SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900H

28,886 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Arc A570M pairing represents a high-mobility laptop configuration that targets substantial compute capability in a power-constrained chassis. With the CPU holding the 81st percentile among all processors and the GPU reaching the 88th percentile among all graphics cards, the combined platform sits at the 85th percentile overall, indicating a system that is well above average for mobile computing. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data and architectural specifications, and it is important to note that no directly measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from synthetic scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this platform is the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable mobile interface designed for laptop systems. The Core i9-13900H is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant, and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². This is a mobile-class processor, and as such, the upgrade path is entirely dependent on the laptop chassis — users cannot swap the CPU for a different desktop part. The system memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving OEMs flexibility in balancing cost and performance, though the exact bandwidth figures are not specified in the data. For PCIe, the CPU provides Gen 5 connectivity with 8 lanes, which is reserved for the primary discrete GPU or other high-bandwidth devices, while the Arc A570M itself interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, a standard configuration for mid-range mobile graphics.

Regarding power delivery, the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, which is typical for a high-performance H-series laptop processor, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, totaling approximately 120 W for the core compute components alone. The suggested PSU field is null, meaning the database does not provide a recommended power supply rating for this mobile configuration — a sensible assumption is that the laptop's included adapter must handle the combined load of the CPU, GPU, and other system components, but without a specific number, any wattage figure would be speculative. The practical upgrade path for this platform is limited to adding more RAM (DDR4 or DDR5) and swapping the storage drive, as the CPU and GPU are both soldered and non-replaceable. For users seeking more performance, the only real upgrade is moving to a different laptop entirely, which is a significant consideration for those who value future-proofing.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a CPU that excels in multi-threaded workloads but shows notable scaling behavior across thread counts. In 3DMark testing, the i9-13900H scores 1,078 in single-thread, 2,002 in 2-thread, 3,591 in 4-thread, 5,395 in 8-thread, 7,063 in 16-thread, and 7,670 in max-thread tests. This progression demonstrates strong scaling from 1 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads — the jump from 16 to max threads is only 8.6%, indicating that the 14 cores (20 threads) are efficiently utilized but that the architecture hits a throughput plateau in heavily threaded synthetic workloads. In Cinebench, the CPU achieves 279 points in R15 single-core and 2,666.5 in multi-core, while R20 yields 1,365 single-core and 9,676 multi-core, and R23 produces 1,964.5 single-core and 17,471 multi-core. The R23 multi-core score of 17,471 is particularly strong for a 45 W mobile part, placing it well within the range of desktop mid-range processors from a few generations prior.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 28,886, which lands it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12600H with an average score of 28,882 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT at 28,940 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Core i7-12650H at 28,815 (+0.2% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H at 29,093 (-0.7% delta). This means the i9-13900H is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate performance, despite having a higher core count than the i5-12600H (14 cores vs. 12 cores) and a different architecture than the Ryzen part. The delta percentages are all within ±0.7%, which is effectively a tie, suggesting that the i9-13900H's advantage lies not in raw average throughput but in specific workload characteristics. The GPU, the Intel Arc A570M, scores 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 (+0.3% delta), the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58,528 (-0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 (-0.7% delta). This is a remarkable result — the A570M, a mobile part with a 75 W TDP, trades blows with the RX 6950 XT, which is a desktop flagship from AMD, in this specific OpenCL compute benchmark. However, this does not necessarily translate to gaming performance parity, as OpenCL is a compute-oriented test.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 85 suggests a well-balanced system, but the data reveals a nuanced bottleneck picture. The CPU's 81st percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile indicate that, on average, the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is to its own peers. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU shows a single-thread score of 1,078 in 3DMark, which is modest compared to its multi-thread score of 7,670 — a ratio of roughly 7.1x. This suggests that lightly threaded workloads, such as older games or certain productivity tasks, may be more dependent on single-core performance, where the i9-13900H is not exceptional relative to its multi-core capability. Conversely, the GPU's FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS and its 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate a part that is well-suited for parallel compute, but its 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB of GDDR6 may limit performance in memory-intensive scenarios.

For gaming, the bottleneck is likely to shift depending on the title. In CPU-bound games, the i9-13900H's single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient to avoid severe stalling, but the GPU's 88th percentile suggests it can often outpace the CPU in raw throughput. In GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 and 16 ray tracing cores provide solid compute, but the 128-bit bus could throttle performance at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth becomes critical. The absence of measured FPS data means that actual frame pacing and 1% lows cannot be assessed, but the synthetic scores imply that this pairing is reasonably balanced for 1080p gaming, with the CPU potentially becoming the limiting factor in esports titles that favor high clock speeds and the GPU limiting in graphically intensive AAA games at higher settings.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is targeted at mobile users who need a laptop that can handle both demanding productivity and modern gaming without compromising on portability. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, make it a strong candidate for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation — tasks that utilize the multi-threaded performance evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 17,471. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and its ray tracing capabilities (16 RT cores) suggest it can handle entry-level ray-traced gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve, though professional workloads would benefit from more VRAM than the 8 GB available. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this pairing capable of high-refresh-rate play in less demanding titles and smooth 60 FPS experiences in most AAA games, based on the estimated performance from the benchmark scores.

Students and small business workstations also fit this profile, as the i9-13900H's PassMark single-thread score of 3,754 ensures responsive everyday computing, while the multi-thread score of 27,673 handles spreadsheet analysis, coding, and virtual machines. The laptop class means this is an all-in-one solution — users do not need to source separate components, and the integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides a fallback for power saving when the discrete GPU is not needed. The platform's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that OEMs can offer configurations at different price points without changing the core architecture, though the exact performance difference between the two memory types is not quantified in the data. This is not a system for enthusiasts seeking maximum overclocking or upgradeability — the multiplier is locked and the BGA socket is not user-serviceable — but for those who prioritize portability with high-end compute, it is a compelling option.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system is estimated to deliver high frame rates in competitive titles such as Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, where the CPU's boost clock of 5.40 GHz and the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance should easily exceed 144 FPS, though exact numbers are unavailable. In more demanding titles, the GPU's 88th percentile ranking suggests it can hold 60 FPS at high settings, but the 128-bit memory bus may cause dips in texture-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The i9-13900H's 14 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for encoding a 1080p60 stream via x264 while gaming simultaneously, as the multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 17,471 indicates ample headroom. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores (the field is null) means that hardware-accelerated AI features like DLSS are not available, but Intel's Xe-HPG architecture does support ray tracing, which can offload some rendering tasks.

Video Editing: The PassMark integer math score of 97,159 and floating-point math score of 69,611 suggest strong performance in codecs and effects that rely on CPU compute, while the GPU's 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs accelerate timeline rendering and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p editing, but 4K projects with heavy effects may exceed the memory capacity.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the i9-13900H's 20 threads are a clear asset, with a PassMark multithread score of 27,673 indicating it can handle complex scenes in Blender Cycles or V-Ray that scale well with core count. The GPU's 16 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering in supported applications, though its 5.325 TFLOPS is modest compared to desktop workstation GPUs.

Software Development: The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and high boost clock are beneficial for compilation, where the PassMark data compression score of 326,425 and extended instructions score of 19,330 highlight strong performance in archive extraction and SIMD-optimized code. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, significantly reducing build times for large projects.

Student and Office Work: The single-thread score of 3,754 in PassMark ensures snappy response in word processors, spreadsheets, and web browsers, while the integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides a low-power mode for extended battery life. The 8 GB GPU memory is more than adequate for dual-monitor setups and video conferencing, and the laptop form factor makes it ideal for carrying between classes or meetings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Arc A570M combination, as the FACT PACK contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame object and dataIsMeasured is false. Consequently, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and the GPU's architectural specifications. The Arc A570M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, which rivals the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, suggests that at 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU could deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, though the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cap performance in games that require high memory throughput. In esports titles like League of Legends or Rocket League, the CPU's single-thread score of 1,078 in 3DMark implies that frame rates could exceed 200 FPS at 1080p with low settings, but at ultra settings, the GPU's pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s become the limiting factors, potentially holding frame rates to around 100-144 FPS. For AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed, the GPU's 16 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggests that enabling ray tracing at 1080p ultra could drop frame rates to the 30-50 FPS range, requiring DLSS-like upscaling (which is not available due to null tensor cores) or reduced settings to hit 60 FPS. The CPU's 14 cores provide sufficient headroom for game logic and AI, but the lack of measured data means that 1% low frame rates and frame pacing are unknown, which is critical for a smooth gaming experience.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H mobile variant, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 45 W TDP, and is built on the Intel BGA 1744 socket. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is critical for performance in latency-sensitive workloads. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and its PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the discrete GPU and NVMe storage. The benchmark scores paint a picture of a CPU that is strong in multi-threaded tasks but only average in single-threaded performance relative to its peers — the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,078 is modest, while the max-thread score of 7,670 is impressive. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 17,471 is 8.9x the single-core score of 1,964.5, indicating excellent scaling. The PassMark multithread score of 27,673 and single-thread score of 3,754 confirm this trend. The nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i5-12600H and AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, have nearly identical average scores, meaning the i9-13900H does not offer a significant aggregate performance advantage over these parts, but its higher core count and boost clock may favor specific workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering that utilize all threads.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core i9-13900H?

A: The processor uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile interface, meaning it is not upgradeable in a traditional sense.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The average benchmark score is 28,886, which is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i5-12600H (28,882), AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (28,940), Intel Core i7-12650H (28,815), and Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (29,093), indicating a statistical tie in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A570M is at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the upper tier of graphics cards, rivaling the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and variable rate shading features.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing OEMs to choose between cost-effective and higher-bandwidth options.

Q: Is there measured frame rate data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The overall build is at the 85th percentile, indicating that this laptop configuration outperforms the majority of systems in the database.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-256, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It is part of the Alchemist generation, specifically the Arc 5 Mobile segment, and features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across an 8 GB GDDR6 interface with a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 5.325 TFLOPS and FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU's TDP is 75 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. In the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, it scores 58,239, which places it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This score is remarkably close to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, -0.3% delta), a desktop GPU with significantly higher power draw, suggesting that the A570M is exceptionally efficient in compute workloads. However, the 128-bit memory bus is a potential bottleneck for gaming, as bandwidth is critical for texture streaming and high-resolution rendering. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it has 16 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the tensor cores field is null, meaning no dedicated AI acceleration hardware is present. This limits the GPU's ability to perform DLSS-style upscaling, though it can still handle traditional rendering and compute tasks effectively.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900H, a 14-core Raptor Lake mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A570M, a 75 W mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, in a laptop form factor (buildClass: "laptop"). The CPU holds the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 88th percentile, and the combined platform sits at the 85th percentile, indicating a high-tier mobile system. The CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP together represent a thermal envelope that is manageable in a large laptop chassis, and the lack of a suggested PSU rating confirms that this is a self-contained mobile solution. The CPU's benchmark scores show strong multi-threading, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,471 and a PassMark multithread score of 27,673, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 rivals desktop parts like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. This combination is well-suited for a premium laptop aimed at content creators and gamers who need portability without sacrificing compute performance. The absence of measured FPS data means that real-world gaming performance is uncertain, but the synthetic scores suggest that this system is capable of 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p at medium settings, with the CPU providing ample headroom for streaming and multitasking. Overall, this is a high-performing mobile platform that sits in the top 15% of all systems in the database, making it a strong choice for users who demand desktop-like performance in a portable form factor.