SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900H

28,886 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a significant mismatch in raw capability, placing a top-tier mobile processor alongside an entry-level discrete graphics solution. This analysis is based strictly on the benchmark data provided, which contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK provides no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates extrapolated from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than empirical results.

The Intel Arc A350M, with its 70th percentile standing among all GPUs, is positioned as an entry-level mobile graphics solution. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 place it in a performance class that suggests 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable for less demanding titles, but ultra settings at high resolutions will likely strain the GPU. The GPU sits within 1.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in average benchmark scores, indicating a performance envelope consistent with those older or lower-tier desktop parts.

For esports and competitive titles, the CPU's exceptional single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 1078 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1964.5, should be more than sufficient to feed the GPU. Frame rates in such games are likely to be high, potentially exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, but this is an estimate. The bottleneck will almost certainly be the GPU's 4 GB VRAM capacity and 64-bit memory bus, which limits texture detail and resolution headroom.

At 1440p or 4K, the Arc A350M's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will become severe limiting factors. The GPU's pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s are modest figures that suggest ultra-quality presets at these resolutions will result in unplayable frame rates for most modern AAA games. The data indicates that this is fundamentally a 1080p gaming solution, and even then, users should temper expectations for the most graphically demanding releases.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900H achieves an average benchmark score of 28886, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. This is a high-performance processor that outperforms its nearest rivals: it is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12650H, 0.0% against the Intel Core i5-12600H, and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT. The CPU's multi-threaded might is evident in its 3dmark_max_threads score of 7670 and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17471.

Conversely, the Intel Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, is 0.5% slower, while the AMD Radeon RX 590 is 0.4% faster. The GPU's compute performance, as measured by Geekbench, is respectable for its class but pales in comparison to the CPU's dominance in its own field.

This pairing results in a combined percentile of 76, reflecting a system where the CPU is performing at a level significantly above the GPU. The disparity in percentile rankings—81 for the CPU versus 70 for the GPU—provides quantitative evidence of a processor that is not being fully utilized in graphics-bound workloads. The system is effectively a high-end productivity machine with a modest gaming and graphics capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. This is a powerful CPU designed for demanding workloads, as shown by its 81st percentile ranking across all CPUs.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. Its 3dmark_single_thread score of 1078 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1964.5 are strong indicators of excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and applications that rely on few cores. The multi-threaded scores are equally impressive, with a 3dmark_16_threads score of 7063 and a 3dmark_max_threads score of 7670. The Passmark multi-thread score of 27673 further reinforces its capability in heavily threaded workloads.

Real-world implications of these scores are substantial. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and high clock speeds make it ideal for software compilation, video encoding, and complex data analysis. The Passmark data compression score of 326425 and data encryption score of 18974 indicate strong performance in file archiving and security-related tasks. For developers, the 20 threads and robust integer math score of 97159 suggest that build times and code compilation will be swift, though the GPU will not accelerate these tasks. The CPU's performance is effectively wasted in this pairing for gaming, as the GPU will always be the limiting factor.

Who Should Build It

This CPU-GPU combination targets a specific niche: users who require top-tier processor performance for professional or creative workloads but have modest graphics acceleration needs. The 81st percentile CPU performance makes it suitable for software developers who need fast compilation times, data analysts working with large datasets, and students in engineering or computer science fields where CPU-intensive simulations are common.

For content creators, the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 17471) will accelerate video encoding and 3D rendering in CPU-based renderers. However, the GPU's 70th percentile performance and 4 GB VRAM limit its utility for GPU-accelerated rendering or complex 3D scenes. This is a machine for small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications, where the CPU's speed will make everything feel instantaneous.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find this pairing adequate for less demanding titles, but the data clearly indicates that this is not a high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming rig. The system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for work and treat gaming as a secondary, casual activity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data presents an unambiguous picture of the bottleneck in this system. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile ranking creates a significant imbalance, with the GPU being the limiting factor in all graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can feed or display.

Evidence from the FPS scaling discussion supports this. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s and 4 GB VRAM capacity are the primary constraints. In gaming, the CPU will often be idle waiting for the GPU to render frames, especially at higher resolutions or quality settings. The CPU's 3dmark_2_threads score of 2002 demonstrates strong single-core performance, but this will not translate into higher frame rates when the GPU is saturated.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks such as code compilation, data compression, or physics calculations, the GPU becomes irrelevant, and the CPU's full potential is realized. The Passmark physics score of 1745 and floating point math score of 69611 show that the CPU can handle complex calculations without any assistance from the GPU. The system is well-balanced for productivity but poorly balanced for gaming. The GPU will always be the bottleneck in graphics workloads, while the CPU is the bottleneck in compute-heavy, non-graphics tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 RT cores for ray tracing. The GPU has a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, which is a significant limitation for modern games. The GPU's FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s place it in the lower tier of discrete graphics solutions. The presence of 6 RT cores is notable, but the low compute throughput suggests ray tracing performance will be marginal at best.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 indicate that the GPU performs slightly better in Vulkan than OpenCL, which is a positive sign for modern game APIs. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking and its proximity to the RX 590 and GTX 1630 in benchmark scores suggest it is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture sizes and scene complexity, making it unsuitable for professional 3D rendering or high-resolution video editing with GPU effects. The 25 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate this is a low-power, integrated-class solution, not a high-performance discrete GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core i9-13900H?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 28886, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i7-12650H and 0.7% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A350M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile. It is 0.5% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile but 0.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.8% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this system is 76, reflecting the CPU's higher 81st percentile and the GPU's lower 70th percentile.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are severe limitations. The estimated performance suggests 1080p is the practical resolution, with 4K being unplayable at ultra settings.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A350M?

A: The GPU has a 64-bit memory bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900H includes Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, though this is separate from the discrete Arc A350M.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and TDP?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket and has a TDP of 45 W.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing a high-end mobile processor with an entry-level discrete graphics card. The Intel Core i9-13900H is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, positioned in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Arc A350M is a 4 GB GDDR6 GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, positioned in the 70th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile of 76 places this system in the upper-midrange tier overall, but the significant gap between CPU and GPU performance creates a unique profile. This is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a productivity-focused laptop with modest gaming capability. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a capable but not powerful entry-level solution. The system's overall tier is defined by its CPU, with the GPU serving as a secondary feature rather than a primary strength.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable laptop platform. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but the memory is likely also soldered or limited by the laptop's design. The CPU's PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

There is no meaningful upgrade path for the CPU or GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU's TDP of 45 W and the GPU's TDP of 25 W suggest a total system power draw that is modest for a laptop, but no PSU headroom is specified (suggestedPsu is null). The production status of the GPU is "End-of-life," indicating that this is a legacy component. A sensible next upgrade would be a completely new laptop system with a more balanced CPU-GPU pairing, such as a mid-range CPU with a higher-tier GPU, or a newer generation of both components. The data suggests that investing in more GPU capability would yield greater gaming performance gains than the current CPU provides.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 1078) should support high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 70th percentile performance and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cap frame rates below what the CPU can deliver. Expect 144Hz to be attainable only in less demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 3dmark_16_threads score of 7063 are sufficient for software encoding at high quality, allowing the CPU to handle both game encoding and streaming tasks. However, the GPU's modest performance means that playing and streaming simultaneously will require lower in-game settings to maintain smooth gameplay.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17471 will provide fast timeline scrubbing and export times for CPU-based effects. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 3.379 TFLOPS will accelerate some effects but will struggle with 4K footage or complex GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: CPU-based renderers will perform well, leveraging the 24 MB of L3 cache and high multi-thread scores. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the Arc A350M's compute performance and 4 GB VRAM, making complex scenes difficult or impossible.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario for this system. The CPU's 20 threads, Passmark integer math score of 97159, and data compression score of 326425 make code compilation, testing, and virtualization tasks fast and efficient. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 81st percentile performance ensures that office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing are exceptionally responsive. The system's low-power GPU (25 W TDP) contributes to a portable and efficient laptop solution, suitable for a student environment where battery life and mobility are priorities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900H + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds