SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900 and Intel Arc A580 pairing represents a fascinating study in asymmetry: a top-tier 24-core processor from the Raptor Lake generation paired with a mid-range Alchemist graphics card. The data in the FACT PACK reveals a system designed for raw computational throughput, but one where the visual experience is dictated by a more modest GPU. This analysis explores the implications of this combination, from the CPU’s commanding lead in multi-threaded tasks to the GPU’s specific capabilities and the balance between the two.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this Intel Core i9-13900 and Intel Arc A580 build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 90, indicating it outperforms 90% of all measured system pairings in the database, placing it in the upper echelon of overall capability.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900 compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX in average benchmark score?

A: The Core i9-13900 has an average benchmark score of 60676, which is 1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX’s score of 60099, according to the deltaPct values.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A580?

A: The Intel Arc A580 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU and GPU percentile rankings against all other components?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 sits in the 92nd percentile against all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A580 sits in the 87th percentile against all GPUs. This means the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU when compared to their respective peers.

Q: Does the Core i9-13900 support ECC memory, and what PCIe version does it use?

A: Yes, the Core i9-13900 supports ECC memory. It also provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is a high-bandwidth interface for the latest storage and expansion cards.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the Intel Arc A580?

A: The suggested power supply for the Intel Arc A580 is 450 W. The GPU itself has a TDP of 175 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, what score did the Arc A580 achieve?

A: The Intel Arc A580 scored 2229 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, which contributes to its overall average benchmark score of 57756.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this system is the Intel Socket 1700 platform, anchored by the Core i9-13900. This CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility, though the presence of ECC memory support suggests a lean toward stability and professional workloads. The platform is modern, with the CPU providing 16 Gen 5 PCIe lanes for the most demanding devices, although the Arc A580 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The 65 W TDP of the processor is notably low for a 24-core part, which means a capable air cooler is likely sufficient for most workloads, keeping the thermal envelope of the system manageable.

The most straightforward path to increased gaming performance would be a GPU upgrade. The Arc A580 requires a 450 W power supply and dual 8-pin connectors, leaving substantial headroom for a more power-hungry graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x16 slot is fully capable of accommodating a higher-tier modern GPU. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking suggests it would not be a bottleneck for a significantly faster graphics card. A sensible next step would be to replace the Arc A580 with a higher-performing GPU, as the Core i9-13900’s multi-threaded might is already at a level where it can drive top-end graphics solutions without being the limiting factor. The platform’s support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means a memory upgrade could also be a consideration, though the CPU’s performance is already strong.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a clear picture of imbalance in this pairing. The Core i9-13900, with a 92nd percentile CPU ranking and an average benchmark score of 60676, vastly outclasses the Arc A580, which holds an 87th percentile ranking and an average score of 57756. In CPU-intensive tasks like the Passmark multi-thread test (score of 45680) or Cinebench R23 multi-core (score of 37931), the processor operates at a level that is several tiers above the GPU’s capabilities. In gaming, this creates a scenario where the CPU is often waiting on the GPU to render frames, meaning the Arc A580 is the clear performance bottleneck in graphics-bound workloads.

This is not necessarily a negative, however. For tasks like data compression, where the CPU scores 577285 in Passmark, the GPU is almost entirely irrelevant. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU. Conversely, in a game with high resolution and ultra settings, the GPU’s 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 indicates a mid-range level of graphics performance. The system’s balance is therefore workload-dependent: a productivity monster with a competent, but not exceptional, gaming component. The CPU’s 1% lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX in average score reinforces its high-end status, further highlighting the disparity with the GPU, which is only 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this setup is likely to disappoint at 1080p with competitive settings. The Core i9-13900’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly, but the Arc A580’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 suggests the GPU will struggle to maintain very high frame rates in demanding titles. The GPU is the limiting factor, and achieving high refresh rates will require lower graphical settings.

In streaming, the system is well-equipped. The 24 cores and 32 threads of the i9-13900 provide immense headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark multi-thread score of 45680 indicates the CPU can handle the simultaneous load of a game and a software encoder without significant performance degradation, making this a strong point for the build.

For video editing, the combination is potent. The CPU’s 37931 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core will make short work of rendering timelines and exporting projects. The Arc A580’s 8 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects and GPU-accelerated previews, though the CPU will be the primary workhorse, making this a very capable editing station.

In 3D rendering, the CPU is the star. The high multi-threaded scores in Cinebench R15 (3823) and R20 (15931) demonstrate its ability to handle complex scene renders, especially in CPU-based engines. The GPU’s role is supplementary; its 24 RT cores and 3072 shading units provide some acceleration, but the sheer number of CPU cores will dominate render times.

For software development, the i9-13900 is a superb choice. A Passmark integer math score of 176107 and data encryption score of 35242 indicate fast compilation times and quick code execution. The high core count allows numerous virtual machines or containers to run smoothly, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for critical development work.

For student and office work, this system is overkill. The Passmark single-thread score of 4309 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2604 are more than sufficient for document editing and web browsing. The primary benefit would be the longevity of the platform, as the sheer processing power of the CPU ensures it will not feel slow for many years, even as software demands increase.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a 36 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration is a hybrid design, though the FACT PACK does not separate performance and efficiency core counts. Its 92nd percentile ranking against all CPUs underscores its high-end status.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 is exceptional, positioning it far ahead of typical desktop parts. The Passmark multi-thread score of 45680 and Geekbench multi-core score of 21164 further confirm its prowess in tasks that can utilize all 32 threads. This makes it a formidable tool for content creation, rendering, and scientific computing.

Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2604. These scores indicate excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and in applications that rely on single-core speed. The Passmark data also shows specific strengths: a floating-point math score of 120492 and an extended instructions score of 32760, which are relevant for scientific simulations and cryptographic tasks. With a launch MSRP of $549, it was positioned as a premium desktop processor.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate expectations presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data clearly indicates that the Intel Arc A580 will be the primary determinant of gaming performance.

Based on the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, which is in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, this pairing is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most modern games. At 1440p, more demanding titles will likely require medium settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM may also become a limiting factor at higher resolutions and texture quality settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 5355) ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential. Overall, this is a system for 1080p gaming, with the potential for 1440p at reduced settings, but it lacks the raw power for high-refresh, high-resolution gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for users who prioritize raw computational power over gaming graphics. The primary target is a content creator or professional who works in video editing, 3D modeling, or software development, where the Core i9-13900’s multi-threaded performance is a massive advantage. The Arc A580 provides enough graphical capability for general use and light GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not the focus.

A gamer at 1080p looking for a solid experience in less demanding titles or willing to lower settings could consider this build. The high-performance CPU ensures a stable platform and future-proofing for a GPU upgrade. A student or professional in a technical field who needs to run simulations or compile code will find the processing power transformative. The ECC memory support also makes it a compelling option for a small business workstation where data integrity is crucial. This is not for the enthusiast gamer seeking maximum frame rates, but for the power user who needs a high-throughput workhorse with a competent, if secondary, graphics component.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that marries a high-end workstation-class CPU with a mid-range graphics card. The Intel Core i9-13900 is a flagship 13th Gen processor, while the Intel Arc A580 is an Alchemist-generation GPU designed for mainstream gaming. The combined percentile of 90 places this system in the top 10% of all configurations in the database, showcasing its overall strength. However, this high combined score is driven almost entirely by the CPU, which sits at the 92nd percentile.

The system’s class is clearly a high-performance desktop workstation with gaming capabilities. It is a pairing that makes sense for users who spend most of their time in professional applications and play games as a secondary activity. The data suggests a system with an immense amount of untapped processing potential, waiting for a future GPU upgrade to unlock its full gaming potential. Until then, it is a uniquely powerful tool for non-graphics tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for this pairing show a significant gulf between the two main components. The Intel Core i9-13900 achieved a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and a single-core score of 5355, contributing to an average benchmark score of 60676. This performance places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, and it is a mere 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T and 1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX.

Conversely, the Intel Arc A580’s average benchmark score is 57756, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its key result is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229. It is 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE. The combined picture is of a system with world-class processing power, as evidenced by the CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking, paired with a graphics card that, while above average, is not in the same performance tier. The data shows a system where the CPU is the clear hero.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and utilizes the DG2-512 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. It features 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, along with 24 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. Its memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

In terms of raw compute, the Arc A580 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. These specifications align with its 87th percentile ranking, indicating solid mid-range performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 suggests it is capable of handling modern games with DirectX 12 Ultimate features. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 show strong compute capability for a range of tasks, though the CPU remains the dominant force in this system. The GPU’s 175 W TDP and dual-slot design are typical for its class, and its support for DisplayPort 2.0 ensures compatibility with the latest high-refresh monitors.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds