SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This page analyzes the Intel Core i9-13900F desktop processor paired with the Intel Arc A310E graphics card. The data provided includes CPU benchmark scores, GPU specifications, and system-level attributes, but no measured frame rates for this exact combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not from direct testing of this pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The chip features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 51730. The nearest rivals show a tightly contested field: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (0.7% higher), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310 (0.8% lower). This indicates the i9-13900F sits essentially at parity with these alternatives, with differences under one percent in either direction.

Looking at threaded performance, the 3DMark scores show a clear scaling pattern: 2 threads yield 2265, 4 threads yield 4393, 8 threads yield 7426, 16 threads yield 9957, and the maximum thread count reaches 13985. Single-thread performance in 3DMark is 1145. The Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 4125, R20 multicore scores 17189, and R23 multicore reaches 40928. Single-core Cinebench scores are 582 (R15), 2426 (R20), and 5778 (R23). Geekbench shows 19680 multicore and 2533 single-core.

The Passmark suite provides additional insight into specific workload characteristics. Multithread performance scores 49693, while single-thread performance is 4406. Integer math scores 188022, floating-point math scores 131007, and extended instructions score 36525. Data compression scores 635147, data encryption scores 38214, and random string sorting scores 70441. Physics performance scores 2766, and find prime numbers scores 204. These numbers indicate strong all-around compute capability, with particularly high throughput in integer-heavy tasks and data compression workloads.

For real-world applications, the multicore scores suggest exceptional capability in heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, remains robust for everyday applications and lightly threaded games. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with data locality, and the dual-channel memory support allows flexibility between DDR4 and DDR5 platforms. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core processor, suggesting efficient power management under typical loads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of this high-end 24-core CPU with a modest 4 GB graphics card creates a significant performance imbalance. The CPU ranks in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This disparity indicates that for most graphics-intensive workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s massive multithreaded throughput, with a max-thread 3DMark score of 13985 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 40928, far exceeds what the Arc A310E can utilize in gaming scenarios.

The GPU’s specifications reinforce this bottleneck: 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, and 6 ray tracing cores. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivers 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. In contrast, the CPU can process data far faster than the GPU can render frames, meaning the GPU will consistently saturate before the CPU reaches its limits. For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or data analysis, the i9-13900F will perform admirably, but for gaming, the Arc A310E will cap frame rates well below what the processor could theoretically support.

The combined percentile for this build is 71, which reflects the overall tier of the system. The FPS scaling evidence, while not directly measured, can be inferred from the GPU’s capabilities. With a pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s, the GPU can handle modest resolutions and detail settings, but high-refresh gaming at high settings would be constrained. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark suggests adequate responsiveness for game logic, but the GPU will determine the playable frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-13900F scores 51730 on average. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 51947 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073 (0.7% higher), the AMD EPYC 8124P scores 52121 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310 (0.8% lower).

Q: What memory types does this processor support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also includes ECC memory support, and the memory bus is dual-channel.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Arc A310E is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 (no benchmark data provided). It has no listed nearest rivals.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the i9-13900F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Q: What is the system’s overall combined percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, placing it above the majority of systems in the database.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is not well suited. The GPU’s 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with a 64-bit bus, will limit frame rates at high refresh rates, especially at higher resolutions or detail settings. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark indicates it can handle game logic, but the GPU will bottleneck performance.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s strong multithreaded performance. With a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and a Passmark multithread score of 49693, the i9-13900F can handle simultaneous game encoding and streaming tasks without significant strain. The GPU’s lack of dedicated encoding hardware beyond standard functionality means the CPU will likely handle encoding duties.

Video editing relies heavily on both CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 13985, excel at rendering timelines and applying effects. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 performance can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit working with large projects. The overall system would handle 1080p editing comfortably but may struggle with 4K timelines.

3D rendering is a CPU-dominated task, and this processor delivers strong results. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 places it among high-end desktop CPUs. The GPU’s 6 ray tracing cores provide some acceleration for ray-traced renders, but the limited memory and bandwidth will constrain complex scenes. This system would perform well for CPU-based rendering with occasional GPU assistance.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high multicore throughput. The Passmark integer math score of 188022 and data compression score of 635147 indicate fast compilation and build times. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with code locality. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, making this pairing more than adequate for development tasks.

Student and office work requires modest resources, and this system exceeds those needs. The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2533, ensuring snappy responsiveness in productivity applications. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it handles basic graphics tasks, though the low VRAM may limit some visualization applications. Overall, this is a capable system for academic and office use, with the CPU providing ample headroom.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The system’s PSU requirement is modest: the GPU suggests a 250 W power supply, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP, meaning most ATX power supplies will provide sufficient headroom.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful graphics card. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking shows it can drive much faster GPUs without bottlenecking. Given the CPU’s strong multithreaded performance, upgrading the GPU to a model with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential. The current GPU’s 4 GB memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary limiting factors for gaming performance.

The platform itself is mature, with support for both memory types and PCIe Gen 5. Users could also increase memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel configuration with DDR5 support can provide additional bandwidth for memory-intensive workloads. The 36 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, and adding more system memory would benefit large datasets.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is based on the DG2-128 chip, part of the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process node. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The card is single-slot, 168 mm long, 69 mm high, and 20 mm wide, with no power connectors required. The TDP is 75 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. It is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of 2024-03-31, and its predecessor is Xe Graphics, with the successor being Battlemage.

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the middle of the performance spectrum. Without benchmark scores or nearest rivals listed, its relative position is less defined, but the specifications indicate it is an entry-level discrete GPU. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but the 64-bit memory bus limits bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The 6 ray tracing cores provide some ray-traced rendering capability, though the low memory capacity may restrict ray-traced scenes.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need exceptional CPU performance but have modest graphics requirements. Gamers playing at lower resolutions with reduced detail settings would find the Arc A310E sufficient, though the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality and resolution. Content creators working on CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering would benefit from the i9-13900F’s strong multithreaded scores, while the GPU assists with lighter graphics tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases would see significant speedups from the CPU’s 24 cores and high integer math score of 188022. Students and small business users running office applications or web-based tools would find this system more than adequate, with the CPU providing long-term headroom. The system’s combined percentile of 71 indicates it outperforms most systems, but the GPU is the clear weak point.

For users whose primary workload is gaming, this pairing is not ideal. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and limited VRAM will constrain frame rates, even at 1080p. However, for users who occasionally game but primarily use CPU-heavy applications, this build offers a balanced compromise where the CPU dominates and the GPU provides basic graphics capability.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900F processor with the Intel Arc A310E graphics card. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 series with a 75 W TDP. The system’s combined percentile is 71, placing it above most builds in the database. The CPU’s individual percentile is 91, while the GPU’s is 50, illustrating the performance imbalance.

The i9-13900F is an unlocked multiplier, though this specific model has the multiplier locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). The processor was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $524. The GPU was released on 2024-03-31 and is end-of-life, with no launch MSRP listed. The pairing represents a workstation-oriented CPU with a basic GPU, suitable for tasks where compute performance matters more than graphics.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier from the combined percentile is moderate-to-high, driven almost entirely by the CPU. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking is exactly average, so users should expect mid-range graphics performance at best.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 51730, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within one percent: the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X at 51947 (-0.4%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX at 52073 (-0.7%), the AMD EPYC 8124P at 52121 (-0.7%), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T at 51310 (+0.8%). This close grouping indicates the i9-13900F is a top-tier performer.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, and its average benchmark score is 0. It sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with no nearest rivals provided. This lack of data means the GPU’s relative performance is inferred from its specifications rather than measured benchmarks.

The combined picture is a system with exceptional CPU performance and average GPU performance. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this asymmetry. For CPU-intensive tasks, this build ranks among the best, but for graphics-heavy workloads, it falls to the middle of the pack. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40928 and Geekbench multicore score of 19680 demonstrate its capability, while the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and GPU specifications. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, confirming these are estimates.

Based on the GPU’s specifications, the Arc A310E with 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth would be limited in gaming scenarios. The 64-bit memory bus and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest playable frame rates at 1080p with low-to-medium settings in less demanding titles. More graphically intensive games would likely see reduced performance due to the VRAM constraint and bandwidth limitations.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark indicates it can handle game logic effectively, but the GPU will be the bottleneck. For esports titles with low system requirements, the system might achieve reasonable frame rates at 1080p, but high-refresh monitors would likely not be fully utilized. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM would become a limiting factor, forcing reduced textures and detail settings.

Given the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking, the processor is not the constraint in gaming. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means frame rates would be average at best. Users seeking high-refresh gaming would need a stronger GPU, while those playing less demanding games at 1080p could find this system adequate, though the estimates suggest the GPU limits overall gaming performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900F

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds