SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a specific configuration of a desktop-class build, combining a 14th-generation Raptor Lake processor with Intel’s Battlemage architecture graphics card. The data indicates a system that sits in the upper-middle tier of overall performance, with a combined percentile of 76 across all evaluated builds. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark scores and specifications provided, with no measured frame rate data available for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussions are therefore estimated from the synthetic benchmark results.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14701E is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors the upgrade path for this system. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more prevalent memory modules or newer, higher-bandwidth options. The inclusion of ECC memory support is notable for workstation-oriented tasks, adding a layer of data integrity that is not universally available on consumer desktop platforms.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes available from the processor itself, which offers substantial headroom for high-speed storage devices or expansion cards. The Arc B580, however, utilizes a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, so the graphics card will operate at the older standard, but the 16 CPU lanes remain available for other peripherals. The platform’s memory controller is dual-channel, and with DDR5 support, the theoretical bandwidth ceiling is high, though the exact figure is not specified in the data.

The power delivery requirements for this build are manageable but not trivial. The i7-14701E has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Arc B580 has a TDP of 190 watts, requiring a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for the graphics card is 450 watts, which indicates that a moderately sized power supply is sufficient for the GPU alone, but the combined system draw will depend on other components. The CPU’s 65-watt TDP is modest for an 8-core part, suggesting that a capable air cooler is adequate, though the boost clock of 5.40 GHz may benefit from better thermal solutions under sustained loads.

Looking ahead, a sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to max out the memory subsystem, either by populating all dual-channel slots with high-speed DDR5 modules or by ensuring the memory controller is running at its optimal frequency. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are not fully utilized by the current GPU, so adding a Gen 5 NVMe drive could take advantage of that bandwidth. The CPU itself has a production status of Active, and the architecture is Raptor Lake-R, which is a refresh of the Raptor Lake design, suggesting that this is a mature platform with a clear upgrade path within the same socket family, potentially to higher-core-count parts, though specific models are not listed in the data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores paint a picture of a strong multi-threaded performer with competitive single-thread capability. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14701E scores 22195 points in multi-core and 3133 points in single-core. The multi-core score is substantial, reflecting the 8 cores and 16 threads working in tandem, while the single-core score of 3133 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with 9321 multi-core and 1315 single-core points.

In Passmark tests, the CPU achieves a multithread score of 26112 and a single-thread score of 4305. The data compression score of 282939 and floating-point math score of 61873 highlight strengths in data-intensive and scientific workloads. The integer math score of 81325 and extended instructions score of 18528 further demonstrate solid computational throughput. The find prime numbers score of 176 is notably lower, indicating that this particular workload does not scale as well with this architecture, but the overall average benchmark score is 33206.

The CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 83, placing it in the top 17% of all processors tracked. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H with an average score of 33201, which is essentially a tie with a delta of 0%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS at 33244, which is 0.1% faster. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is 0.4% slower with a score of 33089, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is 0.3% faster at 33091. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the i7-14701E performs identically to these competitors in aggregate benchmarks, despite being a desktop part compared to some mobile offerings.

The GPU’s benchmark results show a different competitive landscape. The Arc B580 scores 3068 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and 92821 in Geekbench OpenCL, with a higher Vulkan score of 109672. The Passmark G3D score is 15748, with a GPU compute score of 7729. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23021, placing it at the 68th percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061, which is 0.2% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895, which is 0.6% slower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is listed as a rival with a score of 23172, which is 0.7% faster, and the NVIDIA P106-100 is 1% faster at 23249. This is a striking result, as the Arc B580 is essentially on par with an RTX 3080 in aggregate benchmark scores, though real-world gaming performance may differ due to driver optimizations.

The combined picture is that of a balanced system where the CPU and GPU are both strong performers relative to their respective categories. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 68th percentile suggest that the CPU is a slightly stronger component relative to its peers, but the GPU is not a bottleneck in aggregate terms. The combined percentile of 76 confirms that this build is above average overall.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data suggests that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, which implies that in CPU-bound workloads, the i7-14701E will not be the limiting factor. The CPU’s 83rd percentile versus all CPUs, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195, indicates that it can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering without breaking a sweat. The GPU’s 68th percentile, while respectable, is lower, meaning that in GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc B580 may be the component that caps performance.

