SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A370M: A Laptop Pairing Analysis

This build combines Intel's top-tier mobile processor, the Core i9-13900HX, with the entry-level Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The result is a highly unusual laptop configuration where the CPU operates in an entirely different performance class than the GPU. Benchmark data shows the processor ranking in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits in the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This pairing creates a system with exceptional processing power for CPU-bound tasks, but modest graphics capability that will govern the experience in GPU-intensive workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a thermal design power of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This mobile processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and connects to the system via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results paint a picture of extraordinary multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 27,900 points in multi-core and 2,056 points in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly telling: it represents a 1,257% advantage over the single-core score, demonstrating exceptional scaling across the 24 cores. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 14,836 and single-core score of 2,094 follow the same pattern. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a steady progression from 1,102 in single-thread to 11,738 in max-threads, with 16-thread performance reaching 8,929. This scaling curve indicates that the processor maintains efficiency as more cores are engaged, a hallmark of the Raptor Lake-HX architecture.

The PassMark suite reinforces this assessment. The multithread score of 43,062 is substantial, while integer math reaches 156,175 and floating-point math hits 110,470. Data compression scores 531,224, and extended instructions reach 30,550. The single-thread score of 4,081 is competitive for tasks that rely on per-core performance. The processor's average benchmark score of 46,098 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 at 46,062 (0.1% ahead), followed by the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46,030 (0.1% ahead) and the AMD EPYC 4364P at 45,970 (0.3% behind). This clustering shows the Core i9-13900HX sits at the edge of a performance plateau where several modern processors converge.

For real workloads, these numbers translate to exceptional performance in CPU-bound tasks. The 32 threads handle heavily parallel workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in lightly threaded applications, while the large 36 MB L3 cache benefits workloads with repeating data access patterns.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, alongside 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1,550 MHz and a boost clock of 2,050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory runs over a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark data shows the Arc A370M achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673. The average benchmark score of 29,175 places this GPU in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (0.1% behind), the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (0.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (0.6% ahead). Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 is listed as 1% behind, though that result appears anomalous given the RX 6800M's typical performance class. The clustering of these scores suggests the Arc A370M delivers performance comparable to established mid-range desktop GPUs from several generations ago.

The compute capabilities are modest: 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can handle 1080p rendering at moderate settings, but will struggle at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical effects. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, though the limited compute throughput will constrain ray-traced workloads. The 4 GB VRAM is adequate for current games at 1080p with reduced texture quality, but may become a limiting factor in VRAM-intensive applications or future titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU score suggests 1080p gaming at medium settings is realistic for esports titles, but high-refresh 144 Hz gaming at ultra settings is beyond this GPU's capability. The CPU would not be the limiting factor in this scenario.

Streaming: The Core i9-13900HX's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with the 55 W TDP allowing sustained multi-threaded loads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,929 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,900 makes this system highly capable for video editing, particularly for export and rendering tasks that leverage all cores. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will handle effects and timeline rendering at modest resolutions.

3D rendering: The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and 32 threads make it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-based renderers, though the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 156,175 and data compression score of 531,224 indicate rapid code compilation and efficient handling of large codebases. The 36 MB L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock accelerate single-threaded build steps.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4,081 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46,098 places it in the 89th percentile, while the GPU's 29,175 places it in the 74th percentile. This 15-percentile gap means the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance well before the CPU's 32 threads are challenged. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,929 suggests it can feed frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them.

For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, or data processing, the balance shifts entirely. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking becomes irrelevant, and the system performs at the level of the CPU's 89th percentile. The combined percentile of 82 reflects this mixed capability: above average overall, but dragged down by the GPU relative to the CPU. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means precise bottleneck quantification is not possible, but the benchmark scores provide a clear qualitative picture.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900HX achieves an average benchmark score of 46,098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, scores 46,062 (0.1% ahead), while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46,030 (0.1% ahead). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 46,187 (0.2% behind), and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45,970 (0.3% ahead). These margins are negligible, indicating the Core i9-13900HX performs equivalently to these modern alternatives.

The Intel Arc A370M achieves an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (0.1% behind), the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (0.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 (1% ahead). This clustering places the Arc A370M in a narrow performance band with these competitors.

The combined percentile of 82 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects a system that is above average overall but exhibits a significant internal performance disparity. The CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile combine to a weighted average that lands at 82. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. This is a mobile platform, so the upgrade path is limited to the entire laptop. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing flexibility in memory selection, though ECC memory support suggests workstation-oriented use cases.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This interface is more than sufficient for the Arc A370M's bandwidth requirements. The GPU's 35 W TDP is modest, and the CPU's 55 W TDP suggests the total system power draw is manageable for a laptop chassis. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined TDP of 90 W for CPU and GPU indicates a typical laptop power adapter will suffice.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform constraints of a laptop mean the only practical path is a new system. A future laptop with a higher-tier GPU would better complement the Core i9-13900HX class of processor, or a system with a balanced CPU-GPU pairing would avoid the bottleneck seen here. The Arc A370M is marked as end-of-life, and the CPU remains in active production, so the CPU's longevity is not in question, but the GPU's architecture is already superseded.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, reflecting the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile rankings.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900HX compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235?

A: The Core i9-13900HX scores 46,098, which is 0.1% behind the Core Ultra 5 235's score of 46,062.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth of the Arc A370M?

A: The Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory over a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the difference between the CPU's and GPU's percentile rankings?

A: The CPU ranks in the 89th percentile while the GPU ranks in the 74th percentile, a 15-percentile gap that indicates the GPU is the weaker component.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the Core i9-13900HX support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support included.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU remains in active production.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900HX, a 24-core mobile processor from the Raptor Lake generation, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU from the Alchemist architecture. The build class is laptop, indicating this is a mobile configuration. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs makes it one of the most powerful mobile processors available, while the GPU's 74th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 82 places this system above the majority of configurations, though the internal performance disparity is significant.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $668, reflecting its position at the top of Intel's mobile processor stack. The GPU does not have a listed launch MSRP. The Core i9-13900HX features 24 cores and 32 threads with a 5.40 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache, while the Arc A370M offers 1,024 shading units, 8 ray tracing cores, and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. This combination produces a system that excels at CPU-intensive work but delivers modest graphics performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Software developers will benefit from the PassMark integer math score of 156,175 and data compression score of 531,224, which indicate rapid compilation and efficient data handling. Content creators working with video editing will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 27,900 valuable for export and rendering tasks. Students in engineering or scientific fields will appreciate the CPU's 32 threads for simulation and analysis workloads.

Small business workstations handling data processing, financial modeling, or database operations will leverage the CPU's 89th percentile ranking. The ECC memory support adds reliability for critical workloads. Gamers should approach this system with caution: the GPU's 74th percentile ranking supports 1080p gaming at medium settings, but gamers seeking high-refresh or high-detail experiences will be disappointed. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is unnecessary.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for the Intel Core i9-13900HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 29,175 and 74th percentile ranking, the Arc A370M is positioned to handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles. The 4 GB VRAM capacity will require texture quality reductions in VRAM-intensive games. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth may become a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures that frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios will be governed entirely by the GPU's capabilities.

For esports titles and older games, the Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings. For modern AAA games, medium settings at 1080p are the realistic ceiling, with 4 GB VRAM potentially requiring further reductions in texture quality. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for ray-traced effects, but the modest compute throughput suggests ray tracing should be disabled for playable performance. The absence of measured FPS data means these estimates carry inherent uncertainty, but the benchmark scores provide a reasonable foundation for expectations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds