SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Arc A580 form an unusual desktop pairing: a 24-core, 32-thread flagship-class CPU from Intel’s Raptor Lake generation combined with a mid-range graphics card from the same vendor’s Arc Alchemist lineup. The combination sits at the 89th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU pairings tracked in this database, indicating a system that is capable in absolute terms but whose performance profile is heavily shaped by the disparity between the two components. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 87th percentile among all graphics cards. This close percentile relationship suggests the two parts are not as mismatched as their product tiers might imply, but the data reveals a clear bottleneck structure that favors CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-bound scenarios. The following analysis draws exclusively from the benchmark results and specifications provided in the FACT PACK.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a pronounced CPU-first balance in this pairing. The i9-13900F delivers a 3DMark max-threads score of 13985, which is 22.4% higher than its 8-thread score of 7426 and 40.6% higher than its 16-thread score of 9957. This scaling pattern indicates that the processor continues to extract meaningful performance from additional cores beyond 16 threads, which is typical for a 24-core part. In contrast, the Arc A580’s GPU benchmark scores — 2229 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 91657 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 79381 in Geekbench Vulkan — place it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. That GPU percentile is only slightly below the CPU’s 91st percentile, yet the absolute scores suggest that in real-world gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and quality settings.

The CPU’s single-thread performance provides further evidence of where the bottleneck lies. A 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778 indicate strong per-core capability, which is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios. However, the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are modest figures for a discrete card. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 2766 shows the CPU is not the constraint. In GPU-bound tasks like rasterization at 1440p or 4K, the Arc A580’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 96 ROPs will likely cap frame rates well before the CPU reaches its limits.

The FPS scaling data is absent from this FACT PACK — no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data suggests that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread score (Cinebench R23 single-core 5778) and the GPU’s moderate compute (12.29 TFLOPS) will result in a more balanced load, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. At 4K, the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate will dominate the performance profile, making the i9-13900F’s extra cores largely irrelevant for gaming frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a mature LGA socket designed for Raptor Lake and earlier 12th Gen processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer desktop part. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and expansion cards. However, the Arc A580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so the GPU will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds regardless of the CPU’s Gen 5 capability. This is not a bottleneck in practice, as the GPU’s bandwidth requirements are well within PCIe 4.0 limits.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, which is remarkably low for a 24-core part, and this suggests that the platform’s power delivery is not stressed under typical loads. The Arc A580 has a TDP of 175 watts, and the FACT PACK recommends a 450-watt power supply for the GPU alone. When combined with the CPU’s 65-watt TDP, a system using this pairing would require a PSU that can handle the GPU’s peak draw plus the CPU’s modest consumption. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors, which is a standard configuration for mid-range cards. The suggested PSU of 450 watts provides clear headroom for the CPU and GPU combined, assuming other components like drives and fans are within normal ranges.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the Arc A580 with a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom. The i9-13900F’s 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 32 threads can support a much more powerful graphics card without becoming the bottleneck. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means that future GPUs using PCIe 5.0 will be compatible, though current cards like the Arc A580 will not benefit. Alternatively, users could add more DDR5 memory if they are currently using DDR4, though the dual-channel memory bus means capacity is more important than channel count for most workloads. The CPU’s ECC support also makes this platform viable for workstation tasks that require error-correcting memory, which is a rare feature in this socket generation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S desktop variant. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which is a high single-core frequency for this generation. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has a TDP of 65 watts, which is notable for a 24-core part. The CPU was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $524, and it is currently marked as active in production.

Benchmark results show the i9-13900F’s strengths clearly. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 40928, while the single-core score is 5778. This represents a 7.1x scaling factor from single to multicore, which is exceptional and indicates that the 24-core design effectively utilizes all threads. The Geekbench multicore score of 19680 and single-core score of 2533 follow a similar pattern, with the multicore result being 7.8x the single-core result. The PassMark multithread score of 49693 reinforces this picture, and the PassMark integer math score of 188022 and floating point math score of 131007 show that the CPU excels at both integer and floating point workloads. The data compression score of 635147 and random string sorting score of 70441 indicate strong memory subsystem performance, which is critical for database and file operations.

The CPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, which has an average benchmark score of 51947 compared to the i9-13900F’s 51730, a delta of -0.4%. This means the i9-13900F is essentially tied with the Ryzen 9 5950X in overall CPU performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX is 0.7% faster, and the AMD EPYC 8124P is 0.7% faster, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is 0.8% slower. These small deltas place the i9-13900F in a tightly contested performance band, where no single rival dominates. The 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this is a top-tier processor, but the rival data shows that it is not the absolute fastest, just within striking distance of several competitors.

Who Should Build It

The i9-13900F + Arc A580 pairing suits users who need exceptional CPU performance but do not require top-tier GPU capabilities. Gamers playing at 1080p resolution will benefit from the CPU’s high single-thread score of 5778 in Cinebench R23, which ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS will become the primary constraint, but the CPU will still provide a smooth experience in CPU-heavy games like strategy or simulation titles. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the CPU’s 40928 multicore Cinebench R23 score and 19680 Geekbench multicore score to be excellent for parallel workloads. The PassMark data encryption score of 38214 and extended instructions score of 36525 also make this CPU suitable for encryption-heavy tasks and scientific computing.

Software developers will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads for building large codebases, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long compilation jobs. Students and small business workstations that run productivity suites, spreadsheets, and databases will benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 635147 and integer math score of 188022, which indicate fast file operations and calculations. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for light video editing and 2D design work, though heavy 3D rendering will be GPU-limited. The system is not ideal for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, where the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 96 ROPs will limit frame rates. Users who prioritize gaming above all else should consider a different GPU, but for a mixed workload PC that handles productivity and moderate gaming, this pairing is well balanced.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13900F’s average benchmark score is 51730, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X’s 51947.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900F has ECC memory support, which is listed in the specifications.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The Arc A580 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with 3072 shading units.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this pairing?

A: The CPU+GPU combination sits at the 89th percentile among all tracked pairings.

Q: What is the GPU’s recommended power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A580 is 450 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 175 watts.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is based on the DG2-512 chip, which uses the Xe-HPG architecture from Intel’s Alchemist generation (Arc 5). The chip is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process node with 21,700 million transistors and a die size of 406 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU has a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 24 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU’s benchmark results show it performs at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2229, which is a moderate result for a mid-range card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 indicate that the GPU is well-suited for compute workloads, with Vulkan performance being slightly lower than OpenCL. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which has an average score of 58085 compared to the Arc A580’s 57756, a delta of -0.6%. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 0.7% faster, the Intel Arc A570M is 0.8% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 1.1% faster. This places the Arc A580 in a tight cluster of GPUs where performance differences are within 1.1% of each other, meaning real-world differences will be minimal.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the modest FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS means that full ray tracing at high resolutions will be challenging. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and light 1440p textures, but it may be limiting for large 3D scenes or high-resolution texture packs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern game engines and professional applications. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, which support high refresh rates and high resolutions on multiple monitors.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s performance is anchored by its 3DMark scores: 9957 in the 16-thread test, 2265 in the 2-thread test, 4393 in the 4-thread test, 7426 in the 8-thread test, 13985 in the max-thread test, and 1145 in the single-thread test. These scores show a clear scaling pattern where each doubling of threads from 2 to 8 produces a roughly 1.7x performance increase, while the jump from 16 to max threads (24 cores, 32 threads) yields a 40.6% increase. The Cinebench scores follow a similar trajectory, with R15 multicore at 4125, R20 multicore at 17189, and R23 multicore at 40928. Single-core Cinebench scores are 582 (R15), 2426 (R20), and 5778 (R23). The Geekbench scores are 19680 (multicore) and 2533 (single-core). PassMark results include data compression at 635147, data encryption at 38214, extended instructions at 36525, find prime numbers at 204, floating point math at 131007, integer math at 188022, multithread at 49693, physics at 2766, random string sorting at 70441, and single-thread at 4406. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 51730, placing it at the 91st percentile.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are fewer but consistent: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2229, Geekbench OpenCL at 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan at 79381. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 57756, placing it at the 87th percentile. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 89, which reflects the sum of both parts’ relative standings. The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile are close enough that the pairing does not suffer from a severe bottleneck, but the GPU’s lower percentile means it will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while being merely adequate for GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or machine learning inference.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs Intel’s flagship 13th Gen CPU with Intel’s mid-range Arc 5 GPU. The i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 65-watt TDP, while the Arc A580 is a 175-watt GPU with 8 GB of VRAM. The pairing’s combined percentile of 89 puts it in the upper tier of all tracked configurations, but not at the very top. The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile indicate that this is a well-matched pair in terms of relative performance, though the absolute performance of the GPU limits the system’s overall gaming capabilities. The build is best described as a workstation-class CPU with an entry-to-mid-level gaming GPU, making it suitable for users who prioritize compute performance over frame rates. The overall tier is high, with the CPU being one of the stronger consumer parts available (91st percentile) and the GPU being solidly above average (87th percentile), but the system is not optimized for extreme gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread score (5778 in Cinebench R23) ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited, but the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates well below what a high-refresh monitor (e.g., 144Hz or 240Hz) can display in demanding titles. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the GPU’s 87th percentile suggests it can handle esports titles at high frame rates, while AAA games will require lower settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 49693 and data compression score of 635147 indicate that the CPU can handle simultaneous game rendering and encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for game capture at 1080p.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Geekbench multicore score of 19680 make it excellent for video editing software that utilizes multiple cores for timeline scrubbing, effects, and export. The GPU’s 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 performance can accelerate certain effects, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit 4K timeline performance in complex projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high multicore performance (13985 in 3DMark max-threads) is ideal for CPU-based renderers, while the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 and 24 ray tracing cores can accelerate GPU-based renderers. The 8 GB VRAM is limiting for large scenes, but smaller projects will benefit from the GPU’s compute capabilities.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads are well-suited for parallel compilation, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long build processes. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and extended instructions score of 36525 indicate strong performance for code compilation and simulation workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4406 in PassMark and data encryption score of 38214 make it fast for everyday tasks like spreadsheets, databases, and document processing. The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 96 ROPs handle 2D graphics and multiple monitors with ease, while the system’s overall 89th percentile ensures a responsive experience.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, and they should be treated as indicative rather than precise measurements. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1145, Cinebench R23 single-core 5778) and the GPU’s moderate compute (12.29 TFLOPS) suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely result in frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for AAA games, while esports titles can exceed 100 FPS due to lower GPU demands. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, with estimates in the 20-35 FPS range, though lighter games may reach 40-50 FPS. The lack of measured FPS data means these estimates carry uncertainty, but the GPU’s 87th percentile and the CPU’s 91st percentile provide a consistent picture: the CPU will not limit gaming performance, but the GPU will determine the actual frame rates. For users who prioritize gaming, a stronger GPU would be a more suitable pairing with the i9-13900F, but for mixed workloads, this configuration offers balanced performance across a wide range of applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds