SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-13900F pairs with the Intel Arc B770 in a desktop configuration that lands at the 71st percentile overall among all builds, a position driven by a CPU that sits at the 91st percentile of all processors and a GPU that sits exactly at the 50th percentile of all graphics cards. The combination represents a high-end 13th Gen Intel processor with a mid-range discrete GPU, creating a system where the CPU’s substantial multi-threaded capabilities are matched against a GPU that performs at the median of the field. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, with no measured frame-rate figures available for this exact pairing; all gaming expectations are therefore estimates derived from the component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, using Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while its thermal design power is rated at 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for multi-threaded workloads that benefit from large shared pools of fast memory.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well from single-thread to multi-thread operations. In 3DMark tests, the score climbs from 1145 in single-thread, through 2265 in 2-thread, 4393 in 4-thread, 7426 in 8-thread, 9957 in 16-thread, and reaches 13985 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern indicates that the i9-13900F maintains efficiency as more threads are engaged, which is typical of a hybrid architecture mixing performance and efficiency cores. Cinebench R23 scores reinforce this: the multi-core result of 40928 is roughly seven times the single-core result of 5778, showing that the processor can leverage its full thread count for rendering tasks.

Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 19680 versus a single-core score of 2533, while PassMark tests highlight specific workload strengths. The processor achieves 188022 in integer math, 131007 in floating point math, and 635147 in data compression, with data encryption at 38214 and extended instructions at 36525. These figures suggest strong performance in computationally intensive tasks like scientific simulations, financial modeling, and compression algorithms. The average benchmark score of 51730 places the i9-13900F at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, making it a top-tier processor for productivity workloads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900F shows tight competition. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, which scores 51947, and 0.7% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX at 52073 and the AMD EPYC 8124P at 52121. It is 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, which scores 51310. These delta percentages indicate that while the i9-13900F is not the absolute leader in its class, it sits within a margin of less than one percent of four other high-end processors, meaning real-world differences in most workloads would be negligible.

The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 24-core processor, suggesting that power delivery and thermal management are efficient, though the boost clock of 5.60 GHz indicates the ability to reach high frequencies when needed. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled, which broadens its appeal for workstation use where data integrity is critical. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides modern connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark Performance

The i9-13900F delivers a broad set of benchmark scores across multiple testing suites, and the combined picture reveals a processor that excels in both single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput. The 3DMark suite shows a max-thread score of 13985, which is 12.2 times the single-thread score of 1145, indicating excellent thread scaling for games and applications that use many cores. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 40928 is particularly strong for video rendering and 3D animation, while the single-core score of 5778 supports fast application launching and responsive UI interactions.

PassMark tests provide additional granularity. The multithread score of 49693 and the single-thread score of 4406 both position the CPU well above average, while the physics score of 2766 and find prime numbers score of 204 are lower, reflecting that these particular tasks are not the processor’s strongest areas. Random string sorting at 70441 and floating point math at 131007 show robust performance in data manipulation and scientific computing. The average benchmark score of 51730, combined with the 91st percentile ranking, confirms that this CPU sits in the top tier of all processors tested.

For the combined build, the CPU’s 91st percentile contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 50th percentile, and the overall build percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance. The CPU is capable of feeding a much more powerful GPU in most scenarios, but the Arc B770 will be the limiting factor in graphics-heavy tasks. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data analysis, or spreadsheet operations, the i9-13900F will deliver near-top-tier performance, while in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU’s median position will cap overall results.

The nearest rival data shows that the i9-13900F is essentially tied with several other high-end processors. Being 0.4% behind the Ryzen 9 5950X and 0.8% ahead of the Core Ultra 9 285T means that for practical purposes, these CPUs are interchangeable in performance, and the choice between them would come down to platform features rather than raw benchmark scores. The fact that two of the four nearest rivals are from Intel’s own lineup suggests that the 13th Gen architecture remains competitive against both AMD’s older high-end parts and Intel’s newer Core Ultra series.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using TSMC’s 5 nm process with a die size of 368 mm². It features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are set at 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Compute performance is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 39.32 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio), which positions this GPU as a capable performer for rendering and compute tasks. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution textures and pixel-heavy effects. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern game APIs and rendering techniques.

The 16 GB VRAM capacity is significant for a GPU at this percentile level, allowing large textures and complex scenes to be loaded without exceeding memory limits. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1440p gaming and entry-level 4K, though it is not exceptional compared to higher-end cards. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, which the DirectX 12 Ultimate support enables in titles that implement DXR.

Power requirements are rated at 225 W TDP, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. The card uses a dual-slot cooler and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections, supporting modern high-refresh-rate monitors. The GPU’s percentile ranking at 50 means it performs exactly at the median of all GPUs, which indicates that it will handle most games at medium to high settings at 1080p, with some titles capable of 1440p depending on optimization.

The absence of benchmark scores for the GPU (the benchmarks array is empty) means that direct performance comparisons to other GPUs cannot be made from this data. The average benchmark score of 0 and empty nearestRivals list further confirm that no GPU-specific benchmark data is available. Consequently, the GPU analysis must rely on architectural specifications and the percentile ranking, which suggests a mid-range card that offers balanced performance for its class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combination of a 91st-percentile CPU with a 50th-percentile GPU creates a system where the GPU is the clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s max-thread 3DMark score of 13985 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 far exceed what the Arc B770’s median performance can utilize in most games. In CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, software compilation, or database operations, the GPU will sit largely idle while the CPU delivers top-tier throughput.

For gaming, the bottleneck manifests at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU’s median performance will likely be the limiting factor, as the CPU can easily keep up with frame generation demands. The i9-13900F’s single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark and 5778 in Cinebench R23 indicate excellent per-core performance, so it will not hold back the GPU at standard refresh rates. However, at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU’s 50th percentile position becomes even more pronounced, as pixel throughput demands exceed what the Arc B770 can deliver, and frame rates will drop accordingly.

The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, sitting between the CPU’s 91 and the GPU’s 50. In productivity workloads that rely heavily on CPU compute, the system will perform near the level of the i9-13900F alone, meaning it will be competitive with systems featuring more expensive GPUs. In gaming, the system will perform at a level consistent with the GPU’s median ranking, meaning it will be outclassed by systems with higher-end graphics cards but will still be capable of smooth gameplay at modest settings.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 225 W TDP of the GPU combine to a modest total power draw, and the suggested 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom. This balance suggests that the system will not be power-constrained, and the CPU will not be thermally throttled by the GPU’s heat output in a typical desktop case. The bottleneck is purely performance-based, with the GPU limiting frame rates while the CPU remains underutilized in most gaming scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900F’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The i9-13900F sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51730.

Q: How does the i9-13900F compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i9-13900F is 0.4% behind the Ryzen 9 5950X, which has an average score of 51947, making the two processors nearly identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc B770?

A: The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined build percentile is 71, reflecting a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU.

Q: Does the i9-13900F support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is enabled, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the Intel Arc B770?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which accommodates the GPU’s 225 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Arc B770?

A: The Arc B770 uses TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 368 mm².

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 modules or higher-performance DDR5, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity, though the Arc B770 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU means that most mid-range air coolers or entry-level liquid coolers will suffice, though the boost clock of 5.60 GHz may require adequate cooling to maintain sustained performance. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation use where data corruption must be minimized. The CPU’s production status is active, and it was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $524.

For upgrades, the most obvious path is to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model, as the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking leaves substantial headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The Arc B770’s 50th percentile is the limiting factor, and upgrading to a GPU in the 80th percentile or above would better utilize the CPU’s capabilities. The PCIe Gen 5 support and 20 CPU lanes ensure that any modern GPU will be fully supported.

The power supply requirement of 550 W for the GPU suggests that upgrading to a more power-hungry card would necessitate a PSU upgrade as well, though the current 65 W CPU TDP leaves room for a GPU with a higher TDP. The platform’s DDR5 support means that memory bandwidth can be improved without changing the motherboard, which could benefit memory-sensitive workloads. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available at various price points.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive work and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the i9-13900F’s 24 cores and 32 threads, with PassMark integer math at 188022 and data compression at 635147 indicating strong performance in build tools and source code management. Data scientists and researchers running simulations will appreciate the floating point math score of 131007 and the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 40928.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering but do not require top-tier GPU acceleration will find this pairing suitable. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores in Cinebench and 3DMark max-thread tests support smooth timeline editing and faster rendering, while the Arc B770’s 16 GB VRAM can handle 4K video previews and moderate 3D scenes. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU’s performance for coursework, though the GPU is adequate for entry-level graphics assignments.

Small business workstations that run database applications or virtual machines will benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads and ECC memory support, ensuring reliability for critical workloads. The system is less suited for gamers seeking high-refresh-rate 1440p or 4K experiences, as the GPU’s 50th percentile will limit frame rates. However, for 1080p gaming at medium settings or esports titles, the system will provide a smooth experience.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900F, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with the Intel Arc B770, a Battlemage GPU at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 51730 places it in the top tier of processors, while the GPU’s median position means it is neither exceptional nor deficient among graphics cards. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that the build outperforms the majority of systems, driven primarily by the CPU’s strength.

The i9-13900F’s nearest rival data shows it is within 0.8% of four other processors, including the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, meaning this build’s CPU performance is comparable to other high-end options from both Intel and AMD. The Arc B770’s specs include 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, 4096 shading units, and 32 ray tracing cores, with a 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU. This is a desktop-class build that excels in productivity and compute tasks, with gaming performance constrained by the GPU’s median ranking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Arc B770’s 50th percentile performance should handle esports titles and older games at high frame rates, though the CPU’s single-thread 3DMark score of 1145 will not be a limiting factor. Frame rates will be estimated as moderate for most titles, with the GPU being the bottleneck.

Streaming: The i9-13900F’s 32 threads and max-thread 3DMark score of 13985 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, though the GPU’s median performance may cap game frame rates. Streaming at 1080p60 should be feasible with CPU-based encoding.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 and PassMark data compression score of 635147 support fast video export and timeline scrubbing, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM can handle 4K previews. This is a strong scenario for this build.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R20 (17189) and R23 (40928) makes it excellent for CPU-based rendering, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc B770’s median position.

Software development: PassMark integer math at 188022 and extended instructions at 36525 indicate strong compilation and code analysis performance, making this build ideal for developers.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread scores (4406 in PassMark single-thread, 2533 in Geekbench single-core) ensure responsive application use, while the GPU’s median performance is more than sufficient for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries. All gaming performance figures are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The i9-13900F’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and max-thread score of 13985 indicate that the CPU will not bottleneck most games, while the Arc B770’s 50th percentile ranking suggests it will deliver frame rates consistent with a mid-range GPU.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc B770’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM should allow for playable frame rates in most titles, though demanding games may require lowering settings to high or medium to achieve smooth 60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate will be stressed, and frame rates will likely drop below 60 FPS in graphically intensive titles. At 4K, the GPU’s median position means it is not well-suited for ultra settings, and users should expect to reduce settings significantly or accept lower frame rates.

The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, such as the 40928 Cinebench R23 multi-core result, will provide a stable frame-time experience in games that use multiple cores, reducing stutter. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile means that the overall gaming experience will be comparable to other mid-range graphics cards, and users seeking high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming should consider a more powerful GPU. These estimates are based on the available benchmark data and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds