SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-12900F and Intel Arc B770 form a high-end desktop pairing built around Intel’s Alder Lake architecture and the new Battlemage GPU generation. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 16 GB GDDR6 card with 4096 shading units. Data in this analysis is based on synthetic benchmark scores only; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from CPU and GPU performance percentiles rather than direct in-game testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel’s 10 nm Alder Lake-S architecture. It runs at a 2.40 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that reflects its locked power envelope. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with a peak memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for workstation reliability.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong top-tier performance. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 30405 and single-core score of 4292 demonstrate balanced capability for both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 15965 and single-core score of 2339 reinforce this pattern. PassMark tests show specific strengths: integer math at 129504, floating-point math at 96452, and multithread score at 35912. Data compression hits 451402, while encryption reaches 25251, suggesting solid throughput for data-heavy tasks.

The nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this CPU is with modern competitors. The Intel Core i7-13700KF scores 47330 average, just 0.3% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is 0.4% behind at 46971, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H trails by 0.6% at 47468 average. This means the i9-12900F sits in a performance cluster where no single competitor has a decisive edge. For real workloads, the 16 cores and 24 threads handle video rendering, code compilation, and scientific simulations efficiently, while the 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-thread performance for daily tasks.

The architecture’s hybrid design, typical of Alder Lake, mixes high-performance and high-efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The 215 mm² die size and 30 MB shared L3 cache indicate a large, well-connected design. The 10 nm process node from Intel’s foundry delivers this performance within a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 16-core part and reflects efficient power management. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, although the locked base clock suggests the boost behavior is the primary performance driver.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs provide the foundation for these estimates.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4292 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4017, is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can push modern games at high settings, though the 50th percentile GPU ranking implies it sits at the mid-range tier rather than the top. For 1440p ultra, frame rates would likely remain playable but with more variance, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor. At 4K ultra, the 16 GB VRAM capacity helps with texture-heavy scenes, but the GPU’s mid-tier percentile suggests frame rates would dip below high-refresh thresholds.

The GPU’s architecture, Xe2-HPG on TSMC’s 5 nm process, includes 32 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This modern API support means ray-traced effects are possible, but performance in such titles would be constrained by the GPU’s mid-tier compute capability. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides ample bandwidth for high-resolution textures and future game releases. Competitive esports titles, which are often CPU-bound, would benefit most from the i9-12900F’s strong single-thread scores, likely achieving very high frame rates at 1080p. Heavily GPU-bound AAA games would see more modest results, with the GPU’s 50th percentile positioning suggesting medium-to-high settings at 1440p for smooth gameplay.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 47176, placing it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result, but the nearest rivals show it is not class-leading. The Intel Core i7-13700KF edges ahead by 0.3% with a score of 47330, while the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H leads by 0.6% at 47468. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 trails by 0.3% at 47022, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 sits 0.4% behind at 46971. This tight clustering means the i9-12900F is effectively tied with its direct competitors across synthetic workloads.

The GPU has an empty benchmarks array in the FACT PACK, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This percentile indicates the Arc B770 sits at the median of all GPUs, which is unusual for a card with 16 GB of memory and 4096 shading units. The lack of benchmark scores means there is no direct performance number to cite, but the percentile position suggests mid-range rasterization performance relative to the full GPU market.

The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 70, reflecting a system where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 50th percentile, creating an imbalance where the processor outperforms the graphics card in relative terms. For productivity tasks that rely on CPU compute, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, this pairing excels. For gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, capping frame rates below what the CPU could support with a higher-tier graphics card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Arc B770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU operates at its full interface speed without any lane-sharing concerns. Memory bandwidth is rated at 76.8 GB/s, which is sufficient for the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, though DDR5 modules would be required to reach this peak figure.

The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply, with power delivered through one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, so total system power draw is well within the 550 W suggested PSU rating. This leaves headroom for additional components like storage drives or cooling fans. The GPU is a dual-slot design, fitting most standard ATX cases, and offers one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs for multi-monitor setups.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking can support significantly more graphics horsepower. The GPU’s 50th percentile is the clear weak point, and replacing it with a card in a higher percentile would better balance the system. The CPU’s socket and memory support are current-generation, so a platform change is not necessary for a GPU upgrade. The unlocked multiplier on the CPU also allows overclocking to extract additional performance, though the locked base clock may limit the practical overclocking headroom.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is adequate for 1080p high-refresh gaming, where the CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4292) drives high frame rates. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, however, limits performance at higher resolutions, so 1440p high-refresh would require reduced settings. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra could exceed 100 FPS in less demanding titles, but AAA games would likely fall below that threshold.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 35912 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 indicate the processor can handle both game logic and encoding workloads simultaneously. The GPU’s mid-tier performance would be the limiting factor for maintaining high frame rates while streaming, but the CPU side is well equipped.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3064 and Geekbench multicore score of 15965 show strong multi-threaded performance for rendering timelines and exporting footage. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM helps with GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU would carry most of the processing load. The 89th percentile CPU ranking makes this a capable editing workstation.

3D rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU’s multicore scores dominate. The PassMark integer math score of 129504 and floating-point math score of 96452 indicate strong compute throughput for ray tracing and physics simulation. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance adds some acceleration for render engines that support it, but the CPU is the primary workhorse. This system would handle moderate rendering workloads comfortably.

Software development: The CPU’s 24 threads and high cache capacity (30 MB L3) speed up compilation and testing. The Geekbench multicore score of 15965 and PassMark multithread score of 35912 support parallel builds, while the single-core score of 2339 ensures responsive IDE interaction. The GPU is less relevant here, so the CPU’s 89th percentile makes this a strong development machine.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic productivity, but the performance is undeniable. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4017 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the 16 cores handle multitasking with ease. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and modern API support would be wasted on typical office tasks, but the system would handle any academic software without issue.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-12900F’s core and thread count?

A: It has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-12900F scores an average of 47176, which is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-13700KF, 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, and the GPU uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, with a TDP of 225 W.

Q: Does the FACT PACK include measured gaming frame rates?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The CPU is in the 89th percentile, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile, and the combined percentile is 70.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking far exceeds the GPU’s 50th percentile, meaning the graphics card is the limiting factor in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 451402) or integer math (129504), the processor performs at a high level, but these tasks do not engage the GPU.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. The CPU’s strong single-core scores (Cinebench R23 single-core of 4292) ensure it can feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic, but the GPU’s mid-tier compute (19.66 TFLOPS FP32) caps the frame rate. At 1080p, the CPU might still have headroom, but at 1440p and above, the GPU is fully saturated. The 16 GB VRAM helps avoid memory capacity bottlenecks, but the raw compute is the limiting factor.

For mixed workloads, the balance depends on the task. Video editing that uses GPU acceleration would see the GPU bottleneck, while CPU-only rendering would see the processor operate near its peak. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this uneven pairing, where the system’s overall tier is dragged down by the GPU’s median performance. A more balanced system would pair this CPU with a GPU in a higher percentile, but as configured, the GPU is the clear constraint.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-12900F CPU with the Intel Arc B770 GPU. The CPU is a 12th-generation Alder Lake part with 16 cores and 24 threads, while the GPU is a Battlemage-generation card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 4096 shading units. The combined percentile of 70 places this system in the upper-mid range of all desktop configurations, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong showing.

The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking makes it a top-tier processor, while the GPU’s 50th percentile places it at the median of all GPUs. This creates a system that is excellent for processor-intensive work but only average for graphics-heavy tasks. The desktop class designation means it is intended for stationary use with standard components, and the 65 W CPU TDP plus 225 W GPU TDP indicate a moderate power footprint. The overall tier is a capable workstation with gaming potential, rather than a dedicated high-end gaming rig.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p who play competitive or esports titles would benefit from the CPU’s strong single-core scores, which support high frame rates in CPU-bound games. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would find the 16 cores and 24 threads well suited to their workloads, with the CPU’s 89th percentile ensuring fast export times and smooth previews.

Software developers would appreciate the multithreaded performance for compilation and testing, with the PassMark multithread score of 35912 indicating strong parallel processing. Students and small business users would find this system overqualified for office work, but it would handle any academic or professional software without hesitation. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and modern API support make it adequate for light creative work, but users needing high-end gaming at 1440p or 4K should consider a different GPU. This build is best for the CPU-centric user who occasionally games rather than the dedicated gamer seeking maximum frame rates.