SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

79%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of an Intel Core i9-13900E with an Intel Arc A310 creates a pronounced imbalance, but not in the direction most would expect. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 30 W entry-level Arc Alchemist part. The data shows the CPU sits at the 65th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. This 25-percentile gap indicates the processor is substantially more capable than the graphics card in raw compute terms.

The bottleneck is unambiguously the GPU. The i9-13900E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 and a single-core score of 4,834, both of which are high enough to feed any modern graphics card without constraint. The Arc A310, by contrast, produces a Passmark G3D score of 5,433 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,964. These GPU figures place it in the company of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which is only 1% faster in average benchmark score. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-8565U, are within 0.1% of its average score of 8,676, but those are mobile U-series parts with far fewer cores.

In gaming workloads, the CPU will spend most of its time idle while the GPU runs at maximum utilization. The Arc A310's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will saturate quickly at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU may still be the limiting factor, but the CPU's high single-core score of 4,834 in Cinebench R23 means even the most demanding game logic threads will have ample headroom. The real bottleneck emerges in frame pacing: the GPU's 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs limit pixel and texture throughput, respectively, to 28.00 GPixel/s and 56.00 GTexel/s. These are low figures that will cap frame rates regardless of CPU strength.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads will dominate multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, where the GPU's compute capabilities (2.688 TFLOPS FP32) are secondary. The GPU becomes the bottleneck only when its specific features—like ray tracing or DirectX 12 Ultimate support—are required. The Arc A310 has 6 ray tracing cores, but their performance is constrained by the overall GPU throughput. The data indicates this build is CPU-overpowered and GPU-underpowered, a configuration that excels at processor-bound tasks but struggles in graphics-intensive scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900E a fast processor compared to its rivals?

A: The i9-13900E has an average benchmark score of 8,676, which places it at the 65th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8565U, scores 8,665, just 0.1% lower. The AMD EPYC 7601 scores 8,619, which is 0.7% lower, while the Intel Core i7-10510U scores 8,580, 1.1% lower. These are marginal differences, but the i9-13900E leads all of them in average score.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A310 sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 7,550. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon R7 250, which scores 7,557, just 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,472, which is 1% lower, and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M scores 7,447, 1.4% lower. The Arc A310 is thus a mid-low tier GPU.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration. This makes it suitable for workstation or small server builds where data integrity is important, though the memory controller's bandwidth is not specified in the data.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 53. This means it outperforms 53% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database. The CPU's 65th percentile and GPU's 40th percentile average out to this middle-of-the-pack combined score.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this exact combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. All frame rate discussions must therefore be treated as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a modest figure that will limit performance in memory-intensive applications. The effective memory clock is 15.5 Gbps, which is decent for the bus width, but the narrow bus constrains overall throughput.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the Intel Core i9-13900E has a locked multiplier. The multiplierUnlocked field is false. Users cannot adjust the clock multiplier to overclock this processor. The base clock is 1800.00 MHz and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz, which are fixed by the silicon's design.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The chip has a base clock of 1800.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. This is a relatively low power envelope for a 24-core part, suggesting the "E" suffix denotes an efficiency-oriented variant. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool helps feed the many cores in multi-threaded workloads.

The benchmark results are strong across the board. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 3,451 multi-core and 487 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 14,382 multi-core and 2,030 single-core. The Cinebench R23 scores are 34,244 multi-core and 4,834 single-core. Geekbench results show 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The single-core scores are particularly notable, as they suggest the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is effective in lightly-threaded workloads.

The percentile ranking of 65th among all CPUs might seem low for a Core i9, but this is because the database includes server and HEDT parts with many more cores. The nearest rivals illuminate the competitive landscape: the Intel Core i7-8565U (a 4-core mobile part) is within 0.1%, the Intel Core i5-8365U is 0.4% higher, the AMD EPYC 7601 is 0.7% lower, and the Intel Core i7-10510U is 1.1% lower. These rivals have far fewer cores, which means the i9-13900E's advantage in multi-threaded workloads is significant despite the similar average scores. The average benchmark score of 8,676 is pulled down by the single-core tests relative to the multi-core dominance.

The i9-13900E features 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for a single high-end GPU or fast NVMe storage. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support, making it flexible for various build types. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A310 is the primary GPU. The processor's production status is Active, and it was released on 2023-01-03. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, which is the mainstream LGA 1700 platform.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a processor that targets users who need massive multi-threaded throughput without the power draw of a high-TDP part. Its 65 W TDP and 24 cores make it suitable for small-form-factor workstations or always-on servers where power efficiency is paramount. Content creators who render video or 3D scenes will benefit from the 34,244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which indicates strong parallel processing capability. Software developers compiling large codebases will also see gains from the 32 threads, especially in parallel build systems.

The Arc A310 GPU, however, limits gaming and graphics-heavy work. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings might find it acceptable, but the GPU's 40th percentile ranking suggests it is not a high-refresh-rate part. Students building a budget desktop for coursework and light gaming could use this pairing, but they would be better served by a less powerful CPU and a more balanced GPU. Small business workstations that run office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks will find the CPU's single-core performance of 4,834 in Cinebench R23 more than adequate, while the GPU handles basic 2D and light 3D tasks.

The combined percentile of 53 indicates this build is average overall. It is not a top-tier gaming rig, nor is it a professional rendering workstation. It is a CPU-centric build where the processor does the heavy lifting and the GPU provides essential display output. Users who prioritize CPU performance for compilation, scientific computing, or virtual machines, and who only need basic graphics, will find this pairing sensible. Those who expect modern gaming at high settings will be disappointed by the GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900E's benchmark scores are impressive for a 65 W part. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,451 multi-core and 487 single-core. The R20 run yields 14,382 multi-core and 2,030 single-core. The R23 results are 34,244 multi-core and 4,834 single-core. Geekbench shows 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core. The average benchmark score is 8,676, placing it at the 65th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8565U, scores 8,665, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core i5-8365U is 0.4% higher at 8,708, while the AMD EPYC 7601 is 0.7% lower at 8,619.

The Intel Arc A310's scores are more modest. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 30,607, and in Vulkan, it scores 28,964. Passmark results show 31 in DirectX 10, 33 in DirectX 11, 29 in DirectX 12, and 69 in DirectX 9. The Passmark G2D score is 625, G3D is 5,433, and GPU Compute is 2,157. The average benchmark score is 7,550, at the 40th percentile. The nearest rival, AMD Radeon R7 250, scores 7,557, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 0.4% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is 1% lower.

The combined picture is a CPU that is 25 percentiles above the GPU. This means the CPU can handle far more than the GPU can display. In CPU-bound tasks like rendering or encoding, the system will perform exceptionally well. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming, the system will be limited by the Arc A310's throughput. The combined percentile of 53 reflects this balance: slightly above average overall, but skewed heavily toward CPU performance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is a desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The transistor density is 45.9M per mm². The GPU has a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz, with a memory clock of 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a narrow bus, which limits memory throughput in bandwidth-sensitive applications.

The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. It also has 6 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute is 2.688 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 5.376 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These figures place the Arc A310 at the entry level of desktop GPUs. The Passmark G3D score of 5,433 is close to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which is 1% slower in average score. This suggests the Arc A310 is comparable to a GTX 1650 in traditional rasterization.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means it supports modern rendering features like ray tracing and mesh shaders, but the hardware's modest compute power will limit their effectiveness. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but the overall GPU throughput of 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 will constrain ray-traced workloads. The GPU also has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which is a modern display interface. The TDP is 30 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. It is a single-slot card with no power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

The production status is End-of-life, with a release date of 2022-10-11. Its predecessor is Xe Graphics, and its successor is Battlemage. The GPU's percentile of 40 among all GPUs indicates it is below the median. In rendering tasks, the 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 will handle basic 3D workloads but will struggle with complex scenes. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming at low settings but will become a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop platform. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for a high-speed GPU or NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is available as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 200 W, which is very low, reflecting its 30 W TDP. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, so the total system power draw is modest. This means a small power supply is sufficient, and the system can be built in a compact case. The GPU is single-slot and requires no power connectors, simplifying installation. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is adequate for the GPU's bandwidth needs.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A310 with a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 65 W TDP can support a much stronger graphics card without bottlenecking. The 24 cores and 32 threads of the i9-13900E will remain relevant for years, so the GPU is the primary upgrade target. Moving to a GPU with more VRAM and higher compute throughput would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and rendering. The platform's support for DDR5 also allows for a future memory upgrade, though the current dual-channel configuration is adequate.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900E, a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor, with the Intel Arc A310, a 4 GB entry-level desktop GPU. The build class is desktop. The CPU is at the 65th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 53, meaning this configuration outperforms 53% of all CPU+GPU pairs in the database.

The i9-13900E is a Raptor Lake-S part with a 65 W TDP, making it an efficiency-focused version of the Core i9 line. The Arc A310 is a 30 W Alchemist GPU with 768 shading units and 6 ray tracing cores. The pairing is unusual: a high-end CPU with a low-end GPU. This is not a balanced gaming rig, but rather a CPU-centric workstation where the processor dominates. The overall tier is mid-range, as indicated by the 53rd combined percentile. Users get exceptional CPU performance but limited graphics capability.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the Intel Core i9-13900E with the Intel Arc A310. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of each component, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 5,433 and its proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (which is 1% faster in average score), the Arc A310 should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with low-to-medium settings in most modern games. The 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle, with frame rates likely dropping below playable thresholds in demanding titles. The CPU's high single-core score of 4,834 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the CPU will not be a limiting factor in gaming, so the GPU's performance is the sole determinant of frame rates.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the Arc A310 might achieve high frame rates due to their low graphical demands, but the GPU's modest compute of 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 will cap performance. In AAA games, expect 30-60 FPS at 1080p low settings, with drops below 30 FPS in the most demanding scenes. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but enabling ray tracing will severely impact performance due to the low overall GPU throughput. Frame generation or upscaling technologies are not listed in the data, so the GPU must rely on native rendering.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The Arc A310's 40th percentile ranking and 5,433 Passmark G3D score will not sustain frame rates above 144 FPS in most titles. The CPU can handle high frame rates, but the GPU cannot deliver them. Users seeking 144 Hz or 240 Hz gaming should look for a more powerful GPU.

Streaming: The i9-13900E's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The CPU's 34,244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means it can handle both game rendering and video encoding simultaneously. The GPU's lack of dedicated encoder hardware is not listed, so software encoding via the CPU is the primary option, which works well due to the CPU's strength.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU's multi-core performance will accelerate rendering and export times in video editing software. The GPU's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB VRAM can handle basic effects and timeline scrubbing, but complex GPU-accelerated effects may be slow. The CPU does the heavy lifting, making 1080p and even 4K editing feasible.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent. The 24 cores and 32 threads will render scenes quickly, as indicated by the high Cinebench scores. GPU-based rendering, such as in Blender's Cycles, will be limited by the Arc A310's compute and VRAM. The 4 GB VRAM will restrict scene complexity, and the 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 will result in long render times for GPU-accelerated passes.

Software development: The i9-13900E is ideal for developers. Compilation times will be short due to the 32 threads, and the large 36 MB L3 cache helps with repetitive build tasks. The GPU is sufficient for running an IDE and basic GUI acceleration. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running builds where data integrity matters.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical student and office tasks. The CPU's power is wasted on web browsing and document editing, though the single-core score of 4,834 ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU's 625 Passmark G2D score indicates adequate 2D performance for spreadsheets and presentations. The low 65 W CPU TDP and 30 W GPU TDP make this an energy-efficient system for a dorm room or office.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900E

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds