SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900T

37,112 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900T paired with the Intel Arc A310E represents a highly specific desktop configuration: a low-power 16-core Alder Lake processor driving a compact entry-level discrete GPU. This pairing is unusual because the CPU is a high-end, efficiency-oriented part while the GPU is designed for basic rendering tasks, making it critical to examine what each component actually delivers in isolation before considering their combined behavior. The benchmark data shows the CPU is a strong multi-threaded performer that sits in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds a mid-pack 50th percentile position with no measured benchmarks of its own. This analysis uses only the provided facts to explain what this system can and cannot do.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900T is built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². It packs 16 cores and 24 threads, a configuration that relies on a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores typical of 12th Gen Core parts. The base clock is 1400.00 MHz, which is notably low for a Core i9, but the boost clock reaches 4.90 GHz, allowing significant single-thread headroom when workloads demand it. The thermal design power is just 35 W, meaning this CPU is engineered for systems where heat and power draw are primary constraints, not raw peak performance. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it does not support ECC memory. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output even without the discrete GPU.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large shared pool helps feed the 16 cores during multi-threaded tasks. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, which is ahead of most platforms. It uses the Intel Socket 1700, and the multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking is possible if the motherboard and cooling allow it, though the low 35 W TDP suggests the power delivery is intentionally restricted.

Benchmark results confirm the architecture’s strengths. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 24528, which is a very high number for a 35 W part, while the single-core score of 3462 shows that even at low power, single-thread performance is competitive. Geekbench scores are 11615 multi-core and 2259 single-core, both indicating solid productivity capability. PassMark tests show 29601 for multithread, 3810 for single-thread, and strong results in specific workloads: 108211 in integer math, 75741 in floating point math, and 345021 in data compression. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37112, which places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (deltaPct 0), slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (deltaPct 0.1), and marginally behind the Intel Core i7-13700 (deltaPct -0.1) and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (deltaPct -0.1). These negligible deltas mean the i9-12900T sits in a very tight performance band with those parts, so real-world differences would be minimal.

For real workloads, the 24 threads handle heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation with ease, as evidenced by the high Cinebench multi-core scores. The lower base clock means sustained all-core loads will not run at 4.9 GHz, but the boost clock allows bursts of speed for single-threaded responsiveness. The data suggests this CPU is a capable multi-tasking workhorse constrained primarily by its power envelope.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are well-documented, but the GPU has no benchmark entries in the data—its avgBenchmarkScore is 0, and the nearestRivals list is empty. The GPU does have a percentileVsAllGpus of 50, meaning it sits exactly at the median of all GPUs, which indicates it is an entry-level part. The Arc A310E is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with a DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. Its FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1). Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth from a 1937 MHz memory clock (15.5 Gbps effective). The GPU runs at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, with a TDP of 75 W, and it draws power entirely from the PCIe slot, requiring no external power connectors. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and outputs to 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, which places the system in the upper third of all builds. However, the CPU’s 85th percentile is far ahead of the GPU’s 50th percentile, creating a clear imbalance. The CPU can process data much faster than the GPU can render it, so any workload that relies heavily on graphics will be limited by the Arc A310E. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 29601 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24528 indicate that processor-bound tasks will perform at a high level, while the GPU’s lack of measured benchmarks means its actual rendering performance is unknown from this data, only its median percentile position.

The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-intensive computation but is modest for graphics. For example, data encryption at 20750 and extended instructions at 20054 show strong CPU throughput, but gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the 3.072 TFLOPS compute and 4 GB VRAM. The system is not balanced for high-end graphics work, but it could handle light GPU tasks, office productivity, and software development that is primarily CPU-bound.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i9-12900T’s 85th percentile rank and average benchmark score of 37112 dwarf the GPU’s 50th percentile with an avgBenchmarkScore of 0. In any workload that uses both components, such as gaming or video encoding with hardware acceleration, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s high multi-core scores—24528 in Cinebench R23 and 29601 in PassMark multithread—mean it can feed data to the GPU quickly, but the GPU’s modest 3.072 TFLOPS and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will not keep up with the CPU’s output.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, spreadsheet calculations, or database operations, the CPU is the star. The PassMark data compression score of 345021 and integer math score of 108211 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks. The GPU is irrelevant in these cases, so there is no bottleneck from the graphics side. Conversely, for GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or modern gaming, the Arc A310E will be the constraint. Its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are small, and the 16 ROPs limit pixel throughput. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s, which are entry-level figures.

The FPS scaling, if it were measured, would show that higher resolutions or detail settings would quickly overwhelm the GPU. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, we can only infer from the GPU’s specs: 768 shading units and 6 RT cores are not enough for high-refresh gaming at 1080p ultra settings, let alone higher resolutions. The CPU would remain underutilized in most gaming scenarios because the GPU cannot process frames fast enough. This is a textbook CPU-over-GPU imbalance, where the processor is capable of far more than the graphics card can deliver.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need substantial CPU compute power but only light graphics capability. The i9-12900T’s 24 threads and 85th percentile rank make it ideal for developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, or students in engineering fields who use CPU-intensive software. The low 35 W TDP also suits small form factor or always-on workstations where heat and power are concerns, yet the CPU still delivers Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 24528, which is competitive with many higher-TDP parts.

The GPU, while entry-level, supports modern APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it can handle basic display tasks, 2D acceleration, and light video playback. Small business workstations that run office suites, manage databases, or process spreadsheets will benefit from the CPU’s single-thread score of 3462 in Cinebench R23, which ensures snappy application responsiveness. The GPU’s 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs allow for multiple monitors, which is useful for productivity.

Gamers are not the target audience. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are insufficient for modern AAA titles at 1080p with high settings. However, for gamers who play older or esports titles at lower settings, the system might suffice, but the CPU is overkill for that use case. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU excellent for encoding and physics calculations, but the GPU will slow down previews and final renders. The ideal user is one who prioritizes CPU performance above all else and only needs the GPU for basic display output.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports 12th Gen Alder Lake and also 13th Gen Raptor Lake CPUs, though the fact pack only specifies the 12th Gen series. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, so builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and expansion cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed.

The GPU, Intel Arc A310E, is end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so it is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots (backward compatible). The GPU’s TDP is 75 W, and the suggested PSU for the entire system is 250 W, which leaves headroom for upgrades. Since the GPU draws no external power connectors, the PSU only needs to feed the CPU and motherboard. The CPU TDP is 35 W, so total system power is low, meaning a 250 W PSU is sufficient for the current configuration. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has plenty of headroom to support it. The 4 GB VRAM on the Arc A310E is a clear limitation, and replacing it with a higher-end card would unlock the CPU’s full gaming and rendering potential. The PCIe 4.0 x8 slot means any modern GPU will work, and the 250 W PSU would need to be upgraded if the new GPU draws more power, but the CPU’s low TDP leaves room in the power budget.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and GPU specifications. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so treat the following as qualitative expectations, not measured results. The CPU is more than capable for gaming, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3462 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3810, which would not bottleneck most games. However, the GPU is the limiting factor. The Arc A310E has 768 shading units, 6 RT cores, 16 ROPs, and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. These specs are typical of an entry-level card from a few generations ago.

At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the GPU could handle esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, but at higher settings, the 4 GB VRAM would quickly fill, causing stutters. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be overwhelmed, and frame rates would be low. The pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s are modest, limiting fill-rate-bound scenes. The 6 RT cores support ray tracing, but the low compute power (3.072 TFLOPS) means ray tracing performance would be poor. DirectX 12 Ultimate support is present, so the GPU can run modern APIs, but the hardware is not designed for high-fidelity gaming. In summary, expect playable frame rates only in undemanding games at 1080p with reduced settings, and the CPU will likely sit at low utilization because the GPU cannot deliver enough frames to stress it.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS compute cannot push high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. The CPU is ready, but the GPU limits any session to low settings and modest refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and high multi-core scores (24528 in Cinebench R23) can handle software encoding for streaming, but the GPU’s lack of performance means games will run poorly, making streaming gameplay impractical.

Video editing: The CPU excels at encoding and decoding with its high integer and floating-point scores (108211 and 75741 in PassMark), so timeline scrubbing and export are fast. The GPU only accelerates previews, and its 4 GB VRAM may cause slowdowns with 4K footage.

3D rendering: CPU rendering will be strong, as the 16 cores and 24 threads handle ray tracing in software well. GPU rendering is limited by the Arc A310E’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB memory, so expect long times for complex scenes.

Software development: Excellent. The PassMark multithread score of 29601 and data compression score of 345021 mean compiling large projects, running containerized workloads, and executing test suites are smooth. The GPU is irrelevant here.

Student and office work: Overkill but effective. The CPU’s single-core performance (3810 PassMark) ensures fast application launches, and the low 35 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool. The GPU handles multiple monitors via 4x mini-DisplayPort.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs a high-end, low-power CPU with an entry-level GPU. The Intel Core i9-12900T is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, designed for efficiency without sacrificing multi-threaded throughput. The Intel Arc A310E is a 75 W GPU based on Xe-HPG, with 4 GB GDDR6 and a 50th percentile rank among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 68, placing this system in the upper third of all builds, but that rank is driven almost entirely by the CPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile highlight the imbalance. This build is best described as a CPU-centric workstation with basic graphics capability, not a balanced gaming or rendering system. Its strength is in processor-bound tasks, and its weakness is any graphics-intensive workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900T has an average benchmark score of 37112, which is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37117, deltaPct 0), slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, deltaPct 0.1), and marginally behind the Intel Core i7-13700 (37135, deltaPct -0.1) and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161, deltaPct -0.1). The differences are within a fraction of a percent.

Q: Does this system use integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900T includes UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated GPU. This provides a display output even without the discrete Intel Arc A310E installed, and it can be used as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It does not support ECC memory, so standard consumer memory modules are required.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for modern gaming?

A: No. The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, 768 shading units, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance. These specs are entry-level, so the GPU would only handle light or older games at low settings. No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so this is an estimate.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 250 W, which provides enough headroom for the current configuration without external GPU power connectors.

Q: Can the GPU be upgraded without changing the CPU?

A: Yes. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The CPU’s low 35 W TDP leaves power budget headroom, but the suggested PSU of 250 W would likely need to be increased for a more powerful GPU that draws more power.

Q: What is the CPU’s release date and launch price?

A: The CPU was released on 2022-01-03, and its launch MSRP is $489. The GPU was released on 2024-03-31 and has no launch MSRP listed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900T + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900T

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds