SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900K

42,335 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU is a DG2-512 chip, part of the Alchemist generation within the Arc 5 lineup. It ships with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective transfer rate. These memory figures place the card in a solid mid-range position, capable of feeding the shading units without obvious starvation in most 1080p and 1440p scenarios.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. It contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. Pixel rate is rated at 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute at 12.29 TFLOPS. FP16 performance doubles to 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, which is relevant for workloads that can exploit reduced precision. There are 24 ray tracing cores, though the card has no dedicated tensor cores listed. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 are all supported, meaning the card is API-complete for modern gaming and professional applications.

Benchmark data for the A580 includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381. The average benchmark score is 57756, placing the GPU at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (deltaPct -0.6), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (deltaPct 0.7), the Intel Arc A570M (deltaPct -0.8), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -1.1). These deltas are all within roughly one percentage point, indicating that the A580 trades blows with a cluster of cards spanning OEM and high-end desktop parts. The RX 6950 XT being only 1.1% ahead is notable, though that comparison relies on aggregate benchmark scores rather than pure rasterization gaming tests.

For rendering workloads, the 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the Vulkan 1.4 support suggests strong low-level API performance. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial for an 8 GB card, which helps with texture-heavy scenes and higher resolutions. The FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS is adequate for real-time graphics, while the FP16 capability of 24.58 TFLOPS could accelerate certain compute shaders and AI-assisted rendering pipelines, assuming software support. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated hardware for DLSS-style upscaling, but the card still supports DirectX 12 Ultimate features.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Arc A580, and how does it rank?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average benchmark score of 57756, which places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Arc A580 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM has an average score of 58085, which is 0.6% higher than the Arc A580. The delta is small, meaning the two cards perform nearly identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What memory configuration does the Arc A580 use?

A: The card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the Arc A580 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 24 ray tracing cores, along with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible titles.

Q: What is the TDP of the Arc A580, and what PSU does Intel suggest?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 175 W, and Intel suggests a 450 W power supply for systems using this card.

Q: What display outputs does the Arc A580 offer?

A: The card provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Q: How does the Arc A580's Vulkan performance compare to its OpenCL performance?

A: The Geekbench Vulkan score is 79381, while the OpenCL score is 91657. The OpenCL score is higher, suggesting the card performs better in compute-oriented OpenCL workloads than in Vulkan compute tasks.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, built on Alder Lake architecture (Alder Lake-S). It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel and has a die size of 215 mm². The CPU runs at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.20 GHz. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, and the processor includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes is available from the CPU. The TDP is 125 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, confirming overclocking capability. The release date was November 3, 2021, with a launch MSRP of $599.

Cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data, such as rendering and compilation tasks.

Benchmark results show strong scaling from 2 to 16 threads. The 3DMark scores are 2120 for 2 threads, 4145 for 4 threads, 7596 for 8 threads, 9912 for 16 threads, and 11620 for max threads. Single-thread score is 1073. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is about 30%, and from 16 to max threads is about 17%, indicating some diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, likely due to the hybrid architecture mixing performance and efficiency cores. Cinebench R23 multicore score is 26125, while single-core is 2004.5. Geekbench multicore is 16378, single-core 2193. PassMark multithread score is 41213, with single-thread at 4136.

The average benchmark score is 42335, placing the CPU at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12950HX (deltaPct -0.4), AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (deltaPct 0.7), AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (deltaPct 0.9), and Intel Core i7-14700T (deltaPct 1). The i9-12900K is effectively tied with these parts, all within one percentage point in aggregate score. The 12950HX is a mobile chip, yet it edges out the desktop 12900K by 0.4%, which confirms the efficiency of the hybrid architecture.

For real workloads, the PassMark integer math score of 139090 and floating point math of 105471 indicate strong general-purpose compute. Data compression score of 537341 and encryption of 29579 show the CPU handles compression and encryption tasks well. Extended instructions score of 33682 suggests good SIMD performance. The physics score of 2219 is moderate, but the multithread score of 41213 is what matters for heavily threaded applications like video rendering or scientific simulations. The single-thread score of 4136 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly threaded games.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-12900K and Intel Arc A580. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as expectations, not measured results.

The CPU sits at the 88th percentile, and the GPU at the 87th percentile. Both components are near the top of their respective hierarchies, which suggests the pairing is well balanced for high-refresh gaming. The i9-12900K's single-thread score of 4136 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2004.5 indicate excellent per-core performance, which is critical for games that rely on a few fast threads. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can push high framerates at 1080p and solid framerates at 1440p in most titles, assuming the game is not VRAM-limited beyond 8 GB.

Based on the GPU's 87th percentile ranking and the CPU's 88th percentile, one would expect 1080p ultra settings to deliver high frame rates in esports titles, potentially exceeding 144 Hz in games like CS:GO or Valorant, though these are estimates. For AAA titles at 1440p ultra, the 8 GB VRAM could become a limiting factor, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate texture streaming bottlenecks. At 4K, the A580's 12.29 TFLOPS is likely insufficient for ultra settings in demanding titles, so users should expect to lower settings or use upscaling. Since the card lacks tensor cores, AI-based upscaling is not hardware-accelerated on this GPU, though the DirectX 12 Ultimate support may allow alternative methods.

The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads ensure that even the most CPU-intensive games, such as simulation or strategy titles, will not be the bottleneck at any resolution. The 30 MB L3 cache also reduces latency in game logic and physics calculations. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is strong at 1080p and good at 1440p, with 4K requiring compromises.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen series. The i9-12900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This flexibility means users can choose between cheaper DDR4 or faster DDR5, though the memory controller is dual-channel, so bandwidth is capped at 76.8 GB/s regardless of module type. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is forward-looking for future GPUs and NVMe drives. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without a discrete GPU.

The Arc A580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot, though the card will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 175 W and requires two 8-pin power connectors. Intel suggests a 450 W power supply for the GPU alone, but with the i9-12900K's 125 W TDP, a system-level PSU of 450 W or more is advisable. Given the combined TDP of 300 W for CPU and GPU, plus motherboard, drives, and fans, a 450 W PSU is the minimum, but users should consider a higher-capacity unit for overclocking headroom or future upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the workload. For gaming, upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier card (such as one from the 90th percentile or above) would yield more FPS at 1440p and 4K. The CPU is already at the 88th percentile, so it is unlikely to be a bottleneck for the next few generations. For content creation, adding more DDR5 memory (if not already maxed) or upgrading to a newer platform with more PCIe lanes could help, but the 12900K's 16 cores and 24 threads are already strong. The platform supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation tasks, though this requires an appropriate motherboard and registered DIMMs.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This combination of Intel Core i9-12900K and Intel Arc A580 suits users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity and a capable mid-range GPU for gaming and light rendering. The CPU's 88th percentile rank and 26,125 Cinebench R23 multicore score make it ideal for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile code. The 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, and the PassMark multithread score of 41213 supports heavy multitasking. The GPU's 87th percentile and 8 GB VRAM are suitable for 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p with adjusted settings.

Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will benefit from the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4136) and the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS. Developers who run virtual machines, build large codebases, or use containerized workloads will appreciate the 30 MB L3 cache and 24 threads. Students and small business workstations that run office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsers will find the system overkill but responsive, with the CPU's single-thread score of 4136 ensuring snappy interactions. The ECC memory support appeals to users in scientific computing or finance who require data integrity.

The 8 GB VRAM limit means this is not a 4K gaming rig, but for 1080p and entry-level 1440p, the pairing is well matched. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, so users upgrading from older systems will see consistent performance gains.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-12900K has an average benchmark score of 42335, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore 26125, single-core 2004.5, Geekbench multicore 16378, single-core 2193, and PassMark multithread 41213. The GPU, Intel Arc A580, has an average benchmark score of 57756, at the 87th percentile. Its scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2229, Geekbench OpenCL 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan 79381.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 88, meaning the system as a whole outperforms 88% of all desktop builds in the database. The CPU is 1 point above the GPU in percentile, suggesting they are closely matched in relative performance. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12950HX, is only 0.4% ahead, while the GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, is 0.6% ahead. Both components are within one percentage point of their closest competitors, indicating that neither component is a standout outlier in its class.

The combined picture shows a balanced system where neither component massively outclasses the other. The CPU's 16 cores feed the GPU's 3072 shading units without obvious starvation in most workloads. The PassMark floating point math score of 105471 on the CPU and the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS indicate coherent compute capabilities. For tasks that offload to the GPU, such as OpenCL (91657) or Vulkan (79381) compute, the pair offers solid throughput. For CPU-bound tasks, the 30 MB L3 cache and high clock speeds ensure low latency.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i9-12900K with the Intel Arc A580. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread processor from the 12th Gen Core series, built on Alder Lake-S architecture, and the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 card from the Alchemist generation. Both are production-active components, with the CPU released on November 3, 2021, and the GPU on October 9, 2023.

The overall tier is high-mid-range to upper-mainstream. The CPU's 88th percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile, combined with the system's combined percentile of 88, place this build above the vast majority of desktop configurations. The CPU is clearly a high-end part, given its 16 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock. The GPU is a mid-range part that performs near the top of its class, as evidenced by its proximity to the RX 6950 XT (within 1.1%) in aggregate benchmarks. This is not an extreme enthusiast build (no top-1% components), but it is a strong, versatile system for gaming and productivity at mainstream resolutions.

The pairing makes sense for users who want a powerful CPU for multi-threaded work and a competent GPU for gaming without overspending on a flagship graphics card. The 8 GB VRAM and 175 W TDP keep the GPU manageable in terms of power and cooling, while the CPU's 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier allow for overclocking if the user has adequate cooling.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

In CPU-bound workloads, the i9-12900K is the limiting factor only in the sense that the GPU may be underutilized. For example, in lightly threaded tasks like single-threaded applications, the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4136 is high, and the GPU's 87th percentile means it can keep up at 1080p. However, in multi-threaded compute tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU's 88th percentile and 26,125 Cinebench R23 score will outpace the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS in some scenarios, but the GPU can offload via OpenCL (91657) or Vulkan (79381) if software supports it.

In GPU-bound workloads, the A580 becomes the bottleneck. At 1440p or 4K with high settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 12.29 TFLOPS will limit frame rates, while the CPU has headroom. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 is modest, indicating the GPU is not a high-end rasterizer. The FPS scaling evidence is indirect: the CPU is 1 percentile point higher than the GPU, suggesting the GPU is slightly more likely to be the limiting factor in gaming. However, both are within one percentile point, so the bottleneck is mild.

For memory-sensitive workloads, the CPU's 30 MB L3 cache reduces latency, but the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is the higher figure. If a game requires more than 8 GB VRAM, the GPU will stutter or drop textures, which is a clear GPU limitation. Conversely, if a task requires more than 24 threads, the CPU will saturate, but such workloads are rare. Overall, the GPU limits high-resolution gaming, while the CPU limits extreme multi-threading, but for most mainstream uses, the balance is good.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4136 and 16 cores ensure high framerates in CPU-heavy titles, while the GPU's 87th percentile and 12.29 TFLOPS should push well above 60 fps in most games. Users can expect smooth high-refresh experiences, though 1440p may require moderate settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p ultra in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, as evidenced by the PassMark multithread score of 41213 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 11620. The GPU's OpenCL score of 91657 suggests it can also assist with encoding if software supports it. The system should handle 1080p streaming without frame drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26125 indicates strong export and rendering performance in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for timeline previews and effects, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with 4K footage scrubbing. The CPU's 30 MB L3 cache reduces timeline stutter.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads, with a PassMark floating point math score of 105471, excel in CPU-based renderers. The GPU's 24 RT cores and Vulkan 1.4 support allow for GPU-accelerated ray tracing, though the 12.29 TFLOPS is mid-range. Blender or Octane users will see balanced CPU/GPU rendering, with the CPU handling most of the heavy lifting.

Software development: The CPU's 41213 PassMark multithread score speeds up compilation, and the 30 MB L3 cache reduces linker bottlenecks. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long builds. The GPU is less relevant here, but the OpenCL score of 91657 can accelerate compute in scientific libraries.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 4136 ensures instant application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the GPU is disabled, and the system's 88th percentile means it will never feel slow for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. The 8 GB VRAM is irrelevant for this use case, but the CPU's efficiency cores handle background tasks without draining power.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds