SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900KF

42,830 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900KF paired with the Intel Arc B570 is a desktop configuration with a combined performance percentile of 77. This pairing combines a 16-core Alder Lake processor with Intel’s Battlemage-generation graphics card, creating a system that targets high-end productivity and 1080p-class gaming without the need for a flagship GPU. The data presented here is derived exclusively from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The chip, designated BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed clock speed of 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which simplifies thermal and power behavior but leaves no headroom for dynamic clocking. Memory is a 10 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory capacity is notable for a GPU in this percentile tier, as it provides more VRAM headroom than many comparable cards.

The GPU’s rendering hardware includes 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 80 raster output units (ROPs). It also features 18 RT cores dedicated to ray tracing workloads. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These specifications place the Arc B570 in a mid-range tier, as reflected by its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 20556, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (score 20534, deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Arc A750 (score 20582, deltaPct -0.1). This suggests the B570 delivers desktop-class performance that lands between those two reference points.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 2649 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a test that stresses modern DirectX 12 rendering pipelines. In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 83514 in OpenCL and 96844 in Vulkan, indicating that the Vulkan path is significantly stronger for this architecture. PassMark results are more varied: DirectX 9 scores 164, DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 118, and DirectX 12 scores 72. These numbers reveal a GPU that excels in older DirectX 9 workloads but is less efficient in DirectX 10 and 12 scenarios. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 and G2D score of 661 further characterize the GPU as primarily compute-oriented rather than 2D-optimized. The GPU compute score of 7281 suggests that non-graphics workloads, such as OpenCL-based rendering or compute shaders, will perform adequately but not exceptionally.

For rendering specifically, the 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are the key assets. The RT cores, while only 18 in number, provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability that was absent in Intel’s earlier Alchemist architecture. The FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS is sufficient for 1080p rendering tasks and entry-level 1440p work. However, the lower DirectX 12 PassMark score of 72 compared to DirectX 11’s 118 implies that the driver stack or hardware scheduling may favor legacy APIs, which could impact modern game engines that primarily use DX12 or Vulkan. The Vulkan Geekbench score of 96844 being higher than OpenCL’s 83514 suggests that Vulkan-based renderers will see better performance.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 65th percentile and the CPU’s 88th percentile suggest this system is capable of driving high-refresh 1080p monitors in many titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means all expectations are estimates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1069 in 3DMark and 4859 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate strong frame pacing, while the GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides enough raw fill rate for competitive shooters.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads handle encoding workloads well, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 40970 and data encryption score of 29502. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM allows for game capture buffers without exceeding memory limits. However, the absence of a dedicated hardware encoder specification in the data means software encoding on the CPU is the safer assumption.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34420 and Geekbench multicore score of 18113 indicate robust processing power for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and 23.04 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerate effects and color grading. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video timelines with multiple layers.

3D rendering: The CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 105558 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 83514 provide a balanced rendering pipeline. The GPU’s RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible renderers, while the CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for complex scenes. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 indicates the GPU can handle modern DX12 renderers.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 537785 and random string sorting score of 57177 demonstrate fast compilation and data processing. The 24 threads allow parallel builds, and the 10 GB GPU VRAM is ample for local machine learning inference or shader compilation. The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, accommodating various development budgets.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 4144 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2112 handle everyday productivity with ease. The GPU’s G2D score of 661 is modest, but office applications do not stress graphics hardware. The system’s 125W CPU TDP and 150W GPU TDP are manageable for dorm-room or small-office power circuits.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900KF is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, produced on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It belongs to the Core 12th Gen series and carries the Alder Lake-S codename. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the data does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It is an unlocked multiplier part, enabling overclocking on compatible Z-series motherboards.

Benchmark scores for the CPU are consistently strong across the board. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1069 in single-thread, 2112 in 2-thread, 4132 in 4-thread, 7551 in 8-thread, 9860 in 16-thread, and 11586 in max-thread. This scaling indicates that the CPU maintains efficiency as thread count increases, with the 16-thread score representing 85% of the max-thread performance despite using fewer threads. Cinebench results show 489 in R15 single-core and 3469 in R15 multicore, 2040 in R20 single-core and 14456 in R20 multicore, and 4859 in R23 single-core and 34420 in R23 multicore. These numbers place the CPU in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42830.

The nearest rivals provide context for these scores. The Intel Core i9-12900 has an average score of 42906, a deltaPct of -0.2% relative to the 12900KF, meaning the 12900KF is essentially identical in performance to its non-KF sibling. The Intel Core i9-12950HX scores 42487, which is 0.8% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H scores 43210, which is 0.9% higher, and the Intel Core i9-12900K scores 42335, which is 1.2% lower. This tightly clustered set of rivals indicates that the 12900KF sits at the top of the Core i9-12900 family, with only a marginal 0.9% difference from the highest-scoring rival.

For real workloads, the PassMark scores are particularly revealing. The multithread score of 40970, integer math score of 138932, and floating point math score of 105558 demonstrate strong arithmetic throughput. The extended instructions score of 33779 supports SIMD-heavy applications. The data encryption score of 29502 and data compression score of 537785 indicate fast cryptographic and archival operations. The find prime numbers score of 142 is a weak point, suggesting that the CPU is not optimized for single-threaded integer iteration. The physics score of 2098 in PassMark is also modest, which could affect certain simulation workloads. The 30 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample buffering for the 24 threads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 77, which places it above the majority of desktop configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-12900KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900?

A: The 12900KF has an average benchmark score of 42830, while the 12900 scores 42906. This represents a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning the 12900 is marginally faster by 0.2%.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc B570?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s, achieved with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core i9-12900KF has ECC memory support set to false. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Arc B570 and what PSU is suggested?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 150 W, and the suggested PSU rating is 450 W. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, while the RTX 3070 Mobile has a score of 20534. The deltaPct is 0.1%, indicating the Arc B570 is 0.1% faster.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-12900KF?

A: The launch MSRP is $564.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU’s 88th percentile and the GPU’s 65th percentile create a clear imbalance in favor of the processor. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor, as its lower percentile and mid-range compute scores (11.52 TFLOPS FP32) will cap frame rates before the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes a constraint. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1069 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4859 are more than sufficient to feed a GPU in this class. The deltaPct values for the GPU’s rivals show it trading blows with the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, both of which are mid-range parts. In CPU-bound scenarios like low-resolution esports titles, the CPU’s 8-thread score of 7551 and 16-thread score of 9860 will provide high frame ceilings, but the GPU’s rasterization rate of 200.0 GPixel/s will limit pixel throughput.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multicore scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 34420, Geekbench multicore 18113) are strong enough to dominate tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU’s compute scores (OpenCL 83514, Vulkan 96844) are adequate for GPU-accelerated effects, but they are not in the same league as the CPU’s relative standing. The PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 is notably low compared to the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 40970, suggesting that compute-heavy workloads will bottleneck on the GPU. The 10 GB VRAM provides enough capacity for most rendering tasks, but the 160-bit bus width and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest compared to what a higher-percentile GPU would offer.

The combined percentile of 77 reflects this imbalance. The system is not GPU-limited to the point of being unusable, but it is not balanced either. In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU’s 24 threads handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, while the GPU renders frames. The CPU’s data compression score of 537785 and encryption score of 29502 indicate that streaming overhead will be minimal. The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the primary constraint for graphics workloads, while the CPU is the dominant component for all other tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads but still want a competent GPU for 1080p gaming. Gamers at 1080p resolution will benefit from the CPU’s high single-thread scores, which minimize frame-time spikes, while the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game assets. The GPU’s 65th percentile suggests that 1440p gaming is possible but will require settings adjustments, as the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 72 indicates limited DX12 headroom. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34420 and PassMark floating point score of 105558 to be significant assets, while the GPU accelerates previews and final exports via OpenCL (83514) and Vulkan (96844).

Software developers are a primary target audience. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 537785 and random string sorting score of 57177 make code compilation and data processing fast. The 24 threads allow concurrent builds and test runs. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for local shader compilation or machine learning inference tasks. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s 88th percentile for simulation and analysis software, while the GPU handles visualization tasks. Small business workstations that run accounting, database, or office productivity software will find the CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 4144 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2112 more than adequate, while the GPU’s G2D score of 661 is sufficient for 2D applications.

The system is not ideal for users who need maximum GPU compute, as the PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 is modest. It is also not suited for 4K gaming, given the GPU’s 65th percentile and the lack of measured FPS data to suggest otherwise. However, for users who need a powerful CPU with a capable mid-range GPU, this pairing delivers a balanced desktop experience.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-12900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a GPU and one or two NVMe drives. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is half the width of a typical desktop GPU slot, but the bandwidth is adequate for the 380.0 GB/s memory throughput. The system’s power requirements are modest: the CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 150 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W. This leaves significant headroom for upgrades, as the total system draw of 275 W for these two components is well below the suggested PSU rating.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-percentile model. The CPU’s 88th percentile and 24 threads are capable of driving a much more powerful GPU without bottlenecking, as evidenced by the CPU’s max-thread 3DMark score of 11586 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34420. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher average benchmark score than 20556 would leverage the CPU’s untapped potential. However, the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the current GPU is a limitation; a higher-tier GPU would likely use PCIe 4.0 x16, and the CPU’s 20 lanes can accommodate that. The 450 W suggested PSU would need to be upgraded if the next GPU has a higher TDP, but the current 125W CPU TDP leaves room for a GPU up to approximately 300 W before exceeding the suggested PSU rating.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is adequate for current games, but a future upgrade to a GPU with more VRAM would be a logical step for 1440p or 4K gaming. The platform is mature, with the Socket 1700 supporting the 12th Gen series, and the unlocked multiplier on the CPU allows for overclocking to extend its lifespan.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-12900KF and Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake processor with an 88th percentile ranking, and the GPU is a Battlemage-generation card with a 65th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile is 77, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of desktop configurations. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 42830 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, with a deltaPct range of only -0.9% to 1.2%, indicating a highly competitive processor. The GPU’s average score of 20556 is similarly tight against its rivals, with deltaPct values between -0.5% and 0.4%. This system represents a CPU-first design, where the processor is the dominant component and the GPU provides adequate graphics performance for mainstream gaming and compute tasks.

The build class is desktop, confirming that this is not a mobile or laptop configuration. The CPU’s market segment is desktop, and the GPU’s dual-slot design with a 272 mm length and 115 mm height is typical of a desktop graphics card. The system’s overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 77, indicates that it outperforms approximately 77% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. This places it in the upper echelon of mainstream systems, though it is not a flagship-tier configuration. The CPU’s 88th percentile is the standout feature, while the GPU’s 65th percentile is the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s benchmark scores are extensive and consistently strong. The average benchmark score is 42830, with a percentile of 88 among all CPUs. Key 3DMark scores include 1069 for single-thread, 2112 for 2-thread, 4132 for 4-thread, 7551 for 8-thread, 9860 for 16-thread, and 11586 for max-thread. Cinebench scores are 489 (R15 single-core), 3469 (R15 multicore), 2040 (R20 single-core), 14456 (R20 multicore), 4859 (R23 single-core), and 34420 (R23 multicore). Geekbench scores are 2361 for single-core and 18113 for multicore. PassMark scores include 4144 for single-thread, 40970 for multithread, 138932 for integer math, 105558 for floating point math, 33779 for extended instructions, 29502 for data encryption, 537785 for data compression, 57177 for random string sorting, 142 for find prime numbers, and 2098 for physics.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more varied. The average benchmark score is 20556, with a percentile of 65 among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2649. Geekbench scores are 83514 for OpenCL and 96844 for Vulkan. PassMark scores are 65 for DirectX 10, 118 for DirectX 11, 72 for DirectX 12, 164 for DirectX 9, 661 for G2D, 14195 for G3D, and 7281 for GPU compute. The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU’s percentile of 88 is 23 percentage points higher than the GPU’s percentile of 65, indicating a significant performance gap. This suggests that the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in any workload, while the GPU will cap graphics performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-12900KF and Intel Arc B570. The data pack contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. For gaming, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 and PassMark G3D score of 14195 suggest that 1080p gaming at high settings is achievable in most titles, with 1440p requiring lower settings for smoother frame rates. The GPU’s DirectX 12 PassMark score of 72 is low compared to DirectX 11’s 118, which implies that older DX11 games may perform better than modern DX12 titles. The Vulkan Geekbench score of 96844 is the strongest compute result, indicating that Vulkan-based games will see better performance.

The CPU’s high single-thread scores (1069 in 3DMark, 4859 in Cinebench R23) ensure that frame times are stable, even in CPU-intensive scenes. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures and moderate 1440p assets. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for current game engines, though it may become a limitation in future titles that require higher memory throughput. The GPU’s 18 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS suggests that ray tracing performance will be modest, requiring reduced ray counts or lower resolutions. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is that of a solid 1080p card with 1440p capability in less demanding titles, but these are estimates and not measured results.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900KF + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds