SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, drawing a TDP of 125 W. The processor includes a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel memory bus, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is unlocked, and the processor was released in September 2022 with a launch MSRP of $589.

Benchmark scores for this CPU place it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61,766. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T, scores 61,723, a delta of just 0.1%, making the two essentially performance twins. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and Core i9-13900KF both score slightly higher at 61,834 and 61,841 respectively (each -0.1% delta), while the Intel Xeon 636 trails at 61,360 (0.7% delta). The data indicates the 13900K sits at the very top of its competitive tier, with differences that are within measurement noise against its closest peers.

Looking at threaded scaling, the 3DMark results show a clear progression: 2,355 for 2 threads, 4,648 for 4 threads, 8,520 for 8 threads, 11,201 for 16 threads, and 15,509 for max threads. Single-thread score is 1,187. This scaling curve shows strong gains through 16 threads, with diminishing but still positive returns at max thread count. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 38,271.5, while single-core hits 2,238.5; the R20 results are 20,740 multicore and 2,927 single-core. Geekbench multicore is 22,820 and single-core is 2,628. PassMark multithread is 58,589, with integer math at 207,792, floating-point math at 151,562, data compression at 793,645, and data encryption at 46,609. Extended instructions score 46,477, and random string sorting is 87,705. These numbers reveal a processor that excels in both latency-sensitive single-thread tasks and massively parallel workloads, with the 32 threads providing substantial throughput for multi-threaded rendering and compilation.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the 13900K's single-thread performance — a Geekbench single-core score of 2,628 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,187 — ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly. However, the paired GPU (discussed later) will dominate gaming outcomes, so this scenario is limited by graphics rather than the processor.

Streaming and content creation workloads benefit from the 32 threads and high cache. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 indicates that game capture, encoding, and broadcast overlays can run concurrently without starving the main game thread. The 36 MB L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve relies heavily on multi-core throughput. The 3DMark max-thread score of 15,509 and PassMark multithread score of 58,589 suggest strong timeline scrubbing and export performance. The 13900K's performance is nearly identical to the 13900T (0.1% delta) and slightly ahead of the Xeon 636 (0.7% delta), making it a top-tier choice for this workload.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools is a pure multi-core exercise. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20,740 and R15 multicore score of 5,805.5 place this CPU at the upper echelon. The data shows near-parity with the 13900KF (-0.1% delta), meaning those who need rendering speed without integrated graphics could save on the KF variant, but the 13900K itself delivers the same compute muscle.

Software development involves both compile-time parallelism and single-threaded editor responsiveness. The PassMark integer math score of 207,792 and data encryption score of 46,609 indicate strong cryptographic and hashing performance for build tools. The 2,628 Geekbench single-core score keeps IDE interactions smooth. The 92nd percentile overall ranking confirms the processor handles the mixed parallel-serial nature of code compilation and analysis.

For student and office work, the 13900K is vastly over-provisioned. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,355 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,608 are more than sufficient for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output without a discrete GPU, though the system under review pairs it with a discrete card. The high TDP of 125 W is wasted on light workloads, but for a benchmark database perspective, the CPU's capabilities far exceed office requirements.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61,766 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the 13900T (61,723, +0.1% delta), and it is effectively tied with the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61,834, -0.1%) and 13900KF (61,841, -0.1%). The Xeon 636 trails at 61,360, which is a 0.7% deficit. This means in any CPU-bound workload, the 13900K is within 1% of its immediate competitors; the performance tier is extremely tight at the top.

The GPU, Intel Arc A310, scores an average of 7,550, placing it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R7 250 at 7,557 (a -0.1% delta), followed by the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 at 7,580 (-0.4% delta). The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,472, which is 1% behind the A310, and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M trails at 7,447 (1.4% delta). The A310's individual scores include PassMark G3D at 5,433, Geekbench OpenCL at 30,607, and Geekbench Vulkan at 28,964. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 31, 33, and 29 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 69. The GPU compute score is 2,157, and the G2D score is 625.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 66th overall. This is a wide gap: the CPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile. The combined picture is a system where the processor is a top-tier performer and the graphics card is an entry-level model, so overall system performance will be heavily constrained by the GPU in graphics-bound tasks. For compute-oriented workloads that use the CPU, the system is exceptional; for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the A310 becomes the limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking for high-bandwidth storage and future GPUs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the system under review pairs the CPU with a discrete Arc A310.

The GPU has a TDP of 30 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 125 W. A typical 500 W power supply would have ample headroom for this pairing; the 200 W suggested PSU for the GPU is very modest, reflecting the A310's low power draw. The A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and requires no power connectors, drawing all power from the motherboard slot. It is a single-slot card with four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU is at the 92nd percentile and could drive a much faster graphics card without becoming a limiting factor. Upgrading from the A310 to a GPU in a higher percentile tier would immediately raise the system's combined percentile from 66. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics cards, though the A310's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is fully supported on this platform. The motherboard socket 1700 is a mature platform, and the 13900K is among the fastest CPUs available for it, so the upgrade path is clean: replace the GPU, keep the CPU.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is someone who needs extreme CPU compute performance but only modest graphics capability. Gamers at 1080p with low graphical settings or esports titles could see decent frame rates, but the A310's 40th percentile ranking means high-refresh gaming at high settings is not realistic. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound tasks — such as code compilation, data compression, or video encoding using Intel Quick Sync — would benefit from the 13900K's 92nd percentile ranking. The 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache handle heavy multi-threaded workloads, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display.

Developers building large software projects will see strong compile times with the PassMark integer math score of 207,792 and multithread score of 58,589. Students and office workers would find this system massively over-specified, but the CPU's single-thread performance (2,628 Geekbench single-core) ensures snappy responsiveness. Small business workstations that run virtualization or database workloads could leverage the 32 threads, though the GPU is underpowered for any graphics-accelerated tasks. The A310's 4 GB of VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for basic display output and light 2D work, but not for modern 3D applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. There are no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows and no pairRankByFps value. All gaming frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Given the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and its 40th percentile ranking, the A310 is positioned in the entry-level segment. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, scores 7,472 (1% behind the A310), which is a well-known 1080p budget card. The A310's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is limited for modern game textures. At 1080p with low or medium settings, the A310 could handle esports titles and older games, but at 1440p or with high/ultra settings, frame rates would be low. The CPU's performance is not the limiting factor in gaming; the GPU is. The combined percentile of 66 reflects this imbalance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61,766.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Arc A310 scores 7,550 on average, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7,557) and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7,472).

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66th overall, reflecting a strong CPU but a weak GPU.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the TDP and suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 30 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this pairing?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows in the data. All gaming frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of an Intel Core i9-13900K with an Intel Arc A310. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) card at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 66th overall. This is a profoundly unbalanced pairing: the CPU is among the fastest available, while the GPU is positioned near the bottom of the performance curve. The system is best described as a high-performance workstation CPU with a basic display adapter, rather than a gaming or graphics workstation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the GPU as the bottleneck for graphics-bound workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 40th percentile means every graphics task will be limited by the A310. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 is 1% behind the GTX 1650, a card that struggles with modern titles at high settings. In gaming, the CPU could easily drive a GPU with 2-3 times the performance, but the A310 holds the system back. For CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering, data processing — the system is exceptional, and the GPU is irrelevant. The balance is workload-dependent: compute-heavy tasks see near-top-tier performance (92nd percentile), while graphics-heavy tasks see bottom-half performance (40th percentile). The combined percentile of 66 reflects this split, showing a system that is neither fully balanced nor entirely mismatched, but heavily skewed toward CPU capability.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, though tensor core count is not listed. The base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is competitive with entry-level discrete cards from several generations ago. The PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 30,607 indicate limited compute capability. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 29 is particularly low, suggesting poor modern API performance. The GPU's average benchmark score of 7,550 places it in the 40th percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7,557, -0.1% delta). The 30 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a low-power solution suitable for basic display output, but for rendering or gaming, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are severe limitations. The ray tracing cores are present but will be of limited use given the overall low compute throughput. The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds