SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900H

28,003 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A370M is a 4 GB GDDR6 part on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a modest figure by modern standards, and it will be the primary constraint in GPU-heavy workloads. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective throughput. The GPU's base clock is 1550 MHz, boosting to 2050 MHz. These clocks are respectable for a 35 W TDP mobile part, but the narrow memory bus means that bandwidth-hungry tasks like 4K texture streaming or large scene rendering will hit a wall early.

The chip itself is DG2-128, built on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. That transistor density of 45.9M / mm² is high, but the GPU is small in absolute terms. It packs 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These are entry-level discrete GPU numbers, not far from integrated graphics on paper, but the dedicated memory and Xe-HPG architecture give it an edge in sustained workloads.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 8 RT cores. That is a key differentiator from older integrated solutions, but with only 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute behind them, RT performance will be modest. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so feature support is current. Tensor cores are not listed — the pack shows null for that field — so AI-accelerated workloads will rely on the standard compute units. For rendering, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676 and Vulkan score is 28673. The average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. That percentile means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the database, but the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct -0.1), AMD FirePro W8000 (-0.1), AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1.0). The deltaPct values are all within 1%, so the A370M is essentially tied with those parts in aggregate compute — the RX 6800M being 1% ahead is within noise. This is not a rendering powerhouse; it is a capable entry-level mobile GPU for light to moderate 3D work.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The A370M's 74th percentile GPU score suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU ties the RX 470 in compute, which historically means 60+ FPS in esports titles at 1080p, but high-refresh (144 Hz+) will be out of reach in demanding games. The CPU's single-thread score of 999 in 3dmark_single_thread is strong, so frame pacing should be consistent, but the GPU will be the bottleneck.

Streaming: The i9-12900H has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Passmark multithread score of 27340. That is plenty of headroom for x264 encoding at 1080p while gaming. The GPU's lack of listed tensor cores means NVENC-style AI encoding is not applicable here, but the CPU can handle the load. The 80th percentile CPU ranking supports this — streaming on this laptop will not require dropping game settings dramatically.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15946.5 and Passmark integer math score of 93828 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 will accelerate effects and transitions, but the 64-bit memory bus will slow 4K multi-layer timelines. For 1080p editing, this is a solid pairing; for 4K, expect longer render times and potential proxy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. Cinebench R20 multicore of 9501 and R15 multicore of 2576.5 show a mobile CPU that can compete with desktop parts from a few years ago. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 is adequate for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar, but the 4 GB VRAM will cap scene complexity. For architectural visualization or product renders, this will work, but heavy scenes will need CPU fallback.

Software development: The i9-12900H's Passmark data compression score of 316714 and data encryption score of 18548 indicate strong compile times and build performance. The 20 threads handle parallel builds well. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but the 74th percentile GPU score means light UI acceleration and occasional shader compilation will be smooth.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 3717 ensures snappy spreadsheet, browser, and document performance. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the 35 W TDP means the laptop will run cool and quiet. The 80th CPU percentile and 74th GPU percentile make this a capable all-rounder for coursework, including light CAD or data visualization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU-heavy pairing. The i9-12900H sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs, while the A370M sits at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. That 6-point gap indicates the CPU is the stronger component. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, multi-threaded rendering, data processing — the CPU will be the limiting factor only in absolute terms, meaning it will finish tasks quickly. In GPU-bound workloads — gaming, GPU rendering, video effects — the GPU will be the clear bottleneck.

The 3dmark multi-thread scores confirm the CPU's strength: 6457 at 16 threads, 6927 at max threads, and 999 single-thread. The single-thread score is low relative to the multi-thread scores, suggesting the CPU is heavily multi-core optimized. For gaming, this means the CPU will rarely limit FPS, but the GPU will cap performance at lower settings. The estimated FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that at 1080p, the GPU will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but at 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stutter and texture pop-in.

The nearest rival data for the GPU shows a 1% delta with the RX 6800M, which is a much higher-tier part in reality. This suggests the A370M's benchmark scores are competitive in compute, but the 6800M has far more VRAM and bandwidth, so real-world gaming performance would diverge significantly. The CPU's nearest rivals — the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (-0.1%), Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (-0.2%), Core i5-14500T (-0.2%), and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (0.3%) — are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the i9-12900H is exactly in the middle of its performance class. The bottleneck in this system is the GPU, and it is not close.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel BGA 1744, which is a soldered mobile socket. That means the CPU cannot be upgraded — it is permanently attached to the motherboard. The memory support is DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, which means the laptop may have one or the other depending on the specific model. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, so storage and external GPU connections have modern bandwidth. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of compute.

The GPU TDP is 35 W, and the CPU TDP is 45 W. No suggested PSU is listed, but this is a laptop, so power is handled by the AC adapter. The combined TDP of 80 W for CPU and GPU means a typical 130 W laptop adapter has headroom for the rest of the system. The GPU is listed as end-of-life production status, so no future driver optimizations are likely. The CPU is still active, so Intel will continue to support it.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not possible in the traditional sense — the CPU is soldered and the GPU is integrated into the board. The only upgrades available are memory (if the laptop has SODIMM slots) and storage (NVMe Gen 4). For users needing more GPU performance, an external GPU enclosure via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes could work, but the x8 link and the laptop's overall design would limit gains. The realistic upgrade path is to a new laptop entirely, targeting a configuration with a higher GPU percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a 14-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-H part. The architecture is Alder Lake, using Intel's hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, though the pack does not specify the P-core/E-core split. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz. The process node is 10 nm, built by Intel, with a die size of 217 mm². The cache hierarchy is 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. This is a large cache configuration, which helps with multi-threaded workloads.

The TDP is 45 W, which is high for a mobile part but appropriate for a Core i9. The memory support is DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, with no ECC support. The integrated graphics is Iris Xe 96EU, which is a capable fallback but not a gaming solution. The market segment is mobile, and the production status is active. The release date is January 2022, and the part number is SRLD4. The multiplier is locked, so no overclocking.

Benchmark scores tell the story. Cinebench R23 multicore is 15946.5, single-core 1863.5. Cinebench R20 multicore is 9501, single-core 1341. R15 multicore is 2576.5, single-core 266. Passmark multithread is 27340, single-thread 3717. The 3dmark scores show scaling: 999 single-thread, 1891 at 2 threads, 3398 at 4 threads, 5074 at 8 threads, 6457 at 16 threads, and 6927 at max threads. This scaling is not linear — 2 threads nearly double single-thread, but 8 to 16 threads only adds 27% — indicating diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. The max-thread score of 6927 is only 7% higher than 16 threads, suggesting the 20 threads are not fully utilized in this test.

The Passmark extended instructions score of 18875 and floating point math of 67940 show strong SIMD performance. Integer math is 93828, which is very high. Data compression is 316714, and encryption is 18548. The find prime numbers score of 107 is low, which is typical for modern CPUs that rely on frequency rather than raw integer loops. The physics score of 1753 is modest, indicating the CPU is not optimized for legacy physics calculations. The average benchmark score is 28003, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier mobile CPU, competitive with desktop parts from a few generations ago.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-12900H good for gaming?

A: The CPU is strong for gaming — its 3dmark single-thread score of 999 and Passmark single-thread score of 3717 ensure high frame pacing. However, the Intel Arc A370M GPU is the limiting factor, with a 74th percentile score and 4 GB VRAM, so gaming will be capped at 1080p medium settings in most titles.

Q: Can the Intel Arc A370M handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so ray tracing is technically supported. However, with only 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, ray-traced scenes will run at low frame rates. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 470, does not support hardware RT, so the A370M is ahead in features but not in raw RT performance.

Q: Is the i9-12900H better than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G?

A: The benchmark scores are nearly identical. The i9-12900H has an average score of 28003, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28032, a delta of -0.1% — essentially a tie. The Intel part has more cores (14 vs. the Ryzen's unspecified count), but the aggregate scores do not reflect a significant advantage.

Q: How much RAM and storage can this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but the pack does not specify maximum capacity. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes supports fast NVMe storage. No specific capacity limits are listed in the data.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M good for video editing?

A: The GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 is adequate for hardware acceleration in editors that support Intel's API. However, the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will limit 4K editing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15946.5 will handle export rendering well, so this is a balanced pairing for 1080p video work.

Q: What is the difference between the GPU's base and boost clock?

A: The base clock is 1550 MHz and the boost clock is 2050 MHz, a 500 MHz range. The boost clock is achievable under sustained load within the 35 W TDP, but the actual frequency depends on thermal headroom and power delivery in the specific laptop.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop part?

A: Both are mobile components. The CPU is marked as market segment "Mobile" with socket Intel BGA 1744, and the GPU's slot width is "IGP" (integrated graphics package). The build class is "laptop," confirming this is a mobile pairing.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all recorded combinations in the database. The CPU's average benchmark score is 28003, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The combined picture is a system that is stronger in compute than in graphics, with the CPU carrying the load in most productivity tasks.

The CPU's specific scores are consistently strong: Cinebench R23 multicore 15946.5, Cinebench R20 multicore 9501, Cinebench R15 multicore 2576.5, and Passmark multithread 27340. The single-thread scores are also competitive: Cinebench R23 single-core 1863.5, Cinebench R20 single-core 1341, Cinebench R15 single-core 266, and Passmark single-thread 3717. The 3dmark scores show a clear progression from 999 single-thread to 6927 max threads, with the largest jump from 1 to 2 threads (999 to 1891, an 89% increase) and the smallest from 16 to 20 threads (6457 to 6927, a 7% increase).

The GPU's Geekbench scores are 29676 OpenCL and 28673 Vulkan. The delta between OpenCL and Vulkan is 3.5%, which is within normal variance for driver optimization. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, is 1% ahead in aggregate — a surprising result given the 6800M is a high-end part, but the benchmark averages do not account for memory bandwidth or VRAM capacity. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its score, confirming that the i9-12900H sits in a densely populated performance tier. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all performance estimates are derived from these benchmark scores, which are reliable predictors of relative performance but not absolute frame rates.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i9-12900H with the Intel Arc A370M. The CPU is a 12th-generation Alder Lake-H mobile processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, designed for high-performance laptops. The GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 Mobile part, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 4 GB GDDR6 memory. The combination is unusual — a top-tier mobile CPU paired with an entry-level discrete GPU — creating a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is modest in graphics performance.

The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 77, places this build in the upper-middle range of all recorded systems. The CPU's 80th percentile makes it one of the stronger mobile processors in the database, while the GPU's 74th percentile is respectable but not exceptional. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning this is a legacy configuration that will not receive future driver optimizations. The CPU is still active, so it will continue to receive support. This pairing is best understood as a productivity-first laptop with gaming and light GPU work as secondary capabilities.

The launch MSRP is not listed for either component, so no pricing information is available. The GPU's slot width is "IGP," indicating it is integrated into the motherboard, and the display outputs are portable-device dependent, meaning the laptop manufacturer determines the ports. The combined TDP of 80 W (45 W CPU + 35 W GPU) suggests a laptop with a modest cooling solution, consistent with a thin-and-light or mainstream gaming chassis.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need serious CPU horsepower in a mobile form factor but do not prioritize GPU performance. Software developers will benefit from the 20 threads and Passmark integer math score of 93828, which accelerates compilation and testing. Students in engineering or data science programs will find the CPU's 80th percentile ranking sufficient for simulations, statistical analysis, and heavy multitasking. Small business workstations that run spreadsheets, databases, and office suites will be well-served by the single-thread Passmark score of 3717 and the 24 MB L3 cache.

Content creators working in 1080p — video editors, graphic designers, and podcast producers — will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15946.5 for export rendering, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 handles effects and transitions. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the A370M's 74th percentile GPU score sufficient for esports and older titles, but high-refresh gaming at 1440p is not realistic with 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 999 ensures that frame pacing will be smooth, but the GPU will cap performance.

Users who primarily play modern AAA games, do 4K video editing, or work with large 3D scenes should look elsewhere — the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will be a hard limit. This build is for users who spend most of their time in CPU-bound workloads and occasionally game or do light GPU work. The 77th combined percentile reflects a system that is above average overall, but the gap between the CPU and GPU components means it is not a balanced gaming machine. It is a developer's laptop with gaming capability, not a gaming laptop with productivity features.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900H + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds