SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F paired with the Intel Arc A350 presents a striking study in contrast: a 24-core desktop flagship designed for heavy throughput, matched with a low-power entry-level GPU. The data in this FACT PACK confirms that this is a desktop build with a combined percentile of 71, but the performance profile of each component is so divergent that it creates a unique system with clear strengths and distinct limitations. This analysis will interpret the benchmark data to define exactly what this pairing can and cannot do, without relying on any external assumptions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is the computational heart of this system, and its specifications reflect a top-tier desktop processor. It is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process from Intel, featuring a die size of 257 mm². The chip houses 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that allows it to handle heavily parallelized workloads with ease. The base clock is listed at 2000.00 MHz, but the boost clock reaches up to 5.60 GHz, providing significant headroom for single-threaded tasks when needed. This is a locked multiplier part, meaning overclocking is not supported. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation use.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scored 40928 points in the multicore test and 5778 points in the single-core test. The multicore result demonstrates the raw power of the 24-core design, while the single-core score of 5778 indicates excellent per-thread performance, crucial for responsiveness in everyday tasks and many games. This is further corroborated by the Geekbench scores, which show 19680 for multicore and 2533 for single-core. The 3DMark tests show a scaling pattern from 2265 with 2 threads to 13985 with max threads, illustrating how well the processor utilizes additional cores. Similarly, the Passmark scores show a multithread score of 49693 and a single-thread score of 4406, reinforcing the dual nature of high core count and strong single-core speed.

The CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs is 91, placing it in the top tier of available processors. Its average benchmark score is 51730. The nearest rivals are extremely close in performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has an average score of 51947, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the i9-13900F is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX and AMD EPYC 8124P are also within a 0.7% delta, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is 0.8% faster. This indicates that for multi-threaded and mixed workloads, the i9-13900F is firmly in the same performance class as these other high-end chips, despite being a previous-generation part.

For real workloads, this means the CPU will not be the bottleneck in any productivity scenario. The 40928 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates that video rendering, software compilation, and 3D modeling will proceed at a rapid pace. The high single-core scores also mean that the system will feel snappy for general use, and it will not hold back gaming performance in CPU-bound scenarios, as the 5778 single-core score in Cinebench R23 is an excellent result.

GPU Analysis

In stark contrast to the CPU, the Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level, low-power graphics card. It is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The GPU consists of 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The card is equipped with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The base and boost clocks are both listed at 2000 MHz. The memory clock is listed as 1937 MHz, with effective speed of 15.5 Gbps. The FP32 performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS.

This is a card with a 25 W TDP, a single-slot design, and a suggested PSU of 200 W. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8. Interestingly, the FACT PACK lists its display outputs as "No outputs," which suggests this particular SKU is intended for use as a compute or encoding accelerator in a system with another primary display adapter, rather than as a standalone gaming GPU. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating modern API support. The GPU is marked as "End-of-life" production status, and its predecessor is "Xe Graphics," with the successor being "Battlemage."

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its percentile ranking is 50, which is the median. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and there are no nearest rivals provided. This lack of data makes direct performance comparisons impossible from the FACT PACK. However, the specifications suggest a very modest level of performance. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance are characteristics of an entry-level card. The 4 GB memory capacity is a limiting factor for modern games at higher resolutions and detail settings. The presence of 6 ray tracing cores means the hardware is capable of ray-traced effects, but the overall compute power is low, so its impact will be limited.

The combination of a high-end CPU and this entry-level GPU is unusual. In rendering or gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The Arc A350's specifications suggest it is intended for basic display output, media encoding, or specific compute tasks, not for high-end 3D rendering. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a fraction of what a modern mid-range or high-end card offers, so any workload relying heavily on GPU compute will be slow.

Benchmark Performance

The data shows a system with a massive discrepancy between CPU and GPU performance. The Intel Core i9-13900F achieves an average benchmark score of 51730, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result. In contrast, the Intel Arc A350 is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no available benchmark data for the GPU in this pack. The combined percentile for the build is 71, which is heavily influenced by the strong CPU.

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistent across a variety of tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 4125 in multicore and 582 in single-core. In R20, the scores are 17189 and 2426, respectively. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 49693 and a single-thread score of 4406. The data shows the CPU can handle both heavy multi-threaded loads and demanding single-threaded tasks with excellent performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9957 demonstrates its strength in a common benchmark format.

The GPU's lack of benchmark data in the FACT PACK means we cannot provide a direct comparison of its scores to the CPU. The combined picture, however, is clear: this is a system with a top-tier CPU and a low-tier GPU. The CPU is capable of processing data at a rate that the GPU cannot match for graphics-intensive tasks. This is not a balanced system for gaming or rendering, but it is a very powerful system for CPU-centric tasks like data processing, software development, and compilation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis for this system is unambiguous. The Intel Core i9-13900F, with its 91st percentile ranking, will be the limiting factor in almost no workload. The Intel Arc A350, on the other hand, with its entry-level specifications and 50th percentile ranking, will be the primary bottleneck in any graphics-intensive task.

The CPU's massive performance lead means that in gaming, the frame rate will be determined almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU will be waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames, meaning it is not being utilized to its full potential. In contrast, in CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding (using the CPU), data compression, or compiling code, the GPU plays almost no role, and the system's performance will be dictated by the i9-13900F's excellent multi-threaded capability.

The data supports this view. The CPU's Passmark data compression score is 635147, and its integer math score is 188022, indicating huge throughput for processing tasks. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a clear indicator of its modest capabilities for parallel floating-point work like graphics rendering. While the GPU has 6 ray tracing cores, its low compute power means it will struggle to maintain playable frame rates with ray tracing enabled in modern titles. The 4 GB memory capacity will also cause issues with texture loading in high-detail settings. The imbalance is so stark that the system is effectively a high-performance CPU platform with a basic display and compute adapter.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions must be considered estimates based on the benchmark scores of the components.

Given the specifications, gaming performance will be entirely limited by the Intel Arc A350. The CPU will not be a factor in determining frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios. With 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, the Arc A350 is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming at low to medium settings. The 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a significant constraint, and the 3.072 TFLOPS of compute power will struggle with modern game engines.

Estimates suggest that in less demanding esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the A350 might achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with lower settings. However, in graphically intensive AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM will be a major limitation, likely causing stuttering and texture pop-in at even 1080p. Players should expect to significantly lower resolution and detail settings to achieve a stable frame rate. Ray tracing is technically supported through the 6 RT cores, but the performance impact will be severe, making it an impractical feature for most games. The "No outputs" specification suggests this is not a standard consumer card for direct display connection, further complicating its use in a typical gaming setup.

Who Should Build It

This system is a paradox. It is not suitable for a gamer looking for a high-end experience, as the GPU is a significant bottleneck. However, it is an excellent choice for a user whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who requires minimal graphics capability.

The target user is a professional or enthusiast who needs massive multi-threaded processing power for tasks like 3D scene rendering (on the CPU), software compilation, scientific simulations, or heavy data analysis. The i9-13900F's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Passmark multithread score of 49693 are ideal for these workloads. This system could serve as a powerful workstation for a content creator who uses software that relies heavily on the CPU, such as 3D modeling or video editing software that is not GPU-accelerated.

It could also be a viable option for a software developer who needs to compile large codebases quickly. The CPU's high core count and strong single-core speed make it a top-tier choice for this task. For students in computer science or engineering fields, this system offers immense processing power for simulations and data processing, provided their graphics needs are minimal. For a small business, it could function as a high-performance server or workstation for tasks like data processing, database management, and virtualization, where the GPU is an afterthought. The ECC memory support adds to its appeal for workstation reliability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a viable scenario for this build. The Intel Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM, 64-bit memory bus, and low compute power will prevent high-refresh gaming. The CPU is capable of feeding frames at a high rate, but the GPU cannot keep up.

Streaming: While the CPU has the power to encode a stream using x264, the GPU's capabilities are unclear. The lack of display outputs suggests it is not meant to be the primary video output device. If paired with another GPU for display, the Arc A350 could potentially be used for encoding, but its performance is not specified in the data.

Video Editing: This is a mixed scenario. The i9-13900F is excellent for video editing, as its high multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (40928) and Passmark (49693) will allow for fast rendering and export times in software that uses the CPU. However, the Arc A350 will provide little to no acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects or previews, which could make the editing timeline less responsive.

3D Rendering: This depends entirely on the renderer. If using a CPU-based renderer like V-Ray or Arnold, the i9-13900F will be an excellent performer. If using a GPU-based renderer like Octane or Redshift, the Arc A350 will be a major bottleneck, with its 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM being severely limiting.

Software Development: This is a major strength of this system. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide a massive advantage for compiling code. The high single-core speed also ensures a responsive development environment. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this task, making this a highly effective development machine.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overkill for standard student or office tasks like web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets. The CPU will be idle most of the time. The GPU is sufficient for basic 2D display output, but the lack of display outputs is a major caveat. This is not a practical choice for a general-purpose office machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this system is the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The Core i9-13900F is a top-tier CPU for this socket, so a CPU upgrade within the same platform would be an upgrade in name only, as there is little room for improvement without changing the motherboard and memory. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so users have a choice of which memory standard to adopt.

The most logical and impactful upgrade path for this system is to replace the Intel Arc A350. The GPU's suggested PSU is a 200 W unit, but the system will have a 65 W TDP CPU, so the total power draw is low. This means there is significant headroom to install a much more powerful graphics card without needing to upgrade the power supply, provided the PSU has the appropriate connectors. The motherboard will likely support PCIe 4.0, and the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This ensures that any modern GPU will have the bandwidth it needs. For a gaming or rendering build, upgrading the GPU to a model with more VRAM and compute power would transform this system from a CPU-centric workstation into a balanced high-performance machine. The CPU is powerful enough to support any current GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance difference between the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU is a top-tier part, scoring 40928 in Cinebench R23 multicore and ranking in the 91st percentile. The GPU is an entry-level part with 4 GB of VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ranking in the 50th percentile.

Q: Can this system play modern games at high settings?

A: No. The Intel Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and low compute power make it unsuitable for high-detail gaming. Frame rates are estimated to be playable only at 1080p with low to medium settings in less demanding titles.

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900F a good CPU for video editing?

A: Yes, the CPU is excellent for video editing. Its high multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 score of 40928) will allow for fast rendering and export in CPU-based software, though the GPU will not accelerate effects.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 71. This is a reflection of the strong CPU performance offset by the weak GPU.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i9-13900F support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The FACT PACK specifies a suggested PSU of 200 W for the GPU. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A350 have display outputs?

A: According to the FACT PACK, the display outputs for this GPU are listed as "No outputs," indicating it is intended for compute or encoding tasks rather than being the primary display adapter.