SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Arc A380 pairing is a study in extreme contrast, combining a top-tier 24-core processor with an entry-level discrete GPU. The benchmark data indicates a desktop build with a combined percentile of 68, yet the performance ceiling for gaming and graphics work is firmly set by the Arc A380. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the components. The Intel Arc A380's benchmark results, particularly its Passmark G3D score of 6252, place it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (deltaPct of 1.1) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (deltaPct of 1.2), indicating a performance class suited for 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in modern titles, not high-refresh or high-fidelity experiences.

The CPU's immense processing power, with a 3DMark max threads score of 13985 and a Passmark multithread score of 49693, will not translate into high frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios. For games that are graphically demanding, the Arc A380's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will be the limiting factor. Estimates for popular esports titles, which are often CPU-bound, might be respectable, but the GPU's modest pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s will cap performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the data suggests the Arc A380 would struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in AAA games. Its DirectX 12 score of 35 in Passmark is notably low, suggesting that modern API workloads are not its strength. The GPU's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus is also a constraint for high-resolution textures. For 1440p or 4K gaming, the estimates are significantly worse, with the GPU's 44th percentile ranking indicating that it is not designed for such resolutions. The performance gap between the CPU and GPU is so wide that the i9-13900F would often be idle, waiting on the GPU to render frames.

FAQ

Q: What is the expected performance of this build in modern AAA games?

A: Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 6252 and its 44th percentile ranking, modern AAA games are estimated to run at 1080p with low-to-medium settings. The GPU's DirectX 12 Passmark score of 35 suggests that performance in titles using this API will be modest, and the 6 GB VRAM capacity may limit texture quality.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A380 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A380's average benchmark score is 8558, which is -0.4% different from the AMD FirePro W5170M (avg score 8595) and 1.2% different from the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (avg score 8458). This indicates the Arc A380 sits in the same performance tier as these mobile and workstation-class GPUs.

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900F a high-performance processor for productivity?

A: Yes, the data strongly supports this. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Passmark multithread score of 49693 place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating exceptional multi-threaded performance for tasks like video editing and 3D rendering.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 68, a figure that reflects the massive imbalance between the high-tier CPU and the entry-level GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking is dragged down by the GPU's 44th percentile ranking.

Q: Does this build support overclocking?

A: No. The Intel Core i9-13900F has the multiplierUnlocked field set to false, meaning its clock multiplier is locked. The GPU's clocks are also fixed at a base of 2000 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz.

Q: What memory types are supported by the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is listed as "End-of-life" in its production status. Its successor is listed as "Battlemage."

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a processor that excels in every CPU-bound test and a graphics card that delivers entry-level results. The Intel Core i9-13900F is a dominant force, achieving a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 51730, placing it in a virtual tie with the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, which scores 51947 (a -0.4% delta). The i9-13900F also edges out the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, which scores 51310 (a 0.8% delta). This positioning underscores its status as a high-end desktop processor.

The CPU's multi-threaded might is evident in its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Geekbench multicore score of 19680. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1145. The Passmark data further confirms its productivity strength, with an integer math score of 188022 and a floating point math score of 131007.

In contrast, the Intel Arc A380's benchmark results are modest. Its average benchmark score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, scores 8595, a difference of -0.4%, confirming the Arc A380's position in the lower-mid range of graphics cards. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 38224. The Passmark G3D score of 6252 is its primary performance indicator, while its G2D score of 610 shows modest 2D desktop acceleration capabilities. The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU's enormous potential is largely untapped in graphics-intensive workloads, with the GPU acting as the definitive performance bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable. The Arc A380's 44th percentile ranking and modest scores like the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 indicate it cannot generate the frame rates needed for high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz+) in most games. The CPU is capable, but the GPU limits output to well below 144 FPS in all but the lightest esports titles.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. The i9-13900F's 24 cores and 32 threads, demonstrated by a 3DMark max threads score of 13985, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. However, the GPU's performance will be the limiting factor for game quality, as it may struggle to maintain a playable frame rate while the CPU handles the encoding workload.

Video Editing: The data indicates this is a strong scenario for the CPU. The i9-13900F's Passmark multithread score of 49693 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 will handle 4K video timelines and rendering efficiently. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for basic effects and hardware encoding, but it will not accelerate complex GPU-accelerated effects as well as a higher-tier card.

3D Rendering: This is the CPU's domain. Software that relies on CPU rendering will see exceptional performance with the i9-13900F, as its 91st percentile ranking suggests. The Arc A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 1024 shading units will provide some GPU acceleration in viewports, but its rendering power is minimal compared to the CPU's capabilities.

Software Development: The i9-13900F is a powerhouse for compilation. Its 24 cores and 32 threads will drastically reduce build times, and its Passmark data encryption score of 38214 shows strong cryptographic performance. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this task, meaning the system's performance is dictated by the CPU, which is excellent.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for standard office tasks. The CPU's performance is far beyond what is needed for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU's 610 Passmark G2D score is sufficient for 2D desktop environments. The system will be highly responsive, but the cost of the CPU is not justified for these workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which is the foundation for the Core 13th Gen series. The Intel Core i9-13900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in memory choice. Its PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and future expansion cards.

The Intel Arc A380 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and has a low TDP of 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. This is a very low power draw, making the system easy to cool and power. The CPU, with a TDP of 65 W, adds to the system's efficiency.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking means it has years of headroom for more powerful graphics cards. Replacing the Arc A380 with a higher-tier GPU would immediately unlock the CPU's full gaming potential, as the current GPU is the primary bottleneck in all graphics workloads. The 250 W PSU suggestion for the current GPU indicates that a power supply with more capacity would be needed for a more powerful card, but the platform itself is not a limiting factor.

Who Should Build It

This build targets a specific niche: users who require extreme CPU processing power but have minimal graphics demands. The primary audience is content creators and professionals who work in CPU-intensive applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. For these users, the i9-13900F's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Passmark multithread score of 49693 are transformative, cutting render times and build times dramatically.

Gamers at 1080p who play less demanding or esports titles could consider this build, but they would be leaving significant CPU performance on the table. The Arc A380's performance, as indicated by its 44th percentile, will be the limiting factor. Students in computer science or engineering fields would benefit from the CPU's power for compiling code and running simulations, but the GPU is more than sufficient for their needs. Small business workstations that run heavy multi-threaded productivity workloads, such as financial modeling or data analysis, would find the CPU's 32 threads and Passmark integer math score of 188022 highly beneficial. However, the system is not balanced for general-purpose gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a stark imbalance in this pairing. The CPU is the dominant component, with a 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile. This creates a scenario where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in any workload that uses graphics acceleration.

In gaming, the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 is more than sufficient to feed frames to the GPU. However, the GPU's pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates well below what the CPU could handle. The FPS scaling will be flat regardless of CPU performance in GPU-bound scenes.

In productivity, the bottleneck shifts. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads will be fully utilized. For tasks that use GPU acceleration, such as certain effects in video editing or GPU-based rendering, the Arc A380 will be the bottleneck, potentially slowing down workflows despite the CPU's power. The 68th combined percentile accurately reflects this unbalanced nature, showing a system that is exceptional at one thing (CPU processing) and average at another (graphics).

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-13900F, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level Xe-HPG graphics card. The combined percentile of 68 places this system in the upper-midrange tier overall, but this figure masks the vast difference in capability between the two components. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a low-tier entry-level part.

The system is fundamentally a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a basic display adapter. It is a class of build that prioritizes CPU compute power above all else. For users whose primary applications are CPU-bound, this pairing offers exceptional performance. For any task that relies on the GPU, the system will perform at the level of the Arc A380, which is in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, comparable to mobile-class parts like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a large 36 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and features PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

The benchmark scores confirm it as a high-end desktop processor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Geekbench multicore score of 19680 demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Passmark multithread score of 49693 and the 3DMark max threads score of 13985 corroborate this. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5778 and a Passmark single thread score of 4406.

These scores translate to real-world workloads: video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will all see massive performance gains. The Passmark data compression score of 635147 and data encryption score of 38214 highlight its strength in data-intensive tasks. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking, with its average score of 51730 being nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, places it at the top of the consumer desktop hierarchy.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It comes with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. Its FP32 performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The benchmark data shows this is an entry-level GPU. Its Passmark G3D score of 6252 and a 44th percentile ranking place it in the lower tier of graphics cards, on par with mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, suggesting limited capability in modern DX12 titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 is modest, and the Passmark GPU compute score of 2762 indicates limited compute performance.

For rendering, the 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 power is sufficient for basic 2D and light 3D workloads, but it will struggle with complex scenes or high resolutions. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the low overall performance means ray tracing effects will be costly. The 6 GB VRAM is a constraint for modern games at high textures. The GPU's 75 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU make it very power-efficient, but its performance is firmly in the entry-level segment, as reflected by its average benchmark score of 8558.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds