SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900H

28,003 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This is a laptop platform pairing a 14-core Intel Core i9-12900H with an Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The data shows a system where the CPU is not the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads; the GPU carries the heavier load in gaming and rendering tasks. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 86th percentile against all GPUs, and the combined platform percentile is 83. The near-identical percentile positions suggest a reasonably balanced pairing, though the GPU’s slight edge in percentile ranking implies it will be the component that defines the ceiling in most real-world scenarios.

Looking at the CPU’s thread-scaling results, the benchmark progression from 2 threads (1891 in 3dmark) to 4 threads (3398) to 8 threads (5074) to 16 threads (6457) and finally max threads (6927) shows a clear pattern: performance gains diminish as more threads are added. The jump from 2 to 4 threads is 80%, from 4 to 8 threads is 49%, and from 8 to 16 threads is 27%. This indicates that the Alder Lake-H architecture with its 14 cores and 20 threads is well-utilized for multi-threaded productivity, but the scaling curve flattens as the workload saturates. For gaming, where single-thread and moderate multi-thread performance matter most, the 3dmark single-thread score of 999 and 2-thread score of 1891 are the relevant figures, and they suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately without creating a severe bottleneck.

The bottleneck analysis is workload-dependent. In CPU-light, GPU-heavy scenarios like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the Arc A550M will be the constraint. In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (Passmark score of 316714), encryption (18548), or extended instruction workloads (18875), the i9-12900H is the dominant contributor. The Passmark integer math score of 93828 versus floating-point math of 67940 shows the CPU is stronger at integer operations, which favors general productivity and code compilation. For gaming FPS, since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, the estimates must be derived from the benchmark scores; the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 80th percentile suggest that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary limiter, while at lower resolutions or esports titles with low graphical demand, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread 3717, Cinebench R23 single-core 1863.5) becomes more relevant.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the FACT PACK, but the benchmark scores imply that in a balanced laptop, the GPU is the component that dictates frame rates in modern titles. The Arc A550M’s FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and its pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, but the CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 5074 indicates it can keep up with the GPU’s demands in most scenarios. The system is not perfectly balanced — the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its peers — so in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will have headroom, and in CPU-bound scenarios, the GPU will wait. For content creators who run both CPU-heavy encodes and GPU-accelerated renders, this platform offers a workable equilibrium, though neither component is top-tier in its class.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-12900H delivers an average benchmark score of 28003, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a fraction of a percent: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28032 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.2% ahead). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27932, which is 0.3% behind the i9-12900H. This clustering means the i9-12900H is essentially performance-equivalent to these desktop and mobile parts, despite being a mobile chip with a 45 W TDP. The 3dmark multi-thread scores are strong: 6457 for 16 threads and 6927 for max threads, which is a 7.3% improvement from 16 to 20 threads, showing the hyper-threading benefit on the 8 performance cores.

In Cinebench, the multicore R23 score of 15946.5 and single-core score of 1863.5 indicate a solid balance. The single-core R23 score is 11.7% of the multicore score, which is typical for a hybrid architecture with 6 efficiency cores. The Passmark multi-thread score of 27340 and single-thread score of 3717 (listed twice as both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread) confirm the CPU’s positioning. The data compression score of 316714 is notably high, indicating strong memory bandwidth utilization for a mobile part. The i9-12900H’s performance is competitive with recent desktop processors, but it is not a top-tier halo chip; the 80th percentile means roughly one in five CPUs outperforms it.

The Intel Arc A550M GPU has an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT at 50951 (2.4% ahead). The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails at 48477, which is 2.6% behind. These comparisons are striking: the Arc A550M, a mobile GPU with a 60 W TDP, benchmarks nearly identically to desktop flagship GPUs from previous generations. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, showing consistent performance across compute APIs. The combined platform percentile of 83 reflects the pairing of an 80th-percentile CPU with an 86th-percentile GPU, resulting in a system that sits above the majority of laptops but below the top-tier enthusiast segment.

The combined picture is of a laptop platform that performs like a high-end desktop from a few years ago. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15946.5 is comparable to desktop mid-range parts, and the GPU’s Geekbench scores rival desktop GPUs with much higher power draws. However, the absence of measured FPS data means game performance must be estimated from these synthetic benchmarks. The data suggests that in compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, this platform will deliver strong results, but the thermal and power constraints of a laptop chassis will likely prevent sustained peak performance. The GPU’s end-of-life production status also indicates that this is a platform from a specific point in Intel’s Arc lifecycle, and driver maturity may vary.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-12900H compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i9-12900H scores 28003 on average, which is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28032), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054), and the Intel Core i5-14500T (28065). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 scores 27932, which is 0.3% lower. All four rivals are within 0.3% of the i9-12900H, making them effectively identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance tier relative to desktop GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737 on average, which places it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. It benchmarks within 2.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) and within 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, which is only 0.4% higher.

Q: Does this platform support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The actual memory type used depends on the laptop manufacturer’s design, as the CPU memory controller is compatible with both standards.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance, and why does it matter for gaming?

A: The i9-12900H scores 999 in 3dmark single-thread and 3717 in Passmark single-thread. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1863.5. These scores indicate strong single-thread performance, which is important for games that rely on a few heavily-loaded threads. The 2-thread 3dmark score of 1891 shows that even with two threads, the CPU delivers solid performance for legacy or lightly-threaded games.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have, and what is the memory bandwidth?

A: The i9-12900H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the memory bus is dual-channel and supports DDR4 and DDR5. The data compression Passmark score of 316714 suggests strong memory throughput.

Q: Is the GPU capable of hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A550M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). It also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the actual performance in RT-heavy games will depend on the workload and driver optimization.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU, and does it affect availability?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is listed as end-of-life, meaning Intel has discontinued production. The CPU is still active. This means the GPU may become harder to source in new laptops, but existing systems with this GPU will continue to function. The CPU’s active status suggests the platform is still supported in the market.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not user-upgradeable; any CPU upgrade would require replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, so a user could upgrade memory capacity or speed within the constraints of the laptop’s design. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs. The Intel Arc A550M connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth.

The GPU has a TDP of 60 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, for a combined thermal budget of 105 W before accounting for other components like memory, storage, and display. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, which is typical for a laptop where the power supply is integrated into the chassis design. The GPU’s slot width is listed as "IGP," which is unusual for a discrete GPU, but it suggests a compact form factor. The display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the laptop manufacturer determines the external display connectivity.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means memory bandwidth scales with capacity and speed. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast NVMe storage, so upgrading to a Gen 4 SSD would improve load times. The GPU is soldered and not upgradeable, but the CPU’s 20 PCIe lanes and the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface mean that external GPU enclosures could theoretically be used if the laptop supports them, though this is not specified in the data. The platform is at the end of its upgradeability due to the BGA socket; the realistic upgrade path is a new laptop with a newer platform.

The CPU’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives laptop makers flexibility, but from a user perspective, the memory type is fixed at purchase. The lack of ECC memory support means this is not suited for error-sensitive workstation tasks like financial modeling or scientific computing where data integrity is critical. The integrated Iris Xe 96EU GPU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving tasks, but the Arc A550M is the primary graphics solution. The 45 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP indicate this is a performance laptop platform, not an ultraportable, so the power delivery and cooling system are designed for sustained loads. The production status of the GPU as end-of-life suggests that replacement parts may become scarce over time, which is a consideration for long-term ownership.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 217 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The hybrid architecture combines 8 performance cores and 6 efficiency cores, which the 20 threads (8 P-cores with hyper-threading plus 6 E-cores) reflect. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared, with 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for connectivity. The integrated Iris Xe 96EU GPU provides basic graphics capability.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a strong mobile CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15946.5 is the headline figure, indicating sustained multi-threaded performance for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core R23 score of 1863.5 shows that the 5.00 GHz boost clock on the performance cores delivers competitive single-thread performance for gaming and legacy applications. The 3dmark scores show a smooth scaling curve: 999 single-thread, 1891 for 2 threads, 3398 for 4 threads, 5074 for 8 threads, 6457 for 16 threads, and 6927 for max threads. The jump from 16 to 20 threads is only 7.3%, indicating that the efficiency cores contribute diminishing returns beyond 16 threads.

The Passmark scores provide insight into real-world workloads. The integer math score of 93828 versus floating-point math of 67940 shows the CPU is 38% stronger at integer operations, which benefits tasks like database processing, encryption, and compression. The data compression score of 316714 is exceptionally high, and the data encryption score of 18548 indicates hardware acceleration for AES instructions. The extended instructions score of 18875 covers AVX and similar SIMD workloads. The find prime numbers score of 107 is a measure of pure integer throughput, and the random string sorting score of 35296 reflects memory access patterns. The physics score of 1753 is relevant for game physics calculations.

The nearest rival comparisons show that the i9-12900H is effectively a mid-range performer despite its Core i9 branding. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G, a desktop APU, performs identically (0.1% difference). The Intel Core i5-14500T, a low-power desktop chip, also matches it. This means that in a laptop, the i9-12900H delivers desktop-equivalent performance, but it does not reach the heights of flagship desktop CPUs. The 80th percentile ranking confirms this: it outperforms 80% of all CPUs but is not in the top tier. For a laptop user, this is a strong processor that will handle demanding productivity tasks without bottlenecking the GPU in most workloads.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-512 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process node with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The transistor density is 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units. It has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. The memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

The compute performance is quantified by the FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and FP16 of 16.79 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. These figures indicate a GPU that can handle 1080p gaming comfortably and 1440p with adjustments. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern game textures at these resolutions, though 4K gaming with high-resolution texture packs may exceed the 128-bit memory bus’s bandwidth. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest compared to high-end desktop GPUs, which constrains performance in bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark scores are striking: Geekbench OpenCL scores 49894 and Vulkan scores 49580. These are nearly identical, showing consistent performance across compute APIs. The 86th percentile ranking means the A550M outperforms 86% of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include desktop GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% ahead) and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2.4% ahead). The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails by 2.6%. This is remarkable for a 60 W mobile GPU, suggesting that the Arc architecture is highly efficient in compute workloads. However, the end-of-life production status indicates that Intel has moved on, and driver maturity may be a concern for long-term support.

For rendering workloads, the RT cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware ray tracing. The FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS is useful for AI inference and certain rendering techniques that use half-precision. The OpenCL and Vulkan scores suggest strong performance in GPU compute for video encoding, rendering, and scientific workloads. The lack of tensor cores means no dedicated hardware for AI acceleration, which limits performance in workloads that rely on Tensor Core acceleration in NVIDIA GPUs. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most rendering tasks at 1080p and 1440p, but complex scenes with high polygon counts and large textures may exceed it. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU to communicate with the CPU.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i9-12900H + Intel Arc A550M combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and the estimates should be treated as approximations based on the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 80th percentile ranking.

Based on the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS, pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s, and 8 GB VRAM with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, the Arc A550M is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings. At 1080p, the GPU is likely the primary limiter, and the CPU’s single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread 999, Passmark single-thread 3717) should be sufficient to avoid severe bottlenecks in most titles. Esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound at low settings, would benefit from the CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and could achieve high frame rates, but the exact figures are unknown.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become more significant constraints. The pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s suggests that fill-rate-limited scenes could see noticeable frame rate drops. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p textures, but high-resolution texture packs may cause memory pressure. For AAA titles at 1440p, the A550M would likely require medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. At 4K, the GPU would struggle; the 8 GB VRAM and limited bandwidth would force low settings and upscaling techniques.

The CPU’s performance in gaming is adequate. The 3dmark 8-thread score of 5074 indicates that the CPU can handle multi-threaded game engines, and the 2-thread score of 1891 shows strong performance for legacy titles. The Passmark physics score of 1753 suggests that game physics calculations will not be a bottleneck. The overall gaming experience would be defined by the GPU, which is a mid-to-high-tier mobile part. The absence of measured FPS data means that these estimates should be validated with real-world testing before making purchasing decisions. The platform is likely to deliver a solid 1080p gaming experience with the ability to handle esports titles at high frame rates, but 1440p and 4K gaming would require reduced settings.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop platform (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i9-12900H CPU with the Intel Arc A550M GPU. The combined percentile is 83, meaning this system outperforms 83% of all platforms in the database. The CPU is an 80th-percentile performer, and the GPU is an 86th-percentile performer. The system is a high-mid-range laptop that excels in compute-heavy workloads and can handle modern gaming at 1080p.

The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-H processor with a 45 W TDP, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has 24 MB L3 cache, and features Intel’s hybrid performance/efficiency core design. The GPU is an Arc A550M with 8 GB GDDR6, 2048 shading units, 16 RT cores, and a 60 W TDP. The GPU is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors. The platform uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is soldered and not upgradeable.

The performance tier is defined by the benchmark scores: the CPU’s average benchmark score of 28003 and the GPU’s average benchmark score of 49737. The nearest rival comparisons show that this platform performs like a desktop system from a previous generation. The CPU matches the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G within 0.1%, and the GPU matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti within 0.4%. This is a laptop that can replace a desktop for many workloads, but it is not a flagship halo product.

The production status is mixed: the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life. This means the GPU may be difficult to source in new systems, but the platform is still functional. The lack of a launch MSRP for both components suggests that this is an OEM part not sold at retail. The platform is best described as a mobile workstation-class system that balances CPU and GPU performance for content creation, development, and moderate gaming. The 83rd combined percentile places it above the majority of laptops but below the top-tier segment occupied by flagship mobile GPUs like the RTX 4080/4090 series (not listed in the data, but implied by the percentile ranking).

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-12900H + Intel Arc A550M platform is suited for users who need a laptop with strong compute performance and capable graphics, targeted at the high-mid-range mobile market. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium-to-high settings would find this platform adequate, based on the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU in most scenarios. Esports players who prioritize frame rates in CPU-bound titles would benefit from the CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and single-thread performance (Passmark 3717), though the exact frame rates cannot be quantified from the data.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development would find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance valuable. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15946.5 and the Passmark integer math score of 93828 indicate strong performance for compilation, encoding, and rendering tasks. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 suggest it can accelerate GPU-based rendering and compute workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p rendering projects, and the FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS supports half-precision compute.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs would benefit from the platform’s balance of CPU and GPU performance. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads handle multi-threaded simulation software, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate for graphics programming. Small business workstations that run productivity suites, database management, or light CAD software would find the CPU’s data compression score of 316714 and encryption score of 18548 advantageous. The lack of ECC memory support is a limitation for mission-critical financial or scientific applications, but for general business use, the platform is adequate.

The platform is not suited for users who require top-tier gaming performance at 1440p or 4K with maximum settings, as the GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are constraints. It is also not suited for users who need the absolute fastest multi-threaded performance, as the CPU’s 80th percentile ranking means it is not in the top tier. However, for a laptop user who needs a single system for work and play, this platform offers a compelling balance. The end-of-life status of the GPU is a consideration for long-term support, but the active CPU status suggests the platform remains viable. The target buyer is someone who values compute performance over gaming frame rates and can accept 1080p gaming as the primary gaming resolution.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds