SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-12900F

47,176 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-12900F + Intel Arc A380: A Desktop Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F paired with the Intel Arc A380 is a desktop build that presents an extreme asymmetry in capability. The CPU, a 16-core Alder Lake-S part, ranks in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, an entry-level Arc 3 product, sits in the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 67th, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of overall system performance. The data shows that this build is defined entirely by its processor; the graphics card offers just enough performance for basic gaming and display output, making it a workstation-oriented configuration with occasional light-gaming capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process node. It combines performance and efficiency cores to deliver high multithreaded throughput while maintaining a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The chip carries a 30 MB shared L3 cache, with 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, providing 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support — a feature typically associated with professional workloads.

Benchmark results position this CPU at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 30405 points in the multicore test and 4292 points in the single-core test. The multicore result indicates serious rendering and compute capability, while the single-core score shows strong per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 scores of 12770 (multi) and 1802 (single) follow the same pattern, as do the Geekbench scores of 15965 (multi) and 2339 (single).

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for this performance. The Intel Core i7-13700KF scores 47330 on average, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-12900F's 47176 average benchmark score — essentially a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, sitting 0.3% below the i9-12900F. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, 0.4% lower, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47468, 0.6% higher. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the i9-12900F trades blows with a modern midrange CPU and two high-end laptop processors, despite being a desktop part from an earlier generation.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's strengths. The multithread score of 35912 and the single-thread score of 4017 both support the Cinebench findings. Integer math scores 129504 and floating-point math scores 96452, indicating strong compute for scientific and financial workloads. Data compression scores 451402 and data encryption scores 25251, while extended instruction scoring reaches 28265. The random string sorting test scores 48477. The physics test scores 1842, which is a lower relative figure but still respectable for a desktop chip.

The 65 W TDP is notable for a 16-core processor. This power envelope, combined with the 5.10 GHz boost clock, suggests efficient binning and makes the chip suitable for builds where thermal management is a priority. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, allowing overclocking headroom, and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with PCIe Gen 5 support providing 16 CPU lanes.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is one of extreme CPU dominance and GPU limitation. The CPU's average benchmark score is 47176, placing it in the 89th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile. The combined system percentile is 67. This means the CPU is approximately 5.5 times more powerful than the GPU on average, a ratio that will cause severe bottlenecks in graphics-intensive tasks.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A380, scores 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark. In Geekbench, it scores 38224 in OpenCL and 36736 in Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 6252, a G2D score of 610, and a GPU compute score of 2762. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 tests score 37, 38, and 35 respectively, while the DirectX 9 test scores 73 — indicating that the GPU's legacy DirectX performance is weak relative to its compute capabilities.

The nearest GPU rivals show just how low the Arc A380 sits. The AMD FirePro W5170M scores 8595, 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 8870M scores 8462, 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 scores 8458, 1.2% lower, and the AMD Radeon 880M scores 8436, 1.4% lower. These rivals are all mobile or entry-level desktop parts from previous generations, confirming that the Arc A380 competes in the lowest tier of discrete graphics.

For the CPU-specific benchmarks, the Cinebench R15 scores are 3064 (multi) and 432 (single). The PassMark single-thread score is 4017, and the find prime numbers test scores 127. The data compression score of 451402 is particularly strong, indicating that the CPU handles archival and decompression tasks exceptionally well. The encryption score of 25251 shows solid AES performance, which matters for VPNs and encrypted storage.

The combined picture is clear: this build will excel in CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, but will struggle in GPU-bound scenarios like modern gaming at high resolutions or graphics-intensive creative applications. The 67th combined percentile reflects this — it is a system that is better than most on raw compute, but the GPU drags the overall experience down.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900F ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47176.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A380's average score of 8558 is 0.4% lower than the AMD FirePro W5170M, 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, and 1.4% higher than the AMD Radeon 880M.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 67, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of all systems.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-12900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What are the key Cinebench R23 scores for this CPU?

A: The CPU scores 30405 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4292 in single-core, indicating strong multithreaded rendering and solid single-thread performance.

Q: Is the GPU capable of handling modern gaming?

A: The Arc A380 scores 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and sits in the 44th GPU percentile, which indicates entry-level performance sufficient for low-detail or older titles, not modern high-fidelity gaming.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-12900F has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 16-core processor and makes it suitable for power-conscious builds.

Who Should Build It

The data points to specific user profiles for this build. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and strong Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 make it ideal for content creators who work with video encoding, 3D rendering, and batch processing. Software developers will benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, which accelerate compilation and parallel build tasks; the PassMark integer math score of 129504 and data compression score of 451402 are particularly relevant here.

For students, this build offers a workstation-class CPU that handles heavy academic workloads like simulation, data analysis, and coding assignments. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations. Small business workstations can leverage the CPU's multithreaded performance for database operations, financial modeling, and office productivity, while the 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest.

Gamers are not a target audience for this pairing. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking and low 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 mean that gaming performance will be limited to older or less demanding titles at modest settings. The CPU is overkill for gaming at this GPU level — the system will be severely GPU-bound in any game, so users who prioritize gaming should not choose this configuration.

The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 67 reflects a system that is stronger than most in compute but weaker than most in graphics. This is a CPU-first build for professionals who need processing power and only require basic display output and light GPU acceleration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-12900F and the Intel Arc A380 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU in the 89th percentile and the GPU in the 44th percentile, the GPU is the clear bottleneck in any graphics-related workload. In gaming, FPS will be determined almost entirely by the Arc A380's capabilities — the CPU has far more headroom than any current game requires, so CPU utilization will remain low while the GPU runs at its limit.

For CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, the GPU is irrelevant, and the system will perform at the level of the 89th percentile CPU. The i9-12900F's nearest rival, the Core i7-13700KF, is 0.3% faster on average, meaning the CPU is effectively competitive with a newer midrange part. In these scenarios, the system delivers high performance, and the GPU's weakness does not matter.

The bottleneck shifts depending on workload. For office productivity, web browsing, and document editing, neither component is stressed, and the system feels responsive due to the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4292 in Cinebench R23. For light GPU acceleration tasks like video decoding or image processing in supported applications, the Arc A380's compute score of 2762 in PassMark provides some acceleration, but its overall G3D score of 6252 limits the benefit.

The data shows no measured FPS figures for this combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 35 in PassMark and its 44th percentile ranking suggest that it will struggle with modern game engines, while the CPU's high performance will not compensate in GPU-limited scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so the figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

The Intel Arc A380's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 and PassMark G3D score of 6252 place it in the lowest tier of discrete GPUs. In practical terms, this translates to playable frame rates only in esports titles or older games at 1080p with low to medium settings. The DirectX 9 score of 73 in PassMark is relatively higher than the DirectX 11 and 12 scores (38 and 35 respectively), suggesting that the GPU performs better with older APIs than with modern ones.

At 1080p, the GPU will likely deliver around 30-60 FPS in lightweight games like CS:GO or League of Legends, but modern AAA titles will drop below 30 FPS even at low settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be unable to maintain playable frame rates in most games. The GPU's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus provides 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for low-resolution textures but limits performance in memory-heavy scenarios.

The core issue is the imbalance: the CPU could drive a much more powerful GPU, but the Arc A380 caps the gaming experience. Users who want to game should pair the i9-12900F with a higher-tier GPU. As configured, this build is not a gaming machine — it is a professional workstation with basic display capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable. The Arc A380's 44th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 35 in PassMark mean it cannot drive high frame rates in modern games. The CPU is capable, but the GPU limits the experience to low settings and modest FPS.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle stream encoding easily, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 providing ample headroom. The GPU's weak performance limits game capture quality, but the CPU can handle software encoding without impacting other tasks.

Video editing: Strong on the CPU side. The i9-12900F's 89th percentile ranking and high multithreaded scores accelerate export and rendering. The GPU's limited compute (2762 in PassMark GPU compute) means hardware acceleration will be minimal, and effects-heavy timelines may struggle.

3D rendering: Excellent for CPU rendering. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30405 rivals the Core i7-13700KF, which is 0.3% faster on average. GPU rendering is not viable due to the Arc A380's low compute performance.

Software development: Very strong. The 16 cores and 24 threads accelerate compilation, and the PassMark integer math score of 129504 supports heavy code analysis and build tools. The data compression score of 451402 speeds up source archive handling.

Student and office work: Excellent. The CPU's single-thread score of 4292 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output, and the 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining a top-tier CPU with an entry-level GPU. The Intel Core i9-12900F is a 16-core Alder Lake-S processor that ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47176. The Intel Arc A380 is a DG2-128 chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, and ranks in the 44th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 8558.

The combined percentile of 67 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of all builds. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700KF, is 0.3% faster on average, meaning the i9-12900F holds its own against newer parts. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, is 0.4% faster, confirming the Arc A380's position at the bottom of the discrete GPU market.

The build class is desktop, and the intended use is clearly professional. The CPU is the star of this configuration, offering near-top-tier multithreaded performance for a fraction of the power draw of some competitors. The GPU exists primarily to provide a display output and basic 2D acceleration. The Arc A380 has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores, but these are too few to deliver meaningful gaming performance. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 96-bit bus and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz and a TDP of 75 W.

This pairing makes sense only for users who need CPU performance and do not require gaming or GPU acceleration. For any other use case, the GPU will be a severe limitation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-12900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for future expansion. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for professional reliability.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and requires a 250 W suggested PSU, with the card itself rated at 75 W TDP. The power connectors include a single 8-pin. The CPU's 65 W TDP means the total system power draw is modest, leaving significant headroom in the 250 W PSU recommendation for a GPU upgrade.

The most sensible next upgrade for this build is a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 89th percentile performance means it can handle virtually any graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Replacing the Arc A380 with a midrange or high-end GPU would transform this from a workstation with basic display into a capable gaming or GPU-accelerated computing machine. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure no bandwidth limitation for any current GPU.

Alternatively, users who are satisfied with the CPU's performance but want to reduce power draw could consider the platform's unlocked multiplier for undervolting, though the 65 W TDP is already efficient. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose between the two depending on cost and performance priorities, with the 76.8 GB/s bandwidth applying to both.

The GPU itself is end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage, so an upgrade is inevitable for users who want better graphics. The CPU, however, remains an active production part with strong performance that rivals the Core i7-13700KF, which is 0.3% faster on average. The platform has room for growth, and the data shows that the CPU will not be the limiting factor in any future upgrade path.