SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop platform built around Intel’s top-tier mobile silicon and a discrete Arc-series graphics processor. The Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 2.20 GHz base clock and a 5.40 GHz boost clock, while the Arc A730M is an Alchemist-generation GPU with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The combination sits at the 87th percentile for all tested CPU+GPU pairings, indicating a high-end mobile system. Note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all gaming discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than from direct frame-rate testing.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900HX is built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It offers 24 cores and 32 threads, which breaks down into performance and efficiency core groups, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact hybrid configuration. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This is a mobile processor, socketed as Intel BGA 1964, with a 55 W TDP, making it a high-power part intended for large gaming laptops or mobile workstations.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1102 in single-thread to 2143 in 2-thread, 4012 in 4-thread, 6857 in 8-thread, 8929 in 16-thread, and 11738 in max-thread tests. The jump from 8 to 16 threads shows a gain of about 30%, while the max-thread score is roughly 71% higher than the 16-thread result, indicating that the scheduler and power delivery can feed all 24 cores effectively. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 4494.5 versus 296 single-core, R20 multicore hits 14836 versus 2094 single-core, and R23 multicore reaches 27900 versus 2056 single-core. The R23 multicore score is over 13 times the single-core score, which is typical for a high-core-count part but still demonstrates strong scaling.

Passmark tests provide additional workload-specific data. Integer math scores 156175, floating-point math scores 110470, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 30550. Data compression is particularly strong at 531224, while data encryption scores 32130. Random string sorting scores 59199. The multithread score is 43062, and the single-thread score is 4081. The average benchmark score across all tests is 46098, placing this CPU in the 89th percentile of all processors in the database. Its nearest rivals are separated by less than one percent: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030 (0.1% lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 46187 (0.2% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0.3% lower). This means the 13900HX is effectively tied with those parts on average, despite being a mobile chip facing desktop and newer mobile contenders.

For real workloads, the 36 MB L3 cache helps with games and database-style tasks, while the 32 threads handle heavily parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The 5.40 GHz boost clock provides strong single-thread performance for lightly threaded applications, evidenced by the 2056 R23 single-core score. The 55 W TDP is a constraint in thin chassis, but in a laptop designed for this chip, sustained performance should be close to the benchmark scores. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support available, which is unusual for a mobile part and suggests workstation-oriented laptops could use this CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4081 in Passmark and 2056 in Cinebench R23 single-core are strong enough to feed high-refresh displays in esports titles, while the 24-core design ensures background tasks do not interfere. The 89th percentile CPU ranking means this processor will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, though the GPU (84th percentile) will likely cap frame rates in graphically intense games.

Streaming: With 32 threads, the 13900HX can handle game capture, encoding, and broadcasting simultaneously. The Passmark data compression score of 531224 suggests fast handling of stream buffers, and the multithread score of 43062 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding on the CPU if the GPU is busy. The Arc A730M also supports hardware encoding, so streamers have flexible options.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore at 27900 and Passmark floating-point math at 110470 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the 12 GB GPU memory on the Arc A730M assists with GPU-accelerated effects. The 89th percentile CPU ranking puts this in the top tier for mobile video editing.

3D rendering: The max-thread 3DMark score of 11738 and R20 multicore score of 14836 show that the 13900HX can handle CPU-based rendering workloads like Blender or V-Ray. The 32 threads will scale well across multiple frames, and the 55 W TDP, while high for mobile, is manageable in a large chassis. The GPU’s 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance also contributes to GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 32 threads and high integer math score of 156175. The Passmark extended instructions score of 30550 indicates good SIMD throughput for code that uses AVX. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses during large builds, and the 89th percentile ranking means faster builds than the vast majority of laptops.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance is more than adequate for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The Passmark single-thread score of 4081 is above average, and the 24 cores mean multitasking across dozens of browser tabs, office documents, and communication apps will not cause slowdowns. The 55 W TDP is the only downside, as it implies a heavier laptop and shorter battery life compared to low-power ultraportables, but the performance headroom is substantial.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The Arc A730M’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732 and its 84th percentile GPU ranking suggest it performs between a desktop Radeon Pro 5500 XT (0.5% higher average) and a mobile GeForce RTX 5090 (1% lower average), which gives a rough frame-rate envelope.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU’s 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, likely averaging 60-90 FPS in AAA games and well over 144 FPS in esports titles, given the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2056 in R23. At 1440p, the 12 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus become more relevant; expect 50-75 FPS in demanding titles, with the GPU becoming the primary limiter. At 4K, the A730M will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in recent AAA games, likely falling to 30-45 FPS, as the 336 GB/s bandwidth is modest for 4K textures. The CPU is not the bottleneck in any of these scenarios; the 89th percentile CPU ranking means it will keep up with the GPU’s output.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 is a modern DX12 test, so games using DX12 should see performance close to the GPU’s relative ranking. For older DX11 titles, the Arc architecture may require driver overhead, but the Vulkan score of 64693 and OpenCL score of 70352 suggest good compute performance for games that use async compute. The 24 RT cores and 3072 shading units provide hardware ray tracing, though the 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 limits ray tracing to lighter effects rather than full RT at high resolutions.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets gamers who want a laptop that can handle 1080p ultra settings and 1440p high settings, with the CPU ensuring no frame dips in CPU-bound scenes. The 24-core processor is overkill for gaming alone, but it appeals to content creators who also game: video editors will use the 27900 R23 multicore score for exports, and 3D artists will leverage the 32 threads for rendering while the Arc GPU handles viewport acceleration. Software developers building large codebases will benefit from the 156175 integer math score and 36 MB L3 cache, while also having a capable gaming machine after work hours. Students in engineering or data science programs who run simulations or compile code will find the 89th percentile CPU ranking valuable, though the 55 W TDP means they must accept a heavier laptop. Small business workstations that handle video conferencing, office suites, and occasional rendering tasks will have extreme headroom, but the platform’s power draw is better suited to mobile workstations than thin-and-light office laptops. The 87th combined percentile indicates this is a high-tier system, so it is best for users who need both top-tier CPU throughput and solid discrete GPU performance in a single mobile package.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 13900HX’s average benchmark score is 46098, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030), 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (46187), and 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 4364P (45970).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A730M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A730M includes 24 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, meaning this pairing outperforms 87% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, though it is a mobile BGA socket (Intel BGA 1964), so overclocking is limited by laptop cooling and BIOS support.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The Intel Arc A730M is listed as end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production, though it remains available in existing laptops.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process. The die size is 406 mm² with 21,700 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, along with 24 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The base clock is 1100 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Compute performance is rated at 12.60 TFLOPS for FP32 and 25.19 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and is classified as an integrated graphics package (slot width "IGP"), though it is a discrete mobile GPU. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 70352, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 64693. The average benchmark score is 45592, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384, 0.5% lower), NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972, 0.8% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152, 1% lower), and NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043, 1% higher). This places the A730M in a competitive band with workstation-class GPUs and newer mobile parts, despite being end-of-life.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM is generous for mobile, handling large textures and complex scenes without spilling to system memory. The 336 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, which may limit performance in bandwidth-heavy tasks like 4K texture streaming. The 24 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 means full ray tracing at high resolutions will be challenging; mixed raster/RT workloads are more realistic. The Vulkan score of 64693 suggests good driver support for Vulkan titles, which is relevant for modern games and compute applications. The 80 W TDP is reasonable for a laptop GPU, allowing for a dual-fan cooling solution without excessive noise.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 45592, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. The combined pairing is in the 87th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations. These percentile positions indicate a system that is strong in both processing and graphics, with the CPU slightly ahead of the GPU relative to their respective pools.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 is its most impressive result, rivaling desktop parts from a few generations ago. The single-core R23 score of 2056 is also competitive for mobile. The 3DMark max-thread score of 11738 shows that the 24 cores are well-utilized under heavy multi-threaded loads. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 is a modern DX12 test, and its Geekbench OpenCL score of 70352 indicates strong compute for a mobile part. The Vulkan score of 64693 is notably close to the OpenCL score, suggesting balanced performance across API types.

When viewed together, the CPU’s 89th percentile and GPU’s 84th percentile mean the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is to its own peers. However, the combined 87th percentile shows that the pairing is well-matched: neither component is drastically weaker than the other. The 0.1% to 1% deltas between the GPU and its rivals indicate that the A730M is in a tight performance cluster, so real-world differences between laptops with these GPUs will be small. The CPU’s rivals are also within 0.3%, meaning the 13900HX is essentially tied with the next-best alternatives.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") featuring the Intel Core i9-13900HX processor and Intel Arc A730M GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation mobile part with an 80 W TDP. The combined power draw of approximately 135 W (55 W + 80 W) means this requires a substantial laptop cooling solution, typically found in 16-18 inch chassis or thick 15-inch gaming laptops.

The overall tier is high-end, as evidenced by the 87th combined percentile. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking places it among the fastest mobile processors available, while the GPU’s 84th percentile places it above the majority of mobile GPUs but not at the very top tier (where 90th+ percentile parts would sit). This is a system for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while still wanting a discrete GPU that can handle modern games at 1080p and 1440p. The 12 GB VRAM is above average for mobile, providing future-proofing for texture-heavy titles. The platform is not for thin-and-light users, given the power draw, but it is well-suited for a desktop-replacement laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are reasonably balanced, but the data shows the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU’s 89th percentile versus the GPU’s 84th percentile means that in CPU-bound workloads (compilation, video encoding, spreadsheet calculations), the system will perform better than in GPU-bound workloads (high-resolution gaming, GPU rendering). The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 is a top-tier result, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1732 is mid-to-high tier.

In gaming, the bottleneck will be the GPU at resolutions above 1080p. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2056 (R23) is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s 336 GB/s bandwidth and 12.60 TFLOPS will be the limiting factor. The 12 GB VRAM is not a bottleneck at 1080p or 1440p, but at 4K with ultra textures, it may approach capacity. In non-gaming workloads, the CPU is the star: the 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache handle multi-threaded tasks with ease, while the GPU’s compute (70352 OpenCL) assists in GPU-accelerated applications like Premiere Pro or Blender.

The FPS scaling is not measured, but based on the percentile gap, expect the CPU to wait for the GPU in most gaming scenarios. For productivity, the CPU will be the primary driver, with the GPU accelerating specific tasks. The 0.5% delta between the A730M and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT suggests that gaming performance will be similar to that workstation GPU, which is known for solid 1080p performance but not high-refresh 1440p. The 1% delta from the RTX 5090 Mobile is interesting because that is a newer, higher-tier GPU, but the A730M’s 12 GB VRAM may help it in VRAM-heavy titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile (soldered) socket, so the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the motherboard or the entire laptop. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled. This means a user can choose either memory type at purchase, but cannot switch later without a new motherboard. The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides high bandwidth for future NVMe SSDs or external GPU enclosures, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU has a 55 W TDP and the GPU has an 80 W TDP, so the system’s power delivery is designed for a combined load around 135 W plus other components. The FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU for this laptop, but the power draw implies a large AC adapter (typically 200-280 W for a laptop with these components). The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it will not receive new driver optimizations in the long term, but the CPU is still active and will receive support. The platform’s upgrade path is limited to memory (up to the maximum supported by the chipset) and storage (via PCIe Gen 5). A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the 36 MB L3 cache and 32 threads will benefit from more system RAM for large workloads. For the GPU, there is no upgrade path in the same laptop, but a future laptop with a newer Arc or NVIDIA GPU would be the next step. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it will remain competitive for several years, so the primary upgrade driver would be GPU performance rather than CPU performance. The platform is best treated as a fixed configuration, with upgrades limited to storage and memory, and the next logical step being a full laptop replacement rather than a component swap.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A730M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

Intel Arc A730M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds