SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HK

37,425 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900HK + Intel Arc A550M — Mobile Gaming Laptop Benchmark Analysis

This combination pairs Intel’s 14-core Raptor Lake-H flagship mobile processor with Intel’s Arc A550M discrete GPU, a 60 W Xe-HPG part built for thin-and-light gaming laptops. The data shows a system that sits at the 86th percentile across all CPU/GPU pairs, with the CPU delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance while the GPU offers mid-range rasterization and strong compute capabilities. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not lab-tested results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU/GPU pairing, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The Arc A550M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 and OpenCL score of 49894 place it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, which suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with ultra settings achievable in less demanding esports games.

At 1080p ultra, the estimated FPS for AAA titles would likely range from 60 to 90 FPS depending on the game’s optimization for Intel GPUs. The GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are comparable to desktop parts like the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which scores within 0.5% of the A550M in average benchmarks. This indicates the A550M should match or slightly exceed the RX Vega 64’s 1080p performance, meaning roughly 60 FPS in demanding titles and well over 100 FPS in competitive shooters at high settings.

For 1440p, the data suggests a significant drop-off. The 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM will become limiting factors, and estimated FPS at ultra settings would likely fall to 40-55 FPS in most AAA games. The GPU’s 131.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate are modest by current standards, and the 2.6% deltaPct advantage over the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (which scores 48477) does not translate into 1440p dominance because the A550M has half the VRAM and a narrower bus.

At 4K, the A550M is not viable for ultra settings; the data implies sub-30 FPS in most modern titles. The GPU’s 16 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means ray-traced workloads will run at roughly half the frame rate of rasterized scenes. Users targeting high-refresh 1080p gaming will find this pairing adequate, but 1440p high-refresh or 4K gaming is beyond what the benchmark scores support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear CPU-favored balance. The Core i9-13900HK scores at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A550M sits at the 86th percentile among GPUs — nearly identical percentile positions. However, the CPU’s performance headroom is far larger relative to what games need, making the GPU the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads.

Evidence from the Passmark scores supports this: the CPU’s multithread score of 28194 and single-thread score of 3810 are both strong, but gaming FPS scaling is governed by the GPU’s compute throughput. In CPU-bound scenarios like 1080p low-settings esports, the i9-13900HK’s 5.40 GHz boost clock will keep frame rates high, but the A550M’s 8.397 TFLOPS will cap maximum FPS well below what the CPU alone could drive. The deltaPct data shows the A550M is 2.6% slower than the RX 6800 XT, yet that desktop GPU typically pairs with far weaker CPUs without bottlenecking — here, the CPU is overqualified for the GPU.

In productivity workloads, the bottleneck flips. The i9-13900HK’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16025 and Passmark multithread score of 28194 indicate the CPU can saturate the GPU in compute tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 is respectable, but the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads will likely outpace the GPU in parallel integer workloads, as shown by the Passmark integer math score of 94120 versus the GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 ceiling.

The FPS scaling evidence — while estimated — suggests that in gaming, raising resolution from 1080p to 1440p will produce a larger frame rate drop than would occur on a more balanced pairing, because the GPU is already near its memory bandwidth limit (224.0 GB/s) and pixel fill rate (131.2 GPixel/s). Conversely, lowering resolution to 720p will not yield proportional FPS gains because the CPU’s performance is not the constraint.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37425, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H, scores 37522, a deltaPct of -0.3%, meaning the i9-13900HK is essentially tied with that newer part. The Intel Core i5-13600K scores 37685 (0.7% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161 (0.7% behind). This clustering shows the i9-13900HK delivers desktop-class performance in a 45 W mobile package.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49737, at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest competitor, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, scores 49957, a deltaPct of -0.4% — a statistical tie. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (-0.5%), and the RX 6900 XT scores 50951 (-2.4%). The RX 6800 XT scores 48477, meaning the A550M is 2.6% ahead of that desktop card. These comparisons are remarkable because the A550M is a 60 W mobile GPU competing with high-power desktop parts.

Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve an 86th percentile pair rank. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16025 is particularly strong for a mobile chip, and the single-core score of 1843.5 indicates excellent responsiveness. The Passmark single-thread score of 3810 reinforces this. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 and OpenCL score of 49894 are nearly identical, suggesting consistent performance across API boundaries.

The data shows this pairing is not evenly matched for gaming — the CPU is over-specified relative to the GPU — but for mixed workloads (gaming plus productivity), the combination is compelling. The CPU’s 85th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile positions mean neither component is a weak link; the GPU is merely the first to reach its limit in graphics-bound tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HK is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The hybrid architecture pairs performance cores with efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16025 places it firmly in desktop-class territory, while the single-core score of 1843.5 indicates strong IPC and clock headroom. The Passmark multithread score of 28194 and single-thread score of 3810 corroborate this dual strength. Data compression performance (329454) and encryption (19198) are standout numbers, suggesting the CPU handles data-intensive tasks with ease.

The floating-point math score of 68020 and integer math score of 94120 show balanced execution units. The extended instructions score of 19534 indicates robust SIMD throughput, which benefits video encoding and scientific workloads. The find prime numbers score of 110 is low, but that is a legacy benchmark that does not reflect modern workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900HK is effectively tied with the Core Ultra 5 235H (-0.3%) and Core i5-13600K (-0.7%), while leading the Ryzen 7 7735H by 0.7%. This means the i9-13900HK, despite being a mobile part, delivers performance within 1% of desktop mid-range CPUs. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is the key differentiator for single-threaded tasks, giving it an edge in lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office suites, and legacy games.

For real workloads, the data shows the CPU can handle 4K video editing, software compilation, and 3D rendering without breaking a sweat. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with gaming and content creation by reducing memory latency. The dual-channel memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) provides flexibility, though the FACT PACK does not specify memory bandwidth numbers.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the DG2-512 chip, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The transistor density of 53.4M per mm² is moderate by modern standards. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 16 RT cores for ray tracing. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The GPU’s compute throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s are modest figures that align with its 60 W TDP. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, indicating good API efficiency. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern gaming APIs comprehensively.

The 86th percentile ranking means the A550M outperforms the vast majority of GPUs, but its nearest rivals are telling. The RTX 5070 Ti scores within 0.4%, yet that is a high-end desktop card with far more power and memory bandwidth. The A550M achieves parity through raw compute efficiency rather than memory throughput. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is the clear weak point — it is less than half of what the RX 6900 XT offers, yet the A550M is only 2.4% slower in average benchmarks, suggesting the GPU is compute-bound rather than bandwidth-bound in many tests.

For rendering, the data indicates the A550M can handle 1080p gaming at high settings, 1440p at medium settings, and light ray tracing at reduced resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles but will become a constraint as games demand more memory. The 16 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing hardware, but the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits the complexity of ray-traced scenes. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means driver improvements are unlikely to boost performance further, so the benchmark scores represent the ceiling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — the processor cannot be upgraded independently. The GPU is also soldered, so the entire laptop must be replaced for a major upgrade. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU has adequate bandwidth, but the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes are not utilized by the A550M.

Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. The FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacity or speed, but the dual-channel bus is standard for mobile platforms. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, though overclocking in a laptop is thermally constrained by the 45 W TDP. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides fallback display output and hardware encoding support.

The GPU has no suggested PSU rating listed, and the CPU’s TDP is 45 W. The GPU’s TDP is 60 W, so the total system power draw is modest, likely requiring a 150-200 W adapter. The display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning connectivity varies by laptop model. The GPU’s slot width is listed as IGP (integrated graphics processor), confirming it is soldered to the motherboard.

A sensible next upgrade would be a laptop with a newer GPU architecture, given that the A550M is end-of-life and the CPU is already near the top of its class. The CPU’s 85th percentile performance means it will not be the bottleneck in future upgrades — the GPU is the limiting factor. Users could also consider an external GPU enclosure via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the FACT PACK does not provide data on eGPU support.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the estimated FPS of 60-90 in AAA titles and 100+ in esports titles will drive 120 Hz panels adequately, though not 240 Hz. The CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures no CPU-side frame drops, but the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth caps maximum frame rates.

Streaming: The i9-13900HK’s Passmark data compression score of 329454 and encryption score of 19198 indicate strong encoding headroom. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU can offload encoding tasks, while the 14-core CPU handles game and stream simultaneously without significant FPS loss.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16025 and Passmark integer math score of 94120 suggest smooth 4K timeline scrubbing and fast export times. The GPU’s 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 throughput accelerates preview rendering, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit complex effects stacks.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads will dominate CPU-based rendering, with the Cinebench R23 score indicating render times comparable to desktop i5 parts. The GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 supports GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 128-bit memory bus will slow large scene loads.

Software development: The Passmark multithread score of 28194 and single-thread score of 3810 provide fast compilation times and responsive IDE performance. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces context switching overhead in large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3810 and the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking handle spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing effortlessly. The 45 W CPU TDP means long battery life potential, though the GPU’s 60 W TDP will drain battery faster under load.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86th among all CPU/GPU pairs, with the CPU at 85th percentile and GPU at 86th percentile individually.

Q: How does the Arc A550M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The A550M averages 49737 in benchmark scores, while the RTX 5070 Ti averages 49957, a deltaPct of -0.4%, meaning they are statistically tied in average performance.

Q: What does the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16025 mean for gaming?

A: This score indicates the CPU will not bottleneck gaming performance at any resolution, as it exceeds the processing requirements of modern game engines.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, the A550M has 16 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means ray-traced frame rates will be roughly half of rasterized performance.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum speeds or capacities.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor in gaming?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 85th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile rankings are similar, but the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will cap frame rates before the CPU.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Arc A550M is end-of-life, meaning driver updates and optimization are unlikely to improve its benchmark scores further.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-settings play over 1440p or 4K. The estimated 60-90 FPS in AAA titles and 100+ FPS in esports titles make it suitable for competitive gaming at 1080p. Content creators who need strong CPU performance for video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the i9-13900HK’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16025, while the GPU handles real-time previews at moderate resolutions.

Software developers will find the Passmark multithread score of 28194 and single-thread score of 3810 ideal for compilation and testing. Students and office workers will appreciate the CPU’s responsiveness and the GPU’s ability to handle light graphics work without excessive power draw. Small business workstations that run data analysis, virtualization, or CAD software will leverage the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM limits large-scale GPU compute.

The system is not suitable for 4K gaming, high-refresh 1440p, or heavy ray tracing workloads. It is also not ideal for users who require a future-proof GPU, given the end-of-life status. However, for users who need a laptop that excels at CPU-heavy tasks and handles 1080p gaming competently, this pairing delivers a balanced experience with an 86th percentile combined ranking.