SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A380: A Curious Desktop Pairing

This desktop build pairs Intel's 20-core, 28-thread Core i7-14700T with the entry-level Intel Arc A380 GPU. The processor is a powerhouse, sitting at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card is a modest performer at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The result is a system with massive compute headroom in the CPU and a GPU that is clearly the limiting factor for graphics-intensive tasks. The combined percentile of this pairing is 66, indicating a mid-to-upper tier desktop system, but the imbalance between the two components is stark.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a high-refresh gaming build in most titles. The Arc A380's benchmark scores, including a Passmark G3D score of 6252 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808, place it at the 44th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD Radeon 880M, which are entry-level or integrated-class parts. Data suggests that achieving high frame rates at 1080p on high settings will be challenging in demanding games. For esports titles, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667) can help push frame rates, but the GPU will still bottleneck output.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. With 20 cores and 28 threads, the i7-14700T can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without breaking a sweat. Its Passmark multithread score of 30571 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 indicate substantial headroom for x264 encoding. However, the Arc A380's limited gaming performance will cap the in-game frame rates one can achieve while streaming, making this a strong CPU for the task paired with a weak gaming foundation.

Video editing: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads will obliterate video encoding and export tasks; the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2618 and R20 score of 10911 reflect that capability. However, the GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 35 and OpenCL score of 38224 suggest it can assist with some effects and rendering, but it will not accelerate timelines as effectively as a higher-tier GPU. The 6 GB of VRAM is also a limitation for large 4K projects. The CPU is the star here; the GPU is merely adequate for basic GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU is a rendering monster for CPU-based renderers. A Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 puts it ahead of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which scores 41963 on average, but the i7-14700T is actually 0.1% ahead of the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS in average benchmark score. For GPU-based renderers, the Arc A380's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is workable for small scenes but will be slow for complex projects. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores are present, but its 44th percentile standing suggests real-world ray tracing performance will be underwhelming.

Software development: This CPU is a phenomenal choice for developers. The high core count accelerates compilation, and the Passmark data compression score of 354216 and integer math score of 113854 show strong throughput for build tools and code analysis. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, meaning this pairing excels in this scenario. The i7-14700T's single-thread score of 3905 in Passmark ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: For everyday productivity, this system is overkill in the CPU but perfectly serviceable. The i7-14700T's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3667) makes document editing and web browsing feel instant. The Arc A380's Passmark G2D score of 610 is reasonable for 2D desktop acceleration. The CPU's 35W TDP is remarkably efficient for a 20-core part, which is a boon for quiet office systems. However, this is a lot of compute power for tasks that a much cheaper CPU could handle, making it a lopsided choice for pure office work.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700T a high-end processor?

A: Yes. It sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41914. It is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which has an average score of 41963 (a -0.1% delta for the Intel part), and it is 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i7-12850HX.

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Arc A380?

A: It is an entry-level desktop GPU. It ranks at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest competitor is the AMD FirePro W5170M, which scores 8595 on average, only 0.4% higher than the Arc A380's 8558 average score.

Q: How much memory does the Arc A380 have, and what type is it?

A: The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75W. Intel suggests a 250W power supply for a system with this GPU.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, meaning the i7-14700T is not unlocked for overclocking.

Q: What is the socket type and memory support for this CPU?

A: The i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the PCIe interface for the GPU?

A: The Arc A380 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a system with extreme CPU performance and modest GPU performance. The Intel Core i7-14700T achieves an average benchmark score of 41914, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This score is a statistical tie with its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which scores 41963 (a delta of -0.1%), and it beats the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779) by 0.3%. The CPU's Cinebench R23 results are particularly telling: a multicore score of 25980 and a single-core score of 3667. These numbers indicate a processor that is not only a multi-threaded workhorse but also has excellent single-threaded responsiveness. The Passmark scores reinforce this, with a multithread score of 30571 and a single-thread score of 3905.

In contrast, the Intel Arc A380's average benchmark score is 8558, placing it at the 44th percentile. This is lower than the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595) by 0.4% and only slightly better than the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458) by 1.2%. The GPU's raw compute scores are modest: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and a Vulkan score of 36736. In DirectX tests, the Passmark scores are low across the board—DirectX 10 at 37, DirectX 11 at 38, and DirectX 12 at 35. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is a more modern metric, but it still reflects entry-level performance. The combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pair is 66, which confirms the CPU's strength dragging up the overall system ranking despite the weak GPU.

The combined picture is one of a severely imbalanced pairing. The CPU is in the top 12% of all processors, while the GPU is in the bottom 56%. This means the CPU will be waiting on the GPU in almost any graphics-bound scenario. In CPU-bound workloads, this system will perform like a top-tier machine; in GPU-bound workloads, it will perform like an entry-level gaming PC.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a niche user: someone who needs extreme CPU compute power but only requires basic graphics capabilities. The primary target is a software developer or data analyst who compiles large codebases or processes large datasets. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 354216 and integer math score of 113854 show that it excels at these tasks. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide the parallel throughput necessary for heavy build automation.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering engines, such as those in Blender (CPU mode) or Premiere Pro with software encoding, would also benefit. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 ensures fast export times. However, they must accept that GPU acceleration for effects or rendering will be slow due to the Arc A380's 44th percentile position. A student in a computer science or engineering program would find the CPU performance invaluable for simulations and compiling, and the system would handle their daily needs.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or heavy spreadsheet analysis would also be well-served by the CPU's 28 threads. The i7-14700T's 33 MB of shared L3 cache is beneficial for workloads with large working sets. This is not a system for gamers, as the Arc A380 will bottleneck virtually every modern game at 1080p. It is also not for high-end 3D artists who need fast GPU rendering. The build targets those who prioritize CPU throughput above all else, and where the GPU is only needed for basic display output or light 2D acceleration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This is a 35W TDP part, which is remarkable given its core count, making it an efficient choice for compact or quiet systems. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a large 33 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores for this CPU are impressive. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 places it firmly in high-end desktop territory, 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS in average benchmark score. The single-core performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3667, ensuring that everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications are highly responsive. The Passmark results show a balanced profile: a multithread score of 30571, a floating-point math score of 79042, and an integer math score of 113854.

The CPU's performance in specialized tasks is notable. The Passmark data encryption score of 21277 and extended instructions score of 20052 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The physics score of 1946 is a bit lower, but that is a legacy test that doesn't fully utilize many-core processors. For real workloads, this CPU will excel in compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering, and any other parallel task. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures that even single-threaded performance is competitive. The only limitation is that it is not overclockable, but the stock performance is already high.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the Intel Arc A380, which sits at the 44th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 and Passmark G3D score of 6252 are the primary indicators of its gaming capability.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this system should be considered a 30-60 FPS platform in many older or less demanding titles. In esports games like CS:GO or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3667) can help push frame rates, but the GPU will still cap performance. Expect playable but not high-refresh rates. In modern AAA titles, the Arc A380's performance will be a significant bottleneck. Games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield will likely require significant settings reductions to achieve smooth frame rates. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM may also be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures.

The DirectX 12 performance, as measured by Passmark (score of 35), is weak, suggesting that the GPU will struggle in modern DX12 titles. The Vulkan score of 36736 in Geekbench is better, indicating that Vulkan-based games may perform relatively better. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores are present but will not deliver high performance in ray-traced games. Overall, this is not a gaming build. The data suggests that for gaming, this system is best suited for 1080p medium-to-low settings in less demanding games. For high-refresh or high-detail gaming, a different GPU would be required to match the CPU's potential.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but a given motherboard will only support one type. The CPU supports dual-channel memory, and the motherboard choice will dictate whether you use DDR4 or DDR5. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU's 16 lanes, though the Arc A380 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the GPU is not using the full PCIe 5.0 bandwidth available, but that is not a bottleneck for this GPU.

The power requirements are low. The CPU has a 35W TDP and the GPU has a 75W TDP. Intel suggests a 250W power supply for the GPU, which is very modest. This means that a system with this pairing will have significant PSU headroom, even with a small 300-400W unit. This headroom is a major advantage for a future GPU upgrade. The 1x 8-pin power connector on the Arc A380 is standard, and a future GPU would likely require a more substantial power connection.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU. The CPU is so powerful that it will not bottleneck most mid-range or even high-end GPUs. Given the CPU's 88th percentile performance, it can easily drive a GPU that is in the 80th or 90th percentile for gaming. The 250W suggested PSU for the current GPU means that a user could move to a more powerful GPU (which would require a larger PSU) without needing to replace the CPU. The platform's PCIe 5.0 support for the CPU is also future-proof. The memory support for DDR5 (if paired with a DDR5 motherboard) is a solid foundation for future upgrades. The CPU's low TDP also makes it easy to cool, meaning a new, more powerful GPU would be the only major change needed to transform this into a high-end gaming rig.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier 20-core CPU with an entry-level GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700T is at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A380 is at the 44th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 66, which places the overall system in the upper-mid tier of desktop configurations.

The CPU is a 35W, 20-core/28-thread part with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It is a multi-threaded monster that is competitive with (and 0.1% ahead of) the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS in average benchmark score. The GPU is a 75W, 6 GB GDDR6 part with a 96-bit memory bus. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 and Passmark G3D score of 6252 place it firmly in entry-level territory, competing with mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330.

This pairing is unusual because the components are from opposite ends of the performance spectrum. It is a system that is built for CPU-intensive work, such as software compilation, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, and video encoding. The GPU is only sufficient for basic display output and light 2D acceleration. The system's overall tier is driven almost entirely by the CPU's exceptional performance, but the GPU prevents it from being a balanced, general-purpose high-performance machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The data shows that the CPU is at the 88th percentile while the GPU is at the 44th percentile, a gap of 44 percentile points. This is a clear indication that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system for any graphics-related workload.

In gaming, the bottleneck is absolute. The Arc A380's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 is a low bar, and the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark score of 3905) is more than capable of feeding frames to a much faster GPU. The FPS scaling in games will be limited by the GPU's fill rate (65.60 GPixel/s) and texture rate (131.2 GTexel/s). The CPU will be waiting for the GPU to finish rendering each frame. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-frame-rate esports titles at low settings, the CPU's strength might show through, but the GPU will still cap the maximum frame rate.

In productivity, the bottleneck shifts. For tasks like code compilation, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is irrelevant. The Passmark multithread score of 30571 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 show that the CPU can process data far faster than the GPU can display it. For video editing, the CPU will handle encoding and decoding, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 44th percentile compute performance will slow down effects-heavy timelines. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 35 is a sign that it will be a bottleneck in GPU-accelerated applications.

The only scenario where the balance is acceptable is in pure CPU workloads with no graphics output. In any scenario that requires 3D graphics, the GPU is the limiting factor. The data suggests that to balance this system, one would need to upgrade the GPU to a part closer to the CPU's 88th percentile standing. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads have headroom to drive a much more powerful GPU, making the Arc A380 the clear weak link in this otherwise powerful desktop build.