SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900HX paired with the Intel Arc A770M is an all-Intel mobile workstation-class laptop combination: a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX flagship processor sitting at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, matched with a 16 GB Xe-HPG discrete GPU at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing in the database — the fact pack contains no per-game frame rate data — so all gaming discussion below is framed as estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than measured results. The combined percentile of 76 indicates a build whose strength is concentrated on the processor side, with the GPU acting as a competent but mid-tier companion.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 76th percentile when both components are considered together. The CPU alone reaches the 89th percentile versus all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 62nd percentile versus all GPUs, so this is a processor-led configuration.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900HX compare against its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 46098, which places it within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (deltaPct -0.2), and the AMD EPYC 4364P (deltaPct 0.3). Essentially, it trades blows in a statistical dead heat with all four.

Q: How does the Arc A770M compare against its nearest rivals?

A: With an average benchmark score of 18383, the A770M is statistically level with the AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct 0.1), the AMD FirePro D500 (deltaPct -0.8), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (deltaPct 1.1), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct 1.2). The spread across all four rivals is barely more than one percent.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: It is a laptop build. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket — a soldered mobile package — the market segment is listed as Mobile, and the GPU is an integrated-package part with slot width listed as IGP.

Q: Are there measured frame rates for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS entries for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Any frame rate figures discussed are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores.

Q: How much GPU memory does the Arc A770M have, and why does it matter?

A: It has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity is generous for a GPU at the 62nd percentile and supports large textures, high-resolution rendering buffers, and compute workloads with sizable datasets.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the processor?

A: The launch MSRP of the Core i9-13900HX is $668.

Gaming Performance

This section must begin with a caveat that holds for everything that follows: no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so every frame rate statement here is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than a recorded result.

The PassMark G3D score of 11774 is the most useful anchor for gaming expectations. Combined with the 3DMark Steel Nomad DirectX 12 score of 2278, the data indicates a GPU capable of modern AAA titles at 1080p with high settings, where the 62nd-percentile positioning suggests mainstream discrete-GPU performance rather than enthusiast-tier frame rates. The 16 GB of GDDR6 and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth mean texture quality is unlikely to be the limiting factor at 1080p or 1440p — the shader throughput of 4096 shading units and 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 is what sets the ceiling.

The DirectX API breakdown from PassMark is instructive. The DirectX 9 score of 178 is dramatically higher than the DirectX 10 score of 56, the DirectX 11 score of 69, and the DirectX 12 score of 70. Legacy titles running on older APIs appear to run disproportionately well relative to the GPU's overall tier, so older esports-style games and classic titles should be estimated comfortably above the headline percentile, while modern DirectX 12 titles sit at the mainstream level the overall scores imply.

On the CPU side, gaming readiness is not in question. The single-thread score of 1102 in 3DMark and 4081 in PassMark single-thread, plus a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2056, indicate strong per-core performance that will not bottleneck frame pacing in the vast majority of games. The passmark_physics score of 2645 supports the same conclusion for physics-heavy engines. Estimated takeaway: smooth 1080p gaming with high settings across most current titles, older-API games running exceptionally well, and ray tracing viable but at reduced settings given the 32 RT cores in a mid-tier GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm process under the Raptor Lake-HX codename, with a die size of 257 mm². It is a mobile part soldered to the Intel BGA 1964 socket, but its specification sheet reads like a desktop flagship: a 2.20 base clock, a 5.40 boost clock, and 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is deep — 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 — which matters for workloads with large working sets such as compilation, simulation, and video scrubbing.

The benchmark profile tells a clear two-part story. Single-thread results (3DMark 1102, Cinebench R15 at 296, R20 at 2094, R23 at 2056, PassMark 4081) show the 5.40 GHz boost translating into excellent per-core throughput — this is a CPU that makes lightly threaded applications feel fast. Multi-thread results scale hard from there: the 3DMark thread scaling runs from 2143 at 2 threads, to 4012 at 4, 6857 at 8, 8929 at 16, and 11738 at maximum threads. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 27900, R20 reaches 14836, and R15 reaches 4494.5.

That scaling curve is nearly linear through the 8-thread mark and continues gaining substantially through 16 threads and beyond, which is the signature of a heterogeneous big-core-plus-efficiency-core design being fed well. Practically, this means software that parallelizes across many cores — rendering, encoding, batch simulation — extracts close to full value from the 32 threads. The PassMark suite reinforces the compute breadth: integer math at 156175, floating point at 110470, extended instructions at 30550, data compression at 531224, encryption at 32130, string sorting at 59199, and an overall multithread score of 43062.

The average benchmark score of 46098 places the chip at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, and the rival table shows it statistically indistinguishable from far newer silicon — the Core Ultra 5 235 and the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 both sit within 0.1 percent. For a mobile part, matching current-generation competitors in aggregate score is a strong result. Memory support spans DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with ECC support available — unusual for a consumer mobile chip and relevant for workstation use. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, and the multiplier is unlocked, though the soldered BGA package makes that a curiosity rather than a practical lever in most laptops.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The CPU will not be the obstacle: single-thread scores of 1102 (3DMark) and 4081 (PassMark) plus a physics score of 2645 mean frame generation headroom is ample. The GPU at the 62nd percentile sets the ceiling. Estimated from the scores, competitive titles — especially anything running older DirectX APIs, where the PassMark DirectX 9 result of 178 stands out — are the best fit for high-refresh play, while modern AAA games should be targeted at 1080p high settings.

Streaming. This is one of the strongest scenarios for the pairing. The maximum-thread 3DMark score of 11738 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 27900 leave substantial CPU headroom for encoding alongside gameplay, and the 16 GB of GPU memory can absorb the compositor's frame buffers without starving the game. The data indicates a machine that can stream while gaming without the CPU buckling.

Video editing. The 32 threads, 36 MB of shared L3, DDR5 support, and 512.0 GB/s of GPU bandwidth make a solid editing case. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89494 and Vulkan compute score of 74422 indicate usable GPU acceleration for timeline effects and export pipelines, while the CPU's 4494.5 Cinebench R15 multi-core result handles CPU-side encoding. The 62nd-percentile GPU means GPU-accelerated exports are mainstream-tier rather than flagship-tier.

3D rendering. The CPU side is excellent for CPU renderers: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 27900 places it near the top of mobile parts and level with the EPYC 4364P in aggregate score — a server-branded rival, which says something about this chip's throughput. GPU rendering is more modest; the 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores deliver capability, but the 62nd percentile caps expectations for path tracing and heavy viewport work.

Software development. Compilation is one of the best-matched workloads in the dataset. The near-linear thread scaling through 8 threads and continued gains to the 11738 maximum-thread score mean large codebases build quickly, and the 4081 single-thread score keeps IDEs and debuggers responsive. ECC memory support adds a reliability angle for long-running test infrastructure.

Student and office work. Frankly, this pairing is overkill for documents and browsing, but the data shows why it still excels: browser workloads are single-thread-bound, and a 2056 Cinebench R23 single-core score means snappy everyday responsiveness. Students in engineering or media programs get a machine that handles coursework compute — the passmark_floating_point_math score of 110470 and extended instruction score of 30550 cover simulation and statistics coursework with room to spare.

Benchmark Performance

Walking through the complete score set establishes the picture precisely. On the CPU side, 3DMark CPU tests: 1102 single-thread, 2143 two-thread, 4012 four-thread, 6857 eight-thread, 8929 sixteen-thread, 11738 maximum-thread. Cinebench: 296 single / 4494.5 multi in R15, 2094 single / 14836 multi in R20, 2056 single / 27900 multi in R23. PassMark: 43062 multithread, 4081 single-thread, plus the individual subtests cited above and a physics score of 2645.

The CPU average benchmark score is 46098, placing it at the 89th percentile versus all CPUs. The nearest rivals cluster within a third of a percent in either direction — the Core Ultra 5 235 at 46062, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46030, the Ryzen AI 5 440G at 46187, and the EPYC 4364P at 45970 — meaning aggregate CPU performance is effectively identical across this entire group despite spanning different vendors and market segments.

On the GPU side, the scores are: 2278 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DirectX 12, 89494 Geekbench OpenCL, 74422 Geekbench Vulkan, 11774 PassMark G3D, 4778 PassMark GPU compute, 711 G2D, and the DirectX API subtests of 178 (DX9), 56 (DX10), 69 (DX11), and 70 (DX12). The GPU average benchmark score is 18383 at the 62nd percentile, with rivals — RX 460 at 18373, FirePro D500 at 18533, Radeon Pro 5700 at 18189, RTX 3060 Mobile at 18159 — all within 1.2 percent.

The combined picture is a 76th-percentile build. The arithmetic is simple: an 89th-percentile CPU dragging a 62nd-percentile GPU upward. This is a throughput-tilted configuration where compute and parallel workloads shine and pure graphics throughput is the more ordinary half.

Who Should Build It

Because this is a laptop-class, soldered pairing, "build" here means choosing a machine that houses it — but the target-user logic is the same. The data points to several clear fits. Content creators who stream or edit video are the primary audience: the 27900 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 11738 maximum-thread 3DMark score provide encode-and-render headroom, while the 16 GB GPU memory keeps timeline buffers comfortable. Developers — particularly those compiling large codebases — benefit from the same multi-core scaling and the top-tier single-thread result of 4081; the ECC support extends relevance to small workstations running long verification jobs.

Engineers and students in compute-heavy fields get a portable machine whose CPU scores match a server-segment rival, the EPYC 4364P, within 0.3 percent — an unusually strong showing for mobile silicon. Gamers are a secondary audience: 1080p high-settings play is the estimated sweet spot given the 62nd-percentile GPU, with the notable exception of older-API titles where the PassMark DirectX 9 score of 178 suggests exceptional performance. Anyone whose primary workload is GPU-bound — heavy ray tracing, high-resolution AAA gaming, GPU path tracing — should temper expectations, because the 32 RT cores and 16.79 TFLOPS are mid-tier numbers regardless of the CPU's strength.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story is constrained by design. The Intel BGA 1964 socket is soldered, so there is no CPU swap path — the machine's processor is fixed. Memory is the main lever: the chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, so a configuration shipped with slower memory has genuine headroom via DDR5, and ECC support gives workstation buyers a memory reliability option. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes is forward-looking connectivity for this segment, relevant to external enclosures and fast storage in machines that expose it.

The GPU is likewise fixed — the Arc A770M is an integrated-package mobile part with IGP slot classification and no power connectors. On power: the CPU TDP is 55 W and the GPU TDP is 120 W, so the chassis must dissipate a combined load approaching those figures under simultaneous CPU+GPU stress; cooling capacity, not the spec sheet, will determine sustained performance. A sensible next upgrade is therefore a whole-platform one: given that the GPU sits at the 62nd percentile while the CPU holds the 89th, a successor machine pairing this class of CPU with a GPU in the 80th percentile or above would correct the imbalance. The Arc A770M is listed as end-of-life, which reinforces that the GPU half of this pairing is a closing chapter rather than a platform to extend.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class, all-Intel pairing: a Raptor Lake-HX mobile flagship and an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 mobile discrete GPU, both manufactured on different nodes — the CPU on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die, the GPU on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 406 mm² die carrying 21,700 million transistors at 53.4M per mm². The tier, per the percentiles, is upper-mainstream overall: 76th percentile combined, built from an 89th-percentile CPU and a 62nd-percentile GPU. The internal graphics — UHD Graphics 770 — exists as a fallback for low-power operation, but the Arc A770M with its 4096 shading units and 16 GB frame buffer is the intended graphics engine. In class terms, this was positioned as a mobile workstation and enthusiast laptop configuration, and the benchmark data supports exactly that framing: near-desktop CPU throughput with mainstream discrete GPU graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous. In any workload where the GPU does the heavy lifting — gaming at higher settings, GPU rendering, GPU compute — the Arc A770M at the 62nd percentile is the limiter, and the 89th-percentile CPU spends much of its time waiting. The evidence sits in the score gap: the CPU's average benchmark score of 46098 towers over the GPU's 18383, and while those scales aren't directly comparable, the percentile spread of 27 points is. In gaming terms, the estimated frame rate ceiling is set by the 11774 PassMark G3D score and the 2278 Steel Nomad result, not by any CPU metric — the 1102 3DMark single-thread score and 2645 physics score indicate far more CPU headroom than the GPU can consume.

Flip to CPU-bound workloads and the picture inverts. Compilation, CPU rendering, compression, encryption, and general multitasking are fed by a processor whose maximum-thread score of 11738 scales almost linearly from its single-thread base. The 512.0 GB/s of GPU bandwidth and 16 GB of VRAM do keep the GPU from being memory-bottlenecked in the workloads it does handle — bandwidth is not the constraint; raw throughput is. The verdict: a deliberately CPU-weighted configuration, best suited to users whose heaviest work runs on the processor.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A770M is the full-fat Alchemist mobile configuration: the DG2-512 chip with 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units on the Xe-HPG architecture. Clocks run from a 1650 MHz base to a 2050 MHz boost, with memory at 16 Gbps effective on a 256-bit bus — the source of the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth figure. Peak rates are 262.4 GPixel/s and 524.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 compute at 16.79 TFLOPS and FP16 at 33.59 TFLOPS in a 2:1 ratio. Ray tracing is handled by 32 RT cores; tensor cores are not listed for this part, so AI acceleration claims should be treated conservatively.

What the benchmark scores mean for rendering: the Geekbench OpenCL result of 89494 and Vulkan result of 74422 indicate genuinely capable general-purpose compute — the Xe-HPG architecture's compute orientation shows here, and the 21,700 million transistors are being put to work in productivity pipelines. The 4778 PassMark GPU compute score and 2278 Steel Nomad score, however, frame the gaming and real-time rendering tier as mainstream. API support is modern and complete — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 — so software compatibility is not a concern. Production status is end-of-life, and the rival table places it level with the RTX 3060 Mobile at a 1.2 percent delta, which is the most honest one-line summary of where this GPU sits: a mid-tier mobile part whose 16 GB memory and strong compute scores punch above its gaming percentile, exactly the profile that makes this pairing better suited to creation workloads than to pure frame-rate chasing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds