SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14701E + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14701E

33,206 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14701E and Intel Arc A750 combination represents a desktop pairing that sits firmly in the upper-midrange of the benchmark database. The processor, a Raptor Lake Refresh part, delivers strong single-threaded and multithreaded performance, while the graphics card, based on the Xe-HPG architecture, offers a competitive feature set. The data shows a system that is balanced for high-refresh 1080p gaming and capable of handling productivity workloads, though the GPU’s end-of-life status and the CPU’s specific platform requirements shape its overall positioning.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark results indicate a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in overall capability, but the nature of the workload determines which component becomes the limiting factor. The CPU holds an 83rd percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 66th percentile. This gap suggests that in CPU-intensive tasks, the processor will not be the bottleneck, but in graphics-heavy scenarios, the GPU will likely cap performance. The processor’s multi-threaded score of 26112 in Passmark and its single-thread score of 4305 highlight its strength in both parallel and sequential workloads, meaning it can feed the GPU effectively in most gaming scenarios.

However, the GPU’s lower percentile position indicates that in graphically demanding titles at higher resolutions, the Arc A750 will be the primary constraint. The processor’s high boost clock of 5.40 GHz and strong Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133 suggest it can handle the frame pacing demands of esports titles without stuttering, but the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will limit the maximum frame rate in those scenarios. The data shows a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, where the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU’s 66th percentile performance. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, as the CPU’s headroom grows relative to the GPU’s workload.

The Passmark data compression score of 282939 and encryption score of 14862 indicate the CPU excels at data-heavy tasks, which would run without GPU involvement. In mixed workloads like game streaming, the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample capacity for encoding overhead, while the GPU’s dedicated hardware handles rendering. The system’s combined percentile of 75 reflects this balance, showing that neither component drastically overpowers the other, but the GPU’s lower standing means it will dictate performance in most visual applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results place it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and single-core score of 3133 demonstrate strong all-around performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 26112 and single-thread score of 4305 corroborate this, with the processor ranking in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 33206 places it in a tight cluster with rivals such as the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, which scores 33201 with a 0% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, which scores 33244 with a -0.1% delta. The Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33089 with a 0.4% delta, showing the 14701E is statistically tied with these parts, though the differences are negligible in real-world terms.

The GPU’s performance is solid but less dominant. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and Passmark G3D score of 12534 place it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score of 20582 puts it in close competition with the Intel Arc B570, which scores 20556 with a 0.1% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534 with a 0.2% delta. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662 with a -0.4% delta, indicating the A750 is slightly behind that part in average terms. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show the GPU’s compute capabilities are robust, but its Passmark DirectX 11 score of 72 and DirectX 12 score of 70 indicate it performs better in older APIs than in newer ones, which is a consideration for modern titles.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The processor’s 83rd percentile versus the GPU’s 66th percentile means that in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the system will excel, but in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the GPU will limit overall throughput. The average benchmark scores confirm this disparity, with the CPU’s 33206 average being nearly 62% higher than the GPU’s 20582 average, though these scores are not directly comparable across different benchmark suites.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14701E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between older, more widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, depending on motherboard selection. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, providing ample bandwidth for the latest storage devices and graphics cards. The Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is sufficient for the GPU’s bandwidth needs.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, which is modest for a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. This low power draw means it can be cooled by a capable air cooler, and it leaves significant headroom for the system’s power supply. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 225 watts and requires a 550-watt power supply as suggested by the manufacturer. This means the total system power draw is well within the capabilities of a mid-range PSU, and the CPU’s low TDP ensures that the PSU headroom is more than sufficient for the entire build. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, which are standard on most modern power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the GPU, as the CPU’s 83rd percentile performance will remain relevant for several more years. The Arc A750’s end-of-life status means it will not receive the same level of driver optimization as newer parts, so upgrading to a newer GPU with higher performance would be the most impactful change. The CPU’s socket and memory support are current, so a GPU swap would not require a platform change. The processor’s 65-watt TDP also means it could be paired with a more powerful GPU without exceeding PSU limits, as long as the total system draw stays within the power supply’s capacity.

Who Should Build It

This system is well-suited for gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or entry-level 1440p gaming. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133) ensures high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance handles modern AAA games at medium to high settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 indicating strong rendering performance, though the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking may slow GPU-accelerated renders.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 81325 and data compression score of 282939, which indicate fast compilation and archiving. Students and small business workstations will find the system capable of handling office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and light content creation without issue, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 4305 in Passmark ensures responsive application performance. The system’s combined 75th percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of existing systems, making it a strong choice for users who need a balanced desktop for both work and play.

The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with the latest game engines and graphics APIs, making it suitable for developers testing modern rendering techniques. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a notable feature for professionals who require data integrity in their workloads, which is uncommon in consumer desktop processors. The system is not ideal for users seeking maximum GPU performance, as the Arc A750’s 66th percentile ranking lags behind higher-end options, but it offers a solid foundation for most general computing tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming with high texture settings, though some modern titles may exceed 8 GB of VRAM at higher resolutions. The GPU’s base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the memory operates at 2000 MHz with an effective speed of 16 Gbps.

The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, which support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though the performance is modest compared to higher-end parts. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, which are competitive figures for this class of GPU. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 34.41 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, indicating strong compute capabilities for machine learning inference or scientific calculations.

The benchmark scores show the GPU is well-rounded. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates solid performance in modern DirectX 12 titles, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 shows good cross-API compatibility. The Passmark G3D score of 12534 places it in the 66th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 20582 is within 0.5% of rivals like the Quadro M4000M and RTX 3070 Mobile. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 9 score of 181 is notably higher than its DirectX 11 score of 72, suggesting it performs better in older titles that rely on legacy APIs, which is typical for Intel’s driver maturity.

The GPU’s 225-watt TDP and dual-slot design require a robust cooling solution, and the suggested 550-watt PSU ensures stable operation. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 2.0 connections, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor Battlemage already announced, but the current driver support remains functional for the benchmarked workloads. The launch MSRP was 289 USD, though this is no longer indicative of current market pricing.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, indicating the system outperforms 75% of all recorded desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14701E compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H?

A: The i7-14701E has an average benchmark score of 33206, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, resulting in a 0% delta, meaning they perform identically in the aggregate.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A750?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, derived from 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with an effective speed of 16 Gbps.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-14701E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the processor supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation and server applications that require data integrity.

Q: What is the approximate performance difference between the Arc A750 and the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, while the Arc B570 scores 20556, giving a delta of 0.1%, meaning they are statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 225 watts, with a suggested power supply of 550 watts for the entire system.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A750 still in production?

A: No, the production status is end-of-life, and its successor is Battlemage, though the GPU remains functional for the benchmarked workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14701E is a desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-R codename. It uses Intel’s 10 nm process node and has a die size of 257 mm². The processor features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample memory for high-throughput workloads.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support being a standout feature. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with PCIe Gen 5 support, offering 16 lanes from the processor. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provide basic display output and hardware acceleration for media playback. The processor has a TDP of 65 watts, making it power-efficient for a desktop part with this level of performance.

Benchmark results show the CPU is strong in both single-threaded and multithreaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and single-core score of 3133 indicate it handles both lightly-threaded and heavily-parallel workloads with ease. The Passmark data encryption score of 14862 and floating-point math score of 61873 show robust computational capabilities, while the integer math score of 81325 and find prime numbers score of 176 highlight its strength in integer-based calculations. The Passmark single-thread score of 4305 confirms the high boost clock translates into excellent per-core performance.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking places it ahead of the majority of processors, and its average benchmark score of 33206 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, which scores 33201. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX with a score of 33091 and a 0.3% delta, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX with a score of 33089 and a 0.4% delta, showing the 14701E is statistically tied with these parts. This performance profile makes it suitable for demanding applications like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the 8-core/16-thread configuration provides a solid foundation.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-14701E with the Intel Arc A750 in a desktop configuration, classified under the desktop build class. The CPU is a mainstream 8-core part from the Raptor Lake refresh, while the GPU is an end-of-life offering from Intel’s Alchemist generation. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper-middle tier of the database, indicating it can handle a wide range of tasks without major compromises.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile create a system where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. This means the system is best suited for workloads that are CPU-bound or lightly threaded, such as productivity, development, and streaming. For gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but its performance is still competitive with the latest mid-range parts, as shown by its 0.1% delta compared to the Intel Arc B570.

The system’s overall tier is defined by its 75th percentile combined score, which means it outperforms three-quarters of all recorded builds. This is a respectable position, though it falls short of high-end systems that pair more powerful CPUs with top-tier GPUs. The build is a balanced choice for users who need a versatile desktop for work and play, without the expense of flagship components. The CPU’s low 65-watt TDP and the GPU’s 225-watt TDP make power management straightforward, with a 550-watt PSU providing sufficient headroom.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is well-suited. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133, ensures high frame rates in competitive titles, while the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance handles the graphics workload. The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high texture quality without stutter, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a limit in the most demanding titles.

Streaming is a viable scenario for this build. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample capacity for software encoding, and its Passmark multi-thread score of 26112 indicates it can handle the extra load without impacting game performance. The GPU’s support for hardware-accelerated encoding, implied by its Xe-HPG architecture, would offload this work if enabled, though the CPU alone is sufficient for most streaming setups.

Video editing is a strong use case for this system. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and Passmark data compression score of 282939 show it can handle the heavy lifting of video encoding and rendering, while the GPU’s 34.41 TFLOPS of FP16 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p or 1440p editing timelines, though 4K projects may require more memory.

3D rendering benefits from the CPU’s high core count and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 61873 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 indicate both components contribute to rendering performance, with the CPU handling CPU-based renderers and the GPU accelerating GPU-based ones. The 33 MB of L3 cache on the CPU helps with complex scenes.

Software development is an excellent fit for this build. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 81325 and random string sorting score of 29158 show fast compilation and code analysis, while the GPU’s Vulkan support enables testing of graphics applications. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a bonus for developers who need data integrity in their work.

Student and office work is handled with ease. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4305 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU’s 732 Passmark G2D score provides smooth 2D acceleration for spreadsheets and documents. The system’s 75th combined percentile means it exceeds the requirements of typical productivity tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates, and its performance is likely to be competitive with or slightly behind the Intel Arc B570, given their 0.1% delta in average benchmark scores.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles, with esports games exceeding 60 FPS due to the CPU’s high single-thread performance. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests it handles modern APIs well, though the DirectX 11 score of 72 indicates similar performance in older games. The 8 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in in the most demanding titles, but it is sufficient for the majority of games.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s performance will drop proportionally, and the frame rates may fall below 60 FPS in graphically intense titles. The CPU will have more headroom at this resolution, so the bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU. At 4K, the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking will result in low frame rates, likely making the system unsuitable for 4K ultra gaming without significant settings reductions. The estimates are based on the GPU’s average benchmark score of 20582 and its position relative to rivals, but actual gaming performance will vary by title and driver optimization.