462 (1.1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8458 (1.2% slower), and the AMD Radeon 880M at 8436 (1.4% slower).

The combined picture is a system at the 68th percentile overall, which reflects the enormous CPU advantage dragging up a weak GPU baseline. The CPU's nearest rivals — the Core i9-13900T (61723, 0.1% slower), Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, 0.1% faster), Core i9-13900KF (61841, 0.1% faster), and Xeon 636 (61360, 0.7% slower) — all sit within a single percentage point, confirming the i9-13900K is at the top of its performance class. The GPU's nearest rivals are all older or lower-tier mobile parts, illustrating how far the A380 sits from modern desktop GPU performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is the definition of a CPU-bound system in name only; in practice, the GPU is the overwhelming bottleneck for all graphics workloads. The i9-13900K's 92nd percentile ranking versus the A380's 44th percentile creates a 48-point gap that manifests in every gaming scenario. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 is more than six times the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6252, though these are different metrics — the point is that the CPU has enormous compute headroom that the GPU cannot utilize.

In gaming, the FPS scaling evidence (estimated, not measured) shows that a stronger GPU would yield proportionally larger frame rate gains, while upgrading the CPU would produce negligible improvements. The A380's 75 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU indicate a low-power part, while the i9-13900K's 125 W TDP suggests a high-power CPU; this power asymmetry mirrors the performance asymmetry. For CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or compilation, the i9-13900K will perform at its full potential, and the GPU becomes irrelevant. For GPU-heavy workloads like gaming or GPU compute, the A380 will cap performance, and the CPU will idle at a fraction of its capability.

The bottleneck analysis is clear: the GPU limits all graphics-bound tasks, while the CPU limits only those rare tasks that are single-threaded or lightly threaded beyond what the A380 can handle. In multi-threaded CPU workloads, the system performs at the 92nd percentile level. In graphics workloads, it performs at the 44th percentile level. The combined 68th percentile reflects this split personality.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance above all else and need only basic graphics capability. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will see the i9-13900K's full 24-core, 32-thread performance in applications like Cinebench R23 (38271.5 multi-core) or PassMark multi-thread (58589). Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and high multi-thread throughput. Students and small business workstations running office productivity, data analysis, or virtualization workloads will find the CPU far more than sufficient, with the A380 providing adequate display output for productivity applications.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations — esports titles, older games, or indie games — will find the A380 acceptable, but the pairing is not recommended for gaming-first builds. The 44th percentile GPU ranking means this system will underperform any modern gaming desktop with a midrange or better GPU. The i9-13900K is overkill for gaming when paired with the A380; a lower-tier CPU would not meaningfully change gaming performance while freeing budget for a better GPU. The target user is someone who needs a workstation-class CPU for compute tasks and plays games only occasionally at lower settings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor based on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S, codename) built on Intel's 10 nm process. Base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The die size is 257 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. It has 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. Released in September 2022 with a launch MSRP of $589, it remains an active production part.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's class-leading status. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20740 and R15 multi-core score of 5805.5 show strong scaling across generations. PassMark data compression score of 793645 and integer math score of 207792 indicate excellent throughput for compute-heavy workloads. Floating point math at 151562 and extended instructions at 46477 further demonstrate versatility. The single-thread score of 4608 in PassMark and 2628 in Geekbench show that the 5.80 GHz boost clock delivers top-tier per-core performance, which benefits lightly-threaded applications like legacy software and some games.

The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs puts this chip within 0.1% of the Core i9-13900KF and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, and 0.7% ahead of the Xeon 636. For real workloads, this means the i9-13900K handles any CPU-bound task with minimal waiting: video exports complete quickly, compilation times are short, and multitasking across dozens of threads is smooth. The 32 threads allow simultaneous heavy workloads without noticeable contention.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Arc A380 capable of 4K gaming?

A: No. The A380's 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with a 44th percentile GPU ranking, make 4K gaming at ultra settings impractical. Even at 1080p, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6252 suggests medium-to-high settings are more realistic.

Q: How much faster is the i9-13900K than its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, which is 0.1% faster than the Core i9-13900T (61723) and 0.1% slower than the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834). The Core i9-13900KF scores 61841, 0.1% faster.

Q: Does the i9-13900K support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The 125 W TDP provides thermal headroom for overclocking, though actual results depend on cooling and motherboard.

Q: What memory types does this system support?

A: The i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, making this suitable for workstation use.

Q: Is the Arc A380 still in production?

A: No, the Arc A380 is marked as end-of-life in the database. Its successor is Battlemage, and its predecessor is Xe Graphics.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 68th, reflecting the CPU's 92nd percentile and GPU's 44th percentile. This is heavily weighted by the CPU's exceptional performance.

Q: What PSU is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A380 is 250 W. However, the i9-13900K has a 125 W TDP, so a system with both components would require more power, though the database only specifies the GPU's 250 W recommendation.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The A380's 44th percentile GPU ranking and 6 GB memory will struggle to sustain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. The i9-13900K's single-thread score of 1187 (3DMark) ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU caps performance well below high-refresh thresholds in demanding games. Esports titles may reach competitive frame rates at lower settings.

Streaming: The i9-13900K's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 indicating strong encoding throughput. The A380's limited gaming performance means streaming at high quality while gaming will be constrained by the GPU, not the CPU.

Video editing: Excellent. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 58589 and data compression score of 793645 accelerate video encoding, rendering, and export tasks. The A380's GPU compute score of 2762 is adequate for basic effects but will not accelerate heavy GPU-accelerated workflows significantly.

3D rendering: The i9-13900K excels at CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20740 and Geekbench multi-core of 22820. The A380's 1024 shading units and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 provide entry-level GPU rendering capability, but the 6 GB memory limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache speed up compilation, testing, and virtualization. PassMark integer math score of 207792 and extended instructions score of 46477 support heavy compute workloads. The A380 provides sufficient display output for multi-monitor setups, though GPU-accelerated development tools will run at lower performance.

Student and office work: Overkill but effective. The i9-13900K's single-thread performance (Geekbench 2628) ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, while the A380's 610 PassMark G2D score handles 2D desktop workloads without issue. Power consumption may be higher than necessary for basic tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The i9-13900K supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory available — this flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the motherboard must support at least PCIe 4.0 for full GPU bandwidth.

The most sensible upgrade path is replacing the Arc A380 with a higher-performance GPU. The i9-13900K's 92nd percentile CPU ranking means it will not bottleneck any modern GPU, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs for next-generation graphics cards. The A380's 250 W suggested PSU indicates the current power supply is sized for a low-power GPU; upgrading to a higher-tier GPU will likely require a more capable PSU, though the database does not specify the CPU's PSU requirement beyond its 125 W TDP.

The CPU itself is at the top of its platform generation, so upgrading the CPU would require a motherboard change to a newer socket. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance, though the 5.80 GHz boost clock already provides near-maximum stock speeds. The 36 MB L3 cache is generous and will not become a limiting factor for most workloads. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so memory upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard, provided the chosen board supports the desired memory type.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900K, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) graphics card. The CPU is a top-tier desktop part at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a lower-midrange part at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 68 reflects a system that is exceptionally strong for CPU-bound workloads but below average for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

The i9-13900K, with its 125 W TDP, 5.80 GHz boost clock, and 36 MB L3 cache, is a workstation-class processor suitable for content creation, development, and heavy multitasking. The Arc A380, with its 75 W TDP, 6 GB GDDR6 memory, and 1024 shading units, is a basic graphics solution for display output and light gaming. This pairing makes sense only for users whose primary workload is CPU-bound and who need minimal GPU capability. For gaming or GPU compute, the A380 represents a severe bottleneck that negates the i9-13900K's substantial performance advantages.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds