SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the Intel Arc A310E represents an extreme mismatch of capabilities. This is a desktop build where the CPU is a top-tier performer while the GPU is a low-power, entry-level component. The benchmark data shows a combined percentile of 71, but this figure obscures a massive performance gulf between the two main components. The i9-13900K is a 24-core processor that can handle the heaviest multi-threaded workloads, while the Arc A310E is an end-of-life, 75 W graphics card with 4 GB of VRAM. This analysis will break down the individual capabilities of each component, what they mean for real-world tasks, and how this pairing performs in gaming and professional applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is the flagship of the Raptor Lake generation, built on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It is a desktop-class processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that allows it to excel in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks. The base clock of 3.00 GHz can boost up to 5.80 GHz, providing exceptional responsiveness in single-threaded applications. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for keeping data close to the cores during complex calculations.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, it scores 38271.5 points, a figure that demonstrates its immense capability for rendering and video encoding. Its single-core score of 2238.5 in the same benchmark suite is also very strong, ensuring snappy performance in everyday applications and games that rely on a few fast cores. The data shows a Geekbench multi-core score of 22820 and a single-core score of 2628, reinforcing its position as a top-tier processor.

The average benchmark score of 61766 places it in a close competition with its direct rivals. The data shows it is only 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636. It sits 0.1% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and the Intel Core i9-13900KF. This indicates that within its performance class, the i9-13900K is at the very top, with only marginal differences separating it from its nearest competitors. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not be the limiting factor in a system. In PassMark tests, the multi-thread score of 58589, integer math score of 207792, and floating-point math score of 151562 indicate a processor that can chew through scientific simulations, financial modeling, and software compilation without breaking a sweat. The data compression score of 793645 further highlights its ability to handle archival and database workloads efficiently.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a stark contrast to the CPU. This is an entry-level GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It uses the DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. It includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is a surprising feature for such a low-power card. The card has a fixed clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost.

Memory capabilities are a major constraint. The A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This small memory pool and narrow bus will severely limit performance in modern games and any graphical workload with large textures. The motherboard data shows a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs but is not the full x16 connection that higher-end cards use. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it has the software feature set to run modern titles, but the hardware is physically constrained.

Compute performance is modest, with an FP32 rating of 3.072 TFLOPS and an FP16 rating of 6.144 TFLOPS. This puts it in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it is exactly average in the grand scheme of graphics cards. However, that average is heavily skewed by the fact that the GPU is end-of-life and has a TDP of just 75 W. It does not require external power connectors and is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length. The data suggests this is a card designed for basic display output or low-power embedded systems, not for high-end gaming or rendering. The pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s are the hard limits for fill-rate-bound tasks. With no measured GPU benchmark scores available, the analysis must rely on these specifications and the percentile ranking to estimate its performance tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance in this system is unequivocally skewed toward the CPU. The i9-13900K is a processor with an average benchmark score of 61766, placing it in the 92nd percentile. The Arc A310E sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a scenario where the CPU will almost always be idle while waiting for the GPU to complete its tasks in graphics-intensive applications.

In gaming, the bottleneck will be the GPU in virtually every scenario. The CPU has the raw speed to feed frames faster than the A310E can render them. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will also cause significant stuttering and texture pop-in at higher resolutions. In CPU-bound tasks such as data encryption (PassMark score of 46609) or random string sorting (PassMark score of 87705), the CPU will operate at its full potential, but the GPU will remain largely unused. For workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU can handle the physics and geometry calculations, but the final frame rendering on the GPU will be slow. The combined percentile of 71 reflects the average of these two disparate components, but it does not accurately represent the experience of using this system. The data shows that the system is only as fast as its weakest link, and in this case, the GPU is the definitive limiting factor for any graphics work or gaming.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900K a good processor for professional work?

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows it has a multi-core score of 38271.5 in Cinebench R23 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 58589, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. This indicates it is excellent for rendering, video editing, and software compilation.

Q: What is the memory configuration of this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. However, its low overall performance and 4 GB of VRAM will severely limit its ability to run ray-traced games at playable frame rates.

Q: What is the power requirement for the GPU?

A: The Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 W and does not require any external power connectors. The suggested PSU for a system including this GPU is 250 W.

Q: How does the i9-13900K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The data shows it is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and the Intel Core i9-13900KF.

Q: What kind of display outputs does the Arc A310E have?

A: The Arc A310E has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, allowing for multiple high-resolution displays.

Q: What is the production status of the Arc A310E?

A: The production status is listed as "End-of-life," and its successor is "Battlemage."

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance for this pairing is defined by the CPU's dominance and the GPU's modest standing. The CPU's average benchmark score is 61766, which is in the 92nd percentile. Specific scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 and a single-core score of 2238.5. In Geekbench, it scores 22820 multi-core and 2628 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 58589 and a single-thread score of 4608.

The GPU has a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs, and the data shows no specific benchmark scores are available for it. This lack of data makes the GPU's performance comparative to a baseline average. The combined percentile for the system is 71. The CPU is a clear top-tier performer, while the GPU is a mid-pack component that will drag down any graphics-related benchmark. When looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the margin is razor-thin; the i9-13900K is essentially tied with the Core i9-13900T and the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus. This means that in CPU-only benchmarks, the system will perform at the highest level. However, in any combined workload that engages the GPU, the system will fall to the level of the A310E, which is in the 50th percentile. The combined picture is a system that can do heavy CPU work very quickly but is stuck with average graphics performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications. In gaming, the Intel Core i9-13900K will provide a massive performance ceiling. Its high single-thread score of 4608 in PassMark and 2238.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not bottleneck any current game. However, the Intel Arc A310E will be the limiting factor.

Given the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and its specifications—specifically the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth—frame rates at 1080p in modern titles will likely be low. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS is a fraction of what is needed for high-refresh-rate gaming. Expect playable frame rates only in older or less demanding titles, or at reduced settings. At 1440p or 4K, the 4 GB VRAM will be insufficient, causing severe performance degradation. The GPU’s 6 ray tracing cores will allow for ray tracing to be enabled, but the raw compute power is too low to deliver a smooth experience. The CPU can support high frame rates, but the GPU will cap them well below what the CPU is capable of. This system is not suitable for modern competitive gaming or AAA titles at high settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Core i9-13900K uses this socket and supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, allowing for a future high-speed GPU or NVMe drive. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The first and most impactful upgrade for this system would be the graphics card. The CPU is powerful enough to support a significantly faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 W and a suggested PSU of 250 W, meaning the power supply in a system with this card is likely small. Upgrading the GPU to a more powerful model will require a commensurate PSU upgrade, as the current 250 W suggestion is only for the A310E. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, which is manageable for most mid-range coolers. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but a user looking to upgrade memory will need to ensure they have the correct motherboard variant. A sensible next upgrade is a more powerful GPU, followed by a PSU to support it, as the CPU has years of headroom left.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a flagship 13th Gen Intel Core processor with an entry-level Intel Arc graphics card. The CPU is the star of the show, with 24 cores and a 5.80 GHz boost clock, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, in contrast, is an end-of-life product in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This is a fundamentally unbalanced system. The combined percentile of 71 is a statistical average that masks the reality of its performance. It is a system that will excel in CPU-intensive tasks like code compilation, 3D modeling (CPU side), and heavy multitasking, but it will fail to provide a satisfactory experience in GPU-intensive tasks like modern gaming or GPU rendering. The build class is desktop, and it is a pairing that makes sense only for a user who needs extreme CPU power and only basic display output.

Who Should Build It

This specific CPU and GPU pairing targets a niche user: someone who needs the maximum multi-threaded processing power for non-graphical workloads but only requires basic graphics capabilities. The target user could be a developer who compiles large codebases and runs many virtual machines, where the CPU’s 32 threads and high PassMark multi-thread score of 58589 are critical. Students in computer science or engineering fields could benefit from the CPU’s power for simulations, while the GPU handles standard desktop tasks and 2D applications.

Small business workstations that handle data compression (score of 793645) or encryption (score of 46609) would see massive benefits from the CPU. However, this is not a system for gamers. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 50th percentile ranking mean that gaming at 1080p will be limited to low settings on older titles. Content creators who work with video editing will find the CPU acceleration in encoding helpful, but the GPU will struggle with effects and rendering. This build is for the user who prioritizes raw compute power over everything else and needs a display output for basic productivity, not for rendering or gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds