SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm Raptor Lake-HX architecture, paired with the Intel Arc A350M GPU, a 4 GB GDDR6 part based on the Xe-HPG Alchemist design. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct frame-rate testing.

CPU Analysis

The i9-13900HX is a Raptor Lake-HX part with 24 cores and 32 threads, a base clock of 2.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The die measures 257 mm², and the processor is built on Intel's 10 nm process. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is enabled. The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 770. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, and the launch MSRP is $668.

Benchmark data shows a strong multi-threaded presence. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 27900, while single-core reaches 2056. Cinebench R20 multicore is 14836, and single-core is 2094. In Cinebench R15, multicore is 4494.5 and single-core is 296. The 3DMark CPU tests scale predictably with thread count: 16 threads score 8929, 8 threads 6857, 4 threads 4012, 2 threads 2143, and single-thread 1102. The max-thread score is 11738.

PassMark tests reinforce the CPU's strength in integer and floating-point work. Integer math scores 156175, floating-point math 110470, data encryption 32130, data compression 531224, extended instructions 30550, physics 2645, random string sorting 59199, and prime number finding 190. The PassMark multithread score is 43062, with a single-thread score of 4081.

The average benchmark score is 46098, placing the CPU in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Nearest rivals are close: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 46187 (0.2% lower), and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0.3% higher). These deltas are within 0.1–0.3%, indicating the i9-13900HX sits in a tight performance band with these mid-range desktop and mobile processors. The high multi-thread scores suggest strong sustained throughput for rendering, compilation, and scientific workloads, while the single-core score of 2056 in Cinebench R23 indicates capable everyday responsiveness.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU have distinct performance profiles. The CPU's average benchmark score is 46098, which is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, which is in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pair is 80.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546, and the Vulkan score is 24747. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, 0.4% lower), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, 0.8% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% higher). These small deltas mean the GPU performs at a level comparable to a mid-range desktop GPU, but well below the CPU's relative standing.

The combined percentile of 80 reflects a CPU-heavy configuration. The CPU's scores are roughly double the GPU's average in absolute terms (46098 vs 24647), but the percentile gap is moderate (89 vs 70). The combined percentile of 80 suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor for most graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU can handle demanding compute loads.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900HX's socket type?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900HX support?

A: It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support enabled.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The i9-13900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and memory bandwidth?**

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?**

A: The Arc A350M is end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?**

A: The pair ranks in the 80th percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?**

A: The launch MSRP is $668.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The i9-13900HX's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 89th percentile CPU rank, make it suitable for content creators, developers, and small business workstations that handle heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU, with its 70th percentile standing, provides moderate graphics capability, enough for 1080p gaming and lighter GPU-accelerated tasks, but not for high-end visual workloads.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with modest settings will find the CPU headroom and GPU adequate for many titles, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 70th percentile score suggest it will limit performance in modern, VRAM-hungry games. For users whose primary need is CPU-heavy compute, such as data analysis, scientific simulation, or code compilation, the i9-13900HX's 27900 Cinebench R23 multicore score is a strong asset. Students and office workers benefit from the CPU's high single-thread score of 2056 in C3bench R23, which translates to responsive everyday tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed in Intel BGA 1964, which is a mobile platform, so the CPU is not upgradeable in a typical sense. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, both dual-channel, and ECC is available. The platform uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W. The system's power supply headroom is not specified in the data, so no exact PSU wattage can be cited; the combined TDP of 80 W suggests a capable power delivery system.

The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, which allows overclocking if the laptop's BIOS and cooling permit. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning future driver updates and support are limited. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU, but the CPU's socket and integrated graphics make it a solid foundation for a laptop that is already purchased. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, though the laptop's memory slots will dictate which type is usable.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate estimates are derived from benchmark scores. The CPU's high single-thread score (2056 in C3bench R23) and 24 cores suggest it can feed most GPUs, but the Arc A350M's 70th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will limit graphical output. At 1080p with medium settings, the GPU should handle many esports titles and older AAA games, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will likely cause stutter in modern high-VRAM titles.

For 1440p gaming, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are below what would be needed for consistent high-refresh play; the CPU would be idle while the GPU works. The combined 80th percentile indicates a system that is CPU-bound in most workloads, so gaming will be limited by the GPU's compute capacity. Estimates suggest 1080p medium is the practical ceiling, with lower settings required for demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are not balanced. The CPU is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile. The CPU's C3bench R23 multicore score of 27900 is far above the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546, which is a relative measure. In most games and GPU-accelerated workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's 24 cores can feed the GPU with high frame data, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cap the output.

The combined percentile of 80 is closer to the CPU's percentile than the GPU's, indicating the system is CPU-heavy. For workloads like video rendering, the CPU will be the primary performer, while the GPU's OpenCL score will provide only moderate acceleration. For gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck; the CPU will rarely be maxed out, as its multi-thread power is far above what most games use. The lack of measured FPS data means the exact scaling is unknown, but the percentile gap suggests a CPU-bound system with a GPU that will limit high-end visual settings.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: laptop) combining the Intel Core i9-13900HX and the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 89th percentile ranking, and the GPU is a 4 GB GDDR6 Arc A350M with a 70th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 80, placing this pair in the top 20% of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile graphics solution. The overall tier is a high-CPU, mid-GPU laptop suited for compute-heavy tasks and light-to-medium gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 2056 in C3bench R23 and 24 cores will deliver high frame data, but the GPU's 70th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will limit the refresh rates. At 1080p with competitive settings, esports titles will run well, but the GPU will not sustain 144Hz in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and high multi-thread score (27900 in C3bench R23) can handle video encoding alongside gaming. The GPU's lack of dedicated NVENC is not a factor; the CPU can handle the encode workload. The system will stream without severe frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads will process 4K timelines efficiently, and the GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 will assist with previews and effects. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit large effects stacks, but the CPU will be the primary driver.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 makes it a strong performer for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 is moderate, so GPU-render tasks will be slower than on a higher-tier GPU. The combination is adequate for smaller scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 24 cores and high PassMark multithread score (43062) will compile code and run virtual machines efficiently. The GPU is not a factor in development, so this system excels at compilation and testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4081 in PassMark and 2056 in C3bench R23 deliver responsive applications. The GPU is irrelevant for office tasks, but the system's overall high percentile (80) ensures smooth multitasking.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The chip is DG2-128, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors and a die size of 157 mm². The base clock is 1150 MHz, and the boost clock is 2200 MHz. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 6 ray-tracing cores. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, FP32 is 3.379 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1).

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, putting it in the 70th percentile. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546 and Vulkan is 24747. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, 0.4% lower), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, 0.8% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% higher). These small deltas mean the Arc A350M performs in the range of a mid-range desktop GPU, but it is not a high-end part.

The GPU's low VRAM and 64-bit bus limit its memory bandwidth, which will be a bottleneck for high-resolution textures and modern game engines. The ray-tracing cores (6) offer some RT capability, but the GPU's compute power is modest. For rendering tasks, the OpenCL score of 24546 is comparable to a mid-range desktop GPU, but the 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for large 3D scenes or 4K texture sets. The GPU is end-of-life, so no further driver-optimized performance improvements are expected.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds