SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc A770: A Desktop Powerhouse Pairing

This desktop build pairs Intel's 16-core Alder Lake flagship CPU with Intel's 16 GB Arc A770 graphics card, landing in the 90th combined percentile of all system configurations. The CPU alone sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 90th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a balanced high-end platform. The data shows a system that excels in both compute-heavy productivity tasks and modern gaming workloads, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on Intel's Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid design with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, allowing it to scale from efficiency-focused workloads to bursty single-threaded tasks. The chip draws a 65 W TDP, which is notably modest for a 16-core part, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large shared pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, which shows up in the benchmark data. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors, while the single-core score of 4292 demonstrates strong per-thread performance for legacy applications that rely on fewer threads.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the i9-12900F's average benchmark score of 47176 is just 0.3% below the Intel Core i7-13700KF (47330) and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (47022). The gap to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971) is 0.4%, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47468) leads by 0.6%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the i9-12900F trades blows with newer and more expensive parts — an unusual position for a 2022-era chip.

In Geekbench, the multicore score of 15965 and single-core score of 2339 reinforce the picture of a processor that handles both parallel and serial workloads with ease. The Passmark multithread score of 35912 and single-thread score of 4017 confirm this dual strength. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, fast compilation times for developers, and smooth 4K video editing timelines. The data compression score of 451402 indicates archival tasks like ZIP creation finish quickly, while the encryption score of 25251 suggests secure communications and disk encryption do not become a bottleneck.

The floating-point math score of 96452 and integer math score of 129504 categorize this CPU as particularly strong in scientific computing, financial modeling, and any workload that relies on heavy number crunching. The physics score of 1842, while lower in absolute terms, still supports fluid dynamics simulations and physics engines in engineering software. The processor's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs means roughly nine out of ten processors on the market trail it in aggregate performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-12900F?

A: The i9-12900F has 16 cores and 24 threads, which allows it to handle heavily parallel workloads like video rendering and code compilation while also providing strong single-threaded performance.

Q: How does the i9-12900F compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700KF?

A: The average benchmark score of the i9-12900F (47176) is only 0.3% lower than the i7-13700KF (47330), making them effectively equivalent in overall performance despite the 13700KF being a newer generation part.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i9-12900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more affordable memory or newer, higher-performance modules.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This large frame buffer is particularly useful for high-resolution textures and AI workloads.

Q: Does this build support PCIe Gen 5?

A: Yes, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the CPU can connect to next-generation storage and other peripherals at higher bandwidth than the GPU's current interconnect.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. Despite this, its 90th percentile ranking indicates it remains competitive with current mid-range and high-end graphics cards.

Q: How much power does the GPU require from the power supply?

A: The GPU has a 225 W TDP and the suggested PSU rating is 550 W. It uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, so most modern power supplies can accommodate it without issue.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 is a strong indicator of sustained all-core performance, placing it above the vast majority of desktop processors. The single-core score of 4292 ensures that lightly threaded applications like web browsers and office suites still feel responsive. In the Passmark suite, the multithread score of 35912 and single-thread score of 4017 mirror this balance. The Geekbench results of 15965 (multicore) and 2339 (single-core) corroborate these findings across different testing methodologies.

The GPU delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, which places the Arc A770 in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 demonstrate strong compute capability beyond gaming, suggesting the card can accelerate video encoding, machine learning inference, and 3D rendering tasks. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA CMP 90HX with an average score of 69000, a mere 0.3% above the Arc A770's 68809. The AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562) trails by 0.4%, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (69870) and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69986) lead by 1.5% and 1.7%, respectively.

The combined picture is a system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 90th percentile are nearly aligned, resulting in a combined percentile of 90. This suggests workloads that stress both components — such as gaming at high resolutions, streaming while playing, or rendering scenes with complex physics — will see balanced utilization. The average benchmark score for the combined system is 47176 for the CPU and 68809 for the GPU, with no measured FPS data available for this exact pairing, so all gaming estimates must be derived from these scores.

Who Should Build It

The data points to several distinct user profiles that would benefit from this configuration. Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions will find the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game engines. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Content creators working with 4K video will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405, which accelerates export times in editing suites. The GPU's 16 GB memory and compute scores of 109175 (OpenCL) and 94284 (Vulkan) support GPU-accelerated effects and encoding. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by the Passmark integer math score of 129504, which handles parallel compilation tasks with ease.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU's floating-point performance (96452 in Passmark) for MATLAB simulations and the GPU's compute capability for CUDA-independent machine learning projects. Small business workstations running database management, financial analysis, or 3D CAD software will see strong performance in the Passmark data compression score of 451402 and encryption score of 25251, which handle data-heavy operations efficiently. The 65 W CPU TDP also makes this a reasonable choice for office environments where power draw and heat output matter.

Balance and Bottleneck

The alignment of the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 90th percentile creates a system where bottlenecks shift depending on the workload. In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data compression (451402 in Passmark), or single-threaded legacy applications, the processor will be the limiting factor. The GPU will sit idle while the CPU's 16 cores work through the task, which is expected and acceptable for productivity-focused usage.

In GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at 4K resolution with ultra settings, the Arc A770 becomes the constraint. The CPU's strong single-core performance (4292 in Cinebench R23) ensures it can feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations without bottlenecking at lower resolutions. However, at 1080p with a high-refresh monitor, the CPU may cap frame rates in esports titles where the GPU could theoretically render more frames than the CPU can process.

The memory subsystem plays a mediating role. With 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth and dual-channel support for DDR4 and DDR5, the system can feed both components adequately. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for its 16 GB frame buffer. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x16 on the GPU mean that data transfer between components is not a bottleneck in either direction.

The power envelope shows a similar balance: the CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 225 W TDP together suggest a system that can run on a 550 W power supply, per the suggested PSU rating. This modest power draw means thermals are manageable with standard air cooling, and the system does not require exotic liquid cooling solutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports the i9-12900F, which means builders have access to a wide range of 12th and 13th generation Intel processors. The CPU's dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to keep existing DDR4 modules or upgrade to faster DDR5 for marginal gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is fixed by the memory type, so the upgrade path here is about capacity rather than speed.

The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU opens the door for next-generation NVMe SSDs that can exceed the bandwidth of PCIe 4.0 drives. However, the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is currently sufficient for the Arc A770's bandwidth needs. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU when the Arc A770 becomes insufficient, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot will remain compatible with future cards.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU leaves significant headroom in the 550 W suggested PSU rating. The GPU's 225 W TDP combined with the CPU's 65 W means the system draws roughly 290 W under full load, leaving over 250 W of headroom for drives, fans, and peripherals. This means users could upgrade to a higher-TDP GPU in the future without necessarily changing the power supply, as long as the total system draw stays under the PSU's rating.

The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer desktop CPUs and valuable for workstation builds that require data integrity. The production status of the CPU is active, so replacement parts are readily available. The GPU is end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor, so future upgrades would likely move to that architecture or a competing vendor's card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's single-core performance (4292 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's 90th percentile ranking suggest the system can drive high frame rates in competitive titles, with the 16 GB VRAM providing room for high texture quality. Frame rates will be estimate-only since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads can handle encoding workloads alongside gaming, with the Passmark multithread score of 35912 indicating headroom for simultaneous game and stream encoding. The GPU's compute scores also support hardware encoding if the software uses it.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 accelerates export times, while the GPU's 16 GB memory handles large timelines and effects. The Vulkan score of 94284 suggests GPU-accelerated rendering in supported editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's floating-point math score of 96452 handles physics calculations, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 109175 supports GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB VRAM allows for larger scenes than 8 GB cards.

Software development: The integer math score of 129504 and data compression score of 451402 make compilation and packaging fast. The 16 cores handle parallel builds, and the single-core score of 4017 ensures IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and cool, while the 89th percentile CPU ranking handles spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing without strain. The GPU is overkill for these tasks but provides headroom for any emerging workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-12900F with the Intel Arc A770. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake part on Socket 1700, and the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 90 places this system in the top 10% of all configurations, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and GPU at the 90th percentile.

The system's average benchmark scores — 47176 for the CPU and 68809 for the GPU — indicate a high-end pairing that excels in both productivity and gaming. The CPU's launch MSRP was $494, and the GPU's launch MSRP was 329 USD. The build targets users who need a single machine for demanding creative work and modern gaming, with the 16 GB VRAM and 16-core CPU providing longevity for future software requirements.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 21,700 million transistors into a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for a mid-range card and supports high-resolution textures without frame buffer overflow.

The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. The pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance for its class. Compute performance reaches 19.66 TFLOPS in FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, making it capable for AI inference and scientific workloads.

The benchmark data shows the Arc A770 achieving a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, which places it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 demonstrate that the card's compute capabilities extend beyond gaming. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69000 on average, just 0.3% higher than the Arc A770's 68809. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 lead by 1.5% and 1.7%, respectively, indicating the Arc A770 competes with professional-grade cards.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM allows for large 3D scenes and high-resolution textures. The ray tracing cores enable hardware acceleration in DXR and Vulkan ray tracing titles. The card's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and graphics software. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 connectors, supporting high refresh rates at 4K and beyond.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate figures below are estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. These estimates should be treated as approximations based on the 90th percentile GPU ranking and 89th percentile CPU ranking.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU's single-core performance (4292 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU's high texture rate (614.4 GTexel/s) suggest the system can achieve high frame rates in most games. The 16 GB VRAM eliminates any concern about texture memory limits, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports fast streaming of game assets. Esports titles that rely on CPU performance will see the i9-12900F's strong single-thread score come into play.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, but the 90th percentile ranking indicates it can still deliver smooth gameplay in most titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 suggests the card handles modern DX12 games well. The 32 ray tracing cores enable ray-traced effects, though performance will vary depending on the intensity of the effects and the game's optimization.

At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is sufficient, but the compute throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS may struggle with the most demanding titles at maximum settings. The CPU's 16 cores provide plenty of headroom for background tasks while gaming. Users targeting 4K at high refresh rates may need to lower some settings or rely on upscaling technologies, but the system remains capable for 4K gaming at moderate to high settings.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900F

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds