SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop combination that, on the database's aggregate metrics, sits almost exactly at the midpoint of all tracked builds: a combined percentile of 53. That headline number conceals a sharply lopsided internal split, however. The CPU lands in the 88th percentile versus all processors, while the GPU registers in the 18th percentile versus all graphics cards. One component is near the top of the chart; the other is near the bottom. Understanding what each side of that split means in practice is the purpose of this analysis.

One note on data coverage before proceeding: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. All frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from benchmark scores, not directly recorded gameplay, and should be treated as such.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile data tells a clear story about where this build's limits lie. The i7-14700T operates at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41914 that places it within a tenth of a percent of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963, deltaPct -0.1), marginally ahead of the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, deltaPct 0.3), and closely bracketed by the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (42055, deltaPct -0.3) and Intel Core 7 251TE (41650, deltaPct 0.6). In other words, the processor is doing top-quartile work regardless of which rival you use as a yardstick.

The RTX 5070 SUPER, by contrast, records a percentileVsAllGpus value of 18 with an average benchmark score of 2690. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, deltaPct 1), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, deltaPct 1.1), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, deltaPct 1.1), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2645, deltaPct 1.7). Those are its peers as the data ranks them, and the score gap to each is within two percent.

The consequence is unambiguous: in any workload that leans on both components simultaneously — gaming above all — the graphics side is the limiting factor. CPU-bound scenarios such as code compilation, heavy multi-threaded rendering, or physics-heavy simulation will run at a level consistent with the processor's 88th-percentile standing. GPU-bound scenarios will run at a level consistent with an 18th-percentile graphics score. The build's combined percentile of 53 is an average of a strong and a weak half, not evidence of balanced performance, and any bottleneck analysis should treat the GPU as the component that caps throughput in graphically demanding tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark record is extensive. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700T posts 25980 multi-core and 3667 single-core. In Cinebench R20 it scores 10911 multi-core and 1540 single-core; in Cinebench R15, 2618 multi-core and 369 single-core. The PassMark suite fills out the picture: 30571 multithread, 3905 single thread, 113854 integer math, 79042 floating point math, 354216 data compression, 21277 data encryption, 20052 extended instructions, 38546 string sorting, 1946 physics, and 145 on find-prime-numbers.

The single-core numbers deserve attention. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667 paired with a PassMark single-thread score of 3905 indicates that per-thread responsiveness is strong, not merely aggregate throughput. Meanwhile, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 from 20 cores and 28 threads confirms that the hybrid core layout sustains high aggregate output despite the chip's restrained thermal envelope.

The GPU's recorded benchmark is a single entry: 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DirectX 12). Per the nearestRivals data, that score is roughly one percent above the Quadro K1100M, one percent above the GT 1030, and under two percent above the GT 440. Taken together with the 18th-percentile ranking, the combined picture is that of a processor carrying the performance weight of this pairing while the graphics card defines its ceiling in anything render-intensive.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 SUPER's specifications, read alongside its scores, present the most interesting analytical puzzle on this page. The silicon is unambiguously modern: the GB205 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, 31,100 million transistors across a 263 mm² die at a density of 118.3M per mm², and the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. Clocks run at a 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost, with 1750 MHz memory (28 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is 18 GB of GDDR7 across a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that, on paper, should support smooth high-resolution texture streaming.

The compute and rendering hardware is similarly substantial: 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores. Peak rates include 201.0 GPixel/s pixel fill, 502.4 GTexel/s texture fill, and 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio). API support extends to DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, and the card connects over PCIe 5.0 x16 with one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Yet the database ranks this hardware at the 18th percentile with a Steel Nomad score of 2690. The practical interpretation: in this database's ranking model, the measured score — not the spec sheet — is authoritative, and any rendering expectation for this build should be anchored to that 2690 result and its nearest-rival cluster. The 200 tensor cores and 50 RT cores indicate the hardware pathway for ray-traced and AI-assisted workloads exists, but the recorded score defines how far that pathway actually performs here. The 18 GB of GDDR7 and 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth do guarantee that memory pressure itself is unlikely to be the first bottleneck in content-creation tasks; the compute throughput implied by the benchmark score is the governing constraint.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. This is not the build's strength. With the GPU at the 18th percentile and no measured FPS data available, frame-rate expectations must be estimated from the 2690 Steel Nomad score, which sits in the same band as the GT 1030 and Quadro K1100M in this database. High-refresh play at demanding settings is not a realistic target; the CPU's 88th-percentile standing cannot compensate for the graphics ceiling in GPU-bound titles.

Streaming. The CPU side is genuinely capable here: 20 cores and 28 threads, a PassMark multithread score of 30571, and data compression at 354216 give the encoding and simultaneity headroom streaming requires. The limitation is on the game-render side — the GPU's score will constrain the visual quality and frame rate of the stream's source before the CPU breaks a sweat.

Video editing. Editing benefits from the i7-14700T's 33 MB of shared L3 cache, DDR5 support, and strong multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 multi 25980, PassMark 38546 on string sorting). The 18 GB of GDDR7 and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth on the GPU provide ample frame-buffer room for timeline scrubbing. GPU-accelerated effects rendering, however, will be bounded by the 2690 benchmark score.

3D rendering. CPU rendering is the viable mode: Cinebench R23 multi at 25980 and integer math at 113854 place render throughput in the top quartile of processors. GPU-path rendering, whether rasterized or ray-traced through the 50 RT cores, should be expected to track the GPU's 18th-percentile ranking rather than its hardware specification.

Software development. This is arguably the strongest use case for the build as configured. Compilation is CPU- and memory-bound, and a PassMark multithread score of 30571 plus single-thread performance of 3905 (PassMark) and 3667 (Cinebench R23) deliver fast builds and snappy IDE responsiveness. ECC memory support further suits long unattended build and test runs where data integrity matters.

Student and office work. The pairing is oversized for document work, browsing, and online classes in the best way — the 35 W CPU TDP keeps the system quiet and efficient, and the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU is available for display duties. The discrete GPU adds nothing to office tasks but costs nothing in CPU responsiveness.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-14700T compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 41914 is within one percent of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963, deltaPct -0.1), the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, deltaPct 0.3), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (42055, deltaPct -0.3), and the Intel Core 7 251TE (41650, deltaPct 0.6) — effectively a dead heat across all four.

Q: Is this build balanced for gaming?

A: No. The combined percentile of 53 masks an 88th-percentile CPU against an 18th-percentile GPU. The graphics card is the bottleneck in any GPU-bound workload.

Q: How much memory does the RTX 5070 SUPER have, and what type?

A: 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, with 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth and memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: Are there measured frame rates for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, and `dataIsMeasured` is false — all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked on the i7-14700T.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP was $384.

Q: What power connector does the GPU require?

A: A single 16-pin connector, with a 275 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

As stated, no measured FPS data exists for this combination, so everything in this section is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than recorded gameplay. The governing figure is the GPU's Steel Nomad result of 2690, which the database places in the 18th percentile and within roughly one to two percent of the Quadro K1100M, GT 1030, Arc Pro B50, and GT 440. Frame expectations should be set accordingly: graphically demanding modern titles at high settings and higher resolutions are likely to be out of reach, and older or lighter titles at reduced settings are the realistic territory.

At the same time, the CPU's side of the ledger is excellent — single-core scores of 3667 (Cinebench R23) and 3905 (PassMark), plus a physics score of 1946. In CPU-limited situations such as low-resolution, low-setting competitive configurations, the processor will not be what holds frame rates back. The practical conclusion: any gaming estimate for this build is a GPU question, and the GPU's recorded score is the answer the data provides.

Who Should Build It

The pairing suits users whose workloads are processor-dominant. Software developers get a top-quartile CPU (88th percentile, PassMark multithread 30571) with ECC support and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 flexibility — a genuine workstation-grade development box. Students and office users benefit from the 35 W TDP, which implies quiet, efficient operation for coursework and productivity, with the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU as a fallback. Small businesses needing a compact machine for compilation, data compression (354216 PassMark), encryption (21277), or batch processing will find the 28 threads well utilized. Content creators focused on CPU rendering can lean on the Cinebench R23 multi score of 25980, though GPU-rendering-focused creators should note the 18th-percentile graphics ranking. Gamers — particularly those targeting high-refresh or high-resolution play — are not the audience for this configuration as it stands.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing Intel's 14th-generation, Raptor Lake-R-based Core i7-14700T with NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0-based RTX 5070 SUPER on the GB205 chip. The overall tier is mid-pack by the combined percentile of 53, but that figure averages two very different components: a processor in the 88th percentile of all CPUs and a graphics card in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU launched at a $384 MSRP; the GPU's launch MSRP is not recorded in the database. The pairing is best understood as a strong compute platform with a graphics card that the data ranks far below the processor's class.

CPU Analysis

The i7-14700T is a 20-core, 28-thread part built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die and a hybrid Raptor Lake-R layout. Its clocks span a 1.30 GHz base to a 5.20 GHz boost — an unusually wide range that reflects the chip's design intent: modest idle and sustained power (a 35 W TDP) with the ability to spike to strong single-thread speeds when a workload calls for it. Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus 33 MB of shared L3.

The benchmark scores translate directly into workload behavior. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667 means applications that rely on one fast thread — many office applications, older games, scripting — run at near-flagship speed. The multi-core score of 25980 means heavily parallel work such as video encoding, code compilation, and batch file compression runs at a level matching the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Intel Core i7-12850HX within a fraction of a percent. The PassMark string-sorting score of 38546 and extended-instructions score of 20052 further indicate capable memory-handling and SIMD performance. Memory support spans DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, giving platform flexibility, and ECC is supported — notable for a desktop part and relevant to reliability-sensitive deployments.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, supporting DDR4 or DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 lanes from the CPU — exactly matching the RTX 5070 SUPER's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, so the card runs at full interface speed. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides display output redundancy if the discrete card is ever removed.

Power planning comes from the two TDP figures: 35 W for the CPU and 275 W for the GPU. The suggestedPsu field for the graphics card is null in this database, so no vendor recommendation can be cited; what can be said is that the CPU's 35 W envelope leaves substantial headroom relative to the GPU's 275 W requirement, meaning a sensible power supply for this build is sized almost entirely around the graphics card and system peripherals rather than processor load. The CPU's locked multiplier means overclocking is off the table as an upgrade path.

The obvious next upgrade, strictly per the data, is the graphics card: replacing an 18th-percentile GPU would raise the build's combined percentile of 53 far more effectively than any CPU change, since the processor already sits at the 88th percentile with no meaningful headroom left within its own class — its nearest rivals are all within a single percent of its average score. A future GPU upgrade on this motherboard and power delivery would let the i7-14700T's strong single- and multi-thread results finally be exploited in graphically demanding workloads, converting a lopsided pairing into a genuinely balanced one.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds