SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900K

42,335 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900K paired with the Intel Arc A350 is a desktop build with a stark performance split: a high-end 16-core Alder Lake processor that sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, and a low-end GPU that lands exactly at the 50th percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 42,335 places it within 0.4% of the Core i9-12950HX and 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen 5 7400, while the GPU has no benchmark scores of its own and only a 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The combined percentile is 69, and there are no measured FPS values for this pairing — all gaming performance below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The core question for any build is what limits the system, and here the answer is unambiguous: the GPU. The CPU’s benchmark scores are exceptional — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,125 and a single-core of 2,004.5, plus a Geekbench multi-core of 16,378 — while the GPU offers 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 64-bit bus, and 124 GB/s of bandwidth. In any gaming workload that requires filling a frame buffer, the Arc A350’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 25 W TDP will be the ceiling. The CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning a heavy bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming, ray tracing, or any 3D application that stresses pixel throughput.

For CPU-heavy tasks, the situation reverses. The 16 cores and 24 threads of the i9-12900K, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost of 5.20 GHz, dominate multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 139,090 and floating-point math of 105,471 illustrate the processor’s raw compute capability. In these tasks, the GPU’s low-end nature is irrelevant — the CPU becomes the primary driver of performance. The data shows that the system is heavily unbalanced: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a low-tier addition. A user who prioritizes CPU compute will see excellent results, but anyone expecting balanced gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks will find the GPU the hard limit.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are the star of this page. In 3DMark’s thread scaling tests, the i9-12900K scores 1,073 in single-thread, 2,120 in 2-threads, 4,145 in 4-threads, 7,596 in 8-threads, 9,912 in 16-threads, and 11,620 in max-threads — a smooth scaling curve that reflects the hybrid architecture of Alder Lake. Cinebench R23 yields 26,125 multi-core and 2,004.5 single-core, while R20 gives 14,679 and 2,072 respectively, and R15 gives 4,057 and 289. Geekbench reports a multi-core of 16,378 and a single-core of 2,193. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 41,213 and a single-thread score of 4,136, with specific sub-scores of 537,341 for data compression, 29,579 for data encryption, 33,682 for extended instructions, and 105,471 for floating-point math.

The GPU, by contrast, has zero benchmark scores in the data pack. Its percentile is 50, meaning it sits exactly in the middle of all GPUs — a reminder that the Arc A350 is a low-power, entry-level part. The combined percentile of this build is 69, which places the system above average overall, but that number is dragged down by the GPU. The CPU’s 88th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile together yield a combined 69, which is a clear sign of an unbalanced pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake-S architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process. It uses a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the core layout. The base clock is 3.20 GHz and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support. It has a PCIe Gen 5 connection with 16 lanes from the CPU, and integrated graphics in the form of the UHD 770. The processor is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted, and it was released on November 3, 2021, with a launch MSRP of $599.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a very strong processor for both single-thread and multi-thread work. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,125 is about 13 times the single-core score of 2,004.5, indicating excellent scaling across all 24 threads. The Geekbench single-core of 2,193 and multi-core of 16,378 show that the processor is not just a multi-core monster but also competitive in single-thread performance. The PassMark data compression score of 537,341 and encryption score of 29,579 point to strong performance in data-heavy workloads. In the nearest-rival comparison, the i9-12900K is essentially tied with the i9-12950HX (delta -0.4%) and the Ryzen 5 7400 (delta +0.7%), and it is 0.9% ahead of the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and 1% ahead of the Core i7-14700T. This means that for a desktop processor, the 12900K is in the top tier of CPUs in its class.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who need a high-end CPU for compute-intensive tasks but do not need significant GPU power. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a high single-thread score, make it ideal for software development, where compilation and testing are CPU-bound. The PassMark integer math score of 139,090 and floating-point of 105,471 suggest strong performance for scientific simulation and financial modeling. Data compression and encryption scores are also high, making this a capable machine for database work or any workload that involves large data sets.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,125 means that rendering scenes in Blender or encoding video in HandBrake will be much faster than with a mid-range CPU. However, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS will limit any GPU-accelerated rendering or effects work. For students in engineering or computer science, the processor can handle compilation, running virtual machines, and heavy multitasking. For small business workstations that run accounting, SQL, or server-side scripts, the CPU is overkill but will handle any workload without breaking a sweat.

Gamers, however, should not build this. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are not enough for modern titles at high settings, and the 25 W TDP suggests it is meant for low-power or embedded use. The Arc A350 has no display outputs, which means it cannot drive a monitor directly — the system would need to use the integrated UHD 770 graphics on the CPU for display. This is a compute-focused build, not a gaming build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the system is dual-channel. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes provides a high-bandwidth path for future add-in cards. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a narrower connection but still adequate for a low-end card. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W, and the CPU TDP is 125 W, so the total system power requirement is modest. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking is possible, and the process node is 10 nm.

The upgrade path is clear: the GPU is the weak point, and because it is end-of-life (production status: end-of-life) with no outputs, the most sensible upgrade is to replace it with a more capable graphics card. The CPU does not need an upgrade — it is already at the 88th percentile and is only 0.4% behind the i9-12950HX, which is a mobile part. For memory, the board supports DDR4 or DDR5, so the user can choose the appropriate memory type. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a niche but valuable feature for workstations. The integrated UHD 770 graphics provide a fallback for display output, so the system can be used without a discrete GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900K had a launch MSRP of $599.

Q: Does the GPU have any display outputs?

A: The Arc A350 has no display outputs, so it cannot drive a monitor. The system would rely on the integrated UHD 770 graphics for display.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-12900K supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the Arc A350 is end-of-life, with a successor called Battlemage.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 69, which reflects the high CPU and low GPU.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i9-12900K includes Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 124 GB/s bandwidth place it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. For a modern gaming at 1080p, the Arc A350 would likely deliver low settings at playable frame rates, but 4 GB VRAM and a 64-bit bus would limit texture quality and resolution. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be severely overstretched, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance would not compensate. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,004.5 in Cinebench R23 is high, but gaming is typically GPU-bound at high settings. The estimated performance would be suitable for esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at medium settings, but not for AAA games. Because the GPU has no outputs, gaming would require the integrated UHD 770, which is even weaker. Therefore, the gaming experience is limited to low-end, low-resolution, and likely with reduced settings.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier CPU with an entry-level, end-of-life GPU. The CPU, the Intel Core i9-12900K, is a 16-core, 24-thread processor on the Alder Lake architecture, released in November 2021, with a launch MSRP of $599. It scores at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 26,125 and a PassMark multithread of 41,213. The GPU, the Intel Arc A350, is a 6 nm chip from the Alchemist generation, with a 25 W TDP, 4 GB GDDR6, and a 64-bit bus. It has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of this build is 69, which places it in the upper-middle tier of desktop systems. The CPU is the clear performance leader, and the GPU is a placeholder that will limit any graphics-intensive work. This is a compute-first build, not a gaming or general-purpose workstation.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM cannot sustain high refresh at 1080p in modern titles. The CPU’s single-thread speed would support high FPS in CPU-limited games, but the GPU will cap the frame rate. For esports at low settings, it might manage 60 FPS at 1080p, but this is an estimate. The lack of display outputs on the GPU further complicates gaming, as the user would need to use the integrated UHD 770, which is even less capable.

Streaming: The CPU has 16 cores and 24 threads, which can handle video encoding efficiently, but the GPU’s lack of dedicated encoding cores (the pack does not list NVENC or similar) and the low 25 W TDP make it a poor choice for streaming. The CPU can handle encoding with the help of the integrated graphics, but the overall system is not optimized for streaming.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance shines in video rendering and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,125 and the PassMark integer score of 139,090 indicate fast rendering of timelines. However, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 124 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for GPU-accelerated effects or 4K previews. The system would rely heavily on CPU rendering, which is strong but slower than GPU-accelerated workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU is ideal for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (in CPU mode) or V-Ray. The 16 cores and high multi-core score of 26,125 will reduce render times. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 6 ray-tracing cores are too weak for real-time ray tracing or GPU-accelerated rendering, so users should stick to CPU rendering.

Software development: The CPU is a developer’s dream. The high single-thread score of 2,004.5 and multi-thread score of 26,125 speed up compilation, testing, and virtualization. The PassMark data compression score of 537,341 helps with build tools and packaging. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this build is a good choice for a developer workstation.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but it will handle any task without delay. The integrated UHD 770 graphics can drive a display, so the system can be used as a general-purpose office PC. The GPU is not needed for these tasks, but the build is still functional. However, the 125 W TDP and the high-performance CPU may be more than a student needs, and the cost is high.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900K + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds