SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

98 Score

Top 2% Ranking

98 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is a high-end desktop combination that sits in the combined 96th percentile of all tracked systems, pairing a 20-core Raptor Lake Refresh CPU with an Ada Lovelace flagship GPU. One note on data provenance up front: the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than captured in-game measurements. Everything else — core counts, clocks, scores, percentile positions — comes directly from the recorded data.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake-R architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm node with a 257 mm² die. It is a hybrid-design part in the Core 14th Gen family, clocked at a 3.40 base frequency and boosting to 5.60 — a figure that places it among the fastest single-threaded chips in the record. Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 33 MB shared L3 pool that keeps threads fed in heavily loaded scenarios. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a useful trait for workstation duty. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enough for a full-speed GPU link plus a Gen 5 NVMe drive.

The benchmark numbers describe a chip that is nearly the equal of far more expensive hardware. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and single-core score of 6,235 put it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 70,163. Against its nearest rivals the margins are razor thin: it leads the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F by just 0.2 percent, the Ryzen 9 7940HX by 0.4 percent, and the Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.9 percent, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1 percent. In practical terms, this is a CPU that trades blows with Ryzen 9-class silicon while carrying the i7 badge. The single-core results are the headline: 628 in R15, 2,618 in R20, and 2,578 in Geekbench single-core indicate snappy responsiveness in applications that refuse to scale — older game engines, DAW plug-ins, spreadsheet recalculation, and per-core compiler work.

Multi-threaded throughput is equally strong where it matters. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21,462 and PassMark multithread score of 52,425 reflect the full 28-thread capacity, while granular PassMark subtests fill in the workload picture: 183,056 in integer math, 134,393 in floating point math, 694,963 in data compression, 40,046 in encryption, 74,723 in string sorting, and 2,961 in physics. The extended instructions score of 40,660 shows solid vectorized throughput. For real workloads, this profile means fast code compilation, quick video encodes on CPU-based pipelines, and smooth multitasking between a render and foreground applications. The multiplier is unlocked, giving tuners headroom beyond stock.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4090 D is built on NVIDIA's AD102 die — 609 mm² of TSMC 5 nm silicon carrying 76,300 million transistors at a density of 125.3 million per square millimetre. The shader array counts 14,592 shading units, 456 texture mapping units, and 176 render outputs, producing a fill-rate profile of 443.5 GPixel/s and 1,149.1 GTexel/s. Raw compute stands at 73.54 TFLOPS of FP32, with FP16 running at the same 1:1 rate. The ray tracing and AI hardware is the heart of the card: 114 RT cores for hardware-accelerated path tracing and 456 tensor cores for DLSS-style upscaling and frame generation, both essential to pushing flagship frame rates in modern engines.

Memory is a genuine flagship configuration. The card carries 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, clocked at an effective 21 Gbps for 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth — capacity and throughput that keep large 3D scenes, high-resolution textures, and AI workloads resident on the GPU without streaming stalls. Core clocks run from a 2,280 MHz base to a 2,520 MHz boost. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and API support spans DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 — full modern feature coverage including ray tracing tiers.

Benchmark results place this card at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 178,050. In 3DMark's Steel Nomad DX12 test it scores 8,587 — a demanding modern rasterization benchmark where that figure indicates elite GPU-limited throughput. Geekbench OpenCL returns 278,621 and Vulkan returns 246,941, both very high results for general compute. The rival list is instructive: the RTX 4090 D sits within 2.2 percent of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, 3.1 percent of the A100 SXM4 80 GB, 3.6 percent of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, and 4.9 percent of the A100 SXM4 40 GB. Being measured against — and nearly matching — data-center accelerators says everything about where this card lands. For rendering, that means viewport interactivity in heavy scenes, fast GPU render times in ray-traced engines, and ample VRAM headroom for production work, not just gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is the strongest part of this pairing: a combined percentile of 96 against all systems in the database, built from a CPU at the 94th percentile and a GPU at the 98th percentile.

On the CPU side, the complete scorecard: Cinebench R15 multi-core 4,452 and single-core 628; Cinebench R20 multi-core 18,550 and single-core 2,618; Cinebench R23 multi-core 44,167 and single-core 6,235; Geekbench multi-core 21,462 and single-core 2,578; PassMark single-thread 4,480; PassMark multithread 52,425. The average benchmark score of 70,163 places it 0.2 percent ahead of the Ryzen 7 9700F and 0.9 percent ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X — a statistically negligible gap that means buyers are choosing on platform features, not throughput.

On the GPU side, the average score of 178,050 with Steel Nomad at 8,587, OpenCL at 278,621, and Vulkan at 246,941 puts the card in rarefied company, effectively matched with professional Blackwell and Ada hardware and within a few percent of A100-class accelerators. Neither component embarrasses the other. The GPU is the slightly stronger of the two in relative terms, which is the correct orientation for a build aimed at rendering and high-frame-rate play.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination — measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Every frame-rate statement here is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores above, not a captured figure.

With that caveat, the estimates are straightforward. A GPU at the 98th percentile with an 8,587 Steel Nomad score and a CPU at the 94th percentile with a 2,961 PassMark physics score form a pairing that should deliver very high frame rates at maxed settings in mainstream competitive titles, with the CPU's physics and single-thread results suggesting the frame floor stays high in simulation-heavy games. In graphically demanding single-player titles at ultra settings, the 14,592 shaders, 114 RT cores, and 456 tensor cores point to playable path-traced performance when upscaling and frame generation are engaged — the tensor hardware exists precisely to extend reach in exactly these scenarios. Where a weaker CPU would throttle a card of this class, the i7-14700KF's 28 threads and 5.60 boost clock are estimated to keep the GPU fed in the vast majority of engines. Treat all of this as score-derived expectation, to be confirmed by measured rows when they enter the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data describes a well-balanced system with a deliberate lean toward GPU-limited operation — which is what a gamer or renderer wants. The GPU sits four percentile points above the CPU (98 versus 94), and the combined 96th percentile lands almost exactly between them, the signature of a pairing where neither part is dramatically over- or under-specified relative to the other.

Evidence for the GPU as the limiting factor in graphically heavy workloads: the Steel Nomad score of 8,587 in a DX12 rasterization test is a GPU-bound measurement, and the card's proximity to A100-class hardware in compute suggests that any resolution-and-settings combination that saturates 24 GB of GDDR6X and 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth will be the ceiling, not the CPU. Evidence for the CPU holding up under load: the 52,425 PassMark multithread score, the 2,961 physics score, and single-core results in the 94th percentile mean simulation, AI logic, and draw-call submission are unlikely to become the constraint except in the most CPU-bound competitive titles, where the strong single-thread showing of 4,480 limits the depth of any bottleneck. In CPU-only workloads — compilation, encoding — the CPU is obviously the sole actor and performs at its own 94th-percentile level. For a mixed workload such as streaming while gaming, the 28 threads provide room for encode and compositor tasks alongside the game.

Who Should Build It

High-refresh gamers are the primary audience: the estimated combination of a 98th-percentile GPU and 94th-percentile CPU is built for maxed settings and very high frame rates, with the caveat that measured FPS rows are absent and these are score-based estimates. Content creators benefit most tangibly: a 44,167 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for timeline scrubbing and CPU encoding, paired with 24 GB of GPU VRAM and OpenCL throughput of 278,621 for GPU-accelerated effects and exports, covers the full production pipeline. 3D artists and renderers get a card benchmarked within a few percent of professional RTX 5000 Ada and Blackwell hardware — viewport and final-frame work both fit. Software developers get 28 threads and a 21,462 Geekbench multi-core score for parallel builds, plus a 2,578 single-core score for single-threaded tooling. Students in compute-adjacent fields get a machine that handles coursework and research workloads with room to spare, and the ECC memory support makes this a credible small-business workstation for financial or engineering tasks where data integrity matters.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, a widely supported platform with DDR4 and DDR5 memory support — DDR5 is the forward-looking choice, and dual-channel operation means capacity and speed upgrades are cheap and effective. The CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, so a Gen 5 NVMe SSD is a natural complement to the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 link. Note the bus asymmetry: the GPU negotiates PCIe 4.0, so it cannot use the CPU's Gen 5 lanes — those are best spent on storage.

Power is the critical planning item. The RTX 4090 D carries a 425 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector, and the suggested PSU is 800 W; the CPU adds a 125 W TDP on top. An 800 W unit as suggested provides sensible headroom for both parts under simultaneous load, plus fans and drives. Physical clearance matters too: this is a triple-slot card measuring 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 61 mm wide — case selection must accommodate a 12-inch board. The GPU's production status is listed as End-of-life within the GeForce 40 line, succeeded by GeForce 50, so future GPU upgrades within the same chassis are the natural next step; the CPU's unlocked multiplier offers a free-performance path before any part is replaced. The Core i7-14700KF itself launched at a launch MSRP of $384, and the GPU at a launch MSRP of 1,599 USD.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-14700KF compare to the Ryzen 9 7950X in benchmarks?

A: The database average has the i7-14700KF 0.9 percent ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X (70,163 versus 69,515 average score), and it also leads the Ryzen 7 9700F by 0.2 percent while trailing the Core Ultra 7 265K by 1 percent — effectively a dead heat among all four.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 D have, and why does it matter?

A: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus with 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. That capacity supports high-resolution textures, large 3D scenes, and GPU compute workloads without memory pressure, and the compute scores (278,621 OpenCL, 246,941 Vulkan) show it is actually usable throughput, not idle capacity.

Q: Is this build balanced, or is one part holding the other back?

A: Balanced, with a slight GPU lean. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile and the GPU at the 98th, combining to a 96th-percentile system. Neither part is dramatically over-provisioned relative to the other.

Q: Are the frame rates in this article measured?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores — specifically the GPU's 8,587 Steel Nomad result and the CPU's physics and single-thread scores.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4090 D is 800 W. The GPU has a 425 W TDP via one 16-pin connector, and the CPU adds a 125 W TDP, so 800 W provides headroom for the whole system.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory and modern storage?

A: Yes. The CPU supports ECC memory, runs DDR4 or DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU — suitable for a Gen 5 NVMe drive alongside the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 link.

Q: How does this GPU compare to professional cards?

A: Its average score of 178,050 is within 2.2 percent of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, 3.1 percent of the A100 SXM4 80 GB, 3.6 percent of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, and 4.9 percent of the A100 SXM4 40 GB — professional-class performance in a consumer card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With a 98th-percentile GPU, an 8,587 Steel Nomad score, and a CPU posting 4,480 single-thread and 2,961 physics results, this pairing is estimated — absent measured data — to sustain very high frame rates at ultra settings, with the CPU unlikely to be the limiter in most engines.

Streaming: The 28 threads and 52,425 PassMark multithread score leave substantial capacity for video encoding and compositor work running alongside a game, while the GPU's 456 tensor cores can shoulder encode-adjacent acceleration where supported.

Video editing: A 44,167 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles CPU-side timeline work and exports, and the GPU's 24 GB VRAM plus 278,621 OpenCL score drive GPU-accelerated effects, color grading, and playback of heavy codecs without stalls.

3D rendering: The RTX 4090 D benchmarks within a few percent of RTX 5000 Ada and A100-class hardware, and its 114 RT cores and 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth mean both interactive viewports and final ray-traced frames run at professional-adjacent speed.

Software development: Parallel builds are served by the 21,462 Geekbench multi-core score across 28 threads, single-threaded tooling by the 2,578 Geekbench single-core result, and the platform's Gen 5 lanes enable fast storage for large repositories and containers.

Student and office work: For coursework, research, spreadsheets, and everyday productivity, the CPU's 94th-percentile standing means everything is instant, while ECC support and dual-channel DDR5 optionality make it defensible as a small-business workstation where uptime and data integrity count.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds