SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A310E

This pairing combines a 20-core, 28-thread Intel desktop processor from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation with a compact Intel Arc A310E graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands exactly at the 50th percentile, producing a combined system percentile of 69. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth place it at the median of all GPUs, which translates to modest 1080p capability. For high-refresh-rate gaming, the CPU's single-core performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3905, both well above average — will not be the limiting factor. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus will constrain texture-heavy titles, and its 16 ROPs limit fill-rate-bound scenarios. Expect 60+ FPS in esports titles at lower settings, but high-refresh 144Hz+ gaming will require reduced resolution or graphical detail.

Streaming: The CPU's 28 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 30571 and Cinebench R23 multicore result of 25980 indicate that x264 encoding at medium presets will run comfortably alongside gameplay. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a secondary display output or encoding assist, though the Arc A310E's lack of dedicated encoding hardware noted in the specifications means the CPU will carry the encoding load. The 35W TDP of the processor ensures thermal and power headroom for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering benefit from the CPU's strong multicore performance — the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10911 and PassMark integer math score of 113854 indicate solid processing power for codec-heavy workloads. The GPU's 768 shading units and 32 TMUs accelerate effects and transitions, but the 4 GB VRAM capacity will limit working with high-resolution (4K+) timelines or multiple layers of effects. Export times will be CPU-bound, where the i7-14700T's 33 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain high throughput on multi-step render pipelines.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will perform well; the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2618 and PassMark floating-point math score of 79042 demonstrate strong sustained compute. The Arc A310E's 6 ray-tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support in compatible applications, and its 6.144 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (at 2:1 ratio) accelerates mixed-precision workloads. However, GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the 4 GB frame buffer and 64-bit memory interface, making this a CPU-first rendering system with GPU assist rather than a GPU-accelerated render powerhouse.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit directly from the 20 cores and 28 threads, with the PassMark data compression score of 354216 indicating strong parallel throughput for build systems. The CPU's DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel memory support allows flexibility in platform choice. The PassMark extended instructions score of 20052 suggests good SIMD performance for code that leverages AVX-512 or similar instruction sets. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks but provides adequate display output through its 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for document processing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing, but that headroom ensures years of responsiveness. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking means it will never be the bottleneck in office productivity, while the GPU's 50th percentile position handles 2D desktop compositing and video playback effortlessly. The 35W CPU TDP and 75W GPU TDP keep system power draw modest, which is beneficial for dorm rooms or shared workspaces. The single-slot GPU with no power connectors simplifies installation in small form factor cases.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700T achieves an average benchmark score of 41914, placing it in the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, scores 41963 — a difference of merely 0.1%, making these two processors effectively identical in average performance. The Intel Core i7-12850HX trails at 41779 (0.3% behind), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 leads at 42055 (0.3% ahead of the i7-14700T). The Intel Core 7 251TE sits at 41650, 0.6% behind. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the i7-14700T sits in an extremely tight performance cluster where real-world application differences will outweigh benchmark variance.

The Cinebench suite shows strong scaling: R15 multicore at 2618 versus single-core at 369 (a 7.1x ratio), R20 multicore at 10911 versus single-core at 1540 (7.1x), and R23 multicore at 25980 versus single-core at 3667 (7.1x). This consistent ~7x scaling across all three Cinebench versions demonstrates effective thread utilization across the 20 cores. The PassMark results reinforce this pattern — multithread score of 30571 versus single-thread of 3905 (7.8x ratio) — with integer math (113854) substantially outpacing floating-point math (79042), indicating the architecture favors integer-heavy workloads.

The Intel Arc A310E has no benchmark scores in the data pack and an average benchmark score of 0, but its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs provides a reference point. Combined with the CPU's 88th percentile, the system's 69th overall percentile reflects the GPU acting as the performance ceiling for graphics-bound tasks. The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 41914 dwarfs the GPU's contribution, making this a CPU-dominant build where graphics performance is deliberately modest.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E uses the DG2-128 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, which is notably high for a low-power part. Memory runs at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) across a 64-bit bus, producing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 4 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is the most significant limitation — modern games at 1080p with high textures can exceed this capacity, forcing texture streaming or reduced quality settings.

The compute configuration includes 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. Pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 6.144 TFLOPS (at 2:1 ratio) place this GPU in entry-level territory. The 6 ray-tracing cores provide hardware RT acceleration, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

The 50th percentile ranking means this GPU performs exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database. For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM will be the primary constraint — complex scenes with high-resolution textures will exceed capacity, causing fallback to system memory over the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but insufficient for 1440p high-texture workloads. The 75W TDP and lack of power connectors make installation simple, and the single-slot 168 mm length fits in compact cases. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups, though adapters may be needed for standard DisplayPort or HDMI displays.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with modest graphical expectations will find this system adequate for esports and older titles, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3905) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound applications — video encoding, batch processing, code compilation — will benefit from the 28 threads and 33 MB L3 cache, while the GPU handles preview and light acceleration tasks. The PassMark data encryption score of 21277 indicates solid performance for encrypted storage workflows.

Developers building large codebases will appreciate the multicore throughput, with the PassMark integer math score of 113854 providing evidence of strong compilation performance. Students need a system that handles everything from virtual machines to 3D modeling coursework; this pairing covers both, with the CPU's 88th percentile ranking ensuring academic software runs smoothly. Small business workstations that run database queries, spreadsheet analysis, and light CAD work will find the CPU more than sufficient, while the GPU provides adequate display output for multiple monitors through its 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections.

The system's 69th combined percentile indicates a balanced-for-purpose build — not a gaming rig, not a render farm, but a versatile desktop that excels at CPU-heavy tasks while providing competent graphics. Users who need occasional GPU acceleration without the power draw or cost of a high-end graphics card will find the Arc A310E's feature set (ray tracing, DX12 Ultimate) sufficient for occasional gaming or light creative work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700T packs 20 cores and 28 threads into an Intel Socket 1700 package, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process from Intel. The die measures 257 mm². Core configuration follows the hybrid architecture: performance cores and efficiency cores combine to deliver the 20-core count, with the 28-thread count indicating 8 performance cores with Hyper-Threading plus 12 efficiency cores without. Base clock is 1.30 GHz, boosting to 5.20 GHz — a substantial 4.0 GHz boost range that allows the chip to idle efficiently at low clocks while delivering high single-thread bursts when needed.

The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a 20-core processor, making this an energy-efficient choice for always-on workstations. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache — the large L3 capacity helps mitigate the dual-channel memory bandwidth limitation. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer chip and valuable for workstation reliability.

The benchmark picture shows a processor that competes within 0.6% of its nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, Intel Core i7-12850HX, AMD Ryzen 5 7400, and Intel Core 7 251TE all fall within a 1.2% performance band around the i7-14700T. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 places it firmly in high-end desktop territory, while the single-core score of 3667 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The PassMark physics score of 1946 and find prime numbers score of 145 are lower relative to other tests, suggesting the architecture prioritizes throughput over latency-sensitive workloads. The release date of 2024-01-07 and active production status indicate this is a current-generation part with ongoing availability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling high-bandwidth NVMe storage or future graphics cards. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel configurations means builders can choose their platform cost point, though DDR5 offers higher bandwidth for memory-intensive workloads. The i7-14700T's 35W TDP leaves substantial power headroom on any standard ATX power supply; the GPU's 250W suggested PSU and 75W TDP are equally modest, so a typical 500W+ power supply provides ample margin.

The Arc A310E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots (backward compatible to Gen 4). The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, so future GPU upgrades will bring substantial performance gains. The 250W suggested PSU means the current GPU draws minimal power; upgrading to a more powerful graphics card would require reassessing PSU requirements. The CPU's 35W TDP means even a high-end GPU upgrade would keep total system power reasonable, though the CPU's locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) prevents overclocking to compensate for GPU-bound scenarios.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310E with a higher-tier GPU while keeping the i7-14700T — the CPU's 88th percentile performance ensures it will not bottleneck any consumer GPU for years. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs on the current GPU support multi-monitor productivity, but gaming-focused users would benefit from a GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth. The platform itself supports DDR5 memory upgrades if starting with DDR4, and additional PCIe Gen 5 lanes remain available for storage expansion.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system exhibits a clear performance asymmetry: the CPU ranks in the 88th percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. For CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering, data processing — the system performs at a high level, with the i7-14700T's 28 threads providing abundant parallelism. For GPU-bound workloads — gaming at higher resolutions, GPU-accelerated rendering, machine learning inference — the Arc A310E becomes the limiting factor, with its 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth capping performance.

The estimated FPS picture follows this pattern. In CPU-light, GPU-intensive games, the 50th-percentile GPU will produce frame rates consistent with entry-level graphics cards — playable at 1080p medium settings in most titles, but far from high-refresh territory. In CPU-heavy games with lower graphics demands, the i7-14700T's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667) will push frame rates higher, but the GPU will still cap maximum FPS. The 7.8x ratio between PassMark multithread and single-thread scores indicates the CPU scales well with threaded workloads, but games that rely on both CPU and GPU will always hit the GPU ceiling first.

The combined percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance — the system performs well above average overall, but the GPU drags down the collective score. For users who understand this dynamic, the build makes sense: CPU-heavy workloads run at high performance, while GPU tasks run at acceptable, if unremarkable, levels. The 35W CPU TDP and 75W GPU TDP mean thermals and power draw are non-issues, allowing both components to sustain their maximum clocks without throttling in most chassis.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i7-14700T, a 20-core Raptor Lake Refresh processor with a 35W TDP and 5.20 GHz boost clock, with the Intel Arc A310E, a 4 GB GDDR6 graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture with a 75W TDP. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking produce a combined system percentile of 69, placing this build in the upper-third of all systems while making clear that the GPU is the performance ceiling.

The i7-14700T's nearest rivals — all within 0.6% average score difference — include both AMD and Intel parts from mobile and desktop segments, indicating that this chip delivers competitive performance regardless of comparison point. The Arc A310E's end-of-life production status and 50th-percentile GPU ranking mark it as an entry-level component suited for basic graphics tasks rather than demanding gaming. This is a productivity-first desktop with adequate graphics capability, ideal for developers, students, and professionals who need substantial CPU compute without the power draw or cost of a high-performance GPU. The platform supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 devices, and ECC memory, providing flexibility for various build configurations.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700T compare to its closest rivals?

A: The i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41914, placing it 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779), 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (42055), and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core 7 251TE (41650). These differences are negligible in real-world use.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Arc A310E?

A: With no measured FPS data available for this combination, gaming performance is estimated from the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth support 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles, but high-refresh or high-detail gaming will require lower settings.

Q: Is the CPU's 35W TDP sufficient for sustained workloads?

A: Yes. The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a 20-core processor, and benchmark results show strong sustained performance — the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25980 and PassMark multithread score of 30571 demonstrate that the chip delivers high throughput within its power envelope.

Q: Can I use DDR4 memory with this CPU?

A: The i7-14700T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. The choice of motherboard will determine which memory type you can use, and ECC memory is also supported for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this system?

A: The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports PCIe Gen 5 (16 CPU lanes), so you can upgrade to a more powerful graphics card without changing the motherboard. The GPU is end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor, making a GPU upgrade the most sensible next step. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for years.

Q: How does the Arc A310E handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 6 dedicated ray-tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, with only 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 4 GB VRAM, ray-traced workloads will run at modest performance levels suitable for light effects rather than full ray-traced gaming.

Q: Is this system suitable for software development?

A: Yes. The 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with a PassMark integer math score of 113854 and data compression score of 354216, make this an excellent compilation machine. The 33 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the 35W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on development workstations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700T

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds