SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900HX

35,003 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-12900HX + Intel Arc A770M is a laptop-class pairing that combines a 16-core Alder Lake-HX processor with a 16 GB Arc 7 mobile GPU. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 62nd percentile, giving the combined system a 73rd percentile overall position. This is not a top-tier halo build, but a capable mobile workstation and gaming platform with distinct strengths and clear trade-offs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The chip uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, meaning it is permanently mounted in laptops. Cache layout includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback for basic display tasks.

Benchmark data shows a processor that scales well with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the i9-12900HX scores 1026 in single-thread, 1994 in 2-thread, 3729 in 4-thread, 6461 in 8-thread, 8077 in 16-thread, and 9067 in max-thread tests. The jump from 8-thread to 16-thread is about 25%, and from 16-thread to max-thread another 12%, indicating that the 24-thread configuration extracts meaningful extra performance in heavily threaded workloads. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 3566, R20 multicore is 11764, and R23 multicore is 23150. Single-core scores are 278 in R15, 1660 in R20, and 1912.5 in R23. The R23 multicore-to-single-core ratio is roughly 12:1, showing strong parallel scaling for a mobile chip.

PassMark tests add more texture. Integer math scores 113416, floating-point math 84410, and extended instructions 24315. Data compression hits 400636, encryption 22932, and random string sorting 43877. Physics simulation scores 2012, and find prime numbers is 132. Multithread score is 33158, while single-thread is 3745. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in integer-heavy and compression workloads, common in software builds, database operations, and file archiving. The average benchmark score is 35003, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13800H (avg score 34988, delta 0%), Intel Core 7 253PTE (34962, +0.1%), Intel Core i5-14500HX (35094, -0.3%), and Intel Xeon 6349P (34890, +0.3%). All deltas are within 0.3%, meaning the i9-12900HX is statistically tied with these chips in aggregate performance. The practical takeaway: this CPU is a solid high-end mobile part, but not a class leader; it trades blows with newer i7 and i5 HX parts.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A770M GPU, with a 62nd percentile rank, is not designed to push maximum frame rates at high refresh in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1026 in 3DMark and 1912.5 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough for most game logic, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. Expect playable frame rates at 1080p medium-to-high settings, but not consistently high refresh on ultra presets.

Streaming: The 24-thread CPU handles encoding and game capture simultaneously without bottlenecking. PassMark multithread score of 33158 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 23150 provide ample headroom for x264 encoding at reasonable presets. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via its Xe-HPG architecture, though specific encoder quality metrics are not in the data. The CPU’s 84th percentile rank ensures streaming overhead won’t cripple game performance.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, color grading, and export benefit from both CPU and GPU. The CPU’s high multicore scores (R23 23150, PassMark multithread 33158) accelerate rendering and effects that are CPU-bound. The GPU’s 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with GPU-accelerated effects and previews. PassMark GPU compute score of 4778 is modest, so expect faster exports on CPU-heavy codecs but slower GPU-accelerated tasks compared to higher-tier GPUs.

3D rendering: This is a CPU-dominated workload, and the i9-12900HX delivers. Cinebench R23 multicore of 23150 puts it in range for Blender or similar CPU renderers. The GPU’s 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 33.59 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) can assist with GPU rendering, but its 62nd percentile rank means it’s not a primary renderer. For professional 3D work, the CPU is the workhorse; the GPU is a secondary accelerator.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from the CPU’s integer math (113416) and multithread (33158) scores. Data compression of 400636 indicates fast builds with source archives. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with repeated code access. The 84th percentile CPU rank means this laptop can handle large codebases, though the 16 GB GPU memory is irrelevant here. The CPU’s 24 threads allow parallel builds to scale well.

Student and office work: Overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 3745 in PassMark ensures snappy UI responses. The 16-core design means background tasks (antivirus, cloud sync) won’t degrade foreground work. The GPU’s 711 G2D score is adequate for 2D desktop acceleration. Battery life is not in the data, but the 55 W CPU TDP suggests a power-hungry machine that is better suited for plugged-in use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system’s combined percentile is 73, but the CPU (84th) is clearly stronger than the GPU (62nd). This imbalance means the GPU will bottleneck in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, especially at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread and 16-thread scores (3DMark 16-thread 8077) can drive high physics and simulation loads, but the GPU’s 11774 PassMark G3D score will cap frame rates. At 1440p or higher, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced.

In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering, the CPU is the limiting factor only in the sense that it defines the ceiling; the GPU plays a minor role. PassMark GPU compute of 4778 is low relative to the CPU’s 33158 multithread score, so any workload relying on GPU compute (e.g., some AI inference, GPU-accelerated filters) will lag. The memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s on the GPU is generous, but the GPU’s raw compute is what limits it.

The nearest GPU rivals are revealing: AMD Radeon RX 460 (avg score 18373, delta 0.1%), AMD FirePro D500 (18533, -0.8%), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, +1.1%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, +1.2%). All are within 1.2% of the Arc A770M, meaning this GPU performs like an entry-level desktop card or a midrange mobile card from a previous generation. The CPU, by contrast, rivals newer i7 and i5 HX parts with deltas under 0.3%. This pairing is CPU-heavy; users should expect the GPU to be the first component to max out.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance but can accept midrange GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the Arc A770M sufficient, but those seeking 1440p ultra or high-refresh 1080p should look elsewhere. Content creators who prioritize CPU rendering (video exports, 3D scenes) will benefit from the 84th percentile CPU, while GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on higher-tier GPUs. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the 24 threads and high integer math scores. Students and office workers will find the performance excessive, but the 16 GB GPU memory and 30 MB L3 cache ensure no task feels sluggish. Small business workstations that run database queries, data analysis, or batch file processing will see strong CPU throughput, as evidenced by PassMark data compression (400636) and integer math (113416). The 73rd combined percentile means this is a mid-to-high tier system, not a flagship.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35003, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13800H, scores 34988 (delta 0%), meaning the i9-12900HX is effectively identical in aggregate. The Intel Core 7 253PTE (34962, +0.1%) and Intel Xeon 6349P (34890, +0.3%) are also within a rounding error. The Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 35094 (-0.3%), slightly higher, so the i9-12900HX is marginally behind that chip. These deltas are noise-level; the CPU is competitive with modern mid-high mobile parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 18383, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 460, scores 18373 (delta 0.1%), meaning the Arc A770M is statistically tied with a 2016-era desktop GPU. The AMD FirePro D500 (18533, -0.8%) and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, +1.1%) bracket it, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, +1.2%) is slightly lower. This puts the Arc A770M in the same performance class as the RTX 3060 Mobile, which is a solid 1080p gaming GPU but not a high-end part. The combined percentile of 73 reflects the CPU’s strength pulling up the GPU’s weakness.

Specific GPU benchmarks: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2278, Geekbench OpenCL 89494, Geekbench Vulkan 74422, PassMark G3D 11774, PassMark GPU compute 4778, PassMark G2D 711. DirectX 9 (178), DX10 (56), DX11 (69), and DX12 (70) scores are low in absolute terms, indicating this GPU is not optimized for legacy APIs. The combined picture: a CPU that punches near the top of mobile processors, paired with a GPU that sits in the middle of the pack, resulting in a system that is better at compute and productivity than at raw graphics.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores. The GPU’s 62nd percentile and its proximity to the RTX 3060 Mobile (delta 1.2%) suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, this system can achieve playable frame rates (30-60 FPS) in most AAA titles, with esports titles potentially reaching higher. At 1440p, expect lower frame rates, likely dipping below 60 FPS in demanding games. The CPU’s high single-thread score (3745 PassMark, 1026 3DMark) ensures no CPU bottleneck at these resolutions, so the GPU will be the sole limiter. For users who prioritize gaming, this pairing is adequate for 1080p, but not for high-refresh (above 60 Hz) or high-resolution gaming. The 16 GB VRAM is generous and helps with texture-heavy games, but the GPU’s raw compute (16.79 TFLOPS FP32) is modest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed on Intel BGA 1964, which is a soldered mobile platform. There is no upgrade path for the CPU; it is fixed in the laptop. The GPU is also integrated into the laptop (slot width IGP, display outputs "Portable Device Dependent"), so neither component can be swapped. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with ECC capability, so users can upgrade RAM if the laptop allows it. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU is available for storage and other devices, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient. The GPU’s TDP is 120 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 55 W, but no suggested PSU is listed, and power connectors are not specified. Since this is a laptop, the power delivery is fixed by the manufacturer. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, and the CPU is active, so the platform is aging. A sensible "next upgrade" would be a new laptop, as neither the CPU nor GPU can be replaced. For storage, users can add NVMe drives via the PCIe lanes, and memory can be increased to the maximum supported by the laptop’s BIOS, but the core compute is locked.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-12900HX (16 cores, 24 threads, Alder Lake-HX) with the Intel Arc A770M (16 GB GDDR6, Xe-HPG architecture). The CPU is a high-end mobile part at the 84th percentile, while the GPU is a midrange mobile part at the 62nd percentile. The combined percentile is 73, indicating an overall upper-midrange system. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3% in average score, making it a competitive processor, while the GPU’s nearest rivals include the RTX 3060 Mobile, placing it in the mainstream gaming tier. This is not a flagship gaming laptop, but a capable productivity machine with decent gaming chops. The CPU excels in threaded workloads (Cinebench R23 23150, PassMark multithread 33158), and the GPU offers 16 GB of VRAM with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is rare at this tier. The system is best suited for users who do heavy CPU work (rendering, compiling, data processing) and game at 1080p as a secondary activity. The GPU’s end-of-life status and the CPU’s soldered nature mean the system has no upgrade path, so buyers should view it as a fixed configuration.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-12900HX faster than the Intel Core i7-13800H?

A: In aggregate benchmark score, the i9-12900HX scores 35003, while the i7-13800H scores 34988, a delta of 0%. They are statistically identical in performance.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A770M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The Arc A770M has an average benchmark score of 18383, while the RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18159, a delta of 1.2%. The Arc is slightly faster in aggregate, but both are in the same performance class.

Q: Can this laptop run games at 1440p?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this pairing. Based on the GPU’s 62nd percentile rank and similarity to the RTX 3060 Mobile, 1440p gaming would likely result in sub-60 FPS in demanding titles at ultra settings. 1080p is the more suitable resolution.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 1026 in 3DMark single-thread, 1912.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 3745 in PassMark single-thread. These are strong numbers for a mobile chip, indicating responsive day-to-day use.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900HX supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: Is the GPU upgradeable?

A: No. The Arc A770M is an integrated mobile GPU (slot width IGP) with display outputs marked as "Portable Device Dependent." It is soldered into the laptop and cannot be replaced.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W. The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, but no suggested PSU is listed, as this is a laptop with fixed power delivery.