In gaming, the balance depends on the resolution and settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4305 in Passmark and 3133 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can feed frames quickly, potentially pushing the GPU to its limits. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases, and the Arc B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance becomes the more relevant metric. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the synthetic scores indicate that the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck in demanding titles at high settings.

The FPS scaling evidence, or lack thereof, is a key point. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, the data cannot show how frame rates scale with resolution or settings. However, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s and 12 GB of VRAM suggest that it can handle high-resolution textures, but the 192-bit bus width may limit performance at very high resolutions compared to wider-bus competitors. The CPU’s 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide a solid foundation for keeping data close to the cores, reducing latency in compute-heavy tasks.

The Passmark physics score of 2399 for the CPU is a moderate result, indicating that physics simulations in games or engineering applications will run adequately but not exceptionally. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 76 and DirectX 11 score of 128 are low in absolute terms, but these are synthetic metrics that do not directly translate to gaming performance. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 is a more modern indicator, and it suggests that the GPU can handle DX12 titles, though it may not excel in every scenario.

Who Should Build It

This build is suitable for a range of users, but its characteristics point to specific target demographics. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution will benefit from the CPU’s high single-thread performance and the GPU’s respectable compute capabilities, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and GPU’s 68th percentile indicate that this system can handle modern games, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup.

Content creators who rely on multi-threaded workloads will find the i7-14701E’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195, to be a capable partner for video editing and rendering tasks. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p video editing, and the Vulkan score of 109672 suggests good compute performance for GPU-accelerated effects. Software developers will appreciate the ECC memory support and the strong integer math score of 81325, which is relevant for compilation and data processing tasks.

Students and small business workstations are also viable use cases, given the CPU’s 65-watt TDP and the platform’s dual-channel memory support. The system’s combined percentile of 76 means it outperforms most builds, making it suitable for productivity applications, office suites, and light development work. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs, which is beneficial for emerging applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.60 GHz, which boosts up to 5.40 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both idle efficiency and burst performance. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a substantial amount for keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

The benchmark scores for this CPU are consistently strong. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 is a clear indicator of its multi-threaded prowess, while the single-core score of 3133 is competitive with the best desktop and mobile parts. The Passmark multithread score of 26112 and single-thread score of 4305 corroborate these results. The data compression score of 282939 is particularly high, suggesting that the CPU excels at archiving and file management tasks, which are often memory-bandwidth dependent.

In real workloads, these scores translate to fast video rendering, quicker code compilation, and responsive multitasking. The CPU’s 33 MB of L3 cache is beneficial for gaming, as it reduces the need to access system memory, and the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures that lightly-threaded tasks, such as web browsing or office applications, are snappy. The 65-watt TDP is noteworthy for a processor with this core count and clock speed, indicating that it can be cooled effectively in a variety of chassis, from compact towers to full-sized ATX cases.

The CPU’s integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 770, provide a fallback option for troubleshooting or basic display output without the discrete GPU. The ECC memory support is a differentiator that makes this CPU suitable for entry-level workstations where data integrity is paramount. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments, but the high stock boost clock already provides strong performance.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 at 3133 and Passmark at 4305, is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles at standard refresh rates. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 and Passmark G3D score of 15748 provide a reference for its expected gaming capability.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the Arc B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 456.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most modern games, though the frame rates will vary by title. At 1440p, the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is an asset for high-resolution textures, but the 192-bit memory bus may limit performance in bandwidth-heavy scenarios. The GPU’s support for ray tracing is present through its 20 RT cores, but the performance impact will be significant, and users should expect lower frame rates with RT enabled.

The CPU’s role in gaming is to maintain high frame times, and its 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures that it can keep up with the GPU’s output. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive shooters at low settings, the i7-14701E will excel, potentially allowing the GPU to run at lower utilization. In GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc B580 will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom to spare. The lack of measured data means these are qualitative assessments, but the benchmark scores suggest a system that is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the GPU being the more likely bottleneck at higher resolutions or settings.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node. The chip, designated BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units, along with 20 ray tracing cores. The base and boost clocks are both set at 2670 MHz, which is a high frequency for a GPU, contributing to its peak performance.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, with an effective data rate of 19 Gbps. This configuration provides ample capacity for modern games and applications, though the 192-bit bus is narrower than some competitors, which may impact memory-intensive workloads at high resolutions. The GPU’s pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate performance.

The FP32 performance is rated at 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 27.34 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs. The tensor cores are not listed, which suggests that AI-accelerated features may rely on the shader units or ray tracing cores. The GPU’s benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672, indicate that it performs well in synthetic DX12 and Vulkan workloads.

The GPU’s 68th percentile versus all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 23021 place it in the upper-mid range. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, has an average score of 23172, which is 0.7% faster, illustrating that the Arc B580 is remarkably close to a high-end part from a previous generation in aggregate terms. The GPU’s TDP of 190 watts and dual-slot design are typical for this performance class, and the single 8-pin power connector simplifies installation. The display outputs, including one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1, support modern monitors with high refresh rates and resolutions.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-14701E with the Intel Arc B580, creating a desktop-class system that targets the upper-midrange segment of the market. The CPU’s 83rd percentile versus all CPUs and the GPU’s 68th percentile versus all GPUs result in a combined percentile of 76, indicating that this system outperforms approximately three-quarters of all tracked builds. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, which is typical for a build where the processor is a higher-tier part than the graphics card.

The i7-14701E provides a solid foundation with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 5.40 GHz boost clock, and 33 MB of L3 cache, making it a versatile processor for both productivity and gaming. The Arc B580, with 12 GB of VRAM and 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, is a capable GPU that offers competitive performance against established rivals like the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, based on aggregate benchmark scores. The system’s overall tier is above average, and it is well-suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for multi-threaded tasks while still maintaining strong gaming capability.

The build class is explicitly desktop, and the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for builders. The CPU’s ECC memory support and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM make this a viable option for entry-level workstations, while the 65-watt CPU TDP and 450-watt suggested PSU for the GPU indicate that the system’s power requirements are moderate. The combination of the 10 nm CPU and 5 nm GPU processes means the system is relatively power-efficient for its performance level.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 76, meaning the system outperforms approximately 76% of all tracked builds in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14701E compare to its nearest rival in aggregate benchmarks?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33206, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33201, showing a delta of 0%. It is also within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, which scores 33244.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU, and does it support ECC?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU supports ECC memory, but the GPU does not have an ECC capability listed.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B580 is 450 watts, and the GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics, and what is its socket type?

A: Yes, the i7-14701E includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Arc B580 is 249 USD.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4305 in Passmark and the GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute should deliver high frame rates in less demanding titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means this is an estimate. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is ample for 1080p textures, and the CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures minimal frame time spikes.

Streaming while gaming is viable, as the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195, can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 109672 suggests it can also assist with encoding tasks, though the specific encoder quality is not detailed in the data.

Video editing in 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Passmark data compression score of 282939 indicates fast file operations, which is useful for large video projects. The GPU’s compute score of 7729 in Passmark supports GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering workloads, such as Blender or CAD, will leverage the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9321 and the GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS, though rendering performance is typically GPU-bound and the Arc B580’s 68th percentile suggests it is a mid-tier renderer. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a bonus for long rendering tasks where data corruption is a concern.

Software development, including code compilation and running virtual machines, is well-served by the CPU’s integer math score of 81325 and 16 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 26112 indicates that parallel build processes will complete quickly. The GPU is less relevant for development, but its DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with graphics debugging tools.

For students and office work, the system is overpowered but efficient, with the CPU’s 65-watt TDP keeping power consumption low during light tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 4305 ensures that office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks are responsive, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is unnecessary for these workloads but provides headroom for future needs.