SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900T

37,112 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, the second-generation Battlemage design, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip, designated BMG-G31, measures 368 mm², which is a substantial die for a mid-tier desktop GPU. The GPU ships with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. That memory configuration is generous for the class and directly relevant for high-resolution texture workloads and large 3D scenes.

Clock behavior is straightforward: a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. This is not a factory-overclocked monster; it is a solid, predictable design that will hold boost clocks under sustained load if cooling is adequate.

The compute configuration is robust. There are 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 ROPs. Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS via the 2:1 ratio. This places the card in a comfortable mid-range position for rasterization and compute workloads alike.

Ray tracing hardware is present: 32 dedicated RT cores. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The API support is current and full-featured, meaning modern game engines that leverage ray-traced shadows, reflections, and global illumination will run natively. However, the RT core count is not class-leading; it is sufficient for playable ray tracing at reasonable settings, but not for heavy RT workloads at high resolutions without upscaling.

Tensor cores are not listed in the fact pack. The architecture does not specify dedicated tensor hardware, which means any AI-accelerated features will rely on the general compute units. This is a notable distinction from NVIDIA competitors that have dedicated tensor cores for DLSS. Intel's upscaling solution, XeSS, may use the general compute pipeline, but the fact pack does not provide specifics on that.

The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 in the fact pack. This is unusual; the percentile suggests a median performer, but the lack of benchmark scores means the percentile is likely derived from aggregate data not shown here. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature. Large scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-material compositions will fit comfortably. The 512 GB/s bandwidth ensures texture streaming is not a bottleneck in most real-world scenarios.

The slot is dual-slot, power comes from a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin connector, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The TDP is 225 W. These are modest power requirements for the performance tier. The card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient; PCIe 5.0 is not needed for this class of GPU.

Display output is modern: 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. This supports high refresh rates at 1440p and 4K, and multi-monitor setups are well served. For content creators, the 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are the primary reasons to consider this card. Video editing timelines with multiple 4K streams, 3D rendering with large geometry, and GPU-accelerated effects will all benefit from the memory capacity.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks are extensive and show a clear performance profile. In Cinebench R15, the Core i9-12900T scores 2472 multi-core and 348 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 10301 multi-core and 1454 single-core. Cinebench R23, the more demanding test, yields 24528 multi-core and 3462 single-core. Geekbench scores are 11615 multi-core and 2259 single-core.

PassMark results provide a broader view. Multi-thread score is 29601, single-thread is 3810. Integer math scores 108211, floating-point math scores 75741, and extended instructions score 20054. Data compression hits 345021, data encryption scores 20750, and random string sorting is 39771. Physics score is 1811, and find prime numbers is 116.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 37112, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals are tightly grouped: AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117 (delta 0%), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 at 37093 (delta 0.1%), Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135 (delta -0.1%), and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161 (delta -0.1%). This means the i9-12900T is effectively tied with these competitors, with a performance spread of less than one tenth of one percent. The 85th percentile is a strong position; this is a high-end desktop CPU by any measure.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the fact pack. The percentile vs all GPUs is 50, and the average benchmark score is 0. The nearest rivals list is empty. The combined percentile for the build is 68. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, and there are no measured FPS rows for this combination. Any FPS discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured.

The combined picture is a CPU that is clearly above average, paired with a GPU that is median. The CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, which has implications for bottlenecking (discussed later). The 68th combined percentile suggests a system that is solidly mid-to-upper tier for desktop builds, but not a top-tier enthusiast rig. The CPU's 85th percentile against the GPU's 50th creates an imbalance that favors CPU-bound workloads.

For gaming, the CPU can easily feed the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's median position means it will handle 1080p and 1440p well but may struggle at 4K with high settings. For productivity, the CPU is the star. The multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (24528) and PassMark multi-thread (29601) indicate strong rendering and compilation performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM will help with GPU-accelerated tasks, but the compute throughput (19.66 TFLOPS FP32) is not exceptional.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700. This socket supports 12th Gen Alder Lake and 13th/14th Gen Raptor Lake processors. The Core i9-12900T is an unlocked multiplier part, so overclocking is possible on compatible Z-series motherboards, though the T-series low-power design limits headroom. The CPU is a 10 nm Intel process with a die size of 215 mm².

Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5. The fact pack does not specify maximum speeds or capacities. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). This is forward-looking; PCIe Gen 5 SSDs and GPUs are supported, though the Arc B770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible.

The CPU TDP is 35 W. This is a low-power variant, part of the T-series. The GPU TDP is 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The combined system draw will be well within the 550 W recommendation, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and peripherals. The power connectors on the GPU (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) are standard and compatible with most quality PSUs.

A sensible next upgrade depends on the goal. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor. Upgrading to a higher-performing GPU would balance the system, as the CPU has significant headroom. For productivity, the CPU is already strong; the 85th percentile means it is competitive with newer parts. The socket 1700 platform is nearing end-of-life, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard. The DDR5 support means the memory is modern and will carry over to a future platform.

The platform also includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770) in the CPU. This is useful for troubleshooting or as a fallback if the discrete GPU fails. The CPU supports ECC memory? No, ECC is false. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $489, which is a single factual data point. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed.

For a user looking to upgrade, the most impactful change would be a GPU with higher compute throughput and more RT cores. The 16 GB VRAM on the current GPU is sufficient, but the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 is the ceiling. Alternatively, waiting for a platform change to a newer socket would provide more PCIe 5.0 lanes and newer CPU architectures. The current platform is not obsolete, but it is at the end of its socket's life.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's position among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37112. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160, scores 37117, a delta of 0%.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B770 have, and what is the bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Does the fact pack contain any measured frame rates for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so any FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores, not measured results.

Q: What is the power consumption of each component, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W. The suggested PSU for the build is 550 W, providing headroom for the rest of the system.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplierUnlocked field is true. The Core i9-12900T is an unlocked part, though its 35 W TDP and T-series design may limit practical overclocking headroom.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 32 dedicated RT cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. There are no tensor cores listed in the specification.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU is at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is at the 50th percentile. This imbalance is the defining characteristic of this build. In CPU-bound workloads — such as software compilation, data compression, and physics simulations — the CPU will not be the limiting factor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29601 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 are strong. The CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks without breaking a sweat.

In GPU-bound workloads — modern gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering with ray tracing, and video encoding — the GPU is the bottleneck. The 50th percentile position means half of all GPUs perform better. The 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 is solid but not exceptional. For gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU will likely keep the GPU fed, but at 4K with ultra settings, the GPU will be the constraint.

The estimated FPS scaling follows the benchmark scores. Since there are no measured FPS rows, we rely on the percentile positions. A GPU at the 50th percentile will produce median frame rates for its class. The CPU at the 85th percentile will not hold it back in most scenarios. However, in esports titles at low resolutions and high refresh rates, the CPU's single-core performance (3810 PassMark single-thread, 3462 Cinebench R23 single-core) will be more than adequate. The GPU will still be the limit at higher settings.

The combined percentile is 68. This suggests that the system as a whole performs above the median but below the top tier. The CPU pulls the average up, while the GPU drags it down. For a balanced build, the GPU would need to be upgraded to a model in the 70th percentile or higher. This would shift the combined percentile upward and provide better frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios.

The data compression score (345021) and encryption score (20750) indicate the CPU is excellent for file archiving and security workloads. These are CPU-bound and will not be affected by the GPU. The physics score (1811) is relevant for game physics, which is CPU-bound. The GPU's RT cores will handle ray tracing, but the 32 cores are not a top-tier count, so RT-heavy games at high settings will be limited.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The primary audience is the PC builder who needs strong CPU performance for productivity but does not require top-tier GPU compute. The 85th percentile CPU makes this ideal for software developers, data analysts, and engineers who compile code, run simulations, or process large datasets. The PassMark integer math score of 108211 and floating-point score of 75741 are directly relevant to these workloads.

Students in computer science or engineering programs will benefit from the CPU's multi-threading for compilation and the 16 GB VRAM for machine learning experiments and GPU computing coursework. The 35 W CPU TDP means the system will run cool and quiet, suitable for a dorm room or shared office. The 550 W PSU suggestion is modest, keeping the build affordable on the power side.

Small business workstations for accounting, document processing, and database management are well served. The data encryption score of 20750 and data compression score of 345021 indicate strong performance for secure file handling and backup tasks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is overkill for these tasks but provides headroom for future GPU-accelerated applications.

Content creators who edit video in 1080p or 1440p will find the system capable. The GPU's 512 GB/s bandwidth handles multi-stream timelines, and the 16 GB VRAM allows for large effects stacks. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 will speed up rendering and export. However, 4K video editing with heavy color grading may challenge the GPU's 50th percentile position.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p are the target for the GPU. The median GPU performance will deliver playable frame rates at high settings in most titles. Gamers at 4K will need to lower settings or use upscaling. The CPU will not bottleneck at these resolutions. Esports gamers at high refresh rates (144 Hz and above) will benefit from the CPU's strong single-core performance, though the GPU may limit maximum FPS in less demanding titles.

The build is not for enthusiasts seeking maximum GPU compute or ray tracing performance. The 32 RT cores and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 are mid-range. For those users, a higher-tier GPU is necessary. The CPU is not the limitation; it is the GPU that holds the system back from top-tier gaming and rendering performance.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-S desktop variant. The core configuration is hybrid, with performance cores and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not break down the exact P-core/E-core split. The base clock is 1400.00 MHz, which is low, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz. This is a T-series low-power part, designed for thermally constrained environments.

The process node is Intel's 10 nm, with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. This cache configuration supports the high multi-threaded throughput. The memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility.

The benchmark scores tell the real story. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24528 is a strong result for a 35 W part. It indicates the CPU can handle demanding rendering workloads without excessive power draw. The single-core score of 3462 is also respectable, meaning everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding will feel snappy.

Geekbench multi-core of 11615 and single-core of 2259 are consistent with the Cinebench results. PassMark multi-thread of 29601 and single-thread of 3810 confirm the pattern. The CPU is well-rounded, with no obvious weak points. The extended instructions score of 20054 suggests good AVX-512 or similar vector processing performance, which is useful for scientific computing and some content creation tools.

The data compression score of 345021 is exceptionally high. This makes the CPU ideal for file archiving, backup software, and any workload that involves heavy data movement. The encryption score of 20750 is also strong, supporting secure communications and VPN software.

The 85th percentile position is the key takeaway. This is a high-end CPU that outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The nearest rivals are all within 0.1% of its average score, indicating it is at the top of its performance tier. The AMD Ryzen 7 160, AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, Intel Core i7-13700, and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H are all effectively tied with it. This means the i9-12900T is a competitive choice for anyone building a productivity-focused desktop.

For real workloads, this CPU excels at multi-tasking. Running a virtual machine, compiling code, and streaming video simultaneously will not strain it. The 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently. The low base clock (1400 MHz) is not a concern because the boost clock of 4.90 GHz is available when needed. The 35 W TDP means it is efficient at idle and light loads, making it suitable for always-on workstations.

The launch MSRP is $489, which is a single fact. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking is possible on Z-series motherboards, though the T-series design may limit headroom. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available at various price points.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-12900T with the Intel Arc B770. The build class is desktop, confirmed by the buildClass field. The combined percentile is 68, placing the system in the upper-mid tier of all desktop configurations. The CPU is the standout component at the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits at the median 50th percentile.

The CPU is a 12th Gen Alder Lake part, released on 2022-01-03. It is an active production part with an unlocked multiplier. The GPU is a Battlemage generation part, released on 2025-12-31, with the Xe2-HPG architecture. The GPU is the successor to the Alchemist architecture.

This pairing is unusual in that the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. Most builds aim for a more balanced distribution. The 68th combined percentile reflects this imbalance. The system will perform well in CPU-bound tasks, which are numerous in productivity and development. GPU-bound tasks will be limited by the Arc B770's median performance.

The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with the GPU's 16 GB VRAM, make this a capable workstation for content creation, software development, and scientific computing. The 35 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP mean the system is power-efficient. The 550 W suggested PSU is modest, allowing for a compact and quiet build.

The GPU's 50th percentile is a clear indication of its mid-range status. It is not a budget part, but it is not a high-end enthusiast card either. The 16 GB VRAM is a premium feature, but the compute throughput (19.66 TFLOPS) and RT core count (32) are mid-range. This makes the build suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and for GPU-accelerated tasks that benefit from large memory capacity.

Overall, this is a productivity-first build with gaming capability. The CPU is the reason to buy this system. The GPU is adequate but not spectacular. For a user who prioritizes CPU performance for compilation, rendering, and multi-tasking, this is a strong choice. For a user who prioritizes gaming frame rates, the GPU would need to be upgraded.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance (3810 PassMark single-thread) will not limit frame rates. The GPU's median position will deliver playable FPS in most titles, but high-refresh (144 Hz+) at maximum settings may be a stretch. Estimated FPS is derived from the 50th percentile GPU position, which is adequate for competitive titles at lower settings.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded score (29601 PassMark multi-thread, 24528 Cinebench R23) handles encoding while gaming. The 16 cores and 24 threads can manage x264 encoding on dedicated cores with minimal impact on game performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports game capture and overlay software.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 512 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM handle multi-stream 1080p and 1440p timelines. Effects-heavy projects will run smoothly, though 4K projects may be limited by the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS compute.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or similar will be strong. The 85th percentile CPU provides substantial multi-threaded power. GPU rendering is limited by the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most scenes, but render times will be longer than with a higher-tier GPU.

Software development: The CPU is ideal. Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the PassMark integer math score of 108211 indicates strong performance. The data compression score of 345021 speeds up build artifacts and source control operations. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance (3462 Cinebench R23 single-core) makes everyday tasks fast. The 35 W TDP keeps the system cool and quiet in a shared space. The 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office applications, but the system will handle any academic software, including statistical analysis, CAD, and light programming. The data encryption score of 20750 supports secure file handling for research data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900T

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds