SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 and Intel Arc A750 combination sits on the LGA1700 platform, Intel's final socket for the Core 13th and 14th generations. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility between cost-conscious DDR4 boards and higher-bandwidth DDR5 configurations. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support on 16 CPU lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades, though the Arc A750 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The 65W TDP of the Core i9-13900 is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, and the Arc A750's 225W TDP plus a suggested PSU of 550W means a quality 550W power supply handles this entire build with headroom. The 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors on the GPU are standard for this class. The CPU's boost clock of 5.60 GHz allows it to extract maximum performance from the platform, but the locked multiplier (no "K" suffix) means overclocking is off the table—the upgrade path is more about swapping components than tuning this one.

A sensible next upgrade from this platform would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 92nd percentile rating leaves substantial headroom above the Arc A750's 66th percentile GPU ranking. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 support mean a future GPU upgrade will not be bottlenecked by the interface, and the 550W PSU headroom suggests only modest PSU upgrades would be needed for mid-range GPUs. The socket's end-of-life status means CPU upgrades are limited to other 13th/14th gen parts, so the realistic path forward is GPU-centric rather than platform-centric.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a pronounced imbalance: the Core i9-13900 ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 60676, while the Arc A750 sits at the 66th percentile for GPUs with an average score of 20582. This 30-point percentile gap is the defining characteristic of this pairing. In CPU-bound workloads—compilation, data compression, physics simulation—the i9-13900 will be the dominant force, with its PassMark multithread score of 45680 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 leaving the GPU almost irrelevant. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the Arc A750 becomes the limiting factor.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects this compromise: neither component drags the other down catastrophically, but the GPU is clearly the weaker link. The nearest rival data underscores the CPU's strength—the i9-13900 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX by 1% each in average score, and the Intel Core i9-14900F by 1.1%. The GPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 (0.1% ahead) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.2% ahead), showing the A750 is competitive with last-generation mid-range parts but far from the CPU's tier.

For gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355, Geekbench single-core of 2604) will keep frame rates high in CPU-light titles, but the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in graphically intense scenes. At 1440p and 4K, the bottleneck shifts almost entirely to the GPU, making the CPU's advantages largely irrelevant for those resolutions. The practical takeaway: this is a CPU-first build where the GPU serves as a capable but not exceptional companion.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900 delivers class-leading CPU numbers. Cinebench R23 multicore hits 37931, single-core 5355; Geekbench multicore 21164, single-core 2604. PassMark results reinforce the pattern: multithread 45680, single-thread 4309, floating-point math 120492, integer math 176107, and data compression 577285. The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the top decile of desktop processors, with nearest rivals like the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (0.2% behind) and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (1% behind) confirming its position.

The Arc A750's GPU benchmarks are more modest. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2612, Geekbench OpenCL 98554, Vulkan 85631, and PassMark G3D 12534 with GPU compute at 5368. The 66th percentile ranking places it in the upper-middle tier, with the Intel Arc B570 0.1% ahead and the RTX 3070 Mobile 0.2% ahead. The gap between the CPU's 92nd percentile and GPU's 66th percentile is the story: this build excels at compute-heavy tasks but is mid-pack for graphics.

The combined picture is a system that punches far above its weight in CPU workloads and holds its own in GPU tasks. For users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound—software compilation, data analysis, virtualization—the performance is exceptional. For GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering or advanced gaming, the system performs adequately but does not reach the same elite tier. The average benchmark score of 60676 for the CPU versus 20582 for the GPU quantifies this divide: the CPU is roughly three times more powerful in raw benchmark terms than the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need massive CPU horsepower without a correspondingly massive GPU budget. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 indicating exceptional parallel throughput. Data scientists and researchers running simulations or processing large datasets will find the PassMark data compression score of 577285 and integer math score of 176107 invaluable. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the CPU's power for their coursework while the GPU handles their occasional graphics needs.

Small business workstations running virtualization, database servers, or heavy multitasking will thrive on this CPU. The 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms most server-class Xeons in the benchmark database, including the Xeon Gold 6338T. Content creators who edit video will see strong performance in CPU-encoded tasks, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be less impressive. Gamers at 1080p will find this a solid mid-range gaming system, while 1440p and 4K gamers should look elsewhere given the GPU's limitations.

The combination is less suitable for users whose primary workload is GPU compute—machine learning training, high-end 3D animation, or competitive high-refresh gaming at high resolutions. The Arc A750's 8GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but the GPU's 66th percentile ranking means it will not satisfy enthusiasts expecting top-tier graphics. The sweet spot is a user who prioritizes CPU performance and treats the GPU as a secondary consideration.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than empirical results. The CPU's single-thread performance—Cinebench R23 single-core 5355, Geekbench single-core 2604—is sufficient to drive high frame rates in most titles, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 indicate mid-range 1080p capability.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimates suggest playable frame rates in most modern titles, with the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance handling medium-to-high settings comfortably. Esports titles and lighter games should see high triple-digit frame rates given the CPU's strength. At 1440p, the GPU's 8GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting, with frame rates dropping to playable-but-not-smooth in demanding titles. At 4K, the Arc A750 will struggle; the 66th percentile GPU ranking suggests only older or less demanding games will remain playable.

The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of shared L3 cache provide excellent gaming headroom, but the GPU caps overall performance. The nearest rival comparison—the Arc A750 is within 0.2% of the RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% of the Arc B570—positions it as a solid 1080p card. For 1080p gaming, this is a capable system; for higher resolutions, the CPU far exceeds what the GPU can deliver, and frame rates will reflect the GPU's limitations rather than the CPU's strengths.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 uses the DG2-512 chip on TSMC's 6nm process, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. Its 8GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocks at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU's base clock of 2050 MHz boosts to 2400 MHz, and the 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs provide a balanced throughput profile. The 28 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the Xe-HPG architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS and FP16 of 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate strong compute capability for its class. The pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s support the 1080p focus of this GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 and PassMark G3D of 12534 place it in the 66th percentile, with the nearest rival being the Intel Arc B570 at 0.1% ahead. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show respectable API performance, while PassMark directx scores (DX12: 70, DX11: 72, DX9: 181) indicate the GPU handles legacy APIs less efficiently.

For rendering workloads, the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is the standout figure, allowing fast texture streaming and large scene buffers. The 28 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the 66th percentile ranking suggests RT performance will be modest. The GPU's 225W TDP and dual-slot design with 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin connectors make it a standard mid-range power consumer, and the 550W suggested PSU is realistic for most builds. The production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage as the successor, meaning driver maturity and long-term support are considerations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 5355 (Cinebench R23) and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 combine to deliver high frame rates in esports and moderately demanding titles, though the GPU's 66th percentile ranking limits ultra settings at higher refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding and streaming simultaneously with ease, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 45680, allowing software encoding at high quality without impacting game performance.

Video editing: CPU-encoded exports will be fast, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 providing strong performance in Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve's CPU-based workflows, while GPU-accelerated effects will see more moderate gains from the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in CPU-based rendering, with the 60676 average benchmark score placing it in the 92nd percentile, but GPU rendering will be limited by the Arc A750's mid-range compute and 8GB VRAM.

Software development: Compilation and testing workflows benefit enormously from the 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache, with PassMark integer math of 176107 indicating strong performance in build-heavy environments.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (4309 PassMark single-thread) handles office tasks instantly, while the GPU's 732 PassMark G2D score ensures smooth 2D desktop rendering; the 65W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on workstations.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900 compatible with DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 through its dual-channel memory bus, giving builders a choice of motherboard and memory configurations.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The Arc A750's suggested PSU is 550W, which accommodates the GPU's 225W TDP and the CPU's 65W TDP with headroom.

Q: Does the Core i9-13900 support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (the part number SRMB6 lacks the "K" suffix), so the CPU runs at its stock 5.60 GHz boost clock without manual overclocking.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556 versus the A750's 20582, making the A750 0.1% faster in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Does the Arc A750 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 28 RT cores on the Xe-HPG architecture, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate with ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the CPU's position among all desktop processors?

A: The i9-13900 ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60676, outperforming the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T by 0.2%.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock of 2.00 GHz boosts to 5.60 GHz, and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and integrates UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output. The 65W TDP is notable for a 24-core part, reflecting Intel's power efficiency improvements in Raptor Lake.

Benchmark results tell a story of dominance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 and single-core score of 5355 place it at the top of the desktop hierarchy. Geekbench multicore of 21164 and single-core of 2604 reinforce this. PassMark scores are equally strong: multithread 45680, single-thread 4309, floating-point math 120492, integer math 176107, data compression 577285, and extended instructions 32760. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs is backed by nearest rival comparisons showing it 0.2% ahead of the Xeon Gold 6338T and 1% ahead of both the Ryzen 7 8745HX and Ryzen 9 7945HX.

For real workloads, the 24-core configuration shines in heavily threaded tasks like compilation, rendering, and scientific computing. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in large datasets, while the 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness. The locked multiplier is a minor limitation for enthusiasts, but the stock performance is so high that overclocking gains would be marginal. The 65W TDP makes this an efficient powerhouse, and the launch MSRP of $549 positions it at the high end of the desktop CPU market. This is a CPU that defines the top tier of desktop computing, and the Arc A750 GPU is the only factor preventing this system from being a top-tier all-rounder.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds