SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900T

37,112 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900T and Intel Arc A350 represent a unique pairing of a high-end 12th Gen desktop processor with an entry-level discrete GPU. This combination produces a system where the CPU is the dominant component in nearly every scenario, with the GPU serving as a basic display output and light acceleration unit. The data shows a desktop build with a combined percentile of 68, indicating a system that sits above the median in overall capability, though this is almost entirely attributable to the processor’s strong multi-threaded performance. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark scores and specifications to interpret what this pairing means for potential workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance gap between the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37112, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates a massive disparity, with the processor being a top-tier performer and the graphics card being an average, entry-level part.

Q: Does the Core i9-12900T support modern memory standards?

A: Yes, the processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, which is a forward-looking feature for storage and expansion.

Q: What is the integrated graphics capability of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T includes UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated GPU. This provides a basic display output and can handle light tasks, but it is separate from the discrete Arc A350 in the build.

Q: What is the power consumption profile of this build's components?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, which is very low for a 16-core processor, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 watts. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 200 watts, indicating a very low overall power draw.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A350 a current product?

A: No, the production status for the Intel Arc A350 is listed as "End-of-life," with its successor being "Battlemage." Its predecessor is "Xe Graphics."

Q: How many cores and threads does the processor have for multi-threaded work?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T has 16 cores and 24 threads. This configuration is well-suited for heavily parallel workloads, as evidenced by its high multi-core benchmark scores.

Q: What is the memory bus width and bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has a 64-bit memory bus and a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a limiting factor for high-resolution gaming, as it restricts the amount of data that can be transferred to and from the 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results paint a picture of a system with extreme CPU-centric performance. The Intel Core i9-12900T achieves a multi-core score of 24528 in Cinebench R23, a single-core score of 3462 in the same test, and a Geekbench multi-core score of 11615 with a single-core score of 2259. These numbers place the CPU in the 85th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 37112. The data shows it is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Ryzen 7 160, which has an average score of 37117, and the Intel Core i7-13700, which scores 37135. The deltaPct values are essentially zero, indicating a dead heat with these rivals.

The GPU, however, presents a stark contrast. The Intel Arc A350 has no benchmark scores listed, and its percentile rank is 50, meaning it performs better than half of all GPUs but worse than the other half. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, which is not a true performance metric but rather a placeholder due to the lack of data. The combined percentile for the entire build is 68, which is a weighted measure that reflects the high CPU score pulling up the average. For a desktop system, this means the processor is the clear workhorse, capable of handling demanding productivity tasks, while the GPU will be the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive application.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is heavily constrained by the Intel Arc A350. With only 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of VRAM, the GPU is not suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at modern resolutions. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 3462 in Cinebench R23 would not be the limiting factor in most games; instead, the GPU would struggle to maintain high frame rates, making this a poor choice for competitive esports at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 29601 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 indicate that the processor can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant performance degradation. However, the GPU’s lack of dedicated tensor cores (listed as null) and limited encoding capability would mean relying on the CPU for software encoding, which is a viable but less efficient path than using dedicated hardware.

Video editing: The Core i9-12900T excels in this scenario. Its high multi-core performance is critical for rendering timelines and exporting video. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10301 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 11615 confirm its capability in these parallel tasks. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth may be sufficient for basic effects and 1080p editing, but it would struggle with complex projects or high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: This is a CPU-dominated workload, and the i9-12900T is a strong contender. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 is a direct indicator of 3D rendering performance, as most render engines are multi-threaded. The GPU would offer minimal acceleration in this scenario, as its 768 shading units and 48 TMUs are far below what is needed for GPU-based rendering. The low TDP of the CPU (35W) is also a benefit for sustained rendering workloads, as it reduces thermal throttling potential.

Software development: The processor’s balance of single-thread and multi-thread performance is ideal for compilation and code execution. The Passmark single-thread score of 3810 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2259 indicate snappy responsiveness for single-threaded operations, while the multi-thread scores allow for fast parallel builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, except for any GUI acceleration, which the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could also handle.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU’s power is largely untapped in these scenarios, but its low 35W TDP means it will run efficiently. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is more than enough for 2D desktop rendering and video playback. The combined system’s low power draw (suggested PSU of 200W) makes it a quiet and energy-efficient option for a study or office environment, even if the performance is far beyond what is required.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores and specifications, not measured results. The Intel Arc A350’s performance is defined by its FP32 compute of 3.072 TFLOPS, a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, and a 64-bit bus width. These figures suggest that the GPU is positioned for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles.

For older or esports games, the GPU might achieve playable frame rates, but for modern AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM capacity and limited bandwidth will likely cause stuttering and low texture quality, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s excellent single-core performance (3462 in Cinebench R23) ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, but the GPU itself will be the definitive performance ceiling. Users should expect this system to be a poor fit for high-fidelity or high-frame-rate gaming, with the data suggesting that the CPU’s capabilities are wasted in this specific scenario.

Who Should Build It

This system is for users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. The target audience includes software developers who need fast compilation times and run virtual machines, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 and Passmark multi-thread score of 29601 demonstrate exceptional throughput. Content creators working on CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering in CPU-based engines would also benefit from the processor, though they would need a more powerful GPU for previewing work. Students and office workers in technical fields would find the system responsive, but it is considerably more powerful than necessary for their needs. Small business workstations that run complex data analysis or simulations would see a significant performance boost from the i9-12900T. However, no gamer targeting high-refresh or high-resolution experiences should consider this build, as the Arc A350’s 50th percentile ranking and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are clear indicators of its entry-level status.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with a DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It houses 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU’s specifications include 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 6 RT cores. The base and boost clocks are both set at 2000 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective and a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s over a 64-bit bus. The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6, which is a significant limitation for modern games.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS for FP16. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it has the API feature set for modern games, but its raw power is too low to use them effectively. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but with such a low overall shader count, ray tracing performance will be minimal. The 50th percentile ranking confirms that this is a middle-of-the-road GPU, suitable for basic graphical output and light acceleration, but it is the definitive bottleneck in this pairing. For rendering, the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS is far too low for serious GPU-accelerated 3D rendering, and the 4 GB VRAM will quickly fill up with complex scenes.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance in this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. With an 85th percentile CPU versus a 50th percentile GPU, the processor is the clear dominant component. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering, the system performs exceptionally well, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528. In these tasks, the GPU is nearly irrelevant, and the CPU’s performance is fully utilized.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming, the bottleneck is exclusively the Intel Arc A350. The CPU’s single-core performance (3462 in Cinebench R23) is more than capable of feeding frames to a much more powerful GPU, but the Arc A350’s 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will limit frame rates and texture detail. The FPS scaling in this scenario would be poor; increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p would cause a significant frame rate drop due to the VRAM and bandwidth constraints, not the CPU. The data suggests that to achieve a balanced system, one would need to either downgrade the CPU significantly or upgrade the GPU to match the processor’s tier, but as configured, the GPU is the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive task.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-12900T, a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Alder Lake generation, with the Intel Arc A350, an entry-level discrete GPU. The CPU has a base clock of 1400 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of just 35 watts. It is a desktop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field. The combined percentile for this pairing is 68, which places it above the majority of systems but is a direct result of the CPU’s high performance being dragged down by the GPU’s average standing.

The overall tier of this build is a high-performance workstation or productivity machine with a token discrete GPU. The processor’s benchmarks, such as the Passmark multi-thread score of 29601 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2259, place it in the top tier of CPUs, while the GPU’s lack of benchmark data and 50th percentile rank place it in the entry-level segment. This is not a balanced gaming system, but rather a CPU-centric build where the GPU is sufficient for basic display output and light acceleration. The data indicates that this is a system for users who need maximum processing power for multi-threaded applications and are willing to accept minimal graphics performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². Its base clock is 1400 MHz, which is very low, but it can boost up to 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and has a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes. It includes integrated UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results show this is a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10301 are strong indicators of its parallel processing capabilities. The Passmark integer math score of 108211 and floating-point math score of 75741 further confirm its arithmetic prowess. Single-thread performance is also robust, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3810 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2259, making it responsive for everyday tasks. The 85th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 37112 place it in the upper echelon of CPUs, nearly matching the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i7-13700. The low 35W TDP is a remarkable feature, allowing for sustained high performance without significant cooling requirements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900T is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing users to choose between the two memory types. The processor also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, which is beneficial for future high-speed NVMe SSDs and expansion cards. The CPU’s TDP is 35 watts, and the GPU’s TDP is 25 watts, with a suggested PSU of 200 watts, indicating a very low power draw system.

For a sensible next upgrade, the most obvious target is the GPU. The current Intel Arc A350 is the bottleneck in this system, and replacing it with a more powerful graphics card would create a much more balanced system. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support and strong single-thread performance would allow it to feed data to a significantly faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Another upgrade path could be adding more memory, as the processor supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and higher capacity would benefit memory-intensive workloads like video editing. The platform itself is mature, with the CPU being an Active production status, meaning it is still available, though the GPU is End-of-life. Upgrading the GPU to a modern part would be the single most impactful change to improve overall system performance, especially in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900T

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds