SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900E + Intel Arc A380: A Study in Asymmetry

This pairing joins Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with the company's entry-level Arc A380 discrete GPU, creating a desktop build where CPU capability dramatically outpaces graphics horsepower. The Core i9-13900E lands in the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A380 sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs, a gap that defines every workload discussion that follows. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the LGA 1700 socket, Intel's mainstream desktop platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform includes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing substantial bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards. ECC memory support is present, which broadens the platform's appeal for workstation-adjacent tasks where data integrity matters more than raw gaming performance.

The 65W TDP of the processor is remarkably modest for a 24-core part, but the Arc A380 GPU also sips power at just 75W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250W, and given the CPU's 65W TDP, a quality power supply in that range should comfortably handle this pairing under most loads. The combined power envelope is light enough that even a compact desktop build with modest cooling could accommodate both components, though the GPU's dual-slot width and 222mm length require a case with reasonable clearance.

This platform offers a clear upgrade path. The LGA 1700 socket supports Intel's 13th Gen family, so moving to a higher-tier SKU within the same generation is possible without a motherboard swap. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes mean that a future GPU upgrade to a high-bandwidth card would not be bottlenecked by the interface. Memory can be configured as either DDR4 or DDR5 depending on the motherboard chosen, allowing builders to match their existing RAM or jump to the newer standard. The most sensible next upgrade for this build would be replacing the Arc A380 with a substantially more powerful GPU, since the CPU has far more headroom than the current graphics card can utilize.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6nm process, packing 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die. The GPU runs at a base clock of 2000 MHz with a 2050 MHz boost, paired with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory operates at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective speed. The chip contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Compute throughput measures 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate reaches 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 131.2 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it API-complete for modern games. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 connections, which is a strong feature set for a card in this class.

Benchmark results tell a mixed story. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is modest, placing this card firmly in entry-level territory. Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 suggest compute workloads perform adequately but not exceptionally. Passmark results show DirectX 9 scoring 73, which is notably higher than DirectX 10 (37), DirectX 11 (38), and DirectX 12 (35) — an unusual pattern that indicates the card's legacy API performance exceeds its modern API performance in this specific benchmark. The Passmark G3D score of 6252 and GPU compute score of 2762 reinforce the entry-level positioning. The 44th percentile among all GPUs means roughly half of all GPUs in the database perform better, and the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 880M integrated graphics, which trails by only 1.4%.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a high-refresh gaming rig. The GPU's 44th percentile standing, combined with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808, indicates that modern titles at high settings will struggle to reach triple-digit frame rates at 1080p. Older or less demanding games may run acceptably, but the data does not support expectations of high-refresh experiences in current AAA releases.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample encoding headroom for software-based streaming, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 confirms heavy multitasking capability. The GPU's modest compute scores mean hardware encoding via the Arc A380 could help offload work from the CPU, but the overall graphics performance limits the gaming side of a streaming setup.

Video editing: The combination is workable for video editing. The CPU's strong multicore performance handles timeline rendering and export tasks well, while the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth can manage 1080p and light 4K editing workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 indicates compute acceleration is available, though the 44th GPU percentile suggests longer render times than a more powerful card would deliver.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will shine here. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 places this processor well above average, making it suitable for Blender or similar CPU render engines. GPU-accelerated rendering using the Arc A380 will be slower relative to dedicated workstation cards, but the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS provides a baseline capability for light GPU rendering tasks.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks benefit directly from the CPU's 32 threads. The Geekbench multicore score of 8337 and single-core score of 1646 indicate strong performance for both parallel builds and single-threaded tooling. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development work, making this pairing sensible for a developer workstation.

Student and office work: This build is massively overqualified for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4834 handles spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU's 44th percentile is more than sufficient for productivity applications and 2D interfaces, though the Passmark G2D score of 610 suggests 2D acceleration is merely adequate rather than exceptional.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU compute power but have minimal graphics demands. Software developers compiling large codebases benefit from the 32 threads and the Geekbench multicore score of 8337. Researchers or analysts running CPU-bound simulations will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244. Students in engineering or computer science programs get a machine that handles their computational coursework while remaining affordable on the graphics side.

Small business workstations handling accounting, database, or office applications gain headroom for future workloads without paying for a high-end GPU they will never fully utilize. Content creators working primarily in CPU-based workflows — such as audio production or code-based video rendering — will find the processor's strength aligns with their needs. Gamers who play older titles, indie games, or esports at moderate settings could find the Arc A380 sufficient, but the 44th percentile GPU ranking means this is not a gaming-first build.

The 65W TDP of the CPU and 75W TDP of the GPU make this an efficient pairing for office environments where power draw and heat output matter. The ECC memory support extends its appeal to small-scale server or workstation duties where data reliability is prioritized.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900E delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 and single-core score of 4834. Cinebench R20 results show 14382 multicore and 2030 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3451 multicore and 487 single-core. Geekbench results are 8337 multicore and 1646 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 8676, placing the CPU in the 65th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-8565U at 8665 average score with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Core i5-8365U at 8708 with a -0.4% delta, the AMD EPYC 7601 at 8619 with a 0.7% delta, and the Intel Core i7-10510U at 8580 with a 1.1% delta. These rivals are all lower-tier or older parts, yet the i9-13900E's average score sits within 1.1% of them — an indication that the average benchmark score understates this CPU's multicore capabilities, which are heavily weighted by the strong Cinebench results.

The Arc A380 produces a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808, Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224, Geekbench Vulkan score of 36736, Passmark G3D score of 6252, and Passmark GPU compute score of 2762. The average benchmark score is 8558, placing the GPU in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5170M at 8595 with a -0.4% delta, the AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 8462 with a 1.1% delta, the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8458 with a 1.2% delta, and the AMD Radeon 880M at 8436 with a 1.4% delta. The Arc A380 is effectively trading blows with integrated graphics and several-generation-old mobile parts, confirming its entry-level status.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 55, placing the overall build slightly above the median of all desktop configurations. The CPU's 65th percentile and GPU's 44th percentile average out to this middle-of-the-pack result, but the asymmetry means the CPU dominates the combined score.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Arc A380 capable of ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2. However, the modest 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 indicates ray tracing performance will be limited.

Q: What memory types does this build support?

A: The Core i9-13900E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: How many display outputs does the Arc A380 provide?

A: The GPU offers one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 2.0 ports, supporting up to four displays total.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A380 is 250W. The GPU has a 75W TDP and requires one 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics as a fallback?

A: Yes, the Core i9-13900E includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a display output or troubleshooting option if the discrete GPU is removed.

Q: What PCIe interface does the Arc A380 use?

A: The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: Is the Arc A380 still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as end-of-life. Its predecessor is Xe Graphics and its successor is Battlemage.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is severely imbalanced, with the CPU as the clear dominant component. The Core i9-13900E at the 65th CPU percentile versus the Arc A380 at the 44th GPU percentile creates a configuration where the processor has far more capability than the graphics card can feed. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually every scenario, as the CPU's 32 threads and high single-core performance exceed the demands of even the most CPU-intensive games.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 demonstrates a processor capable of heavy parallel workloads, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 reveals a graphics solution suited to light gaming at best. In productivity applications that use the GPU for acceleration, such as video encoding or compute tasks, the GPU's 44th percentile ranking will constrain overall performance despite the CPU's strength.

For CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering, scientific computing — the GPU is largely irrelevant and the CPU performs near its full potential. For GPU-bound workloads — modern gaming, GPU rendering, machine learning inference — the Arc A380 becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU's power goes largely unused. The Passmark DirectX scores show a peculiar pattern: DirectX 9 scores 73 while DirectX 12 scores 35, which suggests the GPU performs relatively better in older APIs, meaning legacy games may run closer to the CPU's potential while modern titles will be more limited.

The estimated FPS picture, derived from the benchmark scores rather than measured data, is one of consistent GPU limitation. The CPU will rarely be the constraint in any graphics-heavy task, and users should expect the Arc A380 to define the gaming experience.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core i9-13900E processor with Intel's Arc A380 graphics card. The overall tier, based on the 55th combined percentile, sits slightly above the median of all configurations in the database. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake part with a 65W TDP, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist architecture card with a 75W TDP. The combination creates a system that excels at processor-intensive workloads and handles light graphics tasks, but it is not balanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated compute. The launch MSRP of the Arc A380 is 149 USD. This build makes sense as a workstation or productivity machine where CPU performance is the priority and basic graphics output is sufficient.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Base clock is 1800.00 MHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support as a notable feature. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark results show strong multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 places this processor well above typical desktop CPUs, and the single-core score of 4834 indicates excellent per-thread performance. Cinebench R20 scores of 14382 multicore and 2030 single-core follow the same pattern. Geekbench results are comparatively lower at 8337 multicore and 1646 single-core, which may reflect differences in workload characteristics. The average benchmark score of 8676 lands in the 65th percentile, though the Cinebench results suggest the processor is stronger than that average implies for heavily threaded workloads.

The 24 cores and 32 threads make this a serious multitasking processor. Compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing all benefit from the high core count. The 36 MB L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing memory latency. The 65W TDP is surprisingly low for this core count, suggesting efficient power management, though boost clocks of 5.20 GHz may push power draw higher under load. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output and basic graphics capability if the discrete GPU is not installed.

Real-world workloads that rely on parallel processing will see the strongest performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34244 is a clear indicator that this CPU can handle demanding threaded tasks without breaking a sweat. Single-threaded performance, as measured by the 4834 Cinebench R23 score, is also strong, ensuring responsive performance in everyday applications. The combination of high core count and strong single-core speed makes this a versatile processor for mixed workloads, even though the GPU pairing in this specific build limits overall system balance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + Intel Arc A380

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds