SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A380: A Study in Asymmetry

This pairing presents one of the most lopsided combinations in the desktop database: a 92nd-percentile CPU harnessed to a 44th-percentile GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900, a 24-core Raptor Lake-S flagship-class processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, sits alongside the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level Alchemist GPU with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The data reveals a system where compute potential vastly outstrips graphics throughput, creating a platform that excels in CPU-bound productivity but struggles to translate its processor's headroom into high-end gaming experiences. This analysis draws exclusively from benchmark scores, percentile rankings, and architectural specifications to explore what this combination can and cannot do.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, with a die size of 157 mm² housing 7,200 million transistors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest configuration by modern standards, and the data reflects that positioning.

The A380's compute resources include 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. For ray tracing, it offers 8 RT cores, while tensor cores are not specified in the data. Pixel rate stands at 65.60 GPixel/s, texture rate at 131.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput at 4.198 TFLOPS. FP16 performance doubles to 8.397 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, which can benefit certain compute workloads that support mixed precision.

Benchmark scores place this GPU in the 44th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558. Its nearest rivals provide context: the AMD FirePro W5170M scores 8595 (a 0.4% advantage), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M scores 8462 (1.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 scores 8458 (1.2% behind), and the AMD Radeon 880M scores 8436 (1.4% behind). These deltas are tight, indicating the A380 sits in a narrow performance band with older mobile and entry-level desktop parts.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the A380 scores 808, a figure that confirms its entry-level positioning. OpenCL performance via Geekbench reaches 38224, while Vulkan scores 36736. Passmark results show DirectX 10 at 37, DirectX 11 at 38, DirectX 12 at 35, and DirectX 9 at 73. The G3D score is 6252, with G2D at 610 and GPU compute at 2762. These numbers indicate that the A380 handles legacy DirectX 9 workloads relatively better than modern DX12 titles, which often demand more from memory bandwidth and shader complexity.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS places this GPU firmly in entry-level territory. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the overall compute density suggests limited headroom for complex scenes. The 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for high-resolution textures, though the 6 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings. The dual-slot design, 75 W TDP, and single 8-pin power connector suggest a compact, low-power solution rather than a performance-oriented card.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data presents a clear imbalance: the CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 68, indicating that the system's overall performance is dragged down significantly by the graphics component. In CPU-bound workloads—such as data compression, encryption, or multi-threaded rendering—the i9-13900 will operate without constraint, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the A380 becomes the limiting factor almost immediately.

Consider the CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 45680 and single-thread score of 4309, alongside the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 6252. In gaming, where frames are rendered by the GPU, the A380's 44th-percentile standing means that even at 1080p, the CPU's headroom will go largely unused. The i9-13900 can feed frames far faster than the A380 can produce them, creating a bottleneck that no CPU-side adjustment can resolve. Conversely, in productivity tasks like Cinebench R23 multi-core (37931), the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU performs at its full 92nd-percentile potential.

The FPS scaling evidence, though not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The A380's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 and its DirectX 12 Passmark score of 35 suggest that frame rates in modern titles will be modest. The CPU's single-core performance, as measured by Geekbench single-core at 2604 and Cinebench R23 single-core at 5355, ensures that any bottleneck in gaming will be GPU-side. The data implies that raising resolution from 1080p to 1440p will further strain the A380, while the CPU remains idle—a classic GPU-limited scenario.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The A380's 44th-percentile GPU standing and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 indicate that high-refresh 1080p gaming is out of reach for demanding titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 Passmark score of 35 and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates well below what the i9-13900's single-thread score of 4309 could otherwise support. For esports titles at lower settings, the 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate may suffice, but the data does not support expectations of 144 Hz gameplay in modern AAA games.

Streaming: The i9-13900's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 45680 and data compression score of 577285. The CPU can handle software encoding without compromising game performance, though the A380's modest GPU compute (2762 in Passmark GPU compute) limits the quality of any GPU-accelerated encoding. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for streaming overhead, but overall stream quality will be constrained by the GPU's rendering limits.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with Cinebench R20 multi-core at 15931 and Geekbench multi-core at 21164, ensuring fast export times. The A380's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p timelines, but 4K editing with effects will strain the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 8 RT cores could accelerate certain effects, but the data suggests a CPU-bound workflow where the GPU is a minor contributor.

3D rendering: The i9-13900 dominates CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R15 multi-core at 3823 and R23 multi-core at 37931. For GPU-based renderers, the A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 provide entry-level acceleration, but the 44th percentile ranking means render times will be slower than mid-range alternatives. The 6 GB VRAM may also limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 176107 and extended instructions score of 32760 support fast compilation and code analysis. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR4/DDR5 memory support enhance multi-threaded build times. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, except for any compute tasks like local model inference, where the A380's 2762 GPU compute score offers modest acceleration.

Student and office work: The i9-13900's single-thread score of 4309 and Geekbench single-core of 2604 ensure snappy responsiveness in office applications. The A380's 610 G2D score and 6 GB VRAM handle desktop rendering and light graphics tasks without issue. This scenario is massively over-provisioned on the CPU side, but the pairing functions adequately for everyday productivity.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU throughput above all else and accept minimal GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations—playing esports or older titles at medium settings—will find the A380's 44th-percentile standing workable, but those seeking 1440p or high-refresh experiences should look elsewhere. Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound applications like video encoding or 3D rendering will benefit from the i9-13900's 92nd-percentile performance, with the A380 serving as a basic display output and light acceleration.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 45680 and integer math score of 176107, making this an efficient workstation for software engineering. Students in computer science or engineering fields can leverage the CPU's compute power for simulations and data analysis, while the GPU handles standard desktop tasks. Small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads will see strong CPU performance, as indicated by the data encryption score of 35242, though GPU-accelerated tasks will lag.

The production status is telling: the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, with the A380's successor listed as Battlemage. This suggests the A380 is a placeholder or budget option, not a long-term investment. Builders targeting the 68th combined percentile should understand that the CPU carries the system, and any GPU upgrade would dramatically shift the balance.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-13900 achieves a 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60676. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572, 0.2% ahead), AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104, 1% behind), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099, 1% behind), and Intel Core i9-14900F (60008, 1.1% behind). These tight deltas place the i9-13900 at the top of its performance tier, with rivals within 1.1% either way.

The Intel Arc A380 achieves a 44th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558. Its nearest rivals—AMD FirePro W5170M (8595, 0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, 1.1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, 1.2% behind), and AMD Radeon 880M (8436, 1.4% behind)—cluster within a narrow band, confirming the A380's entry-level status.

The combined percentile is 68, reflecting a system that sits above the median overall but far below what the CPU alone suggests. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and single-core of 5355, alongside Geekbench multi-core of 21164 and single-core of 2604, paint a picture of a top-tier processor. The GPU's best scores—Geekbench OpenCL at 38224 and Vulkan at 36736—are respectable for its class but cannot compete with mid-range or high-end GPUs. The picture is clear: this is a CPU-first system, with the GPU as a secondary component.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data indicates that the A380's 44th-percentile GPU standing, combined with its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 35, will produce modest frame rates in modern titles at 1080p. For demanding AAA games, expect low-to-medium settings to achieve playable frame rates, while esports titles may run at higher settings given the 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate.

At 1440p, the 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM will become limiting factors, likely forcing reduced settings and lower frame rates. The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 single-core of 5355, ensures that the i9-13900 will not bottleneck the A380 at any resolution—the GPU is the sole constraint. DirectX 9 performance, as shown by the Passmark score of 73, suggests older titles run relatively well, while DirectX 11 (38) and DirectX 12 (35) are closer in performance. Vulkan scores from Geekbench (36736) hint at reasonable API efficiency, but the overall GPU compute (2762 in Passmark) caps the system's gaming ceiling.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 sits at the 92nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 60676, placing it near the top of the database.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A380 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU's performance closer to which rivals?

A: The A380's nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5170M (0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (1.1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (1.2% behind), and AMD Radeon 880M (1.4% behind).

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, reflecting a system that is above average overall but heavily weighted by the CPU's high performance.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900 supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is marked as end-of-life, with its successor listed as Battlemage, while the CPU is active.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The i9-13900 boosts up to 5.60 GHz, with a base clock of 2000 MHz.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the build class data. The pairing combines a 92nd-percentile CPU with a 44th-percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 68. The system occupies an unusual tier: it performs like a high-end workstation for CPU-bound tasks, but like an entry-level gaming rig for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU, with 24 cores and 32 threads on the Raptor Lake architecture, is a top-tier processor that rivals the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX within 1% in average benchmark scores. The GPU, by contrast, is an entry-level Alchemist part that competes with mobile and older desktop GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon HD 8870M.

The 68th combined percentile places this build in the upper-middle range of all systems, but the distribution is bimodal: exceptional CPU performance and modest GPU performance. This is not a balanced gaming system, nor is it a pure compute server—it is a hybrid that leans heavily on processor power. The build class of desktop confirms its suitability for stationary workstations, with the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP suggesting a relatively low-power system overall.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The launch MSRP is $549, and it is not multiplier-unlocked.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 37931, while single-core scores 5355; Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 15931 and single-core 2249; Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 3823 and single-core 539. Geekbench multi-core reaches 21164, with single-core at 2604. Passmark results show multi-thread at 45680, single-thread at 4309, integer math at 176107, floating-point math at 120492, extended instructions at 32760, data compression at 577285, data encryption at 35242, and physics at 2484.

These scores translate to real-world performance: data compression and encryption tasks, as measured by Passmark, indicate strong throughput for archival and security workloads. The find prime numbers score of 186 suggests moderate single-thread integer performance, while the random string sorting score of 64396 points to capable data manipulation. The 92nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 60676 place this CPU in the top tier, with rivals like the Intel Core i9-14900F just 1.1% behind. For users running multi-threaded applications—video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computing—the i9-13900 delivers near-flagship performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built on Intel Socket 1700, with the CPU supporting DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, and the GPU's TDP is 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU. This leaves substantial headroom for upgrades, as the total system power draw is low by modern standards.

The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with the successor listed as Battlemage, making a GPU upgrade the most obvious path. Given the CPU's 92nd-percentile performance, the i9-13900 can drive far more powerful graphics cards without bottlenecking—the data suggests that any GPU up to the high-end range would benefit from this CPU's headroom. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures future compatibility with next-generation GPUs, while the dual-channel memory support allows for DDR5 upgrades to increase bandwidth.

The suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU indicates that a higher-wattage power supply would be needed for a more powerful graphics card, but the current 75 W TDP GPU runs comfortably on minimal power. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the A380 with a mid-range or high-end GPU, leveraging the CPU's 24 cores and 5.60 GHz boost clock to unlock significantly better gaming and rendering performance. The motherboard socket, being current-gen, supports a range of 13th-gen CPUs, though the i9-13900 is already near the top of that stack. Memory upgrades to DDR5 would also improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, given the CPU's dual-channel support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds