SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HK

37,425 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900HK + Intel Arc A350M: A Laptop Duo with a Striking Performance Gap

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier 13th Gen mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, creating a laptop configuration where the CPU is the dominant component by a wide margin. The Core i9-13900HK sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A350M lands at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined build ranks at the 78th percentile overall. This is a machine built around raw processor throughput, with graphics capability that trails significantly behind the CPU's potential, making it well-suited for CPU-intensive professional workloads rather than high-end gaming. The data shows a clear imbalance: this is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level mobile GPU, and understanding that asymmetry is key to evaluating what this system can and cannot do.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900HK uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU itself is not user-upgradeable in any conventional sense. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving laptop manufacturers flexibility in memory configuration, though the exact capacity and speed depend on the specific laptop design. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), which is reserved for the primary discrete GPU or high-speed storage, while the Arc A350M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is more than sufficient for its bandwidth needs given its 112.0 GB/s memory interface.

The power envelope here is instructive: the CPU has a 45 W TDP, while the GPU has a 25 W TDP, for a combined thermal design power of 70 W. This is a modest total for a laptop with an i9-class processor, and it means that the system's power delivery and cooling solution are likely designed around CPU headroom first, with the GPU getting a secondary allocation. There is no suggested PSU listed for the GPU because this is an integrated-class mobile part (labeled "IGP" for slot width), so power supply concerns are not relevant in the desktop sense; the laptop's internal power adapter handles everything. However, the 45 W CPU TDP with a 5.40 GHz boost clock suggests that sustained all-core workloads will push the thermal solution, and the Arc A350M at 25 W is a low-power part that will not add significant thermal stress.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not a CPU swap — that is impossible with BGA 1744 — but rather moving to a different laptop entirely with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it will remain competitive for years, but the GPU's 70th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will become a bottleneck for modern titles. For users who need more graphics headroom, the same CPU paired with a mid-range or high-end discrete GPU (such as a GeForce RTX or Radeon RX class part) would be a logical upgrade path, though that requires a new laptop. Within the existing system, adding more DDR5 memory (if the laptop has available slots or soldered capacity) is the most practical enhancement, as the dual-channel memory controller benefits from higher capacity for multi-tasking and content creation workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The Core i9-13900HK achieves an average benchmark score of 37425, while the Arc A350M averages 24647, a gap of approximately 52% in raw benchmark scores. In the combined build, the CPU is the clear performance leader, and the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-bound workload. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3810 and multi-thread score of 28194 indicate exceptional processing power, while the GPU's Geekbench scores of 24546 (OpenCL) and 24747 (Vulkan) show it is a capable entry-level part but nowhere near the CPU's class.

For CPU-bound workloads — such as data compression (PassMark score of 329454), floating-point math (68020), integer math (94120), and multi-threaded rendering — the i9-13900HK will run at near-full potential, with the GPU playing little to no role. These workloads will show excellent performance that is competitive with the CPU's nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (0.3% lower average score), Intel Core Ultra 5 225F (0.3% higher), Intel Core i5-13600K (0.7% higher), and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (0.7% higher). The CPU is effectively in a dead heat with these parts, all within a 1% band of each other.

For graphics-bound workloads — gaming, 3D rendering, video encoding with GPU acceleration — the Arc A350M becomes the bottleneck. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking means it outperforms roughly 70% of all GPUs, but it is still a 4 GB part with a 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which will limit texture loading and high-resolution performance. In gaming, the CPU will be largely idle while the GPU works at 100%, meaning frame rates will be dictated almost entirely by the Arc A350M's capabilities. The FPS scaling will show diminishing returns: at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU matters more, but at higher resolutions and ultra settings, the GPU saturates and frame rates plateau regardless of CPU headroom.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900HK a good processor for this laptop?

A: Yes, the i9-13900HK is an excellent processor, ranking at the 85th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 37425. It is competitive with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (0.3% lower), Intel Core Ultra 5 225F (0.3% higher), Intel Core i5-13600K (0.7% higher), and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (0.7% higher), making it a top-tier mobile CPU.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350M have, and is it enough?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light creative work, but it will struggle with high-resolution textures and modern AAA titles at high settings, which typically require more than 4 GB.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined build ranks at the 78th percentile overall, which reflects the strong CPU (85th percentile) partially offset by the weaker GPU (70th percentile). The system is well above average for laptops but not a high-end gaming machine.

Q: Can this laptop handle content creation workloads like video editing or 3D rendering?

A: Yes, for CPU-based rendering and encoding, the i9-13900HK's 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16025, provide strong performance. However, GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM, which is below what professional rendering applications typically require.

Q: What is the TDP of each component, and does it affect battery life?

A: The CPU has a 45 W TDP, and the GPU has a 25 W TDP, totaling 70 W for the core components. This is a moderate power draw for a laptop, and battery life will depend on workload; lighter tasks will keep power low, while sustained CPU loads will drain the battery faster.

Q: Does the Arc A350M support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which means it is compatible with the latest games and graphics features, including hardware-accelerated ray tracing via its 6 RT cores.

Q: Is this build suitable for gaming at 1440p or 4K?

A: No, the Arc A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are not adequate for 1440p or 4K gaming at high settings. This GPU is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-low settings, and even then, modern titles will require compromises.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else, particularly those in fields that rely on multi-threaded processing. The i9-13900HK's 14 cores (6 performance and 8 efficiency, implied by the 14-core/20-thread configuration) and 5.40 GHz boost clock make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running simulations, and engineers using CAD or finite element analysis tools. The PassMark data encryption score of 19198 and extended instructions score of 19534 indicate strong cryptographic and vectorized math performance, which benefits security researchers and scientific computing users. Small business workstations that run database queries, virtualization, or heavy spreadsheet models will also see excellent performance from the CPU, as these workloads are largely single-threaded or lightly threaded and the CPU's single-core score of 3810 is top-tier.

Students in computer science, engineering, or data analytics programs will benefit from the CPU's power for compiling, running virtual machines, and executing complex scripts, but they should be aware that the GPU is not designed for gaming or graphics-heavy coursework like 3D modeling. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-based applications — such as audio production, video encoding with x264/x265, or batch photo processing — will find the i9-13900HK exceptionally capable. However, video editors using GPU-accelerated effects in DaVinci Resolve or Adobe Premiere Pro will be limited by the Arc A350M's modest performance and 4 GB VRAM. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the system playable for esports titles and older games, but this is not a gaming laptop by any measure. The target user is someone who needs a portable workstation for CPU-heavy tasks and is willing to accept entry-level graphics as a secondary feature.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, with a die size of 157 mm² and 7,200 million transistors, giving it a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². It has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which is competitive with entry-level discrete GPUs from the previous generation.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a significant limitation: the 64-bit bus and 4 GB capacity are the primary bottlenecks for modern games and GPU-accelerated workloads. The GPU's benchmark scores of 24546 (Geekbench OpenCL) and 24747 (Geekbench Vulkan) place it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 24647. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% higher), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% higher). This places the Arc A350M in the performance range of older desktop GPUs like the RX 590 and GTX 1630, which is respectable for a 25 W mobile part but far from modern mid-range desktop performance.

For rendering workloads, the 6 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, but the limited compute throughput (3.379 TFLOPS FP32) means ray-traced scenes will be slow. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features, but the VRAM capacity will cap texture quality in professional 3D applications. The GPU is end-of-life per its production status, and its 25 W TDP with no power connector suggests it is designed for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is paramount.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and percentile ranking, not direct measurements. The Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24647 and its position at the 70th percentile among all GPUs suggest that it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings for most titles, with frame rates typically in the 30-60 FPS range depending on the game's optimization. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, League of Legends, or Valorant — which are CPU-light and GPU-light — should run at high frame rates, possibly exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p on medium or high settings.

For AAA games at 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated frame rates will be lower, likely in the 20-40 FPS range, as the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors for texture streaming and memory bandwidth. The CPU's exceptional single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1843.5) means that CPU-bound game scenarios will not be a limitation, but the GPU will saturate well before the CPU reaches its limits. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most modern titles, and 4K is not viable for gaming on this GPU. The 6 RT cores enable ray tracing, but enabling it will cut frame rates significantly due to the low compute throughput. The GPU's Vulkan score of 24747 is slightly higher than its OpenCL score of 24546, suggesting good Vulkan driver optimization, which may benefit games using that API.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900HK delivers benchmark scores that place it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37425. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16025 in multi-core and 1843.5 in single-core, while in Cinebench R20 it scores 9548 multi-core and 1347 single-core, and in Cinebench R15 it scores 2398 multi-core and 263 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a single-thread score of 3810, multi-thread score of 28194, data compression of 329454, data encryption of 19198, extended instructions of 19534, find prime numbers of 110, floating-point math of 68020, integer math of 94120, physics of 1896, and random string sorting of 36662. These results are tightly clustered with its nearest rivals: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (37522, 0.3% lower), Intel Core Ultra 5 225F (37313, 0.3% higher), Intel Core i5-13600K (37685, 0.7% higher), and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161, 0.7% higher).

The Intel Arc A350M scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, 0.4% higher), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, 0.8% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% higher). The combined picture shows a CPU that is effectively a top-tier performer, within 1% of several strong rivals, and a GPU that is an entry-level part, within 1.5% of older desktop GPUs. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this asymmetry, with the CPU pulling the overall score up significantly.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing Intel's Core i9-13900HK, a 13th Gen Raptor Lake-H processor, with Intel's Arc A350M, an entry-level Alchemist mobile GPU. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part with a 2.60 GHz base clock and 5.40 GHz boost clock, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. The GPU is a DG2-128 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process with 768 shading units, 6 RT cores, and 4 GB GDDR6. The combined system ranks at the 78th percentile overall, which places it in the upper tier of all laptop configurations, but the balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU.

The overall tier from the percentiles is "upper-mid-range," driven almost entirely by the CPU's 85th percentile ranking. The GPU's 70th percentile is above average but not competitive with high-end mobile GPUs. This is a workstation-oriented laptop that can handle demanding CPU workloads with ease, but its gaming and GPU-accelerated performance are modest. The 45 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP suggest a thin-and-light chassis with adequate but not extreme cooling, and the launch MSRP of the CPU is $697, which indicates a premium processor that justifies a high laptop price. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed, likely because it is sold as part of a laptop rather than as a standalone component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HK is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, indicating overclocking potential, though this is limited in a mobile form factor by thermal and power constraints.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16025 is strong for a 45 W mobile part, and the single-core score of 1843.5 is exceptional, reflecting the high 5.40 GHz boost clock. The PassMark scores show a balanced profile: a single-thread score of 3810 indicates excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks, while multi-thread (28194), integer math (94120), and floating-point math (68020) scores demonstrate strong throughput for computational workloads. The data compression score of 329454 is particularly notable, indicating fast file archiving and database operations. The find prime numbers score of 110 is low, which is typical for this test as it measures a specific integer-heavy operation that does not scale well with the architecture. The physics score of 1896 is moderate, reflecting the CPU's performance in physics simulations, which are often memory-bandwidth-limited.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking places it in the top 15% of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 37425 is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-13600K, a desktop part, which is a remarkable achievement for a mobile processor. This makes the i9-13900HK a top-tier choice for laptop users who need desktop-class CPU performance, particularly in fields like software development, scientific computing, and content creation. The integration of Iris Xe Graphics provides a fallback for basic display output when the discrete GPU is idle, but the primary graphics workload falls to the Arc A350M.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HK + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HK

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds