SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Usage Scenarios

The Intel Core i9-13900 paired with the Intel Arc A310E presents an unusual combination that excels in CPU-bound workloads while offering modest graphics capabilities. For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the i9-13900's single-core performance—evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2604—provides the necessary processing headroom for competitive esports titles. However, the Arc A310E's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will likely cap frame rates well below what the CPU can feed, making this pairing more suited to 60 FPS gaming rather than 144 Hz+ scenarios.

Streaming workflows benefit substantially from the i9-13900's 24 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 45680 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 indicate strong parallel processing capability for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast software. The 65 W TDP means the CPU can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads without excessive thermal throttling, though the GPU's 75 W TDP and single-slot design suggest it is not intended for demanding streaming encodes alongside gaming.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see mixed results. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15931 and Passmark floating-point math score of 120492 demonstrate robust processing for timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks that leverage CPU acceleration. The Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6.144 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) capability can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 4 GB VRAM limits working with high-resolution footage or complex compositions.

3D rendering workloads, particularly CPU-based renders in Blender or V-Ray, will thrive on this system. The i9-13900's Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3823 and Passmark integer math score of 176107 indicate excellent sustained throughput for ray tracing calculations on the CPU. GPU rendering, however, will be constrained by the Arc A310E's 768 shading units and 16 ROPs, which place it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs—adequate for preview renders but not production-scale output.

Software development benefits significantly from this CPU. The Passmark data compression score of 577285 and data encryption score of 35242 show strong performance for compilation tasks, code analysis, and repository operations. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provide flexibility for build servers and development workstations, though the GPU adds little value for most programming workflows beyond basic display output.

For student and office work, this combination is over-provisioned on the CPU side but under-provisioned on the GPU side. The i9-13900's Passmark single-thread score of 4309 ensures snappy application responsiveness in productivity suites, while the Arc A310E's 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups for research and document work. The 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP keep total system power manageable for dorm-room or small-office environments, though the platform's desktop class (buildClass: "desktop") implies a full tower or SFF build rather than an integrated solution.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing is notably asymmetric. The Intel Core i9-13900 achieves an average benchmark score of 60676, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs—a strong high-end result. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 (1% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX at 60099 (1% behind), as well as the Intel Core i9-14900F at 60008 (1.1% behind). This clustering shows the i9-13900 sits at the top of a tight performance band, edging out server and mobile flagship parts by slim margins.

The Arc A310E, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK—its benchmarks array is empty—and holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0. This percentile placement indicates mid-pack performance, but the absence of direct scores means the GPU's exact capabilities must be inferred from its architectural specifications rather than measured results.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, reflecting the substantial gap between the CPU's top-tier performance and the GPU's mid-range standing. This 21-percentage-point difference between the CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile is the defining characteristic of this build: it is a system where the processor dramatically outclasses the graphics card.

Cinebench results illustrate the CPU's multi-core strength: R15 multicore at 3823, R20 multicore at 15931, and R23 multicore at 37931. Single-core scores scale correspondingly at 539 (R15), 2249 (R20), and 5355 (R23). Geekbench results show 21164 multicore and 2604 single-core. Passmark tests reveal specialized strengths: integer math at 176107, floating-point math at 120492, extended instructions at 32760, data compression at 577285, data encryption at 35242, and random string sorting at 64396. The multithread score of 45680 and single-thread score of 4309 round out the picture.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2000.00 MHz, boosting to 5.60 GHz—a substantial frequency range that allows the chip to scale from power-efficient idle states to high-performance bursts.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 allocation supports the 24-core configuration by reducing memory traffic in multi-threaded workloads, which is reflected in the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support for reliability-sensitive applications. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion.

The Passmark physics score of 2484 and find prime numbers score of 186 are notably lower relative to other tests, suggesting that certain integer-heavy or latency-sensitive workloads do not scale perfectly with the core count. However, the floating-point math score of 120492 and integer math score of 176107 demonstrate robust arithmetic throughput for scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 32760 indicates strong SIMD and vector processing capabilities, beneficial for multimedia encoding and signal processing.

The 65 W TDP is surprisingly low for a 24-core part, indicating Intel's power management aggressively limits sustained all-core boost clocks. This is evident in the 0.2% delta to the Xeon Gold 6338T, a server chip with different power characteristics—the i9-13900 achieves comparable average scores while likely running at lower sustained frequencies. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), meaning overclocking is not supported, but the boost clock of 5.60 GHz provides ample single-thread performance out of the box.

The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU offers a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A310E handles graphics duties in this build. The CPU's production status is Active, with a release date of 2023-01-03, and its launch MSRP is $549. The part number is SRMB6, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900 a good match for the Intel Arc A310E?

A: The data indicates a significant imbalance. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 60676, while the GPU holds the 50th percentile with no measured benchmark scores. This creates a combined percentile of 71, meaning the CPU will frequently wait on the GPU in graphics-bound workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900 scores 60676 on average, leading the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T by 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX by 1%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX by 1%, and the Intel Core i9-14900F by 1.1%. These deltas are small, placing all five processors in a tight performance band.

Q: Does the Arc A310E support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers current gaming and rendering APIs. However, the 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 64-bit bus width (124.0 GB/s bandwidth) may limit texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900 support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. This flexibility allows builders to choose based on platform and budget, though the exact bandwidth figures are not provided in the data.

Q: Is the Arc A310E suitable for multi-monitor setups?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, supporting up to four displays. Its 2000 MHz base and boost clocks, along with 768 shading units, provide adequate 2D performance for productivity across multiple monitors.

Q: What is the power requirement for this GPU?

A: The Arc A310E has a 75 W TDP with no power connectors required, and Intel recommends a 250 W PSU. This low power draw makes it suitable for small form factor builds, though the CPU's 65 W TDP means total system power remains modest.

Q: What is the CPU's release timeline and production status?

A: The i9-13900 was released on 2023-01-03, with a launch MSRP of $549, and remains in Active production. The Arc A310E, released on 2024-03-31, is marked as End-of-life with its successor being Battlemage.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users whose workloads are overwhelmingly CPU-bound and who need only basic graphics acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the i9-13900's Passmark data compression score of 577285 and integer math score of 176107, which speed up build times and static analysis. The 32 threads handle parallel compilation gracefully, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces context-switching overhead.

Students in engineering or data science programs will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 useful for MATLAB simulations, Python numerical computing, and CAD tooling, while the Arc A310E's 4 GB VRAM handles simple visualization tasks. The low 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP keep cooling requirements modest for dorm-room builds, and the desktop class form factor allows for easy upgrades.

Small business workstations running database queries, financial modeling, or office suites will see excellent responsiveness from the Passmark single-thread score of 4309. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 compatibility offers deployment flexibility. The GPU's 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups common in trading floors or administrative offices.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-rendered workflows—such as 3D modeling with CPU-based render engines or audio production with many tracks—will appreciate the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15931. The Passmark floating-point math score of 120492 indicates strong performance for physics simulations and video filters. However, those needing GPU-accelerated exports should look elsewhere, as the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance places it at the 50th GPU percentile.

Gamers at 1080p playing less demanding titles or older games may find this build serviceable, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance. The Geekbench single-core score of 2604 ensures game logic and physics run smoothly, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will bottleneck modern AAA titles at higher settings. This is not a system for 1440p or 4K gaming, nor for ray tracing workloads, despite the GPU's 6 RT cores.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 45.9M per mm², indicating a dense but modestly sized chip. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a significant constraint for modern games, which often require more than 4 GB at 1080p ultra settings. The 64-bit bus width limits memory throughput, and the pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s reflect the 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs. These figures place the GPU at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, squarely mid-pack.

Compute capabilities include 768 shading units, 6 RT cores, and FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS. The FP16 rate of 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) indicates support for mixed-precision workloads, but the absence of tensor core data (tensorCores: null) suggests limited AI acceleration. The API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern rendering pipelines, though the hardware may struggle with advanced features like mesh shaders or variable rate shading due to its limited resources.

The GPU's 75 W TDP and single-slot design, with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W, make it ideal for low-power builds. Its dimensions—168 mm length, 69 mm height, 20 mm width—allow it to fit in compact cases. Display output is via 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0, supporting high refresh rates on multiple monitors. The production status is End-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, meaning this is a legacy part in Intel's lineup.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the Arc A310E as the primary bottleneck in most workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile standing among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60676, contrasts sharply with the GPU's 50th percentile position. In gaming, the CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2604 ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates at 1080p. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, with the GPU dragging down the overall system performance.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the bottleneck flips. The i9-13900's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 and Passmark multithread score of 45680 drive these tasks efficiently, while the GPU idles or handles minor display output. The 65 W CPU TDP suggests power limits may throttle sustained all-core loads, evidenced by the tight 0.2% margin over the Xeon Gold 6338T—the CPU may not maintain peak clocks indefinitely.

Memory bandwidth is another potential bottleneck. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides adequate bandwidth for most tasks, but the lack of a specific memory bandwidth figure in the data makes it difficult to assess whether the 36 MB L3 cache compensates fully. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x8 for the GPU provide sufficient bandwidth for current hardware, though the GPU's x8 lane count may limit data transfer in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

The FPS scaling picture is constrained by the absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination (dataIsMeasured: false). Estimations from the benchmark scores suggest 1080p gaming at medium settings is feasible for less demanding titles, but 1440p or high-refresh gaming will be GPU-limited. The CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4309) ensures that even when the GPU is the bottleneck, frame pacing remains consistent without CPU-induced stutter.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing Intel's Core i9-13900 with Intel's Arc A310E. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part on Socket 1700, with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Arc 3 generation Alchemist chip with a 75 W TDP. The combined percentile of 71 places this system in the upper-midrange tier overall, driven almost entirely by the CPU's 92nd percentile performance.

The i9-13900's architecture (Raptor Lake) and 10 nm process node represent Intel's 13th generation Core lineup, released in January 2023. The Arc A310E uses the Xe-HPG architecture on TSMC's 6 nm node, released in March 2024 as an End-of-life product. This pairing is unusual in that it combines a high-end, actively produced CPU with a low-end, discontinued GPU, creating a system that excels in compute-heavy tasks but underperforms in graphics-intensive scenarios.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $549, while the GPU has no launch MSRP in the data. The system's overall tier from the percentiles is best described as a "CPU-first" build—one where the processor provides the majority of value, and the GPU serves as a basic display adapter or light accelerator. For users who need massive parallel processing power but only minimal graphics capability, this is a coherent, if niche, configuration.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK (measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false). All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A310E's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely limit frame rates to 30-45 FPS in modern AAA titles. The GPU's 50th percentile standing and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at 60+ FPS, but demanding games such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield will struggle. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355) ensures that even at low FPS, frame times remain stable without hitches.

For 1080p medium settings, the GPU's 768 shading units and 32 TMUs may push frame rates to 45-60 FPS in less demanding titles. The 6 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the low pixel rate (32.00 GPixel/s) and texture rate (64.00 GTexel/s) suggest RT effects will cause significant performance drops. The 4 GB VRAM is the hard ceiling—textures at medium settings in modern games can exceed this capacity, causing stuttering or asset pop-in.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes severely constrained. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 16 ROPs limit fill-rate-dependent effects. Estimated FPS at 1440p ultra would likely fall below 30 FPS for most titles, making this resolution impractical for gaming. The CPU's performance headroom becomes irrelevant beyond 1080p, as the GPU saturates first.

Older games or indie titles with modest requirements may run well, as the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4309) handles game logic efficiently. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support ensures compatibility with modern APIs, but the hardware's mid-range positioning means users should expect console-level performance at best, and only at 1080p.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface, which supports 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors. This means users have a clear upgrade path to newer Raptor Lake refresh parts without changing the motherboard, though the locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) limits overclocking headroom. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, allowing builders to retain existing DDR4 modules or migrate to DDR5 for higher bandwidth.

PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and expansion cards. The Arc A310E uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the reduced lane count (x8) may slightly impact data transfer rates in bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The GPU's 75 W TDP and lack of power connectors mean the suggested PSU of 250 W is more than sufficient; the CPU's 65 W TDP brings total system draw to well under 200 W, leaving significant headroom for additional components.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310E with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 92nd percentile performance can support much faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The i9-13900's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37931 indicates it can feed high-end GPUs in gaming scenarios, and the PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface ensures future graphics cards have full bandwidth. However, the GPU's End-of-life status and the platform's desktop class (buildClass: "desktop") mean users should consider whether a full platform overhaul is worthwhile versus a simple GPU swap.

Memory upgrades are also viable: the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows increasing capacity beyond the 36 MB L3 cache for workloads that exceed cache capacity. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for professional use, though it requires compatible motherboard and memory modules. The 65 W TDP and 250 W PSU recommendation provide ample headroom for additional storage drives or capture cards, making this a flexible foundation for a workstation build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds