SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-12900F and Intel Arc A580 pairing represents a high-core-count desktop foundation matched with a modern mid-range graphics card, delivering a combined performance percentile of 88. This configuration is not a balanced gaming machine for extreme resolutions, but rather a potent workstation-oriented platform where the CPU significantly outpaces the GPU in raw compute capability. The data indicates that this build is optimized for multi-threaded productivity tasks, with gaming performance constrained by the graphics card, while the CPU provides an exceptionally strong foundation for content creation and development workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. This hybrid design, part of the Core 12th Gen series, combines performance and efficiency cores to deliver substantial multi-threaded throughput. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache, which supports high-bandwidth access to frequently used data.

Benchmark results position this CPU in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves a multi-core score of 30405 and a single-core score of 4292, demonstrating strong scaling across all threads. The multi-core result is particularly telling: it shows the CPU can sustain heavy all-core loads, making it suitable for rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks. The single-core score of 4292 is also robust, ensuring responsive performance in lightly-threaded applications.

The 89th percentile ranking is reinforced by its average benchmark score of 47176, which places it in close competition with several notable rivals. The data shows it is statistically tied with the Intel Core i7-13700KF, which scores 47330 and trails by only 0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, which scores 47022 and leads by 0.3%. This means the 12900F offers performance nearly identical to newer and sometimes more expensive parts. For real workloads, this translates into a CPU that can handle 3D rendering in Cinebench R23 with a score of 30405, which is a strong indicator of its ability to complete complex frames.

In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 15965 and single-core score of 2339 further validate its overall capability. PassMark results show specific strengths: the integer math score of 129504 and floating-point math score of 96452 suggest robust performance in scientific computing and financial modeling. The data compression score of 451402 is exceptionally high, indicating efficiency in file archiving and database operations. Conversely, the find prime numbers score of 127 is low, but this is a specialized test that does not reflect typical workloads. The extended instructions score of 28265 shows solid support for modern instruction sets, which benefits encryption and media encoding tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is a desktop graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 24 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at an effective speed of 16 Gbps. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

The card's performance in benchmark tests places it in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2229, which is a representative measure of its DX12 gaming capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 indicate strong compute potential, particularly in OpenCL environments. The average benchmark score of 57756 puts it in direct competition with the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which scores 58085 and leads by 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which scores 57367 and trails by 0.7%. This suggests the A580 delivers performance comparable to these established cards, making it a viable option for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming.

For rendering workloads, the 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1) performance enable it to handle real-time graphics and some GPU-accelerated tasks. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for ray-traced effects, although the overall performance in such scenarios will be constrained by its mid-range classification. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s are sufficient for standard rasterization at high settings. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility for modern titles and professional applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build is anchored by the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-looking for high-speed storage and future expansion cards. The GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's available lanes, though it does not utilize the newer Gen 5 standard.

The suggested PSU for this configuration is 450 W, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP and the GPU has a 175 W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components such as multiple storage drives or expansion cards. The power connectors on the GPU require 2x 8-pin inputs, which must be accounted for in the PSU selection. Since the system is on Socket 1700, a future upgrade path would involve replacing the motherboard to move to a newer socket, but the current platform can still support high-capacity memory and fast storage.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming or productivity scenarios. The 450 W PSU headroom suggests that a higher-tier graphics card with a similar or slightly higher power draw could be accommodated, but this would require a PSU check. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a notable feature for workstation reliability, although this requires a compatible motherboard and non-ECC memory is more common in consumer builds.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance in this pairing. The i9-12900F ranks in the 89th percentile among CPUs, while the Arc A580 ranks in the 87th percentile among GPUs, but the raw compute disparity is larger than these percentiles suggest. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47176 is significantly higher than the GPU's 57756 average score, but these are not directly comparable metrics. Instead, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 illustrate the respective strengths.

This configuration will bottleneck the CPU in gaming workloads, as the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rate. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking means it can deliver solid 1080p performance, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions or with demanding settings. Conversely, the CPU is overqualified for gaming, and its full potential is only realized in multi-threaded productivity tasks. For content creation, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will provide adequate acceleration for rendering and effects.

The FPS scaling is not measured for this exact combination, and the data indicates no measured FPS rows exist. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's performance relative to rivals like the RX 5600 OEM, which is 0.6% faster, suggests it will perform similarly in games, meaning users should expect a mid-range gaming experience rather than a high-refresh-rate one at 1440p or above.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 88, placing it in the top 12% of all configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-12900F compare to the Intel Core i7-13700KF?

A: The i9-12900F has an average benchmark score of 47176, while the i7-13700KF scores 47330, making the i7 0.3% faster, which is a statistically negligible difference.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A580 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 24 dedicated ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, which accounts for the GPU's 175 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP, leaving headroom for other components.

Q: How does the GPU perform in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The GPU scores 2229 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a measure of its DX12 gaming performance and places it in the 87th percentile among all GPUs.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for professionals and power users who prioritize multi-threaded CPU performance over gaming graphics. The 89th percentile CPU ranking makes it a compelling choice for software developers who compile large codebases, as the 16 cores and 24 threads will significantly reduce build times. Students in engineering or data science fields will benefit from the high integer math score of 129504 and floating-point math score of 96452, which accelerate simulations and numerical analysis.

Small business workstations handling video encoding or batch photo processing will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 invaluable. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU's 87th percentile ranking adequate for most titles, but they should not expect to max out settings on the latest AAA games. Content creators editing 4K video will see smooth timeline performance, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit some effects-heavy work.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's key benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 30405 and single-core at 4292, Geekbench multi-core at 15965 and single-core at 2339, and PassMark multi-thread at 35912. These scores place the CPU in the 89th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 47176. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700KF (0.3% faster), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (0.3% slower), AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (0.4% slower), and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (0.6% faster).

The GPU's benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381. This places it in the 87th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 57756. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.6% faster), AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% slower), Intel Arc A570M (0.8% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (1.1% faster). The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-range GPU, resulting in an overall 88th percentile ranking.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build featuring the Intel Core i9-12900F and Intel Arc A580. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Alder Lake processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 6 nm Xe-HPG architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and the GPU's 87th percentile ranking combine to give this build an overall 88th percentile tier, indicating it outperforms the majority of systems in the database.

The platform is Socket 1700 with support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The suggested PSU is 450 W, which is adequate for the components. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a CPU-centric workstation that offers exceptional compute performance for productivity, with gaming capabilities that are solid but not top-tier.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 87th percentile ranking suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p in most competitive titles, but the CPU's 89th percentile ranking is overkill for this task. Users should expect smooth performance in esports games, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on the GPU's scores.

Streaming: The 24-thread CPU is well-suited for encoding and streaming simultaneously, as its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 ensures that game capture and encoding will not cause frame drops. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for game rendering while the CPU handles the streaming workload.

Video editing: The CPU's high multi-threaded performance will excel in rendering timelines, with Geekbench multi-core score of 15965 indicating fast export times. The GPU's OpenCL score of 91657 provides hardware acceleration for effects and transitions, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit work on very complex 4K projects.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30405 is the standout feature, making this build highly capable for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or 3ds Max. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 power offers some GPU-accelerated rendering support, but the CPU will handle the bulk of the workload.

Software development: The 16 cores and 24 threads make compilation times shorter, and the PassMark integer math score of 129504 indicates strong performance in logic-heavy tasks. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, improving overall developer productivity.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but its 89th percentile CPU ranking ensures it will handle any academic workload, from virtual machines to data analysis. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking provides smooth desktop rendering and support for multiple displays via its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-12900F

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds