SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

77 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 23% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-13900E pairs with the Intel Arc A350 in a desktop configuration that lands at the 58th percentile overall, a figure that reflects a substantial CPU paired with a modest entry-level GPU. The processor itself sits at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This creates a notable asymmetry in performance potential, where the CPU has significantly more headroom than the GPU can utilize in most graphics-bound workloads. The following analysis breaks down the measured data for each component and interprets what the combined system means for specific use cases.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring a die size of 257 mm². It contains 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that provides substantial parallel processing capability for heavily threaded workloads. The base clock runs at 1800 MHz, while the boost clock reaches up to 5.20 GHz, giving the chip a wide dynamic range between power-efficient operation and peak single-thread performance. The multiplier is locked, meaning the clock behavior is governed by the platform rather than user adjustment.

Cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, which benefits workloads with moderate working sets. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled — a feature typically associated with workstation or server environments rather than consumer gaming rigs. The platform uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, which is current-generation connectivity for high-bandwidth devices like NVMe storage and discrete GPUs.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-core throughput. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 34244, while the single-core score is 4834. The ratio between these two scores is approximately 7.1x, indicating excellent scaling across the 24 cores. Cinebench R20 scores are 14382 multi-core and 2030 single-core, while the older R15 test shows 3451 multi-core and 487 single-core. Geekbench results are more modest: 8337 multi-core and 1646 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 8676.

The nearest rival comparisons place this CPU in an interesting position. The closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-8565U with an average score of 8665, a delta of just 0.1% — effectively a statistical tie. The AMD EPYC 7601 scores 8619, putting the i9-13900E 0.7% ahead. The Intel Core i5-8365U scores 8708, meaning the i9-13900E trails it by 0.4%. The Intel Core i7-10510U scores 8580, with the i9-13900E leading by 1.1%. These rivals are all mobile or server parts, which is notable: the i9-13900E's average score places it in company with lower-power processors, despite its desktop-class core count. This suggests the benchmark average is heavily weighted by the Geekbench scores, which are relatively low at 1646 single-core and 8337 multi-core compared to the Cinebench results.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 indicates strong rendering and compilation performance, while the single-core score of 4834 supports responsive single-threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, which implies power efficiency is a design priority. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the system is clearly intended to use the discrete Arc A350.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's percentile ranking of 65 places it above the median but not at the top tier of all processors. The average benchmark score of 8676 serves as the reference point for the nearest rival comparisons. The GPU, however, has no measured benchmark scores — its average benchmark score is 0, and the percentile ranking of 50 is based on its position relative to all GPUs, but without specific test data to reference. The combined system percentile is 58, which sits between the CPU's 65 and the GPU's 50, reflecting the blending of the two components' capabilities.

The data shows a CPU that performs strongly in multi-core rendering tasks but more modestly in general-purpose benchmarks like Geekbench. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 is roughly 7.1x the single-core score of 4834, indicating exceptional thread scaling. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 14382 is about 7.1x the single-core score of 2030, consistent scaling across test versions. The Geekbench multi-core score of 8337 is only about 5.1x the single-core score of 1646, suggesting less efficient scaling in that particular benchmark, possibly due to memory bandwidth or test design.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU can handle demanding computational tasks — rendering, compilation, scientific computing — but the GPU will constrain graphics-intensive applications. The 58th combined percentile indicates a system that is above average overall, but the gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (65 vs. 50) is substantial. This means the CPU will often be waiting on the GPU in gaming and graphics workloads, while in CPU-bound tasks like rendering or code compilation, the system will perform closer to the CPU's 65th percentile level.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate. The GPU has no benchmark scores at all, which limits the precision of any gaming estimate. The CPU's high single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed frames quickly, but the Arc A350's modest specifications — 768 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 — indicate limited graphics throughput.

For 1080p gaming, the estimated performance would be constrained by the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. Modern games at ultra settings typically require more than 4 GB of VRAM, so texture quality and resolution scaling would be the primary limitations. The GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s suggest it can handle esports titles and older games at playable frame rates, but demanding AAA titles would likely require reduced settings to maintain smoothness.

At 1440p, the estimated frame rates would drop further, with the GPU becoming the clear bottleneck. The CPU's performance headroom would be largely unused, as the Arc A350 would struggle to push enough frames to stress the i9-13900E. For 4K, the system would be unsuitable for modern gaming at any reasonable quality setting, as the GPU's bandwidth and compute limits would result in very low frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or above. The CPU's single-core performance of 4834 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for high frame rates, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM would limit output to well below 144 FPS in most titles. Esports games at low settings might approach playable frame rates, but the GPU's modest specs cap overall performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The multi-core score of 34244 in Cinebench R23 indicates the processor can handle both game logic and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware-accelerated encoding would rely on the CPU or the Arc's fixed-function media engine, but the CPU alone is more than capable.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance in Cinebench R20 (14382) and R23 (34244) supports fast timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus would limit GPU-accelerated effects and previews, but CPU-based rendering would excel. The ECC memory support adds stability for long rendering sessions.

3D rendering: This is the system's strongest scenario. The CPU's 24 cores deliver excellent multi-core rendering performance, as shown by the Cinebench scores. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores provide some acceleration for real-time viewport rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM would limit scene complexity. CPU-based renderers like Cinebench would perform admirably.

Software development: The CPU's 32 threads and large 36 MB L3 cache provide strong compilation performance. The single-core score of 4834 in Cinebench R23 supports responsive IDE use, while the multi-core score handles parallel builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development unless doing GPU compute, where its 3.072 TFLOPS would be modest.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for these tasks. The CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 mean the system could run office applications without the discrete GPU. The 24 cores provide headroom for multitasking, but the performance is far beyond what typical office workloads require.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system exhibits a clear CPU-heavy imbalance. The CPU's 65th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a situation where the processor is the stronger component by a significant margin. In gaming and graphics workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level specifications that will cap frame rates and texture quality well below what the CPU can support.

In CPU-bound workloads like rendering and compilation, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU, but the GPU's modest capabilities mean it cannot accelerate those tasks substantially. The combined percentile of 58 reflects this middle-ground positioning. The FPS scaling in gaming would be limited by the GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, which are the hardware limits for rasterization throughput.

The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so there is no interconnect bottleneck. However, the GPU's 25 W TDP and the system's suggested PSU of 200 W indicate the power delivery is designed for a low-power graphics card, reinforcing the entry-level GPU tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13900E has an average benchmark score of 8676, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-8565U (8665), 0.7% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7601 (8619), and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10510U (8580), but 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-8365U (8708).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350 includes 6 RT cores.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, with a base clock of 1800 MHz.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Arc A350 delivers 3.072 TFLOPS FP32.

Who Should Build It

The system targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity tasks but have modest graphics requirements. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles or older games would find the Arc A350 sufficient at reduced settings, but the system is not suited for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34244 demonstrates strong throughput. Software developers would appreciate the compilation speed and large L3 cache.

Students and office workers would find the system overprovisioned, but the 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 mean it can run efficiently without the discrete GPU. Small business workstations that rely on CPU-intensive applications like database processing or engineering simulations would benefit from the ECC memory support and multi-core performance. The system is less suitable for users who prioritize GPU compute or modern gaming at high settings, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 are entry-level figures.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the platform can accommodate either memory type, though the specific motherboard determines which is used. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides modern connectivity for storage and future GPU upgrades. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The GPU's 25 W TDP and the system's suggested PSU of 200 W indicate the power supply is sized for the current low-power graphics card. Upgrading to a more powerful GPU would likely require a higher-capacity PSU, as the 200 W figure is minimal. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves headroom for a more capable GPU within the same power envelope, but the platform's socket and memory support are the primary upgrade constraints. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 65th percentile ranking has significant headroom that the current Arc A350 cannot use. The CPU itself is already at the top of the Core 13th Gen desktop lineup, so a CPU upgrade would require moving to a different socket or generation.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900E with the Intel Arc A350. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 part with 4 GB VRAM and a 25 W TDP. The combined system percentile is 58, placing it slightly above the median of all builds. The CPU's 65th percentile versus the GPU's 50th percentile shows a clear imbalance toward the processor.

The system's overall tier is mid-range, driven primarily by the CPU's strong multi-core performance. The GPU's lack of measured benchmark scores makes exact gaming performance uncertain, but its specifications indicate entry-level graphics capability. The build is best characterized as a CPU-centric workstation with basic gaming capability, rather than a balanced gaming or graphics system.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M / mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, while the memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, yielding 15.5 Gbps effective.

Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU has no tensor cores listed, which means AI acceleration features are limited. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the board is single-slot with no display outputs — it requires the CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 for display.

The GPU's TDP is 25 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is end-of-life, with the predecessor being Xe Graphics and the successor being Battlemage. The GPU's percentile ranking is 50, and it has no measured benchmark scores, so its average score is 0. For rendering workloads, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores provide entry-level acceleration, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus limit texture-heavy scenes. The GPU is best suited for light gaming, media playback, and basic GPU compute tasks where its low power draw and compact size are advantages